Cited by 757Child and Animal Learning DevelopmentAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchSocial Robot Interaction and HRI

Exploration of the autistic child’s theory of mind: Knowledge, belief, and communication

Perner, Josef, Frith, Uta, Leslie, Alan M., Leekam, Susan R.·1989·Child Development

Abstract

26 autistic children with mental ages of 3-13 years were tested on 3 tasks that are within the capability of 3- or 4-year-old normal children. The first task tested understanding of a mistaken belief. Children were shown a typical box of a certain brand of sweets, and they all thought that it contained that kind of sweet. To their surprise, however, the box contained something else. Yet, only 4 out of the 26 autistic children were able to anticipate that another child in the same situation would make the same mistake. In contrast, all but 1 of 12 children with specific language impairment, matched for mental age, understood that others would be as misled as they had been themselves. The autistic children were also tested for their ability to infer knowledge about the content of a container from having or not having looked inside. All 4 children who had passed the belief task and an additional 4 performed perfectly, but most failed. The third task assessed children's pragmatic ability to adjust their answers to provide new rather than repeat old information. Here, too, most autistic children seemed unable to reliably make the correct adjustment. These results confirm the hypothesis that autistic children have profound difficulty in taking account of mental states.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1130734

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research on children's theory of mind has documented the emergence of increasingly robust reasoning about others' mental states during early childhood.

    “several decades of research on children’s “theory of mind” has documented the emergence of increasingly robust reasoning about others’ mental states during the same time period (Carpendale & Lewis, 2006; Perner, et al., 1989; Wellman, Cross, & Watson, 2001)”

    From The accidental transgressor: Morally-relevant theory of mind (2011) · cites this paper as Perner, et al., 1989

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Perner, J., Frith, U., Leslie, A. M., & Leekam, S. R.
Affiliations
Max Planck Society (DE)
Venue
Child Development
Published
1989-06
Volume
60
Issue
3
Pages
689
ISSN
0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2092924948
Cited by
757
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 57
FWCI
18.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, theory of mind, children with autism, mistaken belief, false belief understanding, pragmatic communication, pragmatic inference, specific language impairment, social cognition, mental age
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Autistic Disorder, Child, Communication, Concept Formation, Emotions, Female, Humans, Intelligence, Language Development Disorders, Male, Intellectual Disability, Set, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review