Cited by 9Parasitic Diseases Research and TreatmentHelminth infection and controlResearch on Leishmaniasis Studies

Dirofilaria immitis in Bulgaria: the first genetic baseline data and an overview of the current status

Open access
Panayotova-Pencheva, M., Šnábel, V., Dakova, V., Čabanová, V., Cavallero, S., Trifonova, A., Mirchev, R., Hurníková, Z. +2 more·2020·Helminthologia

Abstract

Summary Dirofilaria immitis , the agent of canine dirofilariosis, is a common parasite of domestic and wild carnivores with zoonotic potential and worldwide distribution, being endemic in many countries. Bulgaria is among European countries recognized as endemic for this heartworm parasite. In the present study, D. immitis adults recovered from pulmonary arteries of domestic dog and golden jackal originating from the Pazardzhik region in southern Bulgaria, and from red fox originating from the Plovdiv region in central-southern Bulgaria, were genetically analyzed in nuclear targets. The first PCR amplification of the internal transcribed region 2 (ITS2) of the ribosomal DNA with previously published D. immitis -specific primers yielded single fragments in size of 302 bp that is characteristic for these heartworms. PCR products of three isolates, resulted from the second amplification of the 5.8S-ITS2 region (235 bp) with pan-filarioid primers, were subjected to direct DNA sequencing. Identical nucleotide composition was detected across the screened target region for these Bulgarian isolates. When the 5.8S-ITS2 sequences were phylogenetically compared to the GenBank-retrieved D. immitis sequences in a worldwide context, the neighbor-joining analysis has shown three discrete clades. The first clade was composed of D. immitis isolates from Europe (including the studied Bulgarian samples), Asia and South America, in the second clade samples from Asia and South America were placed, whereas the third clade was formed by two Brazilian dog isolates originated from the north and southeast part of the country. The purpose of the present study was to verify the taxonomic characterization of D. immitis nematodes from Bulgaria based on morphology and compare their genetic structure with filariae obtained from the different world regions using molecular assays. It also summarizes previous epidemiological and ecological studies on the parasite distribution and prevalences in different hosts and regions undertaken so far in Bulgaria.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2478/helm-2020-0026

Cites

34 of 35 references verified1 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several studies have shown prevalence of D. immitis antigens between 3-44.4% in red foxes and 4.4-58.7% in golden jackals, with isolated cases detected by necropsy.

    “In addition, several studies have shown a prevalence of D. immitis antigens between 3–44.4% in red foxes, and 4.4–58.7% in golden jackals; furthermore, isolated cases of infected red foxes and golden jackals were detected by necropsy [83,89,144].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Kostadinov M. 2012 Prevalence of Dirofilaria immitis and Dirofilaria repens in 310 stray dogs in Bulgaria Proceedings of the European Multicolloquium of Parasitology. July 25–29, 2012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania 2012 343 344 www.zooparaz.net/emop11

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Panayotova-Pencheva, M., Šnábel, V., Dakova, V., Čabanová, V., Cavallero, S., Trifonova, A., Mirchev, R., Hurníková, Z., Vasilková, Z., & Miterpáková, M.
Affiliations
  • Bulgarian Academy of Sciences (BG)
  • Slovak Academy of Sciences (SK)
  • Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
  • Southwest State Enterprise , 2700 Blagoevgrad , Zora 18 , Bulgaria
Corresponding author
Miterpáková, M.
Venue
Helminthologia
Published
2020-08-05
Volume
57
Issue
3
Pages
211-218
ISSN
  • 0440-6605 (ISSN-L)
  • 1336-9083
OpenAlex
W3079875970
Cited by
9
References
34
Citations by year
2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Helminthologia (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Slovenská Akadémia Vied (VEGA 1/0043/19)
  • Bulgarian Academy of Sciences
  • Vedecká Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR a SAV (1/0043/19)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Research on Leishmaniasis Studies
Keywords
Dirofilaria immitis, canine dirofilariasis, Bulgaria, ITS2, phylogenetic analysis, golden jackal, red fox, dogs, zoonotic parasites, parasite distribution, prevalence, Plovdiv region

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review