The DOI matches its Crossref record; 73 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 46 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier
Open accessAbstract
Two C57BL/6 mice colonies maintained in two rooms of the same specific pathogen-free (SPF) facility were found to have different gut microbiota and a mucus phenotype that was specific for each colony. The thickness and growth of the colon mucus were similar in the two colonies. However, one colony had mucus that was impenetrable to bacteria or beads the size of bacteria-which is comparable to what we observed in free-living wild mice-whereas the other colony had an inner mucus layer penetrable to bacteria and beads. The different properties of the mucus depended on the microbiota, as they were transmissible by transfer of caecal microbiota to germ-free mice. Mice with an impenetrable mucus layer had increased amounts of Erysipelotrichi, whereas mice with a penetrable mucus layer had higher levels of Proteobacteria and TM7 bacteria in the distal colon mucus. Thus, our study shows that bacteria and their community structure affect mucus barrier properties in ways that can have implications for health and disease. It also highlights that genetically identical animals housed in the same facility can have rather distinct microbiotas and barrier structures.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 of 46 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Two C57BL/6 mice colonies maintained in two rooms of the same specific pathogen-free (SPF) facility were found to have different gut microbiota and a mucus phenotype that was specific for each colony.”
- Also stated in: § Bacterial composition in the two husbandries · boosted
“The microbiota throughout the gut thus clearly differed between the two colonies housed in adjacent rooms in the same animal facility.”
§ The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Also stated in: § Bacterial composition in the two husbandries · boosted
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, one colony had mucus that was impenetrable to bacteria or beads the size of bacteria—which is comparable to what we observed in free-living wild mice—whereas the other colony had an inner mucus layer penetrable to bacteria and beads.”
§ The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier > Abstract
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, one colony had mucus that was impenetrable to bacteria or beads the size of bacteria—which is comparable to what we observed in free-living wild mice—whereas the other colony had an inner mucus layer penetrable to bacteria and beads.”
§ The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Mice with an impenetrable mucus layer had increased amounts of Erysipelotrichi, whereas mice with a penetrable mucus layer had higher levels of Proteobacteria and TM7 bacteria in the distal colon mucus.”
§ The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Mice with an impenetrable mucus layer had increased amounts of Erysipelotrichi, whereas mice with a penetrable mucus layer had higher levels of Proteobacteria and TM7 bacteria in the distal colon mucus.”
§ The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Two C57BL/6 mice colonies maintained in two rooms of the same specific pathogen-free (SPF) facility were found to have different gut microbiota and a mucus phenotype that was specific for each colony.”
§ The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Nevertheless, these mice often had an even more developed mucus layer than observed in Room 1, which further supports the influence of the microbiota on mucus and that the Room 1 can be considered as a reasonable model.”
§ The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier > Discussion
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A good separation of bacteria and epithelium by a stratified inner mucus layer was only present in mice from Room 1 (Fig4A).”
§ The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier > Results > Bacteria penetration in mucus and histology of mice in different husbandries
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The Clostridia class was significantly more abundant in ileum mucus and caecum samples of Room 2 (Fig1E, Table1).”
§ The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier > Results > Bacterial composition in the two husbandries
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Proteobacteria was also generally more abundant in Room 2 (Supplementary Fig S4, Table1).”
§ The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier > Results > Bacterial composition in the two husbandries
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes
- It may state two separate claims as one. 43
- Probably not a substantial claim. 22
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The thickness and growth of the colon mucus were similar in the two colonies.”
- Also stated in: § Differences in the mucus quality in mice from the two husbandries · plain
“The thickness of the inner mucus layer as well as the mucus growth did not differ significantly between the two rooms on either food (Fig3B).”
§ The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier > Abstract
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § Differences in the mucus quality in mice from the two husbandries · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Immunohistochemistry revealed that the bacteria were separated from the epithelium by a well-stratified mucus layer in Room 1, but bacteria were in close proximity to the epithelium of mice colonized with microbiota from Room 2 (Fig5D).”
§ The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier > Results > The two different mucus phenotypes were reproduced by colonization of germ-free mice
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On Food A, the mice bred in Room 1 were significantly heavier compared to mice bred in Room 2 (P = 0.022, Supplementary Fig S1A).”
§ The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier > Results > Bacterial composition in the two husbandries
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The small intestinal mucus is normally easily removed by aspiration, and the thickness was measured before (pre) and after (post) aspiration. No differences were observed between the rooms or diets (Fig3A).”
§ The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier > Results > Differences in the mucus quality in mice from the two husbandries
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The major difference between the lumen- and mucus-associated microbiota was found in the distal colon where the phyla Deferribacteres had higher abundance in both rooms (Supplementary Fig S4, Table1).”
§ The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier > Results > Bacterial composition in the two husbandries
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“When bacteria were localized in relation to the colon mucus using fluorescent in situ hybridization, bacteria penetrated the inner mucus layer at distinct locations. A separation between epithelium and bacteria was observed in other areas and most bacteria were still not in direct contact with the epithelial surface.”
§ The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier > Results > Bacteria penetration in mucus and histology of mice in different husbandries
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Within this phylum, the classes Betaproteobacteria and Epsilonproteobacteria were found at higher levels in the mucus of mice in Room 2 and Epsilonproteobacteria were significantly more abundant in distal colon lumen and caecum (Fig1D, Table1).”
§ The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier > Results > Bacterial composition in the two husbandries
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The dominant genus within this class contributing to this difference was the genus Allobaculum, which was also found in higher relative abundances at all locations and significantly so in the lumen samples (Fig2B, Table1).”
§ The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier > Results > Bacterial composition in the two husbandries
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Altering the diet from weaning gave some shift in the microbiota, but less than the difference between the two rooms.”
§ The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier > Results > Bacterial composition in the two husbandries
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A tendency towards longer crypts in mice from Room 2 was also observed, but this did not reach significance (Fig4D).”
§ The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier > Results > Bacteria penetration in mucus and histology of mice in different husbandries
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The inner mucus layer was after fixation observed to be thinner, and stratification was not evident in sections from animals fed Food B in both rooms, but the difference between the two rooms remained (Fig4B).”
§ The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier > Results > Bacteria penetration in mucus and histology of mice in different husbandries
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The stool of mice fed Food A was hard and formed distinct pellets, while the stool in animals fed Food B had a looser consistency and did not form hard pellets.”
§ The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier > Results > Bacterial composition in the two husbandries
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“When bacterial diversity was studied (Supplementary Figs S2 and S3), the ileum showed the lowest diversity and the distal colon the highest.”
§ The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier > Results > Bacterial composition in the two husbandries
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The labelled cells were significantly increased in mice from Room 2 as compared to Room 1 (Fig4F and H).”
