Cited by 322Death Anxiety and Social ExclusionHealth disparities and outcomesNeuroendocrine regulation and behavior

In the Eye of the Beholder: Individual Differences in Perceived Social Isolation Predict Regional Brain Activation to Social Stimuli

Open access
Cacioppo, John T., Norris, Catherine J., Decety, Jean, Monteleone, George, Nusbaum, Howard·2009·Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Abstract

Prior research has shown that perceived social isolation (loneliness) motivates people to attend to and connect with others but to do so in a self-protective and paradoxically self-defeating fashion. Although recent research has shed light on the neural correlates of social perception, cooperation, empathy, rejection, and love, little is known about how individual differences in loneliness relate to neural responses to social and emotional stimuli. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we show that there are at least two neural mechanisms differentiating social perception in lonely and nonlonely young adults. For pleasant depictions, lonely individuals appear to be less rewarded by social stimuli, as evidenced by weaker activation of the ventral striatum to pictures of people than of objects, whereas nonlonely individuals showed stronger activation of the ventral striatum to pictures of people than of objects. For unpleasant depictions, lonely individuals were characterized by greater activation of the visual cortex to pictures of people than of objects, suggesting that their attention is drawn more to the distress of others, whereas nonlonely individuals showed greater activation of the right and left temporo-parietal junction to pictures of people than of objects, consistent with the notion that they are more likely to reflect spontaneously on the perspective of distressed others.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/jocn.2009.21007

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Isolated individuals showed greater Stroop interference for negative social versus negative non-social words, with no difference for positive social versus positive non-social words.

    “Using a modified emotional Stroop task, individuals who felt isolated, relative to those who felt connected, showed greater Stroop interference, specifically for negative social relative to negative non-social words.47 No differences were found in Stroop interference for positive social relative to positive non-social words.”

    From Social isolation (2011) · cites this paper as [47]

  • In an fMRI study, individual differences in perceived isolation predicted visual cortex activation to unpleasant social versus nonsocial pictures.

    “In an fMRI study, we found that individual differences in perceived isolation predicted the activation of the visual cortex to the presentation of unpleasant social, in contrast to nonsocial, pictures”

    From Social isolation (2011) · cites this paper as [47]

  • In that fMRI study, perceived social isolation was inversely related to temporoparietal junction activation when viewing unpleasant pictures of people versus objects.

    “TPJ activation was observed when participants viewed unpleasant pictures of people versus objects and, as would be expected if isolation increases a focus on predator evasion and self-preservation, individual differences in perceived social isolation were inversely related to the amount of activation observed in the TPJ.”

    From Social isolation (2011) · cites this paper as [47]

  • Behavioral and fMRI evidence suggests social isolation increases attention to negative social stimuli and motivation to reconnect.

    “Evidence from behavioral and fMRI studies suggest that social isolation increases attention to negative social stimuli (e.g., social threats) as well as increased motivation to reconnect.”

    From Social isolation (2011) · cites this paper as [47]

  • Perceived isolation predicted weaker ventral striatum activation to pleasant pictures of people than to equally pleasant pictures of objects.

    “We found that perceived isolation predicted weaker activation of the ventral striatum to pleasant pictures of people than of equally pleasant pictures of objects.”

    From Social isolation (2011) · cites this paper as [47]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Cacioppo JT Patrick W in press Loneliness New York Norton Press
  2. Mitchell JP in press Contributions of functional neuroimaging to social cognition Current Directions in Psychological Science
  3. Shintel H Nusbaum HC Cacioppo JT under review Accentuate the negative, eliminated the positive? Individual differences in attentional bias to positive and negative information Presented at the 47th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society Houston, Texas Nov

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cacioppo, J. T., Norris, C. J., Decety, J., Monteleone, G., & Nusbaum, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • Dartmouth College (US)
  • 1University of Chicago
Venue
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Published
2009-01-01
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
83-92
ISSN
  • 0898-929X (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8898
OpenAlex
W2148773423
Cited by
322
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 11
FWCI
8.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • John Templeton Foundation
  • National Institute on Aging (P01AG18911, P01AG018911, R01AG034052)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (P50 MH-72850, P50MH072850)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
Keywords
loneliness, perceived social isolation, individual differences, social perception, neural correlates, ventral striatum, visual cortex, temporoparietal junction, emotional attention, reward processing, empathy, social stimuli
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Basal Ganglia, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Neural Pathways, Parietal Lobe, Photic Stimulation, Reference Values, Social Isolation, Social Perception, Temporal Lobe

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review