Cited by 306Artificial Intelligence ApplicationsArtificial Intelligence in EducationArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Exploring the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Enhancing Academic Performance: A Case Study of ChatGPT

Open access
Alshater, Muneer·2022·SSRN Electronic Journal

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2139/ssrn.4312358

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ChatGPT is able to save time for other important activities like spending more time with students through automation of certain tasks and processes.

    “Some educators have already started testing the efficiency of ChatGPT by integrating it in their educational activities (e.g., research, teaching, assessment) and found that through automation of certain tasks and processes, ChatGPT is able to save time for other important activities like spending more time with students (Alshater, 2022; Terwiesch, 2023).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alshater, M.
Affiliations
University of Jordan (JO)
Corresponding author
Alshater, Muneer
Venue
SSRN Electronic Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022
ISSN
1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4313564992
Cited by
304
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 66 · 2024: 114 · 2023: 94 · 2022: 1 · 2016: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
ChatGPT, artificial intelligence in research, academic performance, natural language processing, data analysis and interpretation, scenario generation, scholarly communication, AI ethics, human-AI collaboration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review