Cited by 4

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Examining the Social Signaling and Person Perception Functions of Loneliness

Floyd, Kory, Woo, Nathan, Custer, Benjamin, Dinsmore, Dana, Duncan, Kaylin, Maré, Jeannette·2022·OBM Neurobiology

Abstract

Loneliness is a common condition that poses substantial risks to morbidity and mortality. Cacioppo and Cacioppo’s [1] evolutionary theory of loneliness (ETL) provides that loneliness serves a social signaling function and also manifests in hypervigilance to threat, which we propose can influence person perception. In this experiment, 480 observers evaluated videotaped self-presentation messages from speakers who scored either high or low on a measure of loneliness. On the basis of ETL, we hypothesized that observers can distinguish between lonely and non-lonely speakers to a greater-than-chance degree and that observers’ own loneliness negatively influences their perceptions of speakers. Both predictions received support, and we identify both theoretic and potential clinical implications of these findings.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21926/obm.neurobiol.2202119

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 18 references

Research works printed but not linked: 89

  1. Cacioppo JT, Cacioppo S. Loneliness in the modern age: An evolutionary theory of loneliness. Adv Exp Soc Psychol. 2018; 58: 127-197. · DOI · Paper page
  2. Steptoe A, Shankar A, Demakakos P, Wardle J. Social isolation, loneliness, and all-cause mortality in older men and women. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2013; 110: 5797-5801. · DOI · Paper page
  3. Cacioppo JT, Hughes ME, Waite LJ, Hawkley LC, Thisted RA. Loneliness as a specific risk factor for depressive symptoms: Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. Psychol Aging. 2006; 21: 140-151. · DOI · Paper page
  4. Qualter P, Vanhalst J, Harris R, Van Roekel E, Lodder G, Bangee M, et al. Loneliness across the life span. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015; 10: 250-264. · DOI · Paper page
  5. Victor CR, Yang K. The prevalence of loneliness among adults: A case study of the United Kingdom. J Psychol. 2012; 146: 85-104. · DOI · Paper page
  6. Cudjoe TKM, Roth DL, Szanton SL, Wolff JL, Boyd CM, Thorpe RJ. The epidemiology of social isolation: National health and aging trends study. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2020; 75: 107-113. · DOI
  7. Perissinotto CM, Cenzer IS, Covinsky KE. Loneliness in older persons: A predictor of functional decline and death. Arch Intern Med. 2012; 172: 1078-1083. · DOI · Paper page
  8. Mote J, Gonzalez R, Kircos C, Gard DE, Fulford D. The relationship between state and trait loneliness and social experiences in daily life. PsyArXiv. 2020. doi: 10.31234/osf.io/pr79g. · DOI
  9. van Winkel M, Wichers M, Collip D, Jacobs N, Derom C, Thiery E, et al. Unraveling the role of loneliness in depression: The relationship between daily life experience and behavior. Psychiatry. 2017; 80: 104-117. · DOI
  10. Alpass FM, Neville S. Loneliness, health and depression in older males. Aging Ment Health. 2003; 7: 212-216. · DOI · Paper page
  11. Gerino E, Rollè L, Sechi C, Brustia P. Loneliness, resilience, mental health, and quality of life in old age: A structural equation model. Front Psychol. 2017; 8: 2003. · DOI
  12. Jaremka LM, Fagundes CP, Glaser R, Bennett JM, Malarkey WB, Kiecolt Glaser JK. Loneliness predicts pain, depression, and fatigue: Understanding the role of immune dysregulation. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2013; 38: 1310-1317. · DOI
  13. Paul E, Bu F, Fancourt D. Loneliness and risk for cardiovascular disease: Mechanisms and future directions. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2021; 23: 68. · DOI
  14. Thurston RC, Kubzansky LD. Women, loneliness, and incident coronary heart disease. Psychosom Med. 2009; 71: 836-842. · DOI · Paper page
  15. Wilson RS, Krueger KR, Arnold SE, Schneider JA, Kelly JF, Barnes LL, et al. Loneliness and risk of Alzheimer disease. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007; 64: 234-240. · DOI · Paper page