§ The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier > Results > Bacteria penetration in mucus and histology of mice in different husbandries
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe quote only partly states this claim.
In the paper
“Principal Coordinates Unweighted UniFrac analysis 20 showed separation of ileum and colon samples along the first component, whereas the two rooms clearly separated along PC2 on Food A (Fig1A and B).”
§ The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier > Results > Bacterial composition in the two husbandries
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [20] Lozupone C, Knight R (2005) UniFrac: a new phylogenetic method for comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 71: 8228–8235 source
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Inflammatory markers as S100a8, S100a9 and eosinophil cationic protein 3 were not detected and no difference in albumin or alpha 2-macroglobulin was found between the groups.”
§ The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier > Results > Bacteria penetration in mucus and histology of mice in different husbandries
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As shown before, mice from Room 1 secreted mucus that was impenetrable to the beads, whereas the mucus on explants from mice housed in Room 2 was more penetrable (Fig3C).”
§ The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier > Results > Differences in the mucus quality in mice from the two husbandries
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Mucus penetrability phenotypes were again different as a more penetrable inner mucus layer was observed in mice colonized with microbiota from Room 2, while mice colonized with microbiota from Room 1 showed a mucus layer impervious to beads (Fig5B and C).”
§ The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier > Results > The two different mucus phenotypes were reproduced by colonization of germ-free mice
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All mice on Food B showed higher relative abundances of the phylum Proteobacteria at all locations along the gut and in both rooms with significant differences in ileum lumen, ileum mucus and caecum in Room 1, and in distal colon lumen in both rooms (Supplementary Fig S5, Supplementary Table S1).”
§ The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier > Results > Bacterial composition in the two husbandries
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Mice given food B showed increased penetrability in both groups, but a difference still remained between Room 1 and 2 mice (Fig3C).”
§ The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier > Results > Differences in the mucus quality in mice from the two husbandries
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To analyse the reasons for the different mucus properties, proteomic analyses were performed showing no major differences between the rooms and a high correlation of the proteins identified in the two rooms (Supplementary Fig S6D and E).”
§ The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier > Results > Bacteria penetration in mucus and histology of mice in different husbandries
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In ileum mucus, the dominant genus within the Clostridia class was Candidatus arthromitus (segmented filamentous bacteria, SFB), which was also found in higher levels in Room 2 (Table1). SFB also showed a small but significant difference between the rooms in the distal colon with higher levels in Room 2.”
§ The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier > Results > Bacterial composition in the two husbandries
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The thickness of the inner mucus layer as well as the mucus growth did not differ significantly between the two rooms on either food (Fig3B).”
§ The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier > Results > Differences in the mucus quality in mice from the two husbandries
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The number of these cells was higher in the Room 2 animals; however, it did not reach significance (Fig4G and Supplementary Fig S7A), but there was no major difference in the overall histology between the groups (Supplementary Fig S7B and C).”
§ The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier > Results > Bacteria penetration in mucus and histology of mice in different husbandries
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Our study corroborates previous studies showing an association between altered diets and an increase in Erysipelotrichi and Allobaculum, but various effects are shown for fat-enriched diets 29, 30, 31, 32.”
§ The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [29] Everard A, Lazarevic V, Gaia N, Johansson M, Stahlman M, Backhed F, Delzenne NM, Schrenzel J, Francois P, Cani PD (2014) Microbiome of prebiotic‐treated mice reveals novel targets involved in host response during obesity. ISME J 8: 2116–2130 source
- Not checked yetcites [30] Islam KB, Fukiya S, Hagio M, Fujii N, Ishizuka S, Ooka T, Ogura Y, Hayashi T, Yokota A (2011) Bile acid is a host factor that regulates the composition of the cecal microbiota in rats. Gastroenterology 141: 1773–1781 source
- Not checked yetcites [31] Martinez I, Wallace G, Zhang C, Legge R, Benson AK, Carr TP, Moriyama EN, Walter J (2009) Diet‐induced metabolic improvements in a hamster model of hypercholesterolemia are strongly linked to alterations of the gut microbiota. Appl Environ Microbiol 75: 4175–4184 source
- Not checked yetcites [32] Turnbaugh PJ, Ridaura VK, Faith JJ, Rey FE, Knight R, Gordon JI (2009) The effect of diet on the human gut microbiome: a metagenomic analysis in humanized gnotobiotic mice. Sci Transl Med 1: 6ra14 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We have also observed different inner mucus phenotypes in animals from different vendors, further emphasizing the need for standardization and caution.”
§ The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier > Discussion
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Even though the present study reveals subtle differences in the microbiota between the two mouse colonies, an increased inflammatory tone was observed in Room 2.”
§ The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier > Discussion
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Muc2-deficient mice totally lack a protective inner mucus layer and have direct contact of bacteria with the epithelium and these mice develop severe colitis 14.”
§ The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [14] Johansson ME, Phillipson M, Petersson J, Velcich A, Holm L, Hansson GC (2008) The inner of the two Muc2 mucin‐dependent mucus layers in colon is devoid of bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 15064–15069 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The different properties of the mucus depended on the microbiota, as they were transmissible by transfer of caecal microbiota to germ-free mice.”
- Also stated in: § The two different mucus phenotypes were reproduced by colonization of germ-free mice · plain
“The composition of intestinal microbiota thus has a major influence on the properties of the inner colon mucus barrier.”
§ The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Colonization of germ-free mice with caecal microbiota from a room reproduces that room's relevant microbiota composition.
- Rests on an assumption: Housing colonized germ-free mice in the corresponding room does not introduce room-specific effects that confound the mucus phenotype.
- Also stated in: § The two different mucus phenotypes were reproduced by colonization of germ-free mice · plain
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, our study shows that bacteria and their community structure affect mucus barrier properties in ways that can have implications for health and disease.”
§ The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The mucus is structurally built around the MUC2 mucin that after secretion from the goblet cell expands dramatically and forms sheets of MUC2 networks that stack and form the stratified mucus layer 16.”
§ The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [16] Ambort D, Johansson ME, Gustafsson JK, Nilsson HE, Ermund A, Johansson BR, Koeck PJ, Hebert H, Hansson GC (2012) Calcium and pH‐dependent packing and release of the gel‐forming MUC2 mucin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109: 5645–5650 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Deficiencies in decorating the mucus with O-glycans cause a faster degradation of the Muc2 mucin network resulting in increased bacterial contact with the cell surface and development of spontaneous colitis 19.”
