Cited by 9Cancer survivorship and careMental Health Research TopicsCancer-related cognitive impairment studies

Personalizing psychological care for chronic cancer-related fatigue: A case study on symptom dynamics.

Open access
Schellekens, Melanie P. J., Bootsma, Tom I., Van Woezik, Rosalie A. M., Van der Lee, Marije L.·2021·Journal for Person-Oriented Research

Abstract

Approximately 25% of cancer patients suffer from chronic cancer-related fatigue (CCRF), which is a complex, multifactorial condition. While there are evidence-based interventions, it remains unclear what treatment works best for the individual patient. Psychological network models can offer a schematic representation of interrelations among fatigue and protective and perpetuating factors for the individual patient. We explored whether feedback based on these individual fatigue networks can help personalize psychological care for CCRF. A 34-year old woman with CCRF was referred to our mental healthcare institute for psycho-oncology. During the waitlist period, she filled out an experience sampling app for 101 days, including five daily assessments of fatigue, pain, mood, activity and fatigue coping. The interplay between items was visualized in network graphs at the moment-level and day-level, which were discussed with the patient. For example, acceptance of fatigue in the past three hours was associated with less hopelessness and less fatigue in the following moment. At the day-level, acceptance was also being associated with less fatigue, less hopelessness, a better mood, and more motivation to do things. The patient recognized these patterns and explained how unexpected waves of fatigue can make her feel hopeless. This started a dialogue on how cultivating acceptance could potentially help her handle the fatigue. The patient would discuss this with her therapist. Feedback based on individual fatigue networks can provide direct insight into how one copes with CCRF and subsequently offer directions for treatment. Further research is needed in order to implement this in clinical practice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.17505/jpor.2021.23447

Cites

39 of 41 references verified1 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients who are more accepting of their CRF show lower fatigue levels, suggesting acceptance may protect against fatigue persistence.

    “Regarding protective factors, patients who are more accepting of their CRF show lower fatigue levels, suggesting that acceptance may protect patients from fatigue persistence.4,6,13”

    From Exploring the dynamic interconnectedness of protective and perpetuating factors of cancer-related fatigue (2023) · cites this paper as [4]

    The Results and Discussion report that, for one patient with chronic cancer-related fatigue, greater acceptance was associated with less fatigue at the next assessment and at the day level. The paper does not establish that this association holds across patients or that acceptance protects against fatigue persisting over time. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Feeling guilty is expected to perpetuate one's fatigue, as falling short of one's own and others' expectations can take up a lot of energy.

    “Feeling guilty is another factor that is expected to perpetuate one's fatigue.The idea of falling short of one's own and others' expectations can take up a lot of energy.4,20”

    From Exploring the dynamic interconnectedness of protective and perpetuating factors of cancer-related fatigue (2023) · cites this paper as [4]

    In Results (Moment-Level Temporal Network), Sylvia reports feeling guilty when fatigue or pain kept her from taking good care of herself; Results (Experiences with feedback) says that guilt became a treatment target. The paper does not say that guilt perpetuates fatigue or that falling short of her own and others’ expectations consumes energy. It reports no temporal connections between different symptoms. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • CRF is experienced as a dynamic and unpredictable condition, with patients reporting sudden drops in energy levels and gradual build-up of fatigue throughout the day.

    “CRF is experienced as a dynamic and unpredictable condition, with patients reporting sudden drops in energy levels, as well as a gradual build-up of their fatigue throughout the day.4,5”

    From Exploring the dynamic interconnectedness of protective and perpetuating factors of cancer-related fatigue (2023) · cites this paper as [4]

    The Introduction describes CCRF as unpredictable, with sudden drops in energy and episodes of exhaustion. Results > Course of Fatigue reports fatigue increasing through the day, but that observation comes from one patient, Sylvia; the paper does not establish a gradual daily build-up as a general pattern reported by patients. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Dantzer, R., O’Connor, J. C., Freund, G. G., Johnson, R. W., & Kelley, K. W. (2008). From inflammation to sickness and depression: when the immune system subjugates the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(1), 46– 56. 10.1038/nrn2297.From 18073775 PMC2919277 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schellekens, M. P. J., Bootsma, T. I., Van Woezik, R. A. M., & Van der Lee, M. L.
Affiliations
Tilburg University (NL)
Corresponding author
Schellekens, Melanie P. J.
Venue
Journal for Person-Oriented Research
Published
2021-08-26
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
1-13
ISSN
  • 2002-0244 (ISSN-L)
  • 2003-0177
OpenAlex
W3197935910
Cited by
9
References
34
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2
FWCI
0.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal for Person-Oriented Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
KWF Kankerbestrijding (10761)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
Keywords
psycho-oncology, acceptance, hopelessness, symptom dynamics, ecological momentary assessment, cancer patients

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review