  16. Goldsmith SK, Pellmar TC, Kleinman AM, Bunney WE. Reducing suicide: A national imperative. National Academies Press; 2002.
  17. Stickley A, Koyanagi A. Loneliness, common mental disorders and suicidal behavior: Findings from a general population survey. J Affect Disord. 2016; 197: 81-87. · DOI
  18. Holt Lunstad J, Smith TB, Baker M, Harris T, Stephenson D. Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for mortality: A meta-analytic review. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015; 10: 227-237. · DOI · Paper page
  19. Gerst Emerson K, Jayawardhana J. Loneliness as a public health issue: The impact of loneliness on health care utilization among older adults. Am J Public Health. 2015; 105: 1013-1019. · DOI
  20. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Social isolation and loneliness in older adults: Opportunities for the health care system. Washington: National Academies Press; 2020.
  21. Dahl N. Governing through kodokushi. Japan’s lonely deaths and their impact on community self-government. Contemp Japan. 2020; 32: 83-102. · DOI
  22. Spithoven AWM, Cacioppo S, Goossens L, Cacioppo JT. Genetic contributions to loneliness and their relevance to the evolutionary theory of loneliness. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2019; 14: 376-396. · DOI
  23. Poggi I, D’Errico F. Social signals: A psychological perspective. In: Computer analysis of human behavior. Springer; 2011. pp. 185-225. · DOI
  24. Vigil JM, Strenth C. No pain, no social gains: A social-signaling perspective of human pain behaviors. World J Anesthesiol. 2014; 3: 18-30. · DOI
  25. Debiec J, Olsson A. Social fear learning: From animal models to human function. Trends Cogn Sci. 2017; 21: 546-555. · DOI · Paper page
  26. Tracy JL, Randles D, Steckler CM. The nonverbal communication of emotions. Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2015; 3: 25-30. · DOI
  27. Watson PJ, Andrews PW. Toward a revised evolutionary adaptationist analysis of depression: The social navigation hypothesis. J Affect Disord. 2002; 72: 1-14. · DOI
  28. Christensson K, Cabrera T, Christensson E, Uvnäs Moberg K, Winberg J. Separation distress call in the human neonate in the absence of maternal body contact. Acta Paediatr. 1995; 84: 468-473. · DOI
  29. Russ JM, Jones G, Mackie IJ, Racey PA. Interspecific responses to distress calls in bats (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae): A function for convergence in call design? Anim Behav. 2004; 67: 1005-1014. · DOI
  30. Dorado Rodrigues TF, Campos VA, Santos MM, Pansonato A, Strüssmann C. Circumstances and bioacoustics of the distress call of Leptodactylus chaquensis (Anura: Leptodactylidae) during predation by Thamnodynastes chaquensis (Serpentes: Dipsadidae) in the Brazilian Pantanal. Salamandra. 2012; 48: 237-240.
  31. Labra A, Silva G, Norambuena F, Velásquez N, Penna M. Acoustic features of the weeping lizard’s distress call. Copeia. 2013; 2013: 206-212. · DOI
  32. Laiolo P, Tella JL, Carrete M, Serrano D, López G. Distress calls may honestly signal bird quality to predators. Proc Biol Sci. 2004; 271: S513-S515. · DOI
  33. Smith RJF. Alarm signals in fishes. Rev Fish Biol Fish. 1992; 2: 33-63. · DOI
  34. Hirschmüller S, Egloff B, Nestler S, Back MD. The dual lens model: A comprehensive framework for understanding self-other agreement of personality judgments at zero acquaintance. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2013; 104: 335-353. · DOI
  35. Naumann LP, Vazire S, Rentfrow PJ, Gosling SD. Personality judgments based on physical appearance. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2009; 35: 1661-1671. · DOI
  36. Mearns J, Patchett E, Catanzaro SJ. Multitrait-multimethod matrix validation of the Negative Mood Regulation Scale. J Res Pers. 2009; 43: 910-913. · DOI
  37. Matthews T, Fisher HL, Bryan BT, Danese A, Moffitt TE, Qualter P, et al. This is what loneliness looks like: A mixed-methods study of loneliness in adolescence and young adulthood. Int J Behav Dev. 2021; 46: 18-27. · DOI
  38. Ickes W. Empathic accuracy. J Pers. 1993; 61: 587-610. · DOI
  39. Floyd K, Woo NT. Loneliness and social monitoring: A conceptual replication of Knowles et al. Pers Relat. 2020; 27: 209-223. · DOI
