Cited by 143Non-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringECG Monitoring and AnalysisHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

Accuracy of wearable heart rate monitors in cardiac rehabilitation

Open access
Etiwy, Muhammad, Akhrass, Zade, Gillinov, Lauren, Alashi, Alaa, Wang, Robert, Blackburn, Gordon, Gillinov, Stephen M., Phelan, Dermot +4 more·2019·Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Therapy

Abstract

Background: To assess the accuracy of four wearable heart rate (HR) monitors in patients with established cardiovascular disease enrolled in phase II or III cardiac rehabilitation (CR). Methods: Eighty adult patients enrolled in phase II or III CR were monitored during a CR session that included exercise on a treadmill and/or stationary cycle. Participants underwent HR monitoring with standard ECG limb leads, an electrocardiographic (ECG) chest strap monitor (Polar H7), and two randomly assigned wrist-worn HR monitors (Apple Watch, Fitbit Blaze, Garmin Forerunner 235, TomTom Spark Cardio), one on each wrist. HR was recorded at rest and at 3, 5, and 7 minutes of steady-state exercise on the treadmill and stationary cycle. Results: Across all exercise conditions, the chest strap monitor (Polar H7) had the best agreement with ECG (r c =0.99) followed by the Apple Watch (r c =0.80), Fitbit Blaze (r c =0.78), TomTom Spark (r c =0.76) and Garmin Forerunner (r c =0.52). There was variability in accuracy under different exercise conditions. On the treadmill, only the Fitbit Blaze performed well (r c =0.76), while on the stationary cycle, Apple Watch (r c =0.89) and TomTom Spark (r c =0.85) were most accurate. Conclusions: In cardiac patients, the accuracy of wearable, optically based HR monitors varies, and none of those tested was as accurate as an electrode-containing chest monitor. This observation has implications for in-home CR, as electrode-containing chest monitors should be used when accurate HR measurement is imperative.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21037/cdt.2019.04.08

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Etiwy, M., Akhrass, Z., Gillinov, L., Alashi, A., Wang, R., Blackburn, G., Gillinov, S. M., Phelan, D., Gillinov, A. M., Houghtaling, P. L., Javadikasgari, H., & Desai, M. Y.
Affiliations
Cleveland Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Desai, Milind Y.
Venue
Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Therapy
Published
2019-06
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
262-271
ISSN
  • 2223-3652 (ISSN-L)
  • 2223-3660
OpenAlex
W2944738013
Cited by
143
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 4
FWCI
5.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2020-06-29)
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Cleveland Clinic
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
wearable heart rate monitor, cardiac rehabilitation, heart rate accuracy, wrist-worn devices, Apple Watch, Fitbit, treadmill exercise, stationary cycling, cardiovascular disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review