The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Manufacturing Advantage: Why High-Performance Work Systems Pay off
Abstract
Much of the hoopla surrounding quality circles, teams, and high-performance work systems has been based on anecdotes and very thin evidence. It has not been established that those employee involvement strategies amount to anything more than another series of management fads or ruses designed to get more out of workers without giving them anything in return. This revelatory book, written by some of the skeptics, lays some of the suspicion to rest. Based on their visits to 44 plants and surveys of more than 4,000 employees, Eileen Appelbaum, Thomas Bailey, Peter Berg, and Arne L. Kalleberg concluded that companies are indeed more successful when managers share knowledge and power with workers and when workers assume increased responsibility and discretion. The study of steel, apparel, and medical electronics and imaging plants revealed much. In self-directed teams, workers were able to eliminate bottlenecks and coordinate the work process. In task forces created to improve quality, they communicated with individuals outside their own work groups and were able to solve problems. Expensive equipment in steel mills operated with fewer interruptions, turnaround and labor costs were cut in apparel factories, and costly inventories of components and medical equipment were reduced. And what did the employees think? The worker survey showed that jobs in participatory work systems often provide more challenging tasks and more opportunities for creativity. Employees in apparel had higher hourly earnings; those in steel had both higher hourly earnings and higher job satisfaction. Workers in more participatory settings were no more likely than others to report heavy workloads or excessive demands on their time. They were, however, less likely to report involuntary overtime or conflict with co-workers, and were more likely to be satisfied with their surroundings. Manufacturing Advantage provides the best assessment available of the effectiveness of high-performance work systems. Freestanding chapters near the end of the book provide full documentation of research data without interrupting the narrative flow.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Green Human Resource Management: A Review and Research Agenda*
Renwick, D. W. S., Redman, T., & Maguire, S. (2013) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00328.x · Cited by 2,586
Human resource management and employee well-being: towards a new analytic framework
Guest, D. E. (2017) · Human Resource Management Journal · doi:10.1111/1748-8583.12139 · Cited by 1,362
Building Sustainable Organizations: The Human Factor.
Pfeffer, J. (2010) · Academy of Management Perspectives · doi:10.5465/amp.2010.50304415 · Cited by 862
Boon, C., Den Hartog, D. N., Boselie, P., & Paauwe, J. (2011) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2011.538978 · Cited by 463
Toward a Model of Explaining Teachers’ Innovative Behavior: A Literature Review
Thurlings, M., Evers, A. T., & Vermeulen, M. (2015) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654314557949 · Cited by 462
Progressing in the change journey towards sustainability in healthcare: The role of “Green” HRM
Pinzone, M., Guerci, M., Lettieri, E., & Redman, T. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.031 · Cited by 441
HRM and innovative work behaviour: A systematic literature review
Bos-Nehles, A., Renkema, M., & Janssen, M. (2017) · Personnel Review · doi:10.1108/pr-09-2016-0257 · Cited by 430
Why Has Work Effort Become More Intense?
Green, F. (2004) · Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society · doi:10.1111/j.0019-8676.2004.00359.x · Cited by 408
Bos‐Nehles, A. C., Van Riemsdijk, M. J., & Kees Looise, J. (2013) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.21578 · Cited by 401
Integrating strategic human capital and strategic human resource management
Boon, C., Eckardt, R., Lepak, D. P., & Boselie, P. (2018) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2017.1380063 · Cited by 354
Kalshoven, K., & Boon, C. T. (2012) · Journal of Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1027/1866-5888/a000056 · Cited by 251
Sustainable Human Resource Management with Salience of Stakeholders: A Top Management Perspective
Järlström, M., Saru, E., & Vanhala, S. (2018) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3310-8 · Cited by 229
Old Habits Die Hard:Path Dependency and Behavioral Lock-in
Barnes, W., Gartland, M., & Stack, M. (2004) · Journal of Economic Issues · doi:10.1080/00213624.2004.11506696 · Cited by 201
Yang, J., Mossholder, K. W., & Peng, T. K. (2007) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.681 · Cited by 196
(2007) · D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh) · Cited by 141
The impact of human resource management on corporate social performance strengths and concerns
Rothenberg, S., Hull, C. E., & Tang, Z. (2017) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/0007650315586594 · Cited by 95
The line makes the difference: line managers as effective HRM partners
Bos-Nehles, A. C. (2024) · doi:10.3990/1.9789085705130 · Cited by 40
Social inequality in education: A constraint on an American high-skills future
Lewis, T. (2007) · Curriculum Inquiry · doi:10.1111/j.1467-873x.2007.00390.x · Cited by 33
High-performance work systems and school effectiveness: the case of Malaysian secondary schools
Maroufkhani, P., Nourani, M., & Boerhannoeddin, A. B. (2015) · Asia Pacific Education Review · doi:10.1007/s12564-015-9389-2 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Harrell-Cook, G., Appelbaum, E., Bailey, T., Berg, P., & Kalleberg, A. L.
- Venue
- The Academy of Management Review
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2001-07
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 459
- ISSN
- 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1989172135
- Cited by
- 1,596
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 173.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.