Cited by 13,287Psychometric Methodologies and TestingStatistical Methods and ApplicationsBusiness Strategies and Management Research

Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics

Fornell, Claes, Larcker, David F.·1981·Journal of Marketing Research

Abstract

Several issues relating to goodness of fit in structural equations are examined. The convergence and differentiation criteria, as applied by Bagozzi, are shown not to stand up under mathematical or statistical analysis. The authors argue that the choice of interpretative statistic must be based on the research objective. They demonstrate that when this is done the Fornell-Larcker testing system is internally consistent and that it conforms to the rules of correspondence for relating data to abstract variables.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/002224378101800313

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
Venue
Journal of Marketing Research
Published
1981-08
Volume
18
Issue
3
Pages
382-388
ISSN
  • 0022-2437 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-7193
OpenAlex
W4230637740
Cited by
13,287
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 951 · 2025: 1433 · 2024: 1735 · 2023: 2006 · 2022: 1837 · 2021: 1445 · 2020: 1189 · 2019: 998 · 2018: 643 · 2017: 296 · 2016: 177 · 2015: 130 · 2014: 113 · 2013: 79 · 2012: 68
FWCI
5.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Marketing Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Business Strategies and Management Research
Keywords
structural equation modeling, goodness of fit, latent variables, measurement error, correspondence rules

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review