Cited by 131Smoking Behavior and CessationPublic Health Policies and EducationGlobal Public Health Policies and Epidemiology

The impact of workplace smoking ordinances in California on smoking cessation

Open access
Joel M. Moskowitz, Zian Lin, Esther Sid Hudes·2000·American Journal of Public Health

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The effect of local workplace smoking laws in California was assessed to determine whether such laws increase smoking cessation. METHODS: Workplace smoking ordinance data from 1990 were appended to 1990 California Tobacco Survey data from 4680 adult indoor workers who were current cigarette smokers or reported smoking in the 6 months before the survey. Ordinance effects on cigarette smoking and worksite policy were estimated by using multiple logistic regression controlling for sociodemographic variables. RESULTS: Smokers who worked in localities with a strong workplace ordinance (compared with no workplace ordinance) were more likely to report the existence of a worksite smoking policy (odds ratio [OR] = 1.6; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.2, 2.2) and to report quitting smoking in the prior 6 months (OR = 1.5; 95% CI = 1.1, 1.7). In communities with strong ordinances, an estimated 26.4% of smokers quit smoking within 6 months of the survey and were abstinent at the time of the survey, compared with an estimated 19.1% in communities with no ordinance. CONCLUSIONS: Workplace smoking ordinances increased smoking cessation among employed smokers, indicating that these laws may benefit smokers as well as nonsmokers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2105/ajph.90.5.757

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moskowitz, J. M., Lin, Z., & Hudes, E. S.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Venue
American Journal of Public Health
Published
2000-05-01
Volume
90
Issue
5
Pages
757-761
ISSN
  • 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-0048
OpenAlex
W1567797693
Cited by
131
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
FWCI
4.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • California Wellness Foundation
  • U.S. Public Health Service (U48/909706)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Public Health Policies and Education
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
Keywords
smoking cessation, tobacco control, indoor workers, cigarette smoking, California
MeSH terms
Smoking Prevention, Adolescent, Adult, California, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Smoking, Socioeconomic Factors, Program Evaluation, Logistic Models, Organizational Policy, Occupational Health, Occupational Exposure, Smoking Cessation, Workplace

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review