Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 222

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Decentralization and Inflation: Commitment, Collective Action, or Continuity?

Treisman, Daniel·2000·American Political Science Review

Abstract

Do political and fiscal decentralization make it easier or harder to control inflation? Statistical analysis of average annual inflation rates in a panel of 87 countries in the 1970s and 1980s found no clear relationship between decentralization and the level of inflation. Political decentralization, however, does appear to reduce change in countries' relative inflation rates over time. By creating additional veto players, federal structure may “lock in” existing patterns of monetary policy—whether inflationary or strict. Among the (mostly developed) countries that started with low inflation, inflation tended to increase more slowly in federations than in unitary states. Among the (mostly developing) countries that started with high inflation, inflation tended to increase faster in the federations. There is evidence that political decentralization locks in a country's degree of practical central bank independence—whether high or low—and the relative hardness or softness of budget constraints on subnational governments.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2586211

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 79

  1. Von Hagen, 1996, Budget Processes and Commitment to Fiscal Discipline
  2. 10.1093/wber/6.3.353 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1162/003355300555466 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Madison, 1788, The Federalist Papers
  5. 10.1017/CBO9780511571565 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Geddes, 1995, Economic Reform and Democracy, 59
  7. Gunnemark, 1991, Countries, Peoples and Their Languages: The Linguistic Handbook
  8. 10.2307/2111187 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Ordeshook, 1996, Russia's Party System: Is Russian Federalism Viable?, Post-Soviet Affairs, 12, 195, 10.1080/1060586X.1996.10641422 · DOI
  10. Tanzi, 1995, Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics, 295
  11. 10.1111/0952-1895.00141 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Barro, 1997, Determinants of Economic Growth: A Cross-Country Study
  13. 10.1093/wber/9.3.397 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Nickson, 1995, Local Government in Latin America, 10.1515/9781685855383 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Shibata, 1993, Japan's Public Sector
  16. Treisman, 1996, Fiscal Politics and the Fate of Post-Communist Federations: Yugoslavia, the Soviet Union, Czecho-slovakia—and Russia
  17. McKinnon, 1997, Macroeconomic Dimensions of Public Finance, 73
  18. 10.3386/w5586 · doi:10.3386/w5586
  19. 10.2307/2118453 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Demery, 1992, Adjustment and Equity in Malaysia
  21. Moser, 1997, Checks and Balances, and the Supply of Central Bank Independence
  22. Qian, 1998, Federalism and the Soft Budget Constraint, American Economic Review, 88, 1143
  23. Huang, 1996, Inflation and Investment Controls in China: The Political Economy of Central-Local Relations in the Reform Era
  24. 1998, Statistical Yearbook of the Republic of China 1998
  25. 10.2307/j.ctt1ww3w2t · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.2307/1344465 · doi:10.2307/1344465
  27. Fornasari, 1998, Decentralized Spending and Central Government Deficits: International Evidence
  28. Elazar, 1995, From Statism to Federalism: A Paradigm Shift, Publius, 25, 5
  29. 10.1016/0304-3932(83)90051-X · DOI · Paper page
  30. 1993, Hacia una Nueva Organizacion del Federalismo Fiscal en la Argentina
  31. 10.1006/juec.1997.2042 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1016/0261-5606(91)90045-L · DOI · Paper page
  33. Buchanan, 1950, Federalism and Fiscal Equity, American Economic Review, 40, 583
  34. Government Finance Statistics Yearbook
  35. 10.1086/260997 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Alesina, 1991, Why Are Stabilizations Delayed?, American Economic Review, 81, 1170
  37. International Financial Statistics Yearbook
  38. 10.3386/w6009 · doi:10.3386/w6009
  39. 10.2307/2077833 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1007/BF02719326 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Banks, 1994, Cross-National Time Series Data Archive
  42. 10.2307/2937943 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Haggard, 1992, The Politics of Adjustment: International Constraints, Distributive Conflicts, and the State, 10.1515/9780691188034 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1093/wbro/10.2.201 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1093/pan/6.1.1 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Riker, 1964, Federalism: Origin, Operation, Significance
  47. Bird, 1993, Threading the Fiscal Labyrinth: Some Issues in Fiscal Decentralization, National Tax Journal, 46, 207, 10.1086/NTJ41789011 · doi:10.1086/ntj41789011
  48. Shah, 1994, Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations in Indonesia
  49. Cukierman, 1992, Seignorage and Political Instability, American Economic Review, 82, 537
  50. Demirgüç-Kunt, 1995, Stock Market Development and Financial Intermediaries: Stylized Facts
  51. 10.1596/0-8213-2792-5 · doi:10.1596/0-8213-2792-5
  52. Franzese, 1998, The Positive Political Economy of Public Debt: An Empirical Examination of the OECD Post-War Experience
  53. Garman, 1996, Decentralization in Latin America
  54. 10.1016/0014-2921(88)90065-7 · DOI · Paper page
  55. Ghosh Atish R. , Gulde Anne-Marie , Ostry Jonathan D. , and Wolf Holger C. . 1995. “Does the Nominal Exchange Rate Regime Matter?” IMF Working Paper No. 95/121. · doi:10.5089/9781451854329.001
  56. 10.1017/CBO9781139174800.008 · DOI
  57. 10.1086/260580 · DOI · Paper page
  58. Levine, 1996, Stock Markets, Banks, and Economic Growth
  59. 10.1017/S0043887100012867 · DOI · Paper page
  60. O'Donnell, 1973, Modernization and Bureaucratic Authoritarianism: Studies in South American Politics
  61. Olson, 1982, The Rise and Decline of Nations: Economic Growth, Stagflation, and Social Rigidities
  62. 10.1162/003355300555457 · DOI · Paper page
  63. Posen, 1995, NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 253
  64. Shah, 1991, The New Fiscal Federalism in Brazil
  65. Sivard, 1993, World Military and Social Expenditures 1993
  66. Skidmore, 1977, Authoritarianism and Corporatism in Latin America, 149
  67. Tocqueville, 1835, Democracy in America
  68. Cukierman, 1992, Central Bank Strategy, Credibility, and Independence
  69. 10.2307/2991803 · DOI
  70. 10.1017/S0007123400007225 · DOI · Paper page
  71. 10.2307/2585576 · DOI · Paper page
  72. 10.2307/2952354 · DOI · Paper page
  73. Dillinger, 1998, Fiscal Management in Federal Democracies: Argentina and Brazil
  74. Wildasin, 1996, The Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics 1995, 323
  75. 1992, World Tables
  76. 1997, World Development Report: The State in a Changing World
  77. 2000, World Development Report: Entering the 21st Century
  78. Oates, 1972, Fiscal Federalism
  79. Campbell, 1991, Decentralization to Local Government in LAC: National Strategies and Local Response in Planning, Spending, and Management

Metadata

Authors
Treisman, D.
Venue
American Political Science Review
Published
2000-12
Volume
94
Issue
4
Pages
837-857
ISSN
  • 0003-0554 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5943
OpenAlex
W2322698171
Cited by
222
References
6
FWCI
73.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Decentralization and Inflation: Commitment, Collective Action, or Continuity? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2586211
The paper
Treisman, D. (2000). Decentralization and Inflation: Commitment, Collective Action, or Continuity? American Political Science Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/2586211

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.