The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life
Abstract
Contemporary theories of politics tend to portray politics as a reflection of society, political phenomena as the aggregate consequences of individual behavior, action as the result of choices based on calculated self-interest, history as efficient in reaching unique and appropriate outcomes, and decision making and the allocation of resources as the central foci of political life. Some recent theoretical thought in political science, however, blends elements of these theoretical styles into an older concern with institutions. This new institutionalism emphasizes the relative autonomy of political institutions, possibilities for inefficiency in history, and the importance of symbolic action to an understanding of politics. Such ideas have a reasonable empirical basis, but they are not characterized by powerful theoretical forms. Some directions for theoretical research may, however, be identified in institutionalist conceptions of political order.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Olson, M. (1965) · doi:10.4159/9780674041660 · Cited by 14,191
The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism
Trivers, R. L. (1971) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/406755 · Cited by 11,010
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
(1982) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511809477 · Cited by 8,240
Participation and Democratic Theory
Pateman, C. (1970) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511720444 · Cited by 6,159
States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia and China
Skocpol, T. (1979) · Cambridge University Press · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815805 · Cited by 5,408
Cited by
International Norm Dynamics and Political Change
Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998) · International Organization · doi:10.1162/002081898550789 · Cited by 8,292
Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms
Hall, P. A., & Taylor, R. C. R. (1996) · Political Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.x · Cited by 6,796
Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/231294 · Cited by 6,165
The Adolescence of Institutional Theory
Scott, W. R. (1987) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392880 · Cited by 3,699
The agent-structure problem in international relations theory
Wendt, A. E. (1987) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s002081830002751x · Cited by 1,896
Linz, J. J. (. J. (1990) · Journal of Democracy · doi:10.1353/jod.2005.0026 · Cited by 1,737
Constructing and contesting legitimacy and accountability in polycentric regulatory regimes
Black, J. (2008) · Regulation & Governance · doi:10.1111/j.1748-5991.2008.00034.x · Cited by 1,215
Choosing Preferences by Constructing Institutions: A Cultural Theory of Preference Formation
Wildavsky, A. (1987) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1960776 · Cited by 1,021
Sovereignty: An Institutional Perspective
KRASNER, S. D. (1988) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414088021001004 · Cited by 954
New Institutionalism Through a Gender Lens: Towards a Feminist Institutionalism?
Mackay, F., Kenny, M., & Chappell, L. (2010) · International Political Science Review · doi:10.1177/0192512110388788 · Cited by 738
McAdam, D., & Scott, W. R. (2005) · Social Movements and Organization Theory · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511791000.003 · Cited by 516
Learning about Democracy in Africa: Awareness, Performance, and Experience
Mattes, R., & Bratton, M. (2007) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00245.x · Cited by 432
Making public health programs last: conceptualizing sustainability
Pluye, P., Potvin, L., & Denis, J.-L. (2004) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2004.01.001 · Cited by 374
The Repositioning of American Public Administration
Frederickson, H. G. (1999) · PS Political Science & Politics · doi:10.1017/s1049096500056547 · Cited by 367
The dubious role of institutions in international business: A road forward
Aguilera, R. V., & Grøgaard, B. (2019) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/s41267-018-0201-5 · Cited by 313
Electoral Systems and Democratization in Southern Africa
Reynolds, A. (1999) · doi:10.1093/0198295103.001.0001 · Cited by 276
Gendering research in political science
Lovenduski, J. (1998) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.1.1.333 · Cited by 230
Parkhurst, J. (2016) · London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) · doi:10.4324/9781315675008 · Cited by 756
Markets as institutions versus organizations as markets? Disentangling some fundamental concepts
Ménard, C. (1995) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/0167-2681(95)00030-5 · Cited by 140
Structural Evolution Through Idiosyncratic Jobs: The Potential for Unplanned Learning
Miner, A. S. (1990) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1.2.195 · Cited by 137
Smart governance in institutional context: an in-depth analysis of Glasgow, Utrecht, and Curitiba
Tomor, Z., Przeybilovicz, E., & Leleux, C. (2021) · Cities · doi:10.1016/j.cities.2021.103195 · Cited by 51
PERSISTENCE AND CHANGE AMONG NATIONALLY FEDERATED SOCIAL MOVEMENTS
McCarthy, J. D. (2005) · Social Movements and Organization Theory · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511791000.011 · Cited by 37
Investigating global mental health: contributions from political science
Patterson, A. S., Boadu, N. Y., Clark, M., Janes, C., Monteiro, N., Roberts, J. H., Shiffman, J., Thomas, D., & Wipfli, H. (2020) · Global Public Health · doi:10.1080/17441692.2020.1724315 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P.
- Venue
- American Political Science Review
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1983-12
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 734-749
- ISSN
- 0003-0554 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5943
- OpenAlex
- W2112663818
- Cited by
- 4,011
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 58.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.