Cited by 130Behavioral Health and InterventionsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorNutrition, Genetics, and Disease

Personalising nutritional guidance for more effective behaviour change

Open access
Celis-Morales, Carlos, Lara, Jose, Mathers, John C·2015·Proceedings of the Nutrition Society

Abstract

Improving diet and other lifestyle behaviours has considerable potential for reducing the global burden of non-communicable diseases, promoting better health across the life-course and increasing wellbeing. However, realising this potential will require the development, testing and implementation of much more effective behaviour change interventions than are used conventionally. Evidence-based, personalised (or stratified) interventions which incorporate effective behaviour change techniques (BCT) and which are delivered digitally are likely to be an important route to scalable and sustainable interventions. Progress in developing such interventions will depend on the outcomes of research on: (i) the best bases for personalisation of dietary advice; (ii) identification of BCT which are proven to enhance intervention efficacy; (iii) suitable platforms (digital-based tools) for collection of relevant participant characteristics (e.g. socioeconomic information, current diet and lifestyle and dietary preferences) linked with intelligent systems which use those characteristics to offer tailored feedback and advice in a cost-effective and acceptable manner. Future research should focus on such interventions aiming to reduce health inequalities and to improve overall public health.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0029665114001633

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Different people respond differently to foods and nutrients, warranting personalized approaches to nutrition interventions and services.

    “It is now understood that different people respond differently to foods and nutrients, warranting personalized approaches to nutrition interventions and services [3,17-21].”

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Celis-Morales, C., Lara, J., & Mathers, J. C.
Affiliations
Newcastle University (GB)
Corresponding author
Mathers, John C
Venue
Proceedings of the Nutrition Society
Published
2014-12-12
Volume
74
Issue
2
Pages
130-138
ISSN
  • 0029-6651 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2719
OpenAlex
W2128538650
Cited by
130
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 7
FWCI
1.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of The Nutrition Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Funders
  • Office of Research and Development
  • Scottish Government
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • European Commission (265494)
  • Public Health Agency
  • Directorate for Biological Sciences
  • Chief Scientist Office, Scottish Government Health and Social Care Directorate
  • Medical Research Council (MR/K006312/1, G0900686)
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
  • Economic and Social Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease
Keywords
behaviour change interventions, behaviour change techniques, digital health interventions, non-communicable diseases, lifestyle habits, personalized feedback, intelligent systems, health disparities, socioeconomic factors, food preferences
MeSH terms
Behavior Therapy, Chronic Disease, Combined Modality Therapy, Congresses as Topic, Humans, Life Style, Patient Compliance, Technology Transfer, Nutrition Policy, Internet, Nutrigenomics, Precision Medicine, Elder Nutritional Physiological Phenomena

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review