Cited by 19Gut microbiota and healthProbiotics and Fermented FoodsInfant Nutrition and Health

Exploring Bifidobacterium species community and functional variations with human gut microbiome structure and health beyond infancy

Open access
Ladeira, Ruben, Tap, Julien, Derrien, Muriel·2023·Microbiome Research Reports

Abstract

Aim: The human gut Bifidobacterium community has been studied in detail in infants and following dietary interventions in adults. However, the variability of the distribution of Bifidobacterium species and intra-species functions have been little studied, particularly beyond infancy. Here, we explore the ecology of Bifidobacterium communities in a large public dataset of human gut metagenomes, mostly corresponding to adults. Methods: We selected 9.515 unique gut metagenomes from curatedMetagenomicData. Samples were partitioned by applying Dirichlet’s multinomial mixture to Bifidobacterium species. A functional analysis was performed on > 2.000 human-associated Bifidobacterium metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) paired with participant gut microbiome and health features. Results: We identified several Bifidobacterium-based partitions in the human gut microbiome differing in terms of the presence and abundance of Bifidobacterium species. The partitions enriched in both B. longum and B. adolescentis were associated with gut microbiome diversity and a higher abundance of butyrate producers and were more prevalent in healthy individuals. B. bifidum MAGs harboring a set of genes potentially related to phages were more prevalent in partitions associated with a lower gut microbiome diversity and were genetically more closely related. Conclusion: This study expands our knowledge of the ecology and variability of the Bifidobacterium community, particularly in adults, and its specific association with the gut microbiota and health. Its findings may guide the rational selection of Bifidobacterium strains for gut microbiome complementation according to the individual’s endogenous Bifidobacterium community. Our results also suggest that gut microbiome stratification for particular genera may be relevant for studies of variations of species and associations with the gut microbiome and health.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.20517/mrr.2023.01

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • B. bifidum is characteristic of the bifidobacterial communities residing in the infant gut and contributes to early microbial colonization, alongside B. breve.

    “B. bifidum is characteristic of the bifidobacterial communities residing in the infant gut and contributes to early microbial colonization, alongside Bifidobacterium breve [6-10] .”

    From Genome-scale insights into the metabolic landscape and evolutionary development of Bifidobacterium bifidum (2026) · cites this paper as [9]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says B. bifidum and B. breve are typically abundant and prevalent in infant gut microbiota. The Results (page unavailable) also report higher B. breve prevalence in children under three. These passages support their presence in the infant gut, but do not establish that B. bifidum contributes to early microbial colonization. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ladeira, R., Tap, J., & Derrien, M.
Affiliations
  • Danone (France) (FR)
  • AgroParisTech (FR)
Corresponding author
  • Tap, Julien
  • Derrien, Muriel
Venue
Microbiome Research Reports
Published
2023
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
9
ISSN
2771-5965 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4362460788
Cited by
19
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5
FWCI
1.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Microbiome Research Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Danone
  • Danone Nutricia Research
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
Keywords
Bifidobacterium, gut microbiota, metagenome-assembled genomes, Bifidobacterium longum, Bifidobacterium adolescentis, Bifidobacterium bifidum, butyrate production, gut microbiota diversity, phage genes, human health, adults

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review