§ The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [19] Fu J, Wei B, Wen T, Johansson ME, Liu X, Bradford E, Thomsson KA, McGee S, Mansour L, Tong M et al (2011) Loss of intestinal core 1‐derived O‐glycans causes spontaneous colitis in mice. J Clin Invest 121: 1657–1666 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It was thus concluded that the two C57BL/6 mice strains bred separately had stable, but different microbiota that were vertically transmitted.”
§ The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier > Results > Bacterial composition in the two husbandries
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Nevertheless, these mice often had an even more developed mucus layer than observed in Room 1, which further supports the influence of the microbiota on mucus and that the Room 1 can be considered as a reasonable model.”
§ The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier > Discussion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The two colonies were maintained on different diets with different composition, but we controlled for the impact of diet, at least within one generation of offspring, by feeding the mice in the two colonies the same chow (Food A, standard chow or Food B, autoclaved chow) from weaning.”
§ The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier > Results > Bacterial composition in the two husbandries
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The exoglycosidases are usually arranged in specialized genetic loci for utilizing specific types of substrates as, for example, starch (Sus) and xylose-containing polysaccharides (PUL) 27.”
§ The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [27] Larsbrink J, Rogers TE, Hemsworth GR, McKee LS, Tauzin AS, Spadiut O, Klinter S, Pudlo NA, Urs K, Koropatkin NM et al (2014) A discrete genetic locus confers xyloglucan metabolism in select human gut Bacteroidetes. Nature 506: 498–502 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, free-living mice have mucus that is even better developed, thicker and more stratified with bacteria further separated from the epithelium than in Room 1.”
§ The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier > Results > Differences in the mucus quality in mice from the two husbandries
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Free-living wild mice provide a valid reference for a normal protective colon mucus phenotype.
In the paper
“The commensal bacteria live in the non-attached and expanded outer mucus of colon 26, where they can cleave off and utilize mucin glycans as energy source.”
§ The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [26] Johansson ME, Holmen Larsson JM, Hansson GC (2010) Microbes and Health Sackler Colloquium: the two mucus layers of colon are organized by the MUC2 mucin, whereas the outer layer is a legislator of host‐microbial interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108: 4659–4665 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The protein differences were small and not likely to explain the variable mucus properties.”
§ The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier > Results > Bacteria penetration in mucus and histology of mice in different husbandries
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Ulcerative colitis (UC) patients with active disease have bacteria in contact with the epithelium, whereas patients with UC in remission show a more mixed picture 15.”
§ The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [15] Johansson ME, Gustafsson JK, Holmen‐Larsson J, Jabbar KS, Xia L, Xu H, Ghishan FK, Carvalho FA, Gewirtz AT, Sjovall H et al (2014) Bacteria penetrate the normally impenetrable inner colon mucus layer in both murine colitis models and patients with ulcerative colitis. Gut 63: 281–291 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The origin of the germ-free mice is more related to the origin of the animals in Room 2, but as they still were able to form a functional mucus barrier upon colonization with flora from animals in Room 1, genetic influences are less likely.”
§ The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier > Discussion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“TM7 and the genus Prevotella are also increased in mice deficient in the inflammasome component Nlrp6 and suggested to be associated with inflammation 51.”
§ The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [51] Hu B, Elinav E, Huber S, Strowig T, Hao L, Hafemann A, Jin C, Wunderlich C, Wunderlich T, Eisenbarth SC et al (2013) Microbiota‐induced activation of epithelial IL‐6 signaling links inflammasome‐driven inflammation with transmissible cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110: 9862–9867 source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“However, it is considered to foster a normal intestinal homeostasis in healthy mice, something that is in contrast to the here observed less developed colon mucus 52.”
§ The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [52] Schnupf P, Gaboriau‐Routhiau V, Cerf‐Bensussan N (2013) Host interactions with Segmented Filamentous Bacteria: an unusual trade‐off that drives the post‐natal maturation of the gut immune system. Semin Immunol 25: 342–351 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Certain bacteria can, in contrast to promoting well-developed mucus, also destroy the mucus and its protective properties.”
§ The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [36] Bergstrom KS, Kissoon‐Singh V, Gibson DL, Ma C, Montero M, Sham HP, Ryz N, Huang T, Velcich A, Finlay BB et al (2010) Muc2 protects against lethal infectious colitis by disassociating pathogenic and commensal bacteria from the colonic mucosa. PLoS Pathog 6: e1000902 source
- Not checked yetcites [37] van der Post S, Subramani DB, Backstrom M, Johansson ME, Vester‐Christensen MB, Mandel U, Bennett EP, Clausen H, Dahlen G, Sroka A et al (2013) Site‐specific O‐glycosylation on the MUC2 mucin protein inhibits cleavage by the Porphyromonas gingivalis secreted cysteine protease (RgpB). J Biol Chem 288: 14636–14646 source
- Not checked yetcites [38] Zarepour M, Bhullar K, Montero M, Ma C, Huang T, Velcich A, Xia L, Vallance BA (2013) The mucin Muc2 limits pathogen burdens and epithelial barrier dysfunction during Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium colitis. Infect Immun 81: 3672–3683 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The TM7 phylum is also found in human stool samples at low levels 47 and proposed to play a role in intestinal inflammation 48.”
§ The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [47] Segata N, Haake SK, Mannon P, Lemon KP, Waldron L, Gevers D, Huttenhower C, Izard J (2012) Composition of the adult digestive tract bacterial microbiome based on seven mouth surfaces, tonsils, throat and stool samples. Genome Biol 13: R42 source
- Not checked yetcites [48] Kuehbacher T, Rehman A, Lepage P, Hellmig S, Folsch UR, Schreiber S, Ott SJ (2008) Intestinal TM7 bacterial phylogenies in active inflammatory bowel disease. J Med Microbiol 57: 1569–1576 source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The class Deltaproteobacteria contains sulphur-reducing bacteria (SRB) that are also found at higher frequencies in patients with IBD as compared to healthy individuals 41.”
§ The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [41] Verma R, Verma AK, Ahuja V, Paul J (2010) Real‐time analysis of mucosal flora in patients with inflammatory bowel disease in India. J Clin Microbiol 48: 4279–4282 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Mouse colitis models typically show features like crypt elongation due to increased cell proliferation, infiltration of immune cells in lamina propria, thickening of muscularis propria and weight loss, all criteria used for scoring colitis 33, 34.”
§ The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [33] Sellon RK, Tonkonogy S, Schultz M, Dieleman LA, Grenther W, Balish E, Rennick DM, Sartor RB (1998) Resident enteric bacteria are necessary for development of spontaneous colitis and immune system activation in interleukin‐10‐deficient mice. Infect Immun 66: 5224–5231 source
- Not checked yetcites [34] Van der SM, de Koning BA, De Bruijn AC, Velcich A, Meijerink JP, Van Goudoever JB, Buller HA, Dekker J, Van Seuningen I, Renes IB et al (2006) Muc2‐deficient mice spontaneously develop colitis, indicating that MUC2 is critical for colonic protection. Gastroenterology 131: 117–129 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“This phylum has been linked to inflammatory conditions of the mouth such as periodontitis 46.”
