First molecular identification of mosquito vectors of Dirofilaria immitis in continental Portugal
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Canine dirofilariasis due to Dirofilaria immitis is known to be endemic in continental Portugal. However, information about the transmitting mosquito species is still scarce, with only Culex theileri identified to date, albeit with L1-2, through dissection. This study was carried out to investigate the potential vectors of Dirofilaria spp. in continental Portugal. METHODS: Mosquitoes were collected in three distinct seasons (Summer, Autumn and Spring), 2011-2013, in three districts. CDC traps and indoor resting collections were carried out in the vicinity of kennels. Mosquitoes were kept under controlled conditions for 7 days to allow the development of larval stages of Dirofilaria spp.. DNA extraction was performed separately for both head+thorax and abdomen in order to differentiate infective and infected specimens, respectively, in pools, grouped according to the species and collection site (1-40 specimen parts/pool), and examined by PCR using pan-filarial specific primers. Mosquito densities were compared using non-parametric tests. Dirofilaria development units (DDU) were estimated. RESULTS: In total, 9156 female mosquitoes, from 11 different species, were captured. Mosquito densities varied among the 3 districts, according to capture method, and were generally higher in the second year of collections. From 5866 specimens screened by PCR, 23 head+thorax and 41 abdomens pools, corresponding to 54 mosquitoes were found positive for D. immitis DNA. These belonged to 5 species: Culex (Cux) theileri (estimated rate of infection (ERI)=0.71%), Cx. (Cux) pipiens f. pipiens and f. molestus (ERI=0.5%), Anopheles (Ano) maculipennis s.l. (ERI=3.12%), including An. (Ano) atroparvus, Aedes (Och) caspius (ERI=3.73%) and Ae. (Och) detritus s.l. (ERI=4.39%). All but Cx. pipiens, had at least one infective specimen. No D. repens infected specimens were found. Infection rates were: 3.21% in Coimbra, 1.22% in Setúbal and 0.54% in Santarém. DDU were at least 117/year in the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Culex theileri, Cx. pipiens, An. maculipennis s.l. An. atroparvus, Ae.caspius and Ae. detritus s.l. were identified as potential vectors of D. immitis in three districts of Portugal, from Spring to Autumn, in 5 of the 6 collection dates in 2011-2013. Implications for transmission, in the context of climate changes, and need for prophylactic measures, are discussed.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This study provides the first molecular evidence of Dirofilaria immitis in mosquitoes from continental Portugal, identifying multiple potential vector species across three districts. It reports infected and infective mosquitoes from Spring to Autumn and estimates 117–152 favorable transmission days per year.
Key findings
- From 9,156 female mosquitoes (11 species), 5,866 were PCR-screened; 54 positive pools/mosquitoes were found for D. immitis DNA, including 23 head+thorax and 41 abdomen pools.
- Estimated infection rates were Cx. theileri 0.71%, Cx. pipiens f. pipiens/f. molestus 0.5%, An. maculipennis s.l. 3.12% (including An. atroparvus), Ae. caspius 3.73%, and Ae. detritus s.l. 4.39%; all except Cx. pipiens had at least one infective specimen.
- District infection rates were Coimbra 3.21%, Setúbal 1.22%, and Santarém 0.54%, differing significantly overall (χ2=40.93, df=2, P<0.0001).
- No D. repens-infected specimens were found; DDU estimates indicated at least 152 days in 2011, 119 in 2012, and 117 in 2013 suitable for extrinsic development.
Methods
- Mosquitoes were collected in 2011–2013 during Summer, Autumn, and Spring in Coimbra, Santarém, and Setúbal using CDC light traps with dry ice and indoor resting aspirator collections near kennels; specimens were kept 7 days at 25±2°C, 70±5% RH, 12 h:12 h light:dark, and fed 10% sucrose.
