Cited by 33SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchCOVID-19 epidemiological studiesCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies

How will emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants impact herd immunity?

Open access
Lippi, Giuseppe, Henry, Brandon M.·2021·Annals of Translational Medicine

Abstract

Several lines of evidence now attest that a considerable number of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants are circulating in many countries around the globe, thus reinforcing the need of continuous genomic surveillance to identify introduction events, monitor the diffusion of these new strains and assess their clinical and healthcare impact (1). New viral variants can be defined as “of concern” when their infectivity and/or pathogenicity and/or capacity to escape immune system recognition are significantly higher than the original “wild-type” strain, thus consequently boosting virus spread within the population, enhancing the risk of developing more severe illness and/or even causing epidemic rebounds. As specifically concerns SARS-CoV-2, at least three such variants have been identified in several different territories by both the European Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (ECDC) (2) and the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (3) to-date.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21037/atm-21-893

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Current US acceptance rates of 56-75% may be insufficient to reach at least 80-90% coverage, the threshold thought necessary for herd immunity against SARS-CoV-2.

    “current acceptance rates of 56–75%245 may be insufficient to reach at least 80–90% coverage246, the threshold thought to be necessary for herd immunity against SARS-CoV-2.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lippi, G., & Henry, B. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Verona (IT)
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Lippi, Giuseppe
Venue
Annals of Translational Medicine
Published
2021-04
Volume
9
Issue
7
Pages
585-585
ISSN
  • 2305-5839 (ISSN-L)
  • 2305-5847
OpenAlex
W3135405821
Cited by
33
References
34
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 14
FWCI
2.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Annals of Translational Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Keywords
SARS-CoV-2 variants, herd immunity, genomic surveillance, variants of concern, immune evasion, epidemic rebound, COVID-19 pandemic, virus transmission

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review