§ The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [46] Liu B, Faller LL, Klitgord N, Mazumdar V, Ghodsi M, Sommer DD, Gibbons TR, Treangen TJ, Chang YC, Li S et al (2012) Deep sequencing of the oral microbiome reveals signatures of periodontal disease. PLoS ONE 7: e37919 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This is a phylum, with no cultivated representatives, commonly found in the oral flora at low levels 44, 45.”
§ The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [44] Brinig MM, Lepp PW, Ouverney CC, Armitage GC, Relman DA (2003) Prevalence of bacteria of division TM7 in human subgingival plaque and their association with disease. Appl Environ Microbiol 69: 1687–1694 source
- Not checked yetcites [45] Podar M, Abulencia CB, Walcher M, Hutchison D, Zengler K, Garcia JA, Holland T, Cotton D, Hauser L, Keller M (2007) Targeted access to the genomes of low‐abundance organisms in complex microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 73: 3205–3214 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For the microbiota analysis, significant differences were conducted using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and P-values were converted to false discovery rate values (Q-values) to correct for multiple testing in the R software (http://www.r-project.org/).”
§ The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier > Materials and Methods > Statistical analysis
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The TM7 phylum has also been found in mice more susceptible to colitis caused by Helicobacter hepaticus 49.”
§ The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [49] Yang I, Eibach D, Kops F, Brenneke B, Woltemate S, Schulze J, Bleich A, Gruber AD, Muthupalani S, Fox JG et al (2013) Intestinal microbiota composition of interleukin‐10 deficient C57BL/6J mice and susceptibility to Helicobacter hepaticus‐induced colitis. PLoS ONE 8: e70783 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The phylum Proteobacteria has been associated with human Crohn's disease 40.”
§ The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [40] Gophna U, Sommerfeld K, Gophna S, Doolittle WF, Veldhuyzen van Zanten SJ (2006) Differences between tissue‐associated intestinal microfloras of patients with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. J Clin Microbiol 44: 4136–4141 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Species of lower taxonomic levels within the Proteobacteria phylum have been correlated with colitis in a maternally transmitted fashion 39.”
§ The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [39] Garrett WS, Gallini CA, Yatsunenko T, Michaud M, DuBois A, Delaney ML, Punit S, Karlsson M, Bry L, Glickman JN et al (2010) Enterobacteriaceae act in concert with the gut microbiota to induce spontaneous and maternally transmitted colitis. Cell Host Microbe 8: 292–300 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is obvious from this study that the microbiota influences the properties of the mucus barrier and that this can be observed within the same animal house with animals of identical genetic background.”
§ The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier > Discussion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The microbiota mucus sample strategy used may have reduced the observed differences in mucus microbiota as the amounts of attached mucus were not controlled for.”
§ The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier > Discussion
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“In especially the core 1 deficient mice, the inner mucus layer was more vulnerable and quickly dissolved allowing bacteria to reach the epithelium and by this trigger inflammation 19.”
§ The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [19] Fu J, Wei B, Wen T, Johansson ME, Liu X, Bradford E, Thomsson KA, McGee S, Mansour L, Tong M et al (2011) Loss of intestinal core 1‐derived O‐glycans causes spontaneous colitis in mice. J Clin Invest 121: 1657–1666 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
The two C57BL/6 colonies are genetically identical.
“It also highlights that genetically identical animals housed in the same facility can have rather distinct microbiotas and barrier structures.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Before this study, the possibility that microbiota stimulates the host to develop a more protective mucus layer had not been explored.
“The possibility that the microbiota stimulates the host to develop a mucus layer with improved protective properties has not been explored.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Colonization of germ-free mice with caecal microbiota from a room reproduces that room's relevant microbiota composition.
“germ-free mice were colonized with caecal microbiota from mice in the two rooms.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Housing colonized germ-free mice in the corresponding room does not introduce room-specific effects that confound the mucus phenotype.
“The separate groups of colonized mice were subsequently housed in either room.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Free-living wild mice provide a valid reference for a normal protective colon mucus phenotype.
“The mucus phenotypes were compared with wild normally free-living mice caught in their natural habitat to elucidate the protective properties of natural occurring mucus.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The gut microbiota is required for gut inflammation.
“The gut microbiota is a prerequisite for inflammation in the gut and an imbalance in the microbiota in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has been suggested 35.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The presence of bacteria along the GI tract is critical for the maintenance of the intestinal barrier, which facilitates the exchange of nutrients, water, and electrolytes and prevents the passage of harmful substances and pathogens from the intestinal lumen into the bloodstream (Jakobsson et al., 2015).”
From Microbiome–microglia connections via the gut–brain axis (2019) · cites this paper as Jakobsson et al., 2015
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Ki67 result cites the lamina propria panel
MinorThe text cites Fig. 4F for the increase in Ki67-labelled cells, but the figure caption identifies panel F as the lamina propria cell count. It assigns the Ki67-positive cell count to panel G.
“The labelled cells were significantly increased in mice from Room 2 as compared to Room 1 (Fig4F and H).”
“F The number of cells in lamina propria between two crypts, as shown in Supplementary Fig S7, was counted in sections from mice in the two rooms on Food A (n = 10).”
Helicobacteraceae genus exceeds its reported class abundance
MinorFor Room 2 distal colon lumen, Table 1 reports 1% for the Helicobacteraceae genus but only 0.02% for its parent class, Epsilonproteobacteria. A genus cannot have greater relative abundance than the class containing it.
“| Epsilonproteobacteria | – | < 1 | – | < 1 | –* | 0.02 (0.1)* | < 1 | 2 (5) | –** | 2 (2)** |”
“| Unknown genus (family Helicobacteraceae) | – | < 1 | < 1 | < 1 | –*** | 1 (1)*** | 0.002 (0.006) | 2 (5) | –*** | 2 (2)*** |”
Immune-cell count cites the Ki67 panel
MinorThe text cites Fig. 4G for the lamina propria immune-cell count, but the figure caption identifies panel G as the Ki67-positive cell count. The caption assigns the lamina propria count to panel F.
“The number of these cells was higher in the Room 2 animals; however, it did not reach significance (Fig4G and Supplementary Fig S7A)”
“G The number of Ki67-positive cells per crypt was significantly different in distal colon of mice housed in Room 1 and Room 2 on Food A.”