- Females were dissected into head+thorax and abdomen; DNA was extracted by CTAB and screened by pan-filarial PCR (DIDR-F1/R1) in pools of 1–40 body parts; Cx. pipiens positives were identified to form using CQ11 and ace-2 PCR, and products were sequenced/BLAST-confirmed.
- Infection rates were estimated as MIR and ERI; mosquito densities were compared with non-parametric tests (Mann–Whitney, Kruskal–Wallis, Dunn–Bonferroni), and Dirofilaria development units (DDU) were calculated from temperatures >14°C and DDU30 ≥130.
Limitations
- The paper states that infection rates based on sample sizes <1,000 may not accurately represent true population infection rates; An. maculipennis s.l. (n=400) and Ae. caspius (n=270) had large 95% CIs, and Ae. detritus s.l. (n=23) had a very wide CI, reducing the significance of its high rate.
- The paper states that only three collecting moments per year were insufficient to draw conclusions on seasonal mosquito dynamics, and that the 7-day insectary period at 25°C may not allow complete extrinsic cycle development, being a compromise for mosquito mortality, DNA degradation, and bloodmeal digestion.
- Evident from the text: PCR detects D. immitis DNA rather than confirming viable L3, although head+thorax positivity was used as an infective proxy; Ae. detritus s.l. was not differentiated due to available technique; and Setúbal densities were lower than in previous surveys, possibly due to kennel-site collection design, few collections, and strong winds.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 62 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
Of 5866 mosquitoes screened by PCR, 54 were positive for D. immitis DNA (23 head+thorax pools and 41 abdomen pools).
“From 5866 specimens screened by PCR, 23 head+thorax and 41 abdomens pools, corresponding to 54 mosquitoes were found positive for D. immitis DNA.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The mosquito infection rate in Coimbra (3.21%) was significantly higher than in Setúbal (1.22%).
“or Setúbal (1.22%, χ2=19.46, Df=2, P<0.0001)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
D. immitis DNA was detected in Ae. detritus s.l. with an ERI of 4.39%.
“| Ae. detritus s.l. | 23 | 23 | 16 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 43.5/1000 | 4.39% | 0.008–0.21 |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In 2011, there were at least 152 days with suitable conditions for the completion of the extrinsic development of Dirofilaria spp. in the three studied districts.
“there was, at least, 152 days in 2011, 119 days in 2012 and 117 days in 2013 with suitable conditions for the completion of the extrinsic development of Dirofilaria spp.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The ERI of D. immitis in mosquitoes in Setúbal was 1.22%.
“| Setúbal | 659 | 658 | 398 | 1 | 8 | 8 | 12.2/1000 | 1.22% | 0.006–0.024 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Findingown data
Most of the infected mosquito pools detected in this work were collected during the determined favourable development periods.
“Most of the infected mosquito pools detected in this work (red lines) are in agreement with the determined favourable development periods.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
No D. repens infected specimens were found.
“No amplicons corresponding to the diagnostic size for D. repens DNA were obtained.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The ERI of D. immitis in mosquitoes in Santarém was 0.54%.
“| Santarém | 7818 | 4530 | 1208 | 13 | 19 | 25 | 5.5/1000 | 0.54% | 0.004–0.008 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In 2012, there were at least 119 days with suitable conditions for the completion of the extrinsic development of Dirofilaria spp. in the three studied districts.
“there was, at least, 152 days in 2011, 119 days in 2012 and 117 days in 2013 with suitable conditions for the completion of the extrinsic development of Dirofilaria spp.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
All positive mosquito species except Cx. pipiens had at least one infective specimen.
“All but Cx. pipiens, had at least one infective specimen.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The overall ERI of D. immitis in mosquitoes across the three districts was 0.91%.
“| TOTAL | 9156 | 5866 | 1815 | 23 | 41 | 54 | 9.2/1000 | 0.91% | 0.007–0.012 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
D. immitis DNA was detected in Ae. caspius with an ERI of 3.73%.
“| Ae. caspius | 601 | 270 | 193 | 4 | 8 | 10 | 37/1000 | 3.73% | 0.02–0.067 |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The ERI of D. immitis in mosquitoes in Coimbra was 3.21%.
