Cited by 232Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Treatment and ManagementPancreatic function and diabetes

Novel Use of Glucagon in a Closed-Loop System for Prevention of Hypoglycemia in Type 1 Diabetes

Open access
Castle, Jessica R., Engle, Julia M., Youssef, Joseph El, Massoud, Ryan G., Yuen, Kevin C.J., Kagan, Ryland, Ward, W. Kenneth·2010·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To minimize hypoglycemia in subjects with type 1 diabetes by automated glucagon delivery in a closed-loop insulin delivery system. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Adult subjects with type 1 diabetes underwent one closed-loop study with insulin plus placebo and one study with insulin plus glucagon, given at times of impending hypoglycemia. Seven subjects received glucagon using high-gain parameters, and six subjects received glucagon in a more prolonged manner using low-gain parameters. Blood glucose levels were measured every 10 min and insulin and glucagon infusions were adjusted every 5 min. All subjects received a portion of their usual premeal insulin after meal announcement. RESULTS: Automated glucagon plus insulin delivery, compared with placebo plus insulin, significantly reduced time spent in the hypoglycemic range (15 ± 6 vs. 40 ± 10 min/day, P = 0.04). Compared with placebo, high-gain glucagon delivery reduced the frequency of hypoglycemic events (1.0 ± 0.6 vs. 2.1 ± 0.6 events/day, P = 0.01) and the need for carbohydrate treatment (1.4 ± 0.8 vs. 4.0 ± 1.4 treatments/day, P = 0.01). Glucagon given with low-gain parameters did not significantly reduce hypoglycemic event frequency (P = NS) but did reduce frequency of carbohydrate treatment (P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: During closed-loop treatment in subjects with type 1 diabetes, high-gain pulses of glucagon decreased the frequency of hypoglycemia. Larger and longer-term studies will be required to assess the effect of ongoing glucagon treatment on overall glycemic control.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc09-2254

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Castle et al. were the first to demonstrate that glucagon interventions can be successfully added to an artificial pancreas system as protection against hypoglycemia.

    “Castle et al.3 were the first to perform such a study and demonstrate that glucagon interventions can be successfully added to an AP system as a protection against hypoglycemia.”

    From Pharmacokinetics Modeling of Exogenous Glucagon in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Patients (2013) · cites this paper as [3]

    The Conclusions report that automated high-gain glucagon delivery reduced hypoglycemic events compared with placebo in adults with type 1 diabetes, supporting its use as protection in the studied system. The paper calls its approach novel, but does not establish that Castle et al. were the first to perform such a study; it also notes earlier animal studies of automated glucagon delivery. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In bihormonal closed-loop glucose control, glucagon has been used subcutaneously along with insulin for protection against hypoglycemia.

    “More recently, in a bihormonal closed-loop glucose control, glucagon has been used subcutaneously along with insulin for protection against hypoglycemia.”
  • In bihormonal closed-loop systems, small doses of glucagon are frequently administered.

    “In this context, small doses of glucagon are frequently administered.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Castle, J. R., Engle, J. M., Youssef, J. E., Massoud, R. G., Yuen, K. C. J., Kagan, R., & Ward, W. K.
Affiliations
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
  • Legacy Health (US)
Corresponding author
Castle, Jessica R.
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2010-03-23
Volume
33
Issue
6
Pages
1282-1287
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2154010909
Cited by
232
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 28
FWCI
17.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Good Samaritan Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health (RR024140)
  • Oregon Clinical and Translational Research Institute (UL1RR024140, RR024140)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (T32DK007674)
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR024140)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
Keywords
glucagon, type 1 diabetes, hypoglycemia prevention, artificial pancreas, time in hypoglycemia, glycemic control
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Female, Glucagon, Hormones, Humans, Hypoglycemia, Male, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review