Citations
Cites
QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data
Caporaso, J. G., Kuczynski, J., Stombaugh, J., Bittinger, K., Bushman, F. D., Costello, E. K., Fierer, N., Peña, A. G., Goodrich, J. K., Gordon, J. I., et al. (2010) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.f.303 · Cited by 34,887 · cited 1×
“Post-processing of pyrosequencing data was done using QIIME software 1.7.0 package [54].”
InfluentialSearch and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST
Edgar, R. C. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq461 · Cited by 21,098
Cox, J., & Mann, M. (2008) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.1511 · Cited by 14,855 · cited 1×
“Data from the MS/MS experiments were analysed with the MaxQuant 1.2.2.5 software [63].”
InfluentialStructure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome
The Human Microbiome Project Consortium (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11234 · Cited by 11,726
A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing
MetaHIT Consortium, Qin, J., Li, R., Raes, J., Arumugam, M., Burgdorf, K. S., Manichanh, C., Nielsen, T., Pons, N., Levenez, F., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08821 · Cited by 11,624 · cited 1×
“The microbiota is diverse and typically made up of in total 500–1,000 species with at least 160 species that are shared among individuals with two phyla, the Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes being dominant [2,3].”
UniFrac: a New Phylogenetic Method for Comparing Microbial Communities
Lozupone, C., & Knight, R. (2005) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.71.12.8228-8235.2005 · Cited by 8,227 · cited 3×
“Principal Coordinates Unweighted UniFrac analysis [20] showed separation of ileum and colon samples along the first component, whereas the two rooms clearly separated along PC2 on Food A (Fig 1A and B).”
Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control
Schwanhäusser, B., Busse, D., Li, N., Dittmar, G., Schuchhardt, J., Wolf, J., Chen, W., & Selbach, M. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10098 · Cited by 6,566 · cited 1×
“Relative protein amounts were quantified in ppm by intensity-based absolute quantification (iBAQ) [64].”
The gut microbiota as an environmental factor that regulates fat storage
Bäckhed, F., Ding, H., Wang, T., Hooper, L. V., Koh, G. Y., Nagy, A., Semenkovich, C. F., & Gordon, J. I. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0407076101 · Cited by 6,245 · cited 1×
“Germ-free mice were colonized with caecal flora from mice in the two rooms and treated as conventional animals onwards [53].”
Self-citationFastTree: Computing Large Minimum Evolution Trees with Profiles instead of a Distance Matrix
Price, M. N., Dehal, P. S., & Arkin, A. P. (2009) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msp077 · Cited by 5,602 · cited 2×
“The GG taxonomies were used to generate summaries of the taxonomic distributions of OTUs across different levels (phylum, order, family, genus and species A phylogenetic tree was built with FastTree [57] and used for estimates of a -diversity (Rarefaction curves, Chao1 [58], Shannon diversity [59]) and b -diversity (u…”
Nonparametric estimation of the number of classes in a population
Chao, A. (1984) · Scandinavian Journal of Statistics · Cited by 4,263
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 685
Bhattarai, Y. (2018) · Neurogastroenterology & Motility · doi:10.1111/nmo.13366 · Cited by 61
Sun, Z., Gu, P., Xu, H., Zhao, W., Zhou, Y., Zhou, L., Zhang, Z., Wang, W., Han, R., Chai, X.-Q., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.3389/fcell.2021.808905 · Cited by 57
Microbial Metabolite Regulation of Epithelial Cell-Cell Interactions and Barrier Function
Ornelas, A., Dowdell, A. S., Lee, J. S., & Colgan, S. P. (2022) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells11060944 · Cited by 69
Yu, J., Liu, T., Guo, Q., Wang, Z., Chen, Y., & Dong, Y. (2023) · Microbiology Spectrum · doi:10.1128/spectrum.04698-22 · Cited by 62
Moshkelgosha, S., Masetti, G., Berchner‐Pfannschmidt, U., Verhasselt, H. L., Horstmann, M., Díaz‐Cano, S. J., Noble, A., Edelman, B., Covelli, D., Plummer, S. F., et al. (2018) · Hormone and Metabolic Research · doi:10.1055/a-0653-3766 · Cited by 61
Faecal Microbiota Transplantation and Chronic Kidney Disease
Bian, J., Liebert, A. D., Bicknell, B. T., Chen, X., Huang, C., & Pollock, C. A. (2022) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu14122528 · Cited by 58
Meldrum, O. W., & Yakubov, G. E. (2024) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408398.2024.2390556 · Cited by 63
Etiopathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease
de Souza, H. S. P. (2017) · Current Opinion in Gastroenterology · doi:10.1097/mog.0000000000000364 · Cited by 59
Xie, X., Xiao, Q., Xiong, Z., Yu, C., Zhou, J., & Fu, Z. (2019) · Food & Function · doi:10.1039/c9fo01533g · Cited by 53
Obesity-associated microbiota contributes to mucus layer defects in genetically obese mice
Schroeder, B. O., Birchenough, G. M. H., Pradhan, M., Nyström, E. E. L., Henricsson, M., Hansson, G. C., & Bäckhed, F. (2020) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.ra120.015771 · Cited by 57
Self-citationShi, Y., Li, J., Yang, P., Niu, Z., Li, W., Chen, L., & Gao, L. (2020) · Toxicology Letters · doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2020.09.018 · Cited by 49
Keeping gut lining at bay: impact of emulsifiers
Cani, P. D., & Everard, A. (2015) · Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.tem.2015.03.009 · Cited by 55
Compositional Changes in the Gut Mucus Microbiota Precede the Onset of Colitis-Induced Inflammation
Glymenaki, M., Singh, G., Brass, A., Warhurst, G., McBain, A. J., Else, K. J., & Cruickshank, S. M. (2017) · Inflammatory Bowel Diseases · doi:10.1097/mib.0000000000001118 · Cited by 53
Cage and maternal effects on the bacterial communities of the murine gut
Singh, G., Brass, A., Cruickshank, S. M., & Cg, K. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-89185-5 · Cited by 42
Dietary phytochemicals modulate intestinal epithelial barrier dysfunction and autoimmune diseases
Ganesan, K., Quiles, J. L., Daglia, M., Xiao, J., & Xu, B. (2021) · Food Frontiers · doi:10.1002/fft2.102 · Cited by 56
Rokhsefat, S., Lin, A., & Comelli, E. M. (2016) · Digestive Diseases and Sciences · doi:10.1007/s10620-016-4032-6 · Cited by 54
Microbe–Mucus Interface in the Pathogenesis of Colorectal Cancer
Coleman, O. I., & Haller, D. (2021) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers13040616 · Cited by 54
Kaur, K., Saxena, A., Debnath, I., O’Brien, J. L., Ajami, N. J., Auchtung, T. A., Petrosino, J. F., Sougiannis, A.-J. T., Depaep, S., Chumanevich, A. A., et al. (2018) · Cancer Medicine · doi:10.1002/cam4.1460 · Cited by 54
Microbiome-Metabolome Signature of Acute Kidney Injury
Andrianova, N. V., Popkov, V. A., Klimenko, N. S., Tyakht, A., Baydakova, G., Frolova, O. Y., Zorova, L. D., Pevzner, I. B., Zorov, D. B., & Plotnikov, E. Y. (2020) · Metabolites · doi:10.3390/metabo10040142 · Cited by 50
Intestinal Microbiota and the Innate Immune System – A Crosstalk in Crohn’s Disease Pathogenesis
Haag, L.-M., & Siegmund, B. (2015) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2015.00489 · Cited by 52
Ducray, H. A. G., Globa, L. P., Pustovyy, O. M., Morrison, E. E., Vodyanoy, V. J., & Sorokulova, I. B. (2019) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1111/jam.14361 · Cited by 52
Exploring the impact of intestinal ion transport on the gut microbiota
Engevik, A. C., & Engevik, M. A. (2020) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2020.12.008 · Cited by 52
Shabat, C. S., Albenberg, L. G., Limbergen, J. V., Pressman, N., Otley, A. R., Yaakov, M., Wine, E., Weiner, D., & Levine, A. (2021) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu13113736 · Cited by 51
Wang, N., Feng, B., Hu, B., Cheng, Y., Guo, Y., & Qian, H. (2021) · Food & Function · doi:10.1039/d1fo02216d · Cited by 55
Microbiota of the gastrointestinal tract: Friend or foe?
