Cited by 82Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications

Head motion and correction methods in resting-state functional MRI

Open access
GOTO, Masami, ABE, Osamu, MIYATI, Tosiaki, YAMASUE, Hidenori, GOMI, Tsutomu, TAKEDA, Tohoru·2016·Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences

Abstract

Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (RS-fMRI) is used to investigate brain functional connectivity at rest. However, noise from human physiological motion is an unresolved problem associated with this technique. Following the unexpected previous result that group differences in head motion between control and patient groups caused group differences in the resting-state network with RS-fMRI, we reviewed the effects of human physiological noise caused by subject motion, especially motion of the head, on functional connectivity at rest detected with RS-fMRI. The aim of the present study was to review head motion artifact with RS-fMRI, individual and patient population differences in head motion, and correction methods for head motion artifact with RS-fMRI. Numerous reports have described new methods [e.g., scrubbing, regional displacement interaction (RDI)] for motion correction on RS-fMRI, many of which have been successful in reducing this negative influence. However, the influence of head motion could not be entirely excluded by any of these published techniques. Therefore, in performing RS-fMRI studies, head motion of the participants should be quantified with measurement technique (e.g., framewise displacement). Development of a more effective correction method would improve the accuracy of RS-fMRI analysis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2463/mrms.rev.2015-0060

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
GOTO, M., ABE, O., MIYATI, T., YAMASUE, H., GOMI, T., & TAKEDA, T.
Affiliations
  • Kitasato University (JP)
  • Nihon University (JP)
  • Kanazawa University (JP)
  • The University of Tokyo (JP)
Corresponding author
GOTO, Masami
Venue
Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences
Published
2016
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
178-186
ISSN
  • 1347-3182 (ISSN-L)
  • 1880-2206
OpenAlex
W2266374336
Cited by
82
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4
FWCI
0.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Keywords
head movement, resting-state fMRI, motion correction, functional connectivity, physiological noise, scrubbing, resting-state networks
MeSH terms
Brain Mapping, Head, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Artifacts, Head Movements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review