  40. Cacioppo JT, Norris CJ, Decety J, Monteleone G, Nusbaum H. In the eye of the beholder: Individual differences in perceived social isolation predict regional brain activation to social stimuli. J Cogn Neurosc. 2009; 21: 83-92. · DOI · Paper page
  41. Baumeister RF, Leary MR. The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychol Bull. 1995; 117: 497-529. · DOI · Paper page
  42. Akerlind I, Hörnquist JO. Loneliness and alcohol abuse: A review of evidences of an interplay. Soc Sci Med. 1992; 34: 405-414. · DOI · Paper page
  43. Ong AD, Rothstein JD, Uchino BN. Loneliness accentuates age differences in cardiovascular responses to social evaluative threat. Psychol Aging. 2012; 27: 190-198. · DOI
  44. Bangee M, Harris RA, Bridges N, Rotenberg KJ, Qualter P. Loneliness and attention to social threat in young adults: Findings from an eye tracker study. Pers Individ Differ. 2014; 63: 16-23. · DOI
  45. Vanhalst J, Gibb BE, Prinstein MJ. Lonely adolescents exhibit heightened sensitivity for facial cues of emotion. Cogn Emot. 2017; 31: 377-383. · DOI
  46. Rotenberg KJ, Kmill J. Perception of lonely and non-lonely persons as a function of individual differences in loneliness. J Soc Pers Relat. 1992; 9: 325-330. · DOI
  47. Edwards R, Bello R, Brandau Brown F, Hollems D. The effects of loneliness and verbal aggressiveness on message interpretation. South Commun J. 2001; 66: 139-150. · DOI
  48. Hanley Dunn P, Maxwell SE, Santos JF. Interpretation of interpersonal interactions: The influence of loneliness. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 1985; 11: 445-456. · DOI
  49. Jones WH, Sansone C, Helm B. Loneliness and interpersonal judgments. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 1983; 9: 437-441. · DOI
  50. Christensen PN, Kashy DA. Perceptions of and by lonely people in initial social interaction. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 1998; 24: 322-329. · DOI
  51. Tsai FF, Reis HT. Perceptions by and of lonely people in social networks. Pers Relat. 2009; 16: 221-238. · DOI
  52. Wittenberg MT, Reis HT. Loneliness, social skills, and social perception. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 1986; 12: 121-130. · DOI
  53. Corr PJ, Matthews G. The Cambridge handbook of personality psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2020. · DOI
  54. Goldberg LR. The structure of phenotypic personality traits. Am Psychol. 1993; 48: 26-34. · DOI · Paper page
  55. McCrae RR, John OP. An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. J Pers. 1992; 60: 175-215. · DOI · Paper page
  56. Jonason PK, Sherman RA. Personality and the perception of situations: The Big Five and Dark Triad traits. Pers Individ Differ. 2020; 163: 110081. · DOI
  57. Roccas S, Sagiv L, Schwartz SH, Knafo A. The big five personality factors and personal values. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2002; 28: 789-801. · DOI
  58. Patrick CL. Student evaluations of teaching: Effects of the Big Five personality traits, grades and the validity hypothesis. Assess Eval High Educ. 2011; 36: 239-249. · DOI
  59. Ritchie KL, Palermo R, Rhodes G. Forming impressions of facial attractiveness is mandatory. Sci Rep. 2017; 7: 469. · DOI
  60. McCroskey JC, McCain TA. The measurement of interpersonal attraction. Speech Monogr. 1974; 41: 261-266. · DOI
  61. Russell D, Peplau LA, Cutrona CE. The Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale: Concurrent and discriminant validity evidence. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1980; 39: 472-480. · DOI · Paper page
  62. Hayes AF, Coutts JJ. Use omega rather than Cronbach’s alpha for estimating reliability. But…. Commun Methods Meas. 2020; 14: 1-24. · DOI · Paper page
  63. Graham JM. Congeneric and (essentially) tau-equivalent estimates of score reliability: What they are and how to use them. Educ Psychol Meas. 2006; 66: 930-944. · DOI
  64. Berinsky AJ, Huber GA, Lenz GS. Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk. Polit Anal. 2012; 20: 351-368. · DOI · Paper page
  65. Paolacci G, Chandler J, Ipeirotis PG. Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Judgm Decis Mak. 2010; 5: 411-419. · DOI · Paper page