“| Coimbra | 679 | 678 | 209 | 9 | 14 | 21 | 31.0/1000 | 3.21% | 0.02–0.047 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
D. immitis DNA was detected in An. maculipennis s.l. with an ERI of 3.12%.
“| An. maculipennis s.l. | 406 | 400 | 114 | 5 | 8 | 12 | 30/1000 | 3.12% | 0.017–0.052 |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The panfilarial PCR assay detected as little as 10 pg of parasite DNA in 80 ng of mosquito DNA, from either head+thorax or abdomen.
“This showed that it was able to detect up to 10 pg of parasite DNA in 80 ng of mosquito DNA, either from head+thorax or abdomen”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The mosquito infection rates in Santarém and Setúbal were not significantly different.
“but not significantly different between Santarém and Setúbal.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Sequencing confirmed all filarial DNA as belonging to D. immitis.
“Sequencing confirmed all filarial DNA as belonging to D. immitis (nucleotide sequence data are available under accession numbers [ENA: LN626262 to LN626267] [43], with a sequence similarity on BLAST [36] that ranges from 89% to 97% with sequences available at NCBI database [JX866681.1; DQO18785.1; JX866681.1; FJ263464.1; FJ2634571; HM126606.1.].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [43] ENA ‘European Nucleotide Archive’ http://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/data/view/LN626257-LN626267. accessed March/April 2015.
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [36] BLAST® Basic Local Alignment Search Tool. http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi.
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
In 2013, there were at least 117 days with suitable conditions for the completion of the extrinsic development of Dirofilaria spp. in the three studied districts.
“there was, at least, 152 days in 2011, 119 days in 2012 and 117 days in 2013 with suitable conditions for the completion of the extrinsic development of Dirofilaria spp.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The mosquito infection rate in Coimbra (3.21%) was significantly higher than in Santarém (0.54%).
“being higher in Coimbra (3.21%), compared to Santarém (0.54%, χ2=36.11, Df=2, P<0.0001)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The overall infection rate of mosquitoes differed significantly among the three districts (Coimbra, Santarém, Setúbal).
“The overall infection rate of mosquitoes was significantly different for the three districts (χ2=40.93, Df=2, P <0.0001)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
D. immitis DNA was detected in Cx. pipiens s.l. with an ERI of 0.50%.
“| Cx. pipiens s.l. | 1940 | 1595 | 1123 | 0 | 8 | 8 | 5/1000 | 0.50% | 0.003–0.01 |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In this work, only D. immitis was detected in mosquitoes.
“In this work, only D. immitis was detected”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Infection rates were similar whether estimated as MIR or ERI.
“Infection rates were similar whether estimated as MIR or ERI”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The highest infection rate was recorded for Ae. detritus s.l.
“The highest infection rate was in fact recorded for Ae. detritus s.l..”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In the three districts surveyed in this work, An. maculipennis s.l., Cx. pipiens s.l., Cx. theileri, and Ae. caspius were the species with highest densities.
“In the three districts surveyed in this work, these were also the species with highest densities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Precipitation was higher in the three districts in the second sampling year, 2012/2013.
“precipitation was higher in the three districts in the second sampling year, 2012/2013.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Cx. theileri is capable of becoming infected with D. immitis.
“Our results confirm that not only Cx. theileri is capable of becoming infected with D. immitis”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Setúbal registered an intermediate mosquito infection rate.
“registered an intermediate mosquito infection rate.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Most of these results were in agreement with the prediction of 130 DDU30 for the regions surveyed.
“Most of these results were in agreement with the prediction of 130 DDU30 for the regions surveyed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Collections in the second year yielded higher mosquito densities, particularly for Cx. theileri and Cx. pipiens s.l.