Senchukova, M. A. (2023) · World Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.3748/wjg.v29.i1.19 · Cited by 56
Repairing gut barrier by traditional Chinese medicine: roles of gut microbiota
Zhou, Y., Zhang, D., Cheng, H., Wu, J., Liu, J., Feng, W., & Peng, C. Y. (2024) · Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fcimb.2024.1389925 · Cited by 66
Salzano, F. A., Marino, L., Salzano, G., Botta, R. M., Cascone, G., Fiorenza, U. D., Selleri, C., & Casolaro, V. (2018) · Journal of Immunology Research · doi:10.1155/2018/2724951 · Cited by 49
Evidences for a Role of Gut Microbiota in Pathogenesis and Management of Epilepsy
Amlerová, J., Šroubek, J., Angelucci, F., & Hort, J. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms22115576 · Cited by 57
Liu, H., Gu, F., Zhu, C., Yuan, L., Zhu, C., Zhu, M., Yao, J., Hu, P., Zhang, Y., Dicksved, J., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2022.865982 · Cited by 54
Lundberg, R., Bahl, M. I., Licht, T. R., Toft, M., & Hansen, A. K. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep42245 · Cited by 49
Increased Colonic Permeability and Lifestyles as Contributing Factors to Obesity and Liver Steatosis
Palo, D. M. D., Garruti, G., Ciaula, A. D., Molina‐Molina, E., Shanmugam, H., Angelis, M. D., & Portincasa, P. (2020) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu12020564 · Cited by 50
A systematic review of gut‐immune‐brain mechanisms in Autism Spectrum Disorder
Azhari, A., Azizan, F., & Esposito, G. (2018) · Developmental Psychobiology · doi:10.1002/dev.21803 · Cited by 52
Cross-Talk Between the Intestinal Epithelium and Salmonella Typhimurium
Ménard, S., Lacroix‐Lamandé, S., Ehrhardt, K., Jin, Y., Graßl, G. A., & Wiedemann, A. (2022) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2022.906238 · Cited by 48
Intestinal Barrier Function in Health and Disease—Any Role of SARS-CoV-2?
Sharma, L., & Riva, A. (2020) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms8111744 · Cited by 49
Common dietary emulsifiers promote metabolic disorders and intestinal microbiota dysbiosis in mice
Panyod, S., Wu, W., Chang, C.-T., Wada, N., Ho, H., Lo, Y.-L., Tsai, S.-P., Chen, R.-A., Huang, H., Liu, P., et al. (2024) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-024-06224-3 · Cited by 65
Zhang, L., Gui, S., Liang, Z., Liu, A., Chen, Z., Tang, Y., Xiao, M., Chu, F., Liu, W., Jin, X., et al. (2019) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2019.00522 · Cited by 46
Tingler, A. M., & Engevik, M. A. (2025) · Infection and Immunity · doi:10.1128/iai.00503-24 · Cited by 58
Crosstalk between microbiota, pathogens and the innate immune responses
Günther, C., Josenhans, C., & Wehkamp, J. (2016) · International Journal of Medical Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijmm.2016.03.003 · Cited by 50
The bidirectional nature of microbiome-epithelial cell interactions
Solis, A. G., Klapholz, M., Zhao, J., & Levy, M. (2020) · Current Opinion in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.mib.2020.06.007 · Cited by 48
Naudhani, M., Thakur, K., Ni, Z., Zhang, J., & Wei, Z. (2021) · Food & Function · doi:10.1039/d1fo02942h · Cited by 44
Menafra, D., Proganò, M., Tecce, N., Pivonello, R., & Colao, A. A. L. (2024) · Human Nutrition & Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.hnm.2024.200286 · Cited by 50
Modulation of the gut microbiota to improve innate resistance
Schnupf, P., Gaboriau‐Routhiau, V., & Cerf–Bensussan, N. (2018) · Current Opinion in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.coi.2018.08.003 · Cited by 50
Zhao, X., Fu, Z., Yao, M., et al. (2021) · Food Science & Nutrition · doi:10.1002/fsn3.2689 · Cited by 44
The role of microbiota in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
Ciaula, A. D., Bonfrate, L., & Portincasa, P. (2022) · European Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1111/eci.13768 · Cited by 44
Dietary Shifts May Trigger Dysbiosis and Mucous Stools in Giant Pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca)
Williams, C. L., Dill‐McFarland, K. A., Vandewege, M. W., Sparks, D. L., Willard, S. T., Kouba, A. J., Suen, G., & Brown, A. E. (2016) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.00661 · Cited by 43
Roles of the Cell Surface Architecture of Bacteroides and Bifidobacterium in the Gut Colonization
Nishiyama, K., Yokoi, T., Sugiyama, M., Osawa, R., Mukai, T., & Okada, N. (2021) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2021.754819 · Cited by 41
Sakakida, T., Ishikawa, T., Doi, T., Morita, R., Endo, Y., Matsumura, S., Ota, T., Yoshida, J., Hirai, Y., Mizushima, K., et al. (2022) · Cancer Science · doi:10.1111/cas.15306 · Cited by 45
Kar, F., Hacioglu, C., Kar, E., Donmez, D. B., & Kanbak, G. (2022) · Metabolic Brain Disease · doi:10.1007/s11011-022-00964-z · Cited by 42
Gut microbiota in Celiac Disease: microbes, metabolites, pathways and therapeutics
Olshan, K. L., Leonard, M. M., Serena, G., Zomorrodi, A. R., & Fasano, A. (2020) · Expert Review of Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1080/1744666x.2021.1840354 · Cited by 45
Almeida, H. M., Sardeli, A. V., Conway, J., Duggal, N. A., & Cavaglieri, C. R. (2022) · Ageing Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.arr.2022.101773 · Cited by 47
Mucin glycans and their degradation by gut microbiota
Yamaguchi, M., & Yamamoto, K. (2023) · Glycoconjugate Journal · doi:10.1007/s10719-023-10124-9 · Cited by 40
Zhao, L., Zhang, X., Zuo, T., & Yu, J. Q. (2017) · Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.eng.2017.01.012 · Cited by 35
The Microbiome-Host Interaction as a Potential Driver of Anastomotic Leak
Gershuni, V. M., & Friedman, E. S. (2019) · Current Gastroenterology Reports · doi:10.1007/s11894-019-0668-7 · Cited by 43
