Cited by 201Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchFace Recognition and PerceptionAction Observation and Synchronization

Emotional attribution in high-functioning individuals with autistic spectrum disorder: A functional imaging study

Piggot, Judith, Kwon, Hower, Mobbs, Dean, Blasey, Christine, Lotspeich, Linda, Menon, Vinod, Bookheimer, Susan, Reiss, Allan L.·2004·Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective To determine whether expertise in the attribution of emotion from basic facial expressions in high-functioning individuals with autistic spectrum disorder (ASD) is supported by the amygdala, fusiform, and prefrontal regions of interest (ROI) and is comparable to that of typically developing individuals.Method Functional magnetic resonance imaging scans were acquired from 14 males with ASD and 10 matched adolescent controls while performing emotion match (EM) (perceptual), emotion label (EL) (linguistic), and control tasks. Accuracy, response time, and average activation were measured for each ROI.Results There was no significant difference in accuracy, response time, or ROI activation between groups performing the EL task. The ASD group was as accurate as the control group performing the EM task but had a significantly longer response time and lower average fusiform activation.Conclusions Expertise in the attribution of emotion from basic facial expressions was task-dependent in the high-functioning ASD group. The hypothesis that the high-functioning ASD group would be less expert and would have reduced fusiform activation was supported in the perceptual task but not the linguistic task. The reduced fusiform activation in the perceptual task was not explained by reduced expertise; it is therefore concluded that reduced fusiform activation is associated with the diagnosis of ASD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00004583-200404000-00014

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Three studies, those of Ogai et al. (2003), Pierce et al. (2004) and Piggot et al. (2004), failed to find any significant differences in amygdala activation for the ASD samples compared to controls.

    “However, three studies, those of Ogai et al. (2003), Pierce et al. (2004) and Piggot et al. (2004), failed to find any significant differences in amygdala activation for the ASD samples compared to controls.”

    From Vision in autism spectrum disorders (2009) · cites this paper as Piggot et al. (2004)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Piggot, J., Kwon, H., Mobbs, D., Blasey, C., Lotspeich, L., Menon, V., Bookheimer, S., & Reiss, A. L.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Piggot, Judith
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-04
Volume
43
Issue
4
Pages
473-480
ISSN
0890-8567 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2064755515
Cited by
201
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 12
FWCI
4.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
NIH (MH01142, MH50047, HD31715, MH64708)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, high-functioning autism, facial emotion recognition, emotional attribution, fusiform gyrus, amygdala, prefrontal cortex, emotion perception, emotion labeling, reaction time (psychology)
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Amygdala, Analysis of Variance, Autistic Disorder, Cerebral Cortex, Child, Emotions, Facial Expression, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Psycholinguistics, Social Perception, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review