“Collections in the second year yielded higher densities, particularly for Cx. theileri and Cx. pipiens s.l..”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The DDU30 calculation ranged from 117 days in 2013 to 152 days in 2011 with favourable temperatures for the completion of the extrinsic cycle of D. immitis.
“The calculation of the DDU30 ranged from 117 days in 2013 to 152 days in 2011 with favourable temperatures for the completion of the extrinsic cycle of D. immitis”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
CDC trap catches showed different densities among districts for Cx. theileri and Ae. caspius.
“CDC trap catches were able to show different densities among districts, for Cx. theileri and Ae. caspius”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
No significant differences were registered for average temperatures between years.
“Although no significant differences were registered for the average temperatures”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Santarém and Setúbal registered four infected mosquito species.
“while Santarém and Setúbal registered four infected species.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
IR catches yielded higher numbers of An. maculipennis s.l.
“IR catches yielded higher numbers of An. maculipennis s.l.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Most of the infective and infected mosquitoes detected were collected during the favourable periods.
“Most of the infective and infected mosquitoes detected were collected during these favourable periods.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Infected mosquitoes were found by both collection methods in most of the collecting dates and sites.
“infected mosquitoes were found by both methods in most of the collecting dates and sites.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
During the two-year survey, infected mosquitoes were found in five of the six collection dates.
“During the two year survey, infected mosquitoes were found in five of the six collection dates”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Coimbra was the only district with five infected mosquito species.
“Coimbra was the only district with the five infected species”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
In this study, mosquito abundance in Setúbal was much lower than in previous works.
“in this study, a striking difference was reported in the mosquito abundance in the district of Setúbal, with much lower densities compared to previous works [26,52,53]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Mosquito activity was found in the three time point collections, corresponding to Spring, Summer, and Autumn.
“Activity of these mosquitoes, whether infected, infective or neither, was found in the three time point collections, corresponding to Spring, Summer and Autumn.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Infection rates in mosquitoes were not in agreement with prevalence rates of canine dirofilariasis found in the same research project.
“Infection rates in mosquitoes were not in agreement with prevalence rates of CD found in the same research project [24]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
Total mosquito densities were lower in Coimbra than in the other districts.
“Total mosquito densities were lower in Coimbra, the northern most district”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Ae. detritus s.l. was only found infected in Coimbra.
“as Ae. detritus s.l. was only found infected there”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The suitable conditions allow transmission of Dirofilaria spp. to the vertebrate host.
“and consequently, for its transmission to the vertebrate host”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Canine dirofilariasis due to D. immitis is endemic in continental Portugal.
“Canine dirofilariasis due to Dirofilaria immitis is known to be endemic in continental Portugal.”
- Also stated in: § Background · boosted
“Canine dirofilariasis due to D. immitis is known to be endemic in continental Portugal.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [23] Vieira L, Silvestre-Ferreira AC, Fontes-Sousa AP, Balreira AC, Morchón R, Carretón E, et al. Seroprevalence of heartworm (Dirofilaria immitis) in feline and canine hosts from central and northern Portugal. JournHelminth. 2014;14:1–5.
Not checked in the free run.
- Also stated in: § Background · boosted
- Interpretationown data
This is the first report of molecular evidence for natural infections of mosquitoes with D. immitis in continental Portugal.
“To our knowledge, this is the first report of molecular evidence for natural infections of mosquitoes with D. immitis in continental Portugal.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
In continental Portugal, only Cx. theileri had been identified as a likely vector of Dirofilaria spp., based on L1-2 via dissection.
“with only Culex theileri identified to date, albeit with L1-2, through dissection.”
- Also stated in: § Background · hedged
“with Cx. theileri as the only likely vector of Dirofilaria spp. [25].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] Ribeiro H, Ramos HC, Pires CA. Contribuição para o estudo dos vectores de filaríases animais em Portugal. J Socied Ciências Médicas. 1983;147:143–6.