  66. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009; 41: 1149-1160. · DOI · Paper page
  67. Gosling SD, Rentfrow PJ, Swann Jr WB. A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. J Res Pers. 2003; 37: 504-528. · DOI · Paper page
  68. Litman L, Robinson J. Conducting online research on Amazon Mechanical Turk and beyond. Sage; 2020. · DOI
  69. Tausczik YR, Pennebaker JW. The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. J Lang Soc Psychol. 2010; 29: 24-54. · DOI · Paper page
  70. Cohen P, Cohen P, West SG, Aiken LS. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. 3rd ed. New York: Routledge; 2003.
  71. Rottman J. Evolution, development, and the emergence of disgust. Evol Psychol. 2014; 12: 417-433. · DOI
  72. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge; 1988.
  73. Hofmann SG, Moscovitch DA, Heinrichs N. Evolutionary mechanisms of fear and anxiety. J Cogn Psychother. 2002; 16: 317-330. · DOI
  74. Hagen EH. The bargaining model of depression. In: Genetic and cultural evolution of cooperation. MIT Press; 2003. pp. 95-123. · DOI
  75. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed. American Psychiatric Publishing; 2013. · DOI · Paper page
  76. Cacioppo S, Grippo AJ, London S, Goossens L, Cacioppo JT. Loneliness: Clinical import and interventions. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015; 10: 238-249. · DOI · Paper page
  77. Masi CM, Chen HY, Hawkley LC, Cacioppo JT. A meta-analysis of interventions to reduce loneliness. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2011; 15: 219-266. · DOI · Paper page
  78. Käll A, Shafran R, Lindegaard T, Bennett S, Cooper Z, Coughtrey A, et al. A common elements approach to the development of a modular cognitive behavioral theory for chronic loneliness. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2020; 88: 269-282. · DOI
  79. El Bilsha MA. Effect of interpersonal psychotherapy on the depression and loneliness among the elderly residing in residential homes. Middle East J Age Ageing. 2019; 16: 14-25. · DOI
  80. Jackson S. Message effects research: Principles of design and analysis. Guilford Press; 1992.
  81. Srivastava S, Guglielmo S, Beer JS. Perceiving others’ personalities: Examining the dimensionality, assumed similarity to the self, and stability of perceiver effects. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010; 98: 520-534. · DOI
  82. Knowles ML, Lucas GM, Baumeister RF, Gardner WL. Choking under pressure: Social monitoring among the lonely. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2015; 41: 805-821. · DOI · Paper page
  83. Crump MJC, McDonnell JV, Gureckis TM. Evaluating Amazon’s Mechanical Turk as a tool for experimental behavioral research. PLoS One. 2013; 8: e57410. · DOI · Paper page
  84. Paolacci G, Chandler J. Inside the Turk: Understanding Mechanical Turk as a participant pool. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2014; 23: 184-188. · DOI · Paper page
  85. Shapiro DN, Chandler J, Mueller PA. Using Mechanical Turk to study clinical populations. Clin Psychol Sci. 2013; 1: 213-220. · DOI · Paper page
  86. Afifi WA, Cornejo M. #CommSoWEIRD: The question of sample representativeness in interpersonal communication research. Organizing inclusion: Moving diversity from demographics to communication processes. 1st ed. New York: Routledge; 2020. pp. 238-259. · DOI
  87. Casler K, Bickel L, Hackett E. Separate but equal? A comparison of participants and data gathered via Amazon’s MTurk, social media, and face-to-face behavioral testing. Comput Hum Behav. 2013; 29: 2156-2160. · DOI · Paper page
  88. Visser MA, EI Fakiri F. The prevalence and impact of risk factors for ethnic differences in loneliness. Eur J Public Health. 2016; 26: 977-983. · DOI
  89. Ray CD, Manusov V, McLaren RM. “Emotional support won’t cure cancer”: Reasons people give for not providing emotional support. West J Commun. 2019; 83: 20-38. · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Floyd, K., Woo, N., Custer, B., Dinsmore, D., Duncan, K., & Maré, J.
Venue
OBM Neurobiology
Published
2022-04-19
Volume
06
Issue
02
Pages
1-39
ISSN
2573-4407
Cited by
4
References
18

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review