Cited by 507Physical Activity and HealthSports and Physical Education StudiesRecreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management

The Role of Perceived Personal Barriers to Engagement in Leisure-Time Physical Activity

Open access
Reichert, Felipe F., Barros, Aluísio J.D., Domingues, Marlos R., Hallal, Pedro C.·2007·American Journal of Public Health

Abstract

Objectives. We sought to identify perceived personal barriers to physical activity and examine the potential association between these barriers and sociodemographic and behavioral variables, including participation in leisure-time physical activity. Methods. In 2003, we conducted a population-based study in Pelotas, Brazil. Participants aged 20 years and older were selected according to a multistage sampling strategy. Participants responded to both the International Physical Activity Questionnaire and a standardized questionnaire investigating 8 perceived personal barriers. Results. Only 26.8% of participants achieved 150 minutes per week of leisure-time physical activity. Lack of money (40.3%) and feeling too tired (38.1%) were the most frequently reported barriers to physical activity. A dose–response group association was observed between number of perceived barriers and level of physical activity. In the multivariable analysis, lack of time, dislike of exercising, feeling too tired, lack of company, and lack of money were associated with physical inactivity. Conclusion. Detection of the determinants of physical inactivity, a growing epidemic, should be a public health priority. Brazil is a middle-income (developing) country. The prevalence of most of the personal barriers studied was higher in this population than those levels observed in high-income (developed) countries. Perceiving 5 of the 8 barriers investigated was inversely associated with leisure-time physical activity level.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2105/ajph.2005.070144

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reichert, F. F., Barros, A. J. D., Domingues, M. R., & Hallal, P. C.
Affiliations
Universidade Federal de Pelotas (BR)
Venue
American Journal of Public Health
Published
2007-03
Volume
97
Issue
3
Pages
515-519
ISSN
  • 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-0048
OpenAlex
W2079817372
Cited by
507
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 37
FWCI
9.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Universidade Federal de Pelotas
  • Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
  • Ministério da Saúde
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Life-span and Life-course Studies › Sports and Physical Education Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management
Keywords
leisure-time physical activity, perceived barriers to physical activity, physical inactivity, lack of money, fatigue, time constraints, sociodemographic factors, dose-response relationship, middle-income countries, Pelotas, Brazil
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Attitude to Health, Brazil, Family Characteristics, Female, Humans, Leisure Activities, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Activity, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sex Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, Time Factors, Urban Health, Censuses

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review