Cited by 37Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityMicrobial Natural Products and BiosynthesisAntimicrobial Peptides and Activities

Interactions between statins and Penicillium chrysogenum antifungal protein (PAF) to inhibit the germination of sporangiospores of different sensitive Zygomycetes

Open access
Galgóczy, László, Papp, Tamás, Lukács, Gyöngyi, Leiter, Éva, Pócsi, István, Vágvölgyi, Csaba·2007·FEMS Microbiology Letters

Abstract

This study reports on the antifungal activities of statins combined with an antifungal compound secreted by Penicillium chrysogenum, PAF. Several species belonging in the class Zygomycetes are considered to be agents of human or animal mycoses; other species have significance as postharvest plant pathogens. In the present work, four species (Rhizopus stolonifer, Mortierella wolfii, Syncephalastrum racemosum and Mycotypha africana) that exhibited different sensitivities to lovastatin and PAF in previous experiments were investigated. The efficiencies with which four statins (lovastatin, simvastatin, rosuvastatin and atorvastatin) inhibited sporangiospore germination in the absence or in the presence of a constant concentration of PAF were studied. PAF and lovastatin acted synergistically on the sporangiospore germination of Mycotypha africana, and similar effects of the combinations PAF-rosuvastatin and PAF-atorvastatin were observed on S. racemosum.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2007.00661.x

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The activities of statin-PAF combinations varied and depended on the activities of the components applied separately; when a strain was resistant to one component, significant interactions could not be detected, and when sensitive to both, synergistic or additive interactions were detected.

    “The activities of the statin-PAF combinations on the different strains varied, and depended on the activities of the components applied separately.When a strain was resistant to one of the components, significant interactions could not be detected.On the other hand, when a strain was sensitive to both types of antifungal agents, synergistic or additive interactions were detected [34] .”

    From Statins as antifungal agents (2011) · cites this paper as [34]

  • An antifungal peptide secreted by Penicillium chrsyogenum (PAF) and suramin can decrease growth of zygomyceteous fungal species in the presence of different statins.

    “An antifungal peptide secreted by Penicillium chrsyogenum (Penicillium chrsyogenum antifungal protein; PAF) and a hexasulfonated naphtylurea, suramin (originally applied as an agent for treatment of parasitic infections) can decrease the growth of zygomyceteous fungal species in the presence of different statins [34,35] .”

    From Statins as antifungal agents (2011) · cites this paper as [34]

  • Drug interactions were revealed between statins and nonantifungal drugs that have secondary antifungal activity.

    “Drug interactions were revealed between statins and nonantifungal drugs, which have a secondary antifungal activity.”

    From Statins as antifungal agents (2011) · cites this paper as [34]

  • Differences in effectiveness among statins have been correlated with structural divergences that may influence interaction with the catalytic site of HMG-CoA reductase.

    “Likewise, differences on the effectiveness among statins have been correlated to structural divergences, which may influence the interaction with the catalytic site of HMG-CoA reductase.13”
  • An IR of 0.5-1.5 means additivity, below 0.5 means antagonism, and above 1.5 means synergism.

    “IR values between 0.5 and 1.5 correspond to additive interactions, IR < 0.5 indicates antagonism and IR > 1.5 denotes synergism.13”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 25 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Galgóczy, L., Papp, T., Lukács, G., Leiter, Ã., Pócsi, I., & Vágvölgyi, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Szeged (HU)
  • University of Debrecen (HU)
Venue
FEMS Microbiology Letters
Published
2007-05
Volume
270
Issue
1
Pages
109-115
ISSN
  • 0378-1097 (ISSN-L)
  • 1574-6968
OpenAlex
W1866310169
Cited by
37
References
25
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • FEMS Microbiology Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Debrecen Electronic Archive (University of Debrecen) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities
Keywords
statins, Penicillium chrysogenum, antifungal proteins, PAF, Zygomycetes, sporangiospore germination, lovastatin, simvastatin, rosuvastatin, atorvastatin, antifungal synergy, Rhizopus stolonifer, Syncephalastrum racemosum, fungal infection
MeSH terms
Rosuvastatin Calcium, Atorvastatin, Antifungal Agents, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug Synergism, Fluorobenzenes, Fungi, Heptanoic Acids, Lovastatin, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Penicillium chrysogenum, Pyrimidines, Pyrroles, Spores, Fungal, Sulfonamides, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors, Simvastatin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review