Cited by 36Schizophrenia research and treatmentNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Glutamate and Psychosis Risk

Egerton, Alice, Fusar-Poli, Paolo, M. Stone, James·2012·Current Pharmaceutical Design

Abstract

Increasing evidence suggests that abnormalities in glutamatergic transmission may be associated with psychosis risk. Genetic polymorphisms associated with schizophrenia converge on NMDA receptor signalling pathways, and transgenic animal models and human neuroimaging studies have shown the functional impact of these risk alleles. Animal models have also shown that environmental risk factors, such as stress, cannabis use and maternal infection can result in glutamatergic dysfunction, and in vivo magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) studies have detected glutamatergic abnormalities in individuals at clinical or genetic risk of psychosis. Glutamatergic dysfunction may impact on dopaminergic transmission, and ultimately lead to the emergence of psychosis. In this review, the evidence that genetic and environmental risk factors for psychosis impact on glutamatergic transmission is discussed. If glutamatergic abnormalities are present early in the disorder, this suggests that glutamatergic therapies may be useful in psychosis prevention.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2174/138161212799316244

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Biochemical, imaging, and electrophysiological measurements may help segregating patients into higher- and lower-risk groups.

    “In addition, biochemical 140,141 , imaging 52,142,143 , and electrophysiological measurements 144 may help segregating patients into higher- and lower-risk groups.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Egerton, A., Fusar-Poli, P., & M. Stone, J.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Venue
Current Pharmaceutical Design
Published
2012-02-01
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
466-478
ISSN
1381-6128 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2066451778
Cited by
36
References
28
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Pharmaceutical Design (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
glutamate, psychosis risk, schizophrenia, NMDA receptor signalling, glutamatergic dysfunction, genetic polymorphism, environmental risk factors, stress, cannabis use, maternal infection, magnetic resonance spectroscopy, dopamine signaling, psychosis prevention
MeSH terms
Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Humans, Psychotic Disorders, Risk Factors, Glutamic Acid, Genetic Predisposition to Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review