Josenhans, C., Müthing, J., Elling, L., Bartfeld, S., & Schmidt, H. (2020) · International Journal of Medical Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijmm.2020.151392 · Cited by 40
Vasoactive intestinal peptide regulates ileal goblet cell production in mice
Schwerdtfeger, L., & Tobet, S. A. (2020) · Physiological Reports · doi:10.14814/phy2.14363 · Cited by 38
Gut Feelings: How Microbiota Might Impact the Development and Course of Anorexia Nervosa
Seitz, J., Dahmen, B., Keller, L., & Herpertz‐Dahlmann, B. (2020) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu12113295 · Cited by 37
Guo, J., Ma, B., Wang, Z., et al. (2022) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu14102069 · Cited by 40
Matute, J. D., Duan, J., Flak, M. B., Griebel, P., Tascón-Arcila, J., Doms, S., Hanley, T., Antanaviciute, A., Gundrum, J., Welch, J. L. M., et al. (2022) · The Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.20211938 · Cited by 37
Exploring the Role of Vitamin D and the Vitamin D Receptor in the Composition of the Gut Microbiota
Aggeletopoulou, I., Tsounis, E. P., Mouzaki, Α., & Triantos, C. K. (2023) · Frontiers in Bioscience-Landmark · doi:10.31083/j.fbl2806116 · Cited by 39
Butera, A., Paola, M. D., Pavarini, L., Strati, F., Pindo, M., Sanchez, M., Cavalieri, D., Boirivant, M., & Filippo, C. D. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-32583-z · Cited by 37
Wen, Z., Du, M., Tang, Z., Zhou, T.-Y., Zhang, Z., Song, H., Xiang, X., & Han, X. (2019) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms20225727 · Cited by 40
Gut Bacteria Shape Intestinal Microhabitats Occupied by the Fungus Candida albicans
Eckstein, M., Moreno-Velásquez, S. D., & Pérez, J. C. (2020) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2020.09.027 · Cited by 36
Review of gut nanotoxicology in mammals: Exposure, transformation, distribution and toxicity.
Huang, X.-Q., & Tang, M. (2021) · Science of the Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145078 · Cited by 30
Chen, Y., & Guo, T. L. (2021) · Journal of Immunotoxicology · doi:10.1080/1547691x.2021.1959677 · Cited by 41
Chen, M., Tian, S., Li, S., Pang, X., Sun, J. Y., Zhu, X., Lv, F., Lu, Z., & Li, X. (2021) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules26195812 · Cited by 41
Gueddouri, D., Caüzac, M., Fauveau, V., Benhamed, F., Charifi, W., Beaudoin, L., Rouland, M., Sicherre, F., Lehuen, A., Postic, C., et al. (2022) · Molecular Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.molmet.2022.101438 · Cited by 47
Hausmann, A., Russo, G., Grossmann, J., Zünd, M., Schwank, G., Aebersold, R. H., Liu, Y., Sellin, M. E., & Hardt, W. (2020) · Cellular Microbiology · doi:10.1111/cmi.13191 · Cited by 33
Angelini, G., Castagneto‐Gissey, L., Salinari, S., BERTUZZI, A., Anello, D., Pradhan, M., Zschätzsch, M., Ritter, P., le Roux, C. W., Rubino, F., et al. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-35310-5 · Cited by 39
Microplastics in the soil–water–food nexus: Inclusive insight into global research findings
Garai, S., Bhattacharjee, C., Sarkar, S., Moulick, D., Dey, S., Jana, S., Dhar, A., Roy, A., Mondal, K., Mondal, M., et al. (2024) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173891 · Cited by 36
The Unique Lifestyle of Crohn's Disease-Associated Adherent-Invasive Escherichia coli
Shaler, C. R., Elhenawy, W., & Coombes, B. K. (2019) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2019.04.023 · Cited by 34
Singh, M., Chand, H. S., Banerjee, S., Agarwal, H. S., Raizada, V., Roy, S., & Sopori, M. L. (2019) · Digestive Diseases and Sciences · doi:10.1007/s10620-019-05838-6 · Cited by 37
Rinninella, E., Cintoni, M., Raoul, P. C., Mora, V., Gasbarrini, A., & Mele, M. C. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18042008 · Cited by 37
Reciprocal interactions between gut microbiota and autophagy
Lapaquette, P., Bizeau, J.-B., Acar, N., & Bringer, M.-A. (2021) · World Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.3748/wjg.v27.i48.8283 · Cited by 38
Reciprocal interaction of diet and microbiome in inflammatory bowel diseases
Schaubeck, M., & Haller, D. (2015) · Current Opinion in Gastroenterology · doi:10.1097/mog.0000000000000216 · Cited by 33
Rincel, M., Olier, M., Minni, A., de Oliveira, C. M., Matime, Y., Gaultier, E., Grit, I., Helbling, J., Costa, A., Lépinay, A. L., et al. (2019) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-019-05252-w · Cited by 33
O’Callaghan, A. A., & Corr, S. C. (2019) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms7120663 · Cited by 35
Importance of digestive mucus and mucins for designing new functional food ingredients
Kebouchi, M., Hafeez, Z., Roux, Y. L., Dary, A., & Genay, M. (2020) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108906 · Cited by 33
The intestinal microbiota as a therapeutic target in the treatment of NAFLD and ALD
Huang, W., & Kong, D. (2021) · Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2021.111235 · Cited by 38
Stunting as a Risk Factor of Soil-Transmitted Helminthiasis in Children: A Literature Review
Fauziah, N., Ar-Rizqi, M. A., Hana, S., Patahuddin, N. M., & Diptyanusa, A. (2022) · Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1155/2022/8929025 · Cited by 55
Figueroa‐Lozano, S., & de Vos, P. (2018) · Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety · doi:10.1111/1541-4337.12400 · Cited by 33
Pongking, T., Haonon, O., Dangtakot, R., Onsurathum, S., Jusakul, A., Intuyod, K., Sangka, A., Anutrakulchai, S., Cha’on, U., Pinlaor, S., et al. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0231237 · Cited by 36
García-Mazcorro, J. F., Minamoto, Y., Kawas, J. R., Suchodolski, J. S., & de Vos, W. M. (2020) · Veterinary Sciences · doi:10.3390/vetsci7020044 · Cited by 35
Hereditary hemochromatosis promotes colitis and colon cancer and causes bacterial dysbiosis in mice
