Cited by 885Gut microbiota and healthOral microbiology and periodontitis researchMicrobial Community Ecology and Physiology

Dynamics and associations of microbial community types across the human body

Open access
Ding, Tao, Schloss, Patrick D.·2014·Nature

Abstract

A primary goal of the Human Microbiome Project (HMP) was to provide a reference collection of 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequences collected from sites across the human body that would allow microbiologists to better associate changes in the microbiome with changes in health. The HMP Consortium has reported the structure and function of the human microbiome in 300 healthy adults at 18 body sites from a single time point. Using additional data collected over the course of 12-18 months, we used Dirichlet multinomial mixture models to partition the data into community types for each body site and made three important observations. First, there were strong associations between whether individuals had been breastfed as an infant, their gender, and their level of education with their community types at several body sites. Second, although the specific taxonomic compositions of the oral and gut microbiomes were different, the community types observed at these sites were predictive of each other. Finally, over the course of the sampling period, the community types from sites within the oral cavity were the least stable, whereas those in the vagina and gut were the most stable. Our results demonstrate that even with the considerable intra- and interpersonal variation in the human microbiome, this variation can be partitioned into community types that are predictive of each other and are probably the result of life-history characteristics. Understanding the diversity of community types and the mechanisms that result in an individual having a particular type or changing types, will allow us to use their community types to assess disease risk and to personalize therapies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature13178

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Jensen-Shannon distance between layers of a multiplex system has been used to identify community-based associations in the human microbiome, in agreement with biological expectation.

    “In another application the Jensen -Shannon distance between layers of a multiplex system has been used to identify community-based associations in the human microbiome 32 , where the microbial network corresponding to each body site is represented by a layer in a multiplex network, in perfect agreement with biological expectation 92 .”

    From Complex networks from classical to quantum (2019) · cites this paper as [92]

    The paper reports associations between community types at different body sites, including within the oral cavity and vagina (section labeled Abstract; page unavailable). It does not report using Jensen–Shannon distance between layers of a multiplex network to identify those associations. Its Extended Data Figure 1 instead uses Jensen–Shannon divergence between stool samples for an ordination. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The remaining gut microbiota composition is diverse and dynamic, and acute and chronic dietary exposures significantly affect the overall microbial community.

    “However, the composition of the remaining gut microbiota is remarkably diverse and dynamic, with both acute and chronic dietary exposures significantly affecting the overall microbial community (8,11).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ding, T., & Schloss, P. D.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Schloss, Patrick D.
Venue
Nature
Published
2014-04-16
Volume
509
Issue
7500
Pages
357-360
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2111358533
Cited by
885
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 63 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 92 · 2021: 84 · 2020: 91 · 2019: 74 · 2018: 68 · 2017: 72 · 2016: 69 · 2015: 94 · 2014: 22 · 2012: 1
FWCI
35.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (R01HG005975)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM099514)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK034933)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
Keywords
human microbiome, 16S rRNA gene sequences, Human Microbiome Project, breastfeeding, gender differences, educational attainment, oral microbiota, gut microbiota, vaginal microbiota, microbial community stability, interindividual variability
MeSH terms
Breast Feeding, Disease Susceptibility, Educational Status, Feces, Female, Health, Humans, Life Style, Male, Mouth, Organ Specificity, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Sex Characteristics, Time Factors, Vagina, Human Body, Gastrointestinal Tract, Metagenome, Precision Medicine, Microbiota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review