Cited by 392Nutrition, Health and Food BehaviorBehavioral Health and InterventionsNutrition, Genetics, and Disease

Past, present, and future of computer-tailored nutrition education

Open access
Brug, Johannes, Oenema, Anke, Campbell, Marci·2003·The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Computer-tailored nutrition education is an innovative and promising tool to motivate people to make healthy dietary changes. It provides respondents with individualized feedback about their dietary behaviors, motivations, attitudes, norms, and skills and mimics the process of "person-to-person" dietary counseling. The available evidence indicates that computer-tailored nutrition education is more effective in motivating people to make dietary changes than general nutrition information, especially for reduction of dietary fat. The effectiveness of computer tailoring has been attributed to the fact that individualized feedback commands greater attention, is processed more intensively, contains less redundant information, and is appreciated better than more general intervention materials. Interactive technology (eg, the Internet, the World Wide Web) offers good opportunities for the application of computer-tailored nutrition education, and a first controlled study of Web-based computer tailoring shows promising results. However, using the Web for interactive personalized nutrition education also presents new challenges.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ajcn/77.4.1028s

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Personalizing or tailoring content to a user's specific needs or desires has been shown to affect behavior change and outcome.

    “The ability to personalize or tailor the content to a user’s specific needs or desires has already been shown to have an impact on behavior change and outcome [40, 41].”

    From A Behavior Change Model for Internet Interventions (2009) · cites this paper as [40]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. De Vries H, Brug J. Computer-tailored interventions to promote health promoting behaviors: an introduction to a new approach. Patient Educ Couns 1999;36:99-105.
  2. Flay BR, Petraitis J. The theory of triadic influence: a new theory of health behavior with implication for preventive interventions. Adv Med Sociol 1994;4:4-19.
  3. Van Duyn, Kristal A, Dodd K, Campbell MK, Glanz K, Subar A. Association of diet-related psychosocial variables with fruit and veg- etable consumption: a national survey. Am J Health Promot 2001;16: 69-78.
  4. Contento I, Balch GI, Bronner YL, et al. The effectiveness of nutrition education and implications for nutrition education policy, programs and research. J Nutr Educ 1995;27:277-422.
  5. Brug J, de Vries H. Computer-tailored education. Patient Educ Couns 1999;36:99-105.
  6. De Nooijer J, Lechner L, Candel M, De Vries H. A randomized con- trolled study of short-term and long-term effects of tailored information versus general information on determinants and behaviors related to early detection of cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev (in press).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brug, J., Oenema, A., & Campbell, M.
Affiliations
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Venue
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-04
Volume
77
Issue
4
Pages
1028S-1034S
ISSN
0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1863797700
Cited by
392
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 23
FWCI
2.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease
Keywords
personalized feedback, dietary behavior change, nutrition counseling, fat loss, online intervention, interactive technologies, motivation
MeSH terms
Computer-Assisted Instruction, Health Education, Humans, Research, Nutritional Sciences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review