Cited by 52Nanoparticle-Based Drug DeliveryRNA Interference and Gene DeliveryAdvanced Drug Delivery Systems

Nanotechnology for Neurodegenerative Diseases: Recent Progress in Brain-Targeted Delivery, Stimuli-Responsive Platforms, and Organelle-Specific Therapeutics

Open access
Gao, Lei, Wang, Jia, Bi, Yanhua·2025·International Journal of Nanomedicine

Abstract

Neurodegenerative diseases-including Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, Huntington's disease, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-are characterized by progressive neuronal loss and complex pathological mechanisms such as protein aggregation, mitochondrial dysfunction, and neuroinflammation. Conventional therapies offer limited efficacy due to the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and lack of targeted delivery. Nanotechnology has emerged as a transformative strategy for precise brain-targeted treatment. This review summarizes recent advances in nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems, including polymeric nanoparticles, liposomes, inorganic nanomaterials, and biomimetic carriers, highlighting their design features, BBB-penetration mechanisms, and disease-specific applications. Emphasis is placed on stimuli-responsive nanocarriers that react to pH, reactive oxygen species, or enzyme activity, enabling site-specific drug release. Additionally, organelle-targeting strategies-particularly those directed at mitochondria and lysosomes-are explored for their role in subcellular precision therapy. The integration of diagnostic and therapeutic modalities in theranostic nanoplatforms is also discussed. By consolidating preclinical progress and emerging technologies, this review offers insights into the future of nanomedicine in treating neurodegenerative diseases and lays the groundwork for clinical translation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2147/ijn.s549893

Cites

199 of 199 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 201 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [34]Zhi K, Raji B, Nookala AR, et al. PLGA nanoparticle-based formulations to cross the blood-brain barrier for drug delivery: from R&D to cGMP. Pharmaceutics. 2021; 13(4): 500. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13040500 33917577 PMC8067506 · DOI
  2. [91]Allen SJ, Watson JJ, Shoemark DK, Barua NU, GDNF PNK. NGF and BDNF as therapeutic options for neurodegeneration. Pharmacol Ther. 2013; 138(2): 155– 175. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2013.01.004 23348013 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [128]Pichla M, Bartosz G, Stefaniuk I. Sadowska-Bartosz I. pH-responsive redox nanoparticles protect SH-SY5Y cells at lowered pH in a cellular model of Parkinson’s disease. Molecules. 2021; 26(3): 543. doi: 10.3390/molecules26030543 33494255 PMC7864521 · DOI
  4. [145]Dinamarca MC, Sagal JP, Quintanilla RA, Godoy JA, Arrázola MS, Inestrosa NC. Amyloid-beta-Acetylcholinesterase complexes potentiate neurodegenerative changes induced by the Abeta peptide. Implications for the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease. Mol Neurodegen. 2010; 5: 4. doi: 10.1186/1750-1326-5-4 PMC2823746 20205793 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gao, L., Wang, J., & Bi, Y.
Corresponding author
Bi, Yanhua
Venue
International Journal of Nanomedicine
Published
2025-09
Volume
Volume 20
Pages
11015-11044
ISSN
  • 1176-9114 (ISSN-L)
  • 1178-2013
OpenAlex
W4414148219
Cited by
52
References
201
Citations by year
2026: 49 · 2025: 3
FWCI
3.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Nanomedicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
Keywords
neurodegenerative diseases, brain drug delivery, blood-brain barrier, stimuli-responsive nanocarriers, polymeric nanoparticles, liposomes, inorganic nanomaterials, mitochondrial targeting, lysosomal targeting, subcellular drug delivery, theranostic nanoplatform, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, Huntington's disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, protein aggregation, mitochondrial dysfunction, neuroinflammation
MeSH terms
Nanoparticle Drug Delivery System, Animals, Blood-Brain Barrier, Brain, Drug Carriers, Humans, Liposomes, Organelles, Drug Delivery Systems, Neurodegenerative Diseases, Nanomedicine, Nanoparticles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review