Not checked in the free run.
- Also stated in: § Background · hedged
- Premisecitation
Infection rates based on small sample sizes (<1000) may not accurately represent the true infection rate in the population.
“infection rates based on small sample sizes, i.e. <1000, may not accurately represent the true infection rate in the population [50]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [50] Walter SD, Hildreth SW, Beaty BJ. Estimation of infection rates in population of organisms using pools of variable size. Am J Epidemiol. 1980;112:124–8. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
North of the Montejunto-Estrela mountain range, a proportion of nine An. atroparvus to one An. maculipennis s.s. was found.
“even to the north of this range a proportion of nine An. atroparvus to one An. maculipennis s.s. was found [46,48,49]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [46] Ribeiro H, Ramos HC, Pires CA, Capela RA. An annotated checklist of the mosquitoes of continental Portugal (Diptera, Culicidae) . Actas do III Congresso Ibérico de Entomologia [Proceedings of the III Iberian Congress of Entomology], 1988, 233–254.
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [48] Sousa CA. Malaria vectorial capacity and competence of Anopheles atroparvus Van Thiel, 1927 (Diptera: Culicidae): Implications for the potential re-emergence of malaria in Portugal. PhD Thesis. Lisboa, Portugal: Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical; 2008.
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [49] Capinha C, Gomes E, Reis E, Rocha J, Sousa CA, Do Rosário VE, et al. Present habitat suitability for Anopheles atroparvus (Diptera, Culicidae) and its coincidence with former malaria areas in Mainland Portugal. Geospatial health. 2009;3:177–87. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The positive An. maculipennis s.l. in the district of Setúbal are in fact An. atroparvus.
“we can be confident that the positive An. maculipennis s.l. in the district of Setúbal are in fact An. atroparvus”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
The very high infection rate for Ae. detritus s.l. has reduced significance.
“the very high infection rate has a reduced significance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
Ae. caspius and Ae. detritus s.l. are here for the first time implicated as natural competent vectors of D. immitis.
“Aedes caspius and Ae. detritus s.l. are here for the first time, to the best of our knowledge, implicated as natural competent vectors of D. immitis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The presence of D. immitis DNA in the head+thorax of mosquitoes indicates the presence of L3 infective stage.
- Premisecitation
Hybrids of Cx. quinquefasciatus with Cx. pipiens have recently been found in Greece.
“hybrids with Cx. pipiens have recently been found in Greece [47]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [47] Shaikevich E, Vinogradova E. The discovery of a hybrid population of mosquitoes of the Culex pipiens L. complex (Diptera, Culicidae) on the Kos Island (Greece) by means of molecular markers. Entomologicheskoe Obozrenie. 2013;92(3):480–5. English version in Entomological Review 2014,94: 35–39 doi:10.1134/S0013873814010047.
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Cx. theileri, Cx. pipiens s.l., and An. maculipennis s.l. have already been implicated as vectors of Dirofilaria in Spain, Italy, Turkey, and Iran.
“Culex theileri, Cx. pipiens s.l. and An. maculipennis s.l. have already been implicated as vectors in countries such as Spain [15,20], Italy [16,17], Turkey [18] and Iran [21].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 5 sources checked- cites [15] Morchón R, Bargues MD, Latorre JM, Melero-Alcíbar R, Pou-Barreto C, Mas-Coma S, et al. Haplotype H1 of Culex pipiens implicated as a natural vector of Dirofilaria immitis in an endemic area of western Spain. Vector Borne Zoon Dis. 2007;7:653–8. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [20] Morchón R, Bargues MD, Latorre-Estivalis JM, Pou-Barreto C, Melero-Alcibar R, Moreno M, et al. Molecular Characterization of Culex theileri from Canary Islands, Spain, a potential vector of Dirofilaria immitis. J Clinic Experiment Pathol. 2011;S3:001. doi:10.4172/2161-0681.S3-001.
