The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Understanding Users’ Experiences of a Novel Web-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Platform for Depression and Anxiety: Qualitative Interviews From Pilot Trial Participants
Published version of a preprint
Abstract
Background: Digital mental health interventions (DMHIs) can help bridge the gap between the demand for mental health care and availability of treatment resources. The affordances of DMHIs have been proposed to overcome barriers to care such as accessibility, cost, and stigma. Despite these proposals, most evaluations of the DMHI focus on clinical effectiveness, with less consideration of users’ perspectives and experiences. Objective: We conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial of “Overcoming Thoughts,” a web-based platform that uses cognitive and behavioral principles to address depression and anxiety. The “Overcoming Thoughts” platform included 2 brief interventions—cognitive restructuring and behavioral experimentation. Users accessed either a version that included asynchronous interactions with other users (“crowdsourced” platform) or a completely self-guided version (control condition). We aimed to understand the users’ perspectives and experiences by conducting a subset of interviews during the follow-up period of the trial. Methods: We used purposive sampling to select a subset of trial participants based on group assignment (treatment and control) and symptom improvement (those who improved and those who did not on primary outcomes). We conducted semistructured interviews with 23 participants during the follow-up period that addressed acceptability, usability, and impact. We conducted a thematic analysis of the interviews until saturation was reached. Results: A total of 8 major themes were identified: possible opportunities to expand the platform; improvements in mental health because of using the platform; increased self-reflection skills; platform being more helpful for certain situations or domains; implementation of skills into users’ lives, even without direct platform use; increased coping skills because of using the platform; repetitiveness of platform exercises; and use pattern. Although no differences in themes were found among groups based on improvement status (all P values >.05, ranging from .12 to .86), there were 4 themes that differed based on conditions (P values from .01 to .046): helpfulness of self-reflection supported by an exercise summary (greater in control); aiding in slowing thoughts and feeling calmer (greater in control); overcoming patterns of avoidance (greater in control); and repetitiveness of content (greater in the intervention). Conclusions: We identified the different benefits that users perceived from a novel DMHI and opportunities to improve the platform. Interestingly, we did not note any differences in themes between those who improved and those who did not, but we did find some differences between those who received the control and intervention versions of the platform. Future research should continue to investigate users’ experiences with DMHIs to better understand the complex dynamics of their use and outcomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Similar participant-reported improvements in self-expression, coping, optimism, and well-being have been observed in follow-up studies of adolescent interventions (Eryılmaz & Altınsoy, 2021) and in qualitative evaluations of interventions addressing anxiety-related experiences (Shkel et al., 2023).”
From The Use of Outsider Witness Practice in Narrative Therapy in Group Counseling: A Mixed Method Study (2026) · cites this paper as Shkel et al., 2023
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414
The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure
Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. W. (2001) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x · Cited by 44,910
Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies: Guided by Information Power
Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D., & Guassora, A. D. (2016) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732315617444 · Cited by 12,703
Wang, P. S., Aguilar-Gaxiola, S., Alonso, J., Angermeyer, M. C., Borges, G., Bromet, E. J., Bruffaerts, R., de Girolamo, G., de Graaf, R., Gureje, O., et al. (2007) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61414-7 · Cited by 1,655 · cited 1×
“Despite these high rates, a large proportion of individuals with mental health disorders do not receive treatment [2].”
BackgroundBarriers to mental health treatment: results from the WHO World Mental Health surveys
Andrade, L. H., Alonso, J., Mneimneh, Z., Wells, J. E., Al-Hamzawi, A., Borges, G., Bromet, E., Bruffaerts, R., de Girolamo, G., de Graaf, R., et al. (2014) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291713001943 · Cited by 1,289
Andersson, G., Cuijpers, P., Carlbring, P., Riper, H., & Hedman, E. (2014) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.20151 · Cited by 1,077 · cited 1×
“DMHIs have been shown to be as effective as face-to-face therapy in treating mental health disorders [8,9].”
BackgroundObjective user engagement with mental health apps: systematic search and panel-based usage analysis
Baumel, A., Muench, F., Edan, S., & Kane, J. M. (2019) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/14567 · Cited by 965
Lattie, E. G., Adkins, E. C., Winquist, N., Stiles-Shields, C., Wafford, Q. E., & Graham, A. K. (2019) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/12869 · Cited by 843
Hedman, E., Ljótsson, B., & Lindefors, N. (2012) · Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research · doi:10.1586/erp.12.67 · Cited by 672
Torous, J., Lipschitz, J., Ng, M., & Firth, J. (2020) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2019.11.167 · Cited by 546
Davies, E. B., Morriss, R., & Glazebrook, C. (2014) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.3142 · Cited by 499
Lehtimaki, S., Martic, J., Wahl, B., Foster, K. T., & Schwalbe, N. (2021) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/25847 · Cited by 488 · cited 2×
“” “Overcoming Thoughts” was based on CBT principles, which are commonly used in DMHIs for depression and anxiety [12].”