Sivaprakasam, S., Ristić, B., Mudaliar, N. S., Hamood, A. N., Colmer‐Hamood, J. A., Wachtel, M. S., Nevels, A., Kottapalli, K. R., & Ganapathy, V. (2020) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bcj20200392 · Cited by 31
Clerbaux, L., Filipovska, J., Muñoz, A., Petrillo, M., Coecke, S., Amorim, M. J., & Grenga, L. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm11185400 · Cited by 36
The Role and Mechanism of Gut Microbiota in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
Chen, Y.-H., Wen, Y., Meng, L., Zhong, J., & Liu, X.-Y. (2022) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu14204278 · Cited by 39
Hirata, Y., Ihara, S., & Koike, K. (2016) · Pharmacological Research · doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2016.09.044 · Cited by 35
In Vitro Models for Investigating Intestinal Host–Pathogen Interactions
McCoy, R. S. A., Oldroyd, S., Yang, W., Wang, K., Hoven, D., Bulmer, D. C., Zilbauer, M., & Owens, R. M. (2023) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.202306727 · Cited by 34
Xia, S., Yan, C., Gu, J., et al. (2024) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods13081217 · Cited by 33
Effect of Synbiotics on Amelioration of Intestinal Inflammation Under Hypobaric Hypoxia
Khanna, K., Mishra, K. P., Chanda, S., et al. (2020) · High Altitude Medicine & Biology · doi:10.1089/ham.2020.0062 · Cited by 33
Lee, P., Hsieh, Y.-C., Huo, T., Yang, U., Lin, C., Li, C., Huang, Y., Hou, M., Lin, H., & Lee, K. (2020) · Molecular Nutrition & Food Research · doi:10.1002/mnfr.202000937 · Cited by 34
Zhang, W., Zhou, Q., Liu, H., Xu, J., Huang, R., Shen, B., Guo, Y., Ai, X., Xu, J., Zhao, X., et al. (2023) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2023.1156762 · Cited by 33
Research Progress on the Correlation between the Intestinal Microbiota and Food Allergy
Yang, H., Qu, Y., Gao, Y., Sun, S., Wu, R., & Wu, J. (2022) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods11182913 · Cited by 34
Wang, J., Han, X., Li, J., Shi, R., Liu, L., Wang, K., Liao, Y.-T., Jiang, H., Zhang, Y., Hu, J., et al. (2022) · World Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.3748/wjg.v28.i43.6109 · Cited by 28
Gorman, H., Moreau, F., Dufour, A., & Chadee, K. (2023) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2023.1211336 · Cited by 29
Ultra-Processed Food and Gut Microbiota: Do Additives Affect Eubiosis? A Narrative Review
Bevilacqua, A., Speranza, B., Racioppo, A., Santillo, A., Albenzio, M., Derossi, A., Caporizzi, R., Francavilla, M., Racca, D., Flagella, Z., et al. (2024) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu17010002 · Cited by 43
Sun, X., Zhuang, Y., Wang, Y., Zhang, Z., An, L., & Xu, Q. (2025) · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2025.118119 · Cited by 36
Gut Microbiota in a Rat Oral Sensitization Model: Effect of a Cocoa‐Enriched Diet
Camps‐Bossacoma, M., Pérez-Cano, F. J., Franch, À., & Castell, M. (2017) · Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity · doi:10.1155/2017/7417505 · Cited by 31
Hul, M. V., Karnik, K., Canene‐Adams, K., de Souza, M., den Abbeele, P. V., Marzorati, M., Delzenne, N. M., Everard, A., & Cani, P. D. (2020) · American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism · doi:10.1152/ajpendo.00108.2020 · Cited by 33
Chen, Y., Li, J., Menon, R., Jayaraman, A., Lee, K., Huang, Y., Dashwood, W. M., Zhang, K., Sun, D., & Dashwood, R. H. (2021) · Gut Microbes · doi:10.1080/19490976.2021.1972756 · Cited by 31
Pérez, M., Ntemiri, A., Tan, H., Harris, H. M. B., Roager, H. M., Ribière, C., & O’Toole, P. W. (2021) · Gut Microbes · doi:10.1080/19490976.2021.1919464 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Jakobsson, H. E., Rodríguez‐Piñeiro, A. M., Schütte, A., Ermund, A., Boysen, P., Bemark, M., Sommer, F., Bäckhed, F., Hansson, G. C., & Johansson, M. E.
- Affiliations
- University of Gothenburg (SE)
- Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NO)
- Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Johansson, Malin EV
- ORCID
- Venue
- The EMBO Reports
- Published
- 2014-12-18
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 164-177
- ISSN
- 1469-221X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-3178
- PMC
- PMC4328744
- OpenAlex
- W2103108588
- Cited by
- 700
- References
- 73
- Citations by year
- 2026: 29 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 67 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 103 · 2021: 93 · 2020: 78 · 2019: 65 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 31
- FWCI
- 15.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- addendum (2015-08-25)
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- EMBO Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Swedish Research Council (7461, 21027, 22220‐01‐5)
- The Sahlgrenska Academy
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (U01AI095473, U01AI095776‐03:9006862)
- The Swedish Cancer Foundation
- The Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation
- IngaBritt and Arne Lundberg Foundation
- Sahlgren's University Hospital
- Wilhelm and Martina Lundgren's Foundation
- Assar Gabrielsson's foundation
- Clas Groschinskys foundation
- Torsten och Ragnar Söderbergs Stiftelser
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
- Keywords
- gut microbiota, mucus permeability, mucus layer thickness, Proteobacteria, germ-free mice, C57BL/6 mice, host-microbe interactions
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Female, Intestinal Mucosa, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mucus, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Specific Pathogen-Free Organisms, Mice, Microbiota
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-07, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-07 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review