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [16] Cancrini G, Magi M, Gabrielli S, Arispici M, Tolari F, Dell’Omodarme M, et al. Natural vectors of dirofilariasis in rural and urban areas of the Tuscan region, central Italy. J Med Entomol. 2006;43:574–9. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [17] Latrofa MS, Montarsi F, Ciocchetta S, Annoscia G, Dantas-Torres F, Ravagnan S, et al. Molecular xenomonitoring of Dirofilaria immitis and Dirofilaria repens in mosquitoes from north-eastern Italy by real-time PCR coupled with melting curve analysis. Parasites Vectors. 2012;5:76. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [18] Yildirim A, Inci A, Duzlu O, Biskin Z, Ica A, Sahin I. Aedesvexans and Culex pipiens as potential vectors of Dirofilaria immitis in Central Turkey. Vet Parasitol. 2011;178:143–7. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
This is the first vector incrimination for An. atroparvus.
“hence becoming the first vector incrimination for this species.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
An. atroparvus is the only member of the An. maculipennis complex occurring south of the Montejunto-Estrela mountain range.
“An. atroparvus is the only member of this complex occurring south of the Montejunto-Estrela mountain range”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [46] Ribeiro H, Ramos HC, Pires CA, Capela RA. An annotated checklist of the mosquitoes of continental Portugal (Diptera, Culicidae) . Actas do III Congresso Ibérico de Entomologia [Proceedings of the III Iberian Congress of Entomology], 1988, 233–254.
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [48] Sousa CA. Malaria vectorial capacity and competence of Anopheles atroparvus Van Thiel, 1927 (Diptera: Culicidae): Implications for the potential re-emergence of malaria in Portugal. PhD Thesis. Lisboa, Portugal: Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical; 2008.
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [49] Capinha C, Gomes E, Reis E, Rocha J, Sousa CA, Do Rosário VE, et al. Present habitat suitability for Anopheles atroparvus (Diptera, Culicidae) and its coincidence with former malaria areas in Mainland Portugal. Geospatial health. 2009;3:177–87. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Knowledge of natural and potential vectors of canine dirofilariasis in mainland Portugal was scarce.
“the knowledge of its natural and potential vectors in mainland Portugal was scarce”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] Ribeiro H, Ramos HC, Pires CA. Contribuição para o estudo dos vectores de filaríases animais em Portugal. J Socied Ciências Médicas. 1983;147:143–6.
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
None of the collected mosquito specimens could belong to Cx. torrentium.
“therefore, none of the collected specimens could belong to this species.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
D. repens was not found in parallel animal surveys in the same districts of Portugal.
“D. repens was not found in parallel animal surveys in the same districts of Portugal [24]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [24] Alho AM, Landum M, Ferreira C, Meireles J, Gonçalves L, Madeira de Carvalho L etal. Prevalence and seasonal variations of canine dirofilariosis in Portugal. Vet Parasitol 2014, doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.08.014. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
This is the first study in which both biological forms of Cx. pipiens s.s. (pipiens and molestus) have been found infected with D. immitis.
“This is also the first study in which both biological forms of Cx. pipiens s.s., form pipiens and form molestus have been found infected with D. immitis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Cx. quinquefasciatus has not been recorded in Portugal.
- Interpretationreasoning
There exist infective mosquito vectors that would complete the transmission cycle.
“hence the existence of infective mosquito vectors that would complete the transmission cycle.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Coimbra and Santarém had similar prevalence rates of canine dirofilariasis.
“which had similar prevalence rates of CD.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [24] Alho AM, Landum M, Ferreira C, Meireles J, Gonçalves L, Madeira de Carvalho L etal. Prevalence and seasonal variations of canine dirofilariosis in Portugal. Vet Parasitol 2014, doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.08.014. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
This represents an almost continuous presence of infected vectors, particularly in Santarém.
