Cited by 69Diabetes Treatment and ManagementGallbladder and Bile Duct DisordersDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Effects of liraglutide compared with placebo on events of acute gallbladder or biliary disease in patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk for cardiovascular events in the LEADER randomized trial.

Nauck, Michael A., Muus Ghorbani, Marie Louise, Kreiner, Eskil, Saevereid, Hans A., Buse, John B., the LEADER Publication Committee on behalf of the LEADER Trial Investigators·2019·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To explore gallbladder- and biliary tract–related events reported for the liraglutide and placebo groups in the Liraglutide Effect and Action in Diabetes: Evaluation of Cardiovascular Outcome Results (LEADER) trial. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS LEADER was an international, randomized, double-blind, controlled cardiovascular (CV) outcomes trial. Participants with type 2 diabetes at high risk for CV events (n = 9,340) were randomized 1:1 to receive either liraglutide (≤1.8 mg daily; n = 4,668) or placebo (n = 4,672), with both groups also receiving standard care (treatment period: 3.5–5 years). Acute gallstone disease was a medical event of special interest. This post hoc analysis categorized captured events of acute gallbladder or biliary disease into four groups: uncomplicated gallbladder stones, complicated gallbladder stones, cholecystitis, and biliary obstruction. Time to first event by treatment group was analyzed using Cox regression. RESULTS There was an increased risk of acute gallbladder or biliary disease with liraglutide versus placebo (n = 141 of 4,668 vs. n = 88 of 4,672 patients, respectively; hazard ratio [HR] 1.60; 95% CI 1.23, 2.09; P < 0.001). Similar trends were observed for each of the four categories of gallbladder- or biliary tract–related events. Cholecystectomy was performed more frequently in liraglutide-treated patients (HR 1.56; 95% CI 1.10, 2.20; P = 0.013) but for similar proportions of the patients who experienced gallbladder- or biliary tract–related events (57% with liraglutide vs. 59% with placebo). CONCLUSIONS Although LEADER was not specifically designed to assess acute gallbladder or biliary disease, the trial showed an increased risk of gallbladder- or biliary tract–related events with liraglutide versus placebo, which appeared to be consistent across four categories of these events. Further studies should investigate the relevant mechanisms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc19-0415

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Post hoc analysis of LEADER data revealed a persistent increase in the overall risk of biliary tract-related events and gallbladder diseases across four categories.

    “Post hoc analysis of LEADER data revealed a persistent increase in the overall risk of biliary tract-related events and gallbladder diseases, consistently observed across four categories: uncomplicated gallbladder stones, complicated gallbladder stones, cholecystitis with/without gallbladder stones, and biliary obstruction [34].”
  • Initially the gallbladder events were attributed to GLP-1RA-induced weight loss, as in the SCALE and LEADER trials, the patients with gallbladder events had more than average weight loss.

    “Initially the gallbladder events were attributed to GLP-1RA-induced weight loss, as for example in the SCALE and LEADER trials, the patients with gallbladder events had more than average weight loss”

    From Safety of Semaglutide (2021) · cites this paper as [88]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 41 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nauck, M. A., Muus Ghorbani, M. L., Kreiner, E., Saevereid, H. A., Buse, J. B., & the LEADER Publication Committee on behalf of the LEADER Trial Investigators
Affiliations
  • St. Josef-Hospital (DE)
  • Novo Nordisk A/S, Søborg, Denmark
  • Novo Nordisk (Denmark) (DK)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Nauck, Michael A.
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2019-08-09
Volume
42
Issue
10
Pages
1912-1920
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2969051643
Cited by
69
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3
FWCI
7.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Novo Nordisk
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
liraglutide, biliary tract diseases, gallstones, cholecystitis, biliary obstruction, cholecystectomy, type 2 diabetes, GLP-1 receptor agonists, cardiovascular risk, adverse events
MeSH terms
Liraglutide, Acute Disease, Aged, Cardiovascular Diseases, Cholecystitis, Cholestasis, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Male, Middle Aged, Proportional Hazards Models, Treatment Outcome, Gallstones

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review