Cited by 421Physical Activity and HealthObesity, Physical Activity, DietMobile Health and mHealth Applications

A Meta-Analysis of Pedometer-Based Walking Interventions and Weight Loss

Open access
Richardson, C. R., Newton, T. L., Abraham, J. J., Sen, A., Jimbo, M., Swartz, A. M.·2008·The Annals of Family Medicine

Abstract

PURPOSE: Cross-sectional studies show that individuals who walk more tend to be thinner than those who walk less. This does not mean, however, that the association between higher step counts and lower weight is causal or that encouraging sedentary individuals to increase step counts helps them lose weight. METHODS: In this meta-analysis, we searched 6 electronic databases and contacted pedometer experts to identify pedometer-based walking studies without a dietary intervention that reported weight change as an outcome. We included randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies published after January 1, 1995, in either English or Japanese, with 5 or more adult participants and at least 1 cohort enrolled in a pedometer-based walking intervention lasting at least 4 weeks. RESULTS: Nine studies met the study inclusion criteria. Cohort sample size ranged from 15 to 106, for a total of 307 participants, 73% of whom were women and 27% of whom were men. The duration of the intervention ranged from 4 weeks to 1 year, with a median duration of 16 weeks. The pooled estimate of mean weight change from baseline using a fixed-effects model and combining data from all 9 cohorts was -1.27 kg (95% confidence interval, -1.85 to -0.70 kg). Longer intervention duration was associated with greater weight change. On average, participants lost 0.05 kg per week during the interventions. CONCLUSION: Pedometer-based walking programs result in a modest amount of weight loss. Longer programs lead to more weight loss than shorter programs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1370/afm.761

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Richardson, C. R., Newton, T. L., Abraham, J. J., Sen, A., Jimbo, M., & Swartz, A. M.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Venue
The Annals of Family Medicine
Published
2008-01-01
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
69-77
ISSN
  • 1544-1709 (ISSN-L)
  • 1544-1717
OpenAlex
W2153562409
Cited by
421
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 75 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 19
FWCI
3.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Annals of Family Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Michigan
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Medical School, University of Michigan
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K23HL075098)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
weight loss, step count, physical activity, intervention duration, sedentary behavior
MeSH terms
Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Monitoring, Physiologic, Obesity, Cohort Studies, Weight Loss, Bibliometrics, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Walking, Databases, Bibliographic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review