Cited by 85Genetically Modified Organisms ResearchAgricultural Innovations and PracticesCrop Yield and Soil Fertility

The Realized Yield Effect of Genetically Engineered Crops: U.S. Maize and Soybean

Xu, Zheng, Hennessy, David A., Sardana, Kavita, Moschini, GianCarlo·2013·Crop Science

Abstract

Yield improvements are critical to ensuring food security for a growing world population especially in view of the increasing potential for use of land in biofuel production. Efforts to sustain the impressive rate of past productivity gains, epitomized by such successes as the Green Revolution, are bound to rely on biotechnology innovations such as those responsible for the development of genetically engineered (GE) crops. Some argue that the use of biotechnology can substantially improve yields relative to the trajectory established by traditional breeding in the 20th century. Because U.S. adoption of GE varieties has been very strong since their introduction in the late 1990s, we investigated empirically whether and to what extent the GE technology has improved realized yields. We study this question for nonirrigated U.S. maize (Zea mays L.) and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] yields over 1964 through 2010, having controlled for local effects, weather, fertilization, and the preexisting (non‐GE) crop improvement trend. For maize we find that GE varieties have increased realized yields, with a stronger gain in the Central Corn Belt (CCB). For soybeans, GE varieties appear to have slightly reduced yields. For both crops we find a strong trend in yield growth, which may have accelerated in recent years within the CCB. However, the combined effects of yield trend and GE adoption are predicted to fall short of the growth rate envisioned by industry projections.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2135/cropsci2012.06.0399

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 64 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xu, Z., Hennessy, D. A., Sardana, K., & Moschini, G.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Iowa State University (US)
  • TERI University (IN)
Corresponding author
Moschini, GianCarlo
Venue
Crop Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-05
Volume
53
Issue
3
Pages
735-745
ISSN
  • 0011-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-0653
OpenAlex
W2102598815
Cited by
85
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 1
FWCI
7.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Crop Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
Keywords
genetically modified crops, crop yield, maize, soybean, yield improvement, biotechnology adoption, yield trends, food security, Green Revolution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review