Cited by 152Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Management and EducationDiabetes and associated disorders

Randomized Outpatient Trial of Single- and Dual-Hormone Closed-Loop Systems That Adapt to Exercise Using Wearable Sensors

Open access
Castle, Jessica R., El Youssef, Joseph, Wilson, Leah M., Reddy, Ravi, Resalat, Navid, Branigan, Deborah, Ramsey, Katrina, Leitschuh, Joseph +5 more·2018·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Automated insulin delivery is the new standard for type 1 diabetes, but exercise-related hypoglycemia remains a challenge. Our aim was to determine whether a dual-hormone closed-loop system using wearable sensors to detect exercise and adjust dosing to reduce exercise-related hypoglycemia would outperform other forms of closed-loop and open-loop therapy. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Participants underwent four arms in randomized order: dual-hormone, single-hormone, predictive low glucose suspend, and continuation of current care over 4 outpatient days. Each arm included three moderate-intensity aerobic exercise sessions. The two primary outcomes were percentage of time in hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dL) and in a target range (70–180 mg/dL) assessed across the entire study and from the start of the in-clinic exercise until the next meal. RESULTS: The analysis included 20 adults with type 1 diabetes who completed all arms. The mean time (SD) in hypoglycemia was the lowest with dual-hormone during the exercise period: 3.4% (4.5) vs. 8.3% (12.6) single-hormone (P = 0.009) vs. 7.6% (8.0) predictive low glucose suspend (P < 0.001) vs. 4.3% (6.8) current care where pre-exercise insulin adjustments were allowed (P = 0.49). Time in hypoglycemia was also the lowest with dual-hormone during the entire 4-day study: 1.3% (1.0) vs. 2.8% (1.7) single-hormone (P < 0.001) vs. 2.0% (1.5) predictive low glucose suspend (P = 0.04) vs. 3.1% (3.2) current care (P = 0.007). Time in range during the entire study was the highest with single-hormone: 74.3% (8.0) vs. 72.0% (10.8) dual-hormone (P = 0.44). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of glucagon delivery to a closed-loop system with automated exercise detection reduces hypoglycemia in physically active adults with type 1 diabetes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc18-0228

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The two T1D virtual patient populations were validated against clinical data from real-world patients with T1D.

    “These virtual populations were validated against clinical data acquired from real-world patients with T1D [12].”

    From A statistical virtual patient population for the glucoregulatory system in type 1 diabetes with integrated exercise model (2019) · cites this paper as [12]

    The Participants and Study Design and Procedures sections describe a trial involving adults with type 1 diabetes, not two virtual patient populations. A search for virtual populations, simulation, and validation against clinical data found no passage addressing the claimed validation. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Castle, J. R., El Youssef, J., Wilson, L. M., Reddy, R., Resalat, N., Branigan, D., Ramsey, K., Leitschuh, J., Rajhbeharrysingh, U., Senf, B., Sugerman, S. M., Gabo, V., & Jacobs, P. G.
Affiliations
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
  • Harold Schnitzer Diabetes Health Center, Division of Endocrinology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
Corresponding author
Castle, Jessica R.
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2018-05-11
Volume
41
Issue
7
Pages
1471-1477
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2799357239
Cited by
152
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 9
FWCI
18.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (1DP3-DK-101044)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
Keywords
type 1 diabetes, artificial pancreas, wearable sensors, exercise detection, predictive low glucose suspend, time in range
MeSH terms
Wearable Electronic Devices, Adult, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Female, Glucagon, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Insulin Infusion Systems, Male, Middle Aged, Outpatients, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, Exercise, Cross-Over Studies, Pancreas, Artificial, Young Adult, Meals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review