The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Guiding Knowledge Construction in the Classroom: Effects of Teaching Children How to Question and How to Explain
Abstract
Following teacher-presented science lessons, pairs of fourth and fifth graders studied the material by asking and answering each others’ self-generated questions. In one condition students’ discussion was guided by questions designed to promote connections among ideas within a lesson. In a second condition discussion was guided by similar lesson-based questions as well as ones intended to access prior knowledge/experience and promote connections between the lesson and that knowledge. All students were trained to generate explanations (one manifestation of complex knowledge construction). Analysis of post-lesson knowledge maps and verbal interaction during study showed that students trained to ask both kinds of questions engaged in more complex knowledge construction than those trained in lesson-based questioning only and controls. These findings, together with performance on comprehension tests for material studied, support the conclusion that, although both kinds of questions induce complex knowledge construction, questions designed to access prior knowledge/experience are more effective in enhancing learning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x018001032 · Cited by 13,645
Novak, J. D., Gowin, D. B., & Kahle, J. B. (1984) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173469 · Cited by 5,199
From sage on the stage to guide on the side
King, A. (1993) · College Teaching · doi:10.1080/87567555.1993.9926781 · Cited by 1,462
Peer interaction and learning in small groups
Webb, N. M. (1989) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/0883-0355(89)90014-1 · Cited by 1,050
Learning as a generative process 1
Wittrock, M. C. (1974) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461527409529129 · Cited by 834
Cited by
Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006) · Research in Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11165-005-3917-8 · Cited by 1,529
From monologue to dialogue: Improving written feedback processes in mass higher education.
Nicol, D. (2010) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602931003786559 · Cited by 1,060
Eight Ways to Promote Generative Learning
Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2016) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-015-9348-9 · Cited by 832
Eliciting Self‐Explanations Improves Understanding
Chi, M. T. H., De Leeuw, N., Chiu, M., & Lavancher, C. (1994) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1803_3 · Cited by 757
Students' questions: a potential resource for teaching and learning science
Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2008) · Studies in Science Education · doi:10.1080/03057260701828101 · Cited by 747
Roscoe, R. D., & Chi, M. T. H. (2007) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654307309920 · Cited by 647
Constructive activity and learning in collaborative small groups.
Webb, N. M., Troper, J. D., & Fall, R. (1995) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.87.3.406 · Cited by 474
Kramarski, B., & Mevarech, Z. R. (2003) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312040001281 · Cited by 450
Patterns of Discourse in Two Kinds of Literature Discussion
Chinn, C. A., Anderson, R. C., & Waggoner, M. A. (2001) · Reading Research Quarterly · doi:10.1598/rrq.36.4.3 · Cited by 355
Janssen, J., Erkens, G., Kanselaar, G., & Jaspers, J. (2007) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2006.01.004 · Cited by 352
What the discourse tells us: Talk and indicators of high-level comprehension
Soter, A. O., Wilkinson, I. A., Murphy, P. K., Rudge, L., Reninger, K., & Edwards, M. (2008) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2009.01.001 · Cited by 337
Structuring Peer Interaction to Promote High-Level Cognitive Processing
King, A. (2002) · Theory Into Practice · doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4101_6 · Cited by 320
Self-citationThe pretesting effect: do unsuccessful retrieval attempts enhance learning?
Richland, L. E., Kornell, N., & Kao, L. S. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied · doi:10.1037/a0016496 · Cited by 302
Peer reviewers learn from giving comments
Cho, Y. H., & Cho, K. (2011) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-010-9146-1 · Cited by 294
Contributions of study skills to academic competence.
Gettinger, M., & Seibert, J. K. (2002) · School Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/02796015.2002.12086160 · Cited by 289
Scaffolding Deep Comprehension Strategies Through Point&Query, AutoTutor, and iSTART
Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., & VanLehn, K. (2005) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4004_4 · Cited by 285
Effects of high level prompts and peer assessment on online learners’ reflection levels
Chen, N.-S., Wei, C.-W., Wu, K.-T., & Uden, L. (2009) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.08.007 · Cited by 199
Generative Learning: Which Strategies for What Age?
Brod, G. (2021) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-020-09571-9 · Cited by 145
Cheng, Y.-P., Lai, C.-F., Chen, Y.-T., Wang, W.-S., Huang, Y.-M., & Wu, T.-T. (2023) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104794 · Cited by 130
Students’ Help Seeking During Problem Solving: Effects of Grade, Goal, and Prior Achievement
Newman, R. S., & Schwager, M. T. (1995) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312032002352 · Cited by 112
Teach AI How to Code: Using Large Language Models as Teachable Agents for Programming Education
Jin, H., Lee, S., Shin, H., & Kim, J. (2024) · Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642349 · Cited by 99
Posing Problems for Open Investigations: What questions do pupils ask?
Chin, C., & Kayalvizhi, G. (2002) · Research in Science & Technological Education · doi:10.1080/0263514022000030499 · Cited by 98
Hwang, A., & Francesco, A. M. (2010) · Academy of Management Learning & Education · doi:10.5465/amle.9.2.zqr243 · Cited by 86
Ebersbach, M., Feierabend, M., & Nazari, K. B. B. (2020) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3639 · Cited by 45
Ask Systems: interrogative access to multiple ways of thinking
Jonassen, D. H. (2011) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-010-9179-9 · Cited by 24
Blonder, R., Rap, S., Mamlok-Naaman, R., & Hofstein, A. (2015) · International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education · doi:10.1007/s10763-014-9580-7 · Cited by 19
University Students’ Knowledge Construction during Face to Face Collaborative Writing
Nykopp, M., Marttunen, M., & Laurinen, L. (2014) · Writing as a Learning Activity · doi:10.1163/9789004265011_013 · Cited by 18
Knowledge Tracing in Programming Education Integrating Students’ Questions
Kim, D., Kim, S., & Jo, Y. (2025) · Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.acl-long.1343 · Cited by 9
Web-based learning in the field of empirical research methods
Stark, R., & Mandl, H. (2003) · Universitätsbibliothek der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · doi:10.5282/ubm/epub.267 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- King, A.
- Venue
- American Educational Research Journal
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1994
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 338
- ISSN
- 0002-8312 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2131683772
- Cited by
- 605
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 46.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.