Cited by 306Face Recognition and PerceptionChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

The Recognition of Facial Expressions in the First Two Years of Life: Mechanisms of Development

Nelson, Charles A.·1987·Child Development

Abstract

In recent years the infant's ability to recognize facial expressions of emotion has attracted considerable attention from developmental psychologists. The rationale guiding much of this research has been that this ability plays an important role in later socioemotional development. In the present article, the research relating to this topic is reviewed and synthesized. It is concluded that the recognition of facial expressions develops slowly over the first 2 years of life, and that even at the end of the second year the infant's understanding of facial expressions is still quite rudimentary. Following this review is a discussion of 2 unresolved issues regarding the development of this ability. 1 issue relates to the biological/experimental basis on which the ability to recognize facial expressions develops. Research with primates is brought to bear on this point, and useful analogues with human infants are sought. From this research it is suggested that a component of the ability to recognize facial expressions is unlearned, although experience of some as yet undetermined nature affects this biological readiness. The second issue relates to the possible neurological mechanisms that mediate this ability. Research with primates, normal adults, and brain damaged adults is used to support the speculation that a posterior region of the right hemisphere is responsible for mediating the recognition of facial expressions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1130530

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nelson, C. A.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Nelson, Charles A.
Venue
Child Development
Published
1987-08
Volume
58
Issue
4
Pages
889
ISSN
0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2071005574
Cited by
306
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 13
FWCI
3.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH 29502)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
facial expression recognition, infant development, emotion recognition, social-emotional development, primate research, right hemisphere, brain damage, neurological mechanisms
MeSH terms
Affect, Child Development, Discrimination Learning, Facial Expression, Female, Form Perception, Humans, Infant, Male, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Perceptual Masking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review