Cited by 320Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsTelomeres, Telomerase, and SenescenceAutophagy in Disease and Therapy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

New hallmarks of ageing: a 2022 Copenhagen ageing meeting summary

Open access

Abstract

Genomic instability, telomere attrition, epigenetic alterations, mitochondrial dysfunction, loss of proteostasis, deregulated nutrient-sensing, cellular senescence, stem cell exhaustion, and altered intercellular communication were the original nine hallmarks of ageing proposed by López-Otín and colleagues in 2013. The proposal of these hallmarks of ageing has been instrumental in guiding and pushing forward research on the biology of ageing. In the nearly past 10 years, our in-depth exploration on ageing research has enabled us to formulate new hallmarks of ageing which are compromised autophagy, microbiome disturbance, altered mechanical properties, splicing dysregulation, and inflammation, among other emerging ones. Amalgamation of the 'old' and 'new' hallmarks of ageing may provide a more comprehensive explanation of ageing and age-related diseases, shedding light on interventional and therapeutic studies to achieve healthy, happy, and productive lives in the elderly.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18632/aging.204248

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 New hallmarks of ageing. The figure enumerates the original hallmarks of ageing plus the five new proposed hallmarks that were discussed in the symposium. To qualify as a hallmark, the processes should change with biological age not simply in a correlative manner, but have a causal role. Hence interventions that address the hallmarks should, at the very least, halt further detrimental aspects of ageing, and preferably improve phenotypes associated with ageing.
Figure 1 New hallmarks of ageing. The figure enumerates the original hallmarks of ageing plus the five new proposed hallmarks that were discussed in the symposium. To qualify as a hallmark, the processes should change with biological age not simply in a correlative manner, but have a causal role. Hence interventions that address the hallmarks should, at the very least, halt further detrimental aspects of ageing, and preferably improve phenotypes associated with ageing.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 The force of natural selection in ageing. The force that selects different traits declines as a function of age after reproductive age. Natural selection benefits survival to maturity and reproduction. Therefore, traits that present harmful effects late in life (selection shadow) will likely have already been passed to the next generation. The figure was generated based on the reference [34].
Figure 2 The force of natural selection in ageing. The force that selects different traits declines as a function of age after reproductive age. Natural selection benefits survival to maturity and reproduction. Therefore, traits that present harmful effects late in life (selection shadow) will likely have already been passed to the next generation. The figure was generated based on the reference [34].CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 58 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Flat, 2011, The Evolution of Aging., Nature Education Knowledge, 3

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Schmauck-Medina, T., Molière, A., Lautrup, S., Zhang, J., Chlopicki, S., Madsen, H. B., Cao, S., Soendenbroe, C., Mansell, E., Vestergaard, M. B., Li, Z., Shiloh, Y., Opresko, P. L., Egly, J.-M., Kirkwood, T., Verdin, E., Bohr, V. A., Cox, L. S., Stevnsner, T., Rasmussen, L. J., & Fang, E. F.
Affiliations
  • Department of Clinical Molecular Biology, University of Oslo and Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog 1478, Norway
  • University of Oslo (NO)
  • Jagiellonian Centre for Experimental Therapeutics (JCET), Jagiellonian University, Krakow 30-348, Poland
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Bispebjerg Hospital (DK)
  • Lund University (SE)
  • Copenhagen University Hospital (DK)
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Buck Institute for Research on Aging (US)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Aarhus University (DK)
Corresponding author
  • Stevnsner, Tinna
  • Rasmussen, Lene Juel
  • Fang, Evandro F.
Venue
Aging
Published
2022-08-29
Volume
14
Issue
16
Pages
6829-6839
ISSN
1945-4589 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4293462467
Cited by
319
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 42 · 2025: 67 · 2024: 100 · 2023: 102 · 2022: 8
FWCI
23.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Aging (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Jagiellonian University Repository (Jagiellonian University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity) (cc-by)
Funders
  • Lundbeckfonden (R347-2020-2176)
  • Novo Nordisk
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/W01825X/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
Keywords
hallmarks of aging, aging, autophagy, microbiome, mechanical properties, splicing dysregulation, inflammation, age-related diseases, cellular senescence, stem cell exhaustion, intercellular communication, proteostasis, nutrient sensing, telomere shortening, epigenetic modifications, mitochondrial dysfunction, genomic instability
MeSH terms
Aged, Aging, Humans, Telomere, Cellular Senescence, Genomic Instability, Epigenesis, Genetic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review