Cited by 176Diet and metabolism studiesDiabetes Management and ResearchDietary Effects on Health

A Novel Intervention Including Individualized Nutritional Recommendations Reduces Hemoglobin A1c Level, Medication Use, and Weight in Type 2 Diabetes

Open access
McKenzie, Amy L, Hallberg, Sarah J, Creighton, Brent C, Volk, Brittanie M, Link, Theresa M, Abner, Marcy K, Glon, Roberta M, McCarter, James P +2 more·2017·JMIR Diabetes

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is typically managed with a reduced fat diet plus glucose-lowering medications, the latter often promoting weight gain. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated whether individuals with T2D could be taught by either on-site group or remote means to sustain adequate carbohydrate restriction to achieve nutritional ketosis as part of a comprehensive intervention, thereby improving glycemic control, decreasing medication use, and allowing clinically relevant weight loss. METHODS: ) and related biomarkers of T2D were evaluated at baseline and 10-week follow-up. RESULTS: =1.503, P=.22). CONCLUSIONS: These initial results indicate that an individualized program delivered and supported remotely that incorporates nutritional ketosis can be highly effective in improving glycemic control and weight loss in adults with T2D while significantly decreasing medication use.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/diabetes.6981

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McKenzie, A. L., Hallberg, S. J., Creighton, B. C., Volk, B. M., Link, T. M., Abner, M. K., Glon, R. M., McCarter, J. P., Volek, J. S., & Phinney, S. D.
Affiliations
Indiana University Health (US)
Corresponding author
Phinney, Stephen D
Venue
JMIR Diabetes
Published
2017-03-07
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
e5
ISSN
2371-4379 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2593555386
Cited by
176
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 5
FWCI
13.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JMIR Diabetes (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Diet and metabolism studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Dietary Effects on Health
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, nutritional ketosis, carbohydrate restriction, glycemic control, HbA1c, weight loss, medication reduction, remote intervention, group intervention, diabetes self-management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review