Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 342

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Changing fruit and vegetable consumption among children: the 5-a-Day Power Plus program in St. Paul, Minnesota.

Open access
Perry, C L, Bishop, D B, Taylor, G, Murray, D M, Mays, R W, Dudovitz, B S, Smyth, M, Story, M·1998·American Journal of Public Health

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: A randomized school based trial sought to increase fruit and vegetable consumption among children using a multicomponent approach. METHODS: The intervention, conducted in 20 elementary schools in St. Paul, targeted a multiethnic group of children who were in the fourth grade in spring 1995 and the fifth grade in fall 1995. The intervention consisted of behavioral curricula in classrooms, parental involvement, school food service changes, and industry support and involvement. Lunchroom observations and 24-hour food recalls measured food consumption. Parent telephone surveys and a health behavior questionnaire measured psychosocial factors. RESULTS: The intervention increased lunchtime fruit consumption and combined fruit and vegetable consumption, lunchtime vegetable consumption among girls, and daily fruit consumption as well as the proportion of total daily calories attributable to fruits and vegetables. CONCLUSIONS: Multicomponent school-based programs can increase fruit and vegetable consumption among children. Greater involvement of parents and more attention to increasing vegetable consumption, especially among boys, remain challenges in future intervention research.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2105/ajph.88.4.603

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. 10.1080/01635589209514201 · DOI · Paper page
  2. US Dept of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2000: Midcourse Review and 1995 Revisions. Washington, DC: Public Health Service; 1996.
  3. 10.2105/AJPH.85.12.1623 · DOI
  4. Kann L, 1995, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep., 44, 1
  5. 10.1001/archpedi.1996.02170260085014 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.3322/canjclin.39.5.266 · DOI
  7. 10.2105/AJPH.82.6.816 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1001/archpedi.1996.02170280074014 · DOI
  9. Havas S, Heimendinger J, Reynolds K, etal. 5-a-Day for Better Health: a new research initiative. JAm Diet Assoc. 1994;94:32-36. · DOI
  10. Committee on Diet and Health, Food and Nutrition Board, National Research Council. Diet and Health: Implications for Reducing Chronic Disease Risk. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1989.
  11. 10.1016/S0022-3182(12)80226-3 · DOI
  12. Domel SB, Baranowski T, Davis H, etal. Development and evaluation of a school intervention to increase fruit and vegetable consumption among fourth and fifth grade students. JNutrEduc. 1993;25:345-349. · DOI
  13. Lytle LA, Achterberg CL. Changing the diet of America's children: what works and why? JNutr Educ. 1995;27:250-260. · DOI
  14. Contento I, Balch GI, Bronner YL, etal. The effectiveness of nutrition education and implications for nutrition education policy, programs and research: a review of research. JNutr Educ. 1995;27:297-369.
  15. 10.1001/jama.1996.03530340032026 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Bandura A. Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1977.
  17. Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1986.
  18. 10.1177/109019818501200204 · DOI
  19. Perry CL, Story M, Lytle LA. Promoting healthy dietary behaviors. In: Weissberg RP, Gullotta TP, Adams GR, Hampden RL, Ryan BA, eds. Healthy Children 2010: Strategies to Enhance Social, Emotional, and Physical Wellness. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications; 1997.
  20. 10.1177/109019818901600203 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/0002-8223(93)92247-U · DOI · Paper page
  22. Feskanich D, Buzzard IM, Welch BT, etal. Comparison of a computerized and a manual method of food coding for nutrient intake studies. JAm Diet Assoc. 1988;88:1263-1267. · DOI
  23. Smiciklas-Wright HA, Mitchell DC, Norton LD, Derr JA. Interviewer reliability of nutrient intake data from 24-hour recalls collected using the Minnesota Nutrition Data System (NDS). JAm Diet Assoc. 1991;91:28A. Abstract.
  24. 10.1007/BF00051404 · DOI
  25. 10.1177/0013164490504002 · DOI
  26. 10.1037/0022-006X.58.4.458 · DOI
  27. 10.1177/0193841X9602000305 · DOI
  28. 10.2105/AJPH.84.5.814 · DOI
  29. 10.1006/pmed.1996.0079 · DOI
  30. 10.1093/eurpub/4.3.188 · DOI
  31. 10.1006/pmed.1996.0082 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1006/pmed.1996.0077 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Perry, C. L., Bishop, D. B., Taylor, G., Murray, D. M., Mays, R. W., Dudovitz, B. S., Smyth, M., & Story, M.
Venue
American Journal of Public Health
Published
1998-04
Volume
88
Issue
4
Pages
603-609
ISSN
  • 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-0048
OpenAlex
W2167039707
Cited by
342
References
5
FWCI
12.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.