BackgroundMethodUser‐centered design for psychosocial intervention development and implementation.
Lyon, A. R., & Koerner, K. (2016) · Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice · doi:10.1111/cpsp.12154 · Cited by 478
Garrido, S., Millington, C., Cheers, D., Boydell, K., Schubert, E., Meade, T., & Nguyen, Q. V. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00759 · Cited by 400 · cited 1×
“However, despite the general effectiveness of DMHIs, not every person who uses them experiences benefits [11].”
BackgroundTargets and Outcomes of Psychotherapies for Mental Disorders: An Overview
Cuijpers, P. (2019) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.20661 · Cited by 206
Chevance, A., Ravaud, P., Tomlinson, A., Le Berre, C., Teufer, B., Touboul, S., Fried, E. I., Gartlehner, G., Cipriani, A., & Tran, V. T. (2020) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(20)30191-7 · Cited by 193
Patel, S., Akhtar, A., Malins, S., Wright, N., Rowley, E., Young, E., Sampson, S., & Morriss, R. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/16228 · Cited by 190 · cited 2×
“As such, the popularity and use of DMHIs have gradually increased in the last decade [10].”
BackgroundTechnology-based interventions for mental health in tertiary students: Systematic review
Farrer, L., Gulliver, A., Chan, J. K., Batterham, P. J., Reynolds, J., Calear, A., Tait, R., Bennett, K., & Griffiths, K. M. (2013) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.2639 · Cited by 188 · cited 1×
“To date, most research on DMHIs has used quantitative measures and relied primarily on group averages to assess outcomes [12-15], subsequently masking individual differences.”
BackgroundQualitative Meta-Synthesis of User Experience of Computerised Therapy for Depression and Anxiety
Knowles, S. E., Toms, G., Sanders, C., Bee, P., Lovell, K., Rennick-Egglestone, S., Coyle, D., Kennedy, C. M., Littlewood, E., Kessler, D., et al. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0084323 · Cited by 177
Pepin, R., Segal, D. L., & Coolidge, F. L. (2009) · Aging & Mental Health · doi:10.1080/13607860902918231 · Cited by 158
Carolan, S., & de Visser, R. O. (2018) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/mental.9146 · Cited by 121
Psychotherapy dropouts: Differences by modality, license, and DSM-IV diagnosis
Hamilton, S., Moore, A. M., Crane, D. R., & Payne, S. H. (2011) · Journal of Marital and Family Therapy · doi:10.1111/j.1752-0606.2010.00204.x · Cited by 94
Experimental therapeutics for digital mental health.
Graham, A. K., Lattie, E. G., & Mohr, D. C. (2019) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.2075 · Cited by 93
Boucher, E. M., McNaughton, E. C., Harake, N., Stafford, J. L., & Parks, A. C. (2021) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/26617 · Cited by 61
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0133 · DOI
- 10.1111/eip.12281 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10488-011-0364-x · DOI
- 10.2196/14990 · DOI
- 10.1145/2858036.2858128 · DOI
- 10.2196/29368 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.invent.2021.100398 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12888-018-1979-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.46743/2160-3715/2015.2281 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.426 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.beth.2012.10.001 · DOI
- 10.2196/jmir.1772 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/3173574.3173905 · DOI
- Hitchcock, P, 2016, Behavior Therapist, 39, 51
- 10.1016/j.psychres.2015.07.038 · DOI
- 10.1017/s0033291799001014 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Use of Outsider Witness Practice in Narrative Therapy in Group Counseling: A Mixed Method Study
Kurtuluş, E., & Düşünceli, B. (2026) · Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi · doi:10.17066/tpdrd.1950394
Metadata
- Authors
- Shkel, J., Green, G., Le, S., Kaveladze, B., Marcotte, V., Rushton, K., Nguyen, T., & Schueller, S. M.
- ORCID
- Venue
- JMIR Formative Research
- Publisher
- JMIR Publications Inc.
- Published
- 2023-06-20
- Volume
- 7
- Pages
- e46062
- ISSN
- 2561-326X
- PMC
- PMC10337366
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 24
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