“representing an almost continuous presence of infected vectors, particularly in Santarém.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The activity period for mosquitoes, and hence mosquito-borne diseases, are likely to increase in Portugal.
“the activity period for mosquitoes, and hence mosquito-borne diseases are likely to increase [55]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [55] Casimiro E, Calheiros J, Santos FD, Kovats S. National assessment of human health effects of climate change in Portugal: approach and key findings. Environ Health Perspect. 2006;114:1950–6. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given
The present study is the first PCR screening for Dirofilaria spp. in mosquitoes for continental Portugal.
“To our knowledge, the present study is the first PCR screening for Dirofilaria spp. in mosquitoes for continental Portugal.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
CDC trap collected mosquitoes represent the mosquito population searching for hosts.
“the CDC trap collected mosquitoes represent the mosquito population searching for hosts”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
CDC trap collected mosquitoes are proof of circulating infected vectors.
“and are proof therefore of circulating infected vectors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
An. maculipennis s.l., Cx. pipiens s.l., Cx. theileri, and Ae. caspius are the most abundant and broadly distributed mosquito species in continental Portugal.
“An. maculipennis s.l., Cx. pipiens s.l., Cx. theileri and Ae. caspius are the most abundant and broadly distributed [26]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [26] Almeida APG, Galão RP, Sousa CA, Novo MT, Parreira R, Pinto J, et al. Potential mosquito vectors of arboviruses in Portugal: species, distribution, abundance and West Nile infection. Transact Royal Soc Trop Med Hygiene. 2008;102:823–32. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
We have confirmed and reported new mosquito vectors of dirofilariasis in three districts of Portugal with high prevalence of canine dirofilariasis.
“We have confirmed and reported new mosquito vectors of dirofilariasis in three districts of Portugal with high prevalence of CD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Our results are in agreement with predictions of occurrence and seasonality of Dirofilaria spp., with peaks of infection in Summer (June to September).
“Our results are in agreement with predictions of occurrence and seasonality of Dirofilaria spp., with peaks of infection in Summer, from June to September”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [2] Genchi C, Rinaldi L, Cascone C, Mortarino M, Cringoli G. Is heartworm really spreading in Europe? Vet Parasitol. 2005;133:137–48. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [13] Genchi C, Rinaldi L, Mortarino M, Genchi M, Cringoli G. Climate and Dirofilaria infection in Europe. Vet Parasitol. 2009;163:286–92. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [14] Medlock LM, Barras I, Kerrod E, Taylor MA, Leach S. Analysis of climatic predictions for extrinsic incubation of Dirofilaria in the United Kingdom. Vector Borne Zoon Dis. 2007;7:4–14. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [42] Sassnau R, Czajka C, Kronefeld M, Werner D, Genchi C, Tannich E, Kampen H: Dirofilaria repens and Dirofilaria immitis DNA findings in mosquitoes in Germany: temperature data allow autochthonous extrinsic development. Parasitol Res 2014, doi 10.1007/s00436-014-3970-1. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
CDC traps are superior for targeting Cx. theileri and Ae. caspius.
“as they are superior for targeting these species [26]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [26] Almeida APG, Galão RP, Sousa CA, Novo MT, Parreira R, Pinto J, et al. Potential mosquito vectors of arboviruses in Portugal: species, distribution, abundance and West Nile infection. Transact Royal Soc Trop Med Hygiene. 2008;102:823–32. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
With the exception of Cx. pipiens, these species can support development of D. immitis to the L3 infective stage, based on the presence of filarial DNA in the head+thorax.
“and with the exception of Cx. pipiens, to the L3 infective stage, based on the presence of filarial DNA in the head+thorax.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The presence of D. immitis DNA in the head+thorax of mosquitoes indicates the presence of L3 infective stage.
- Rests on an assumption: Cx. quinquefasciatus has not been recorded in Portugal.
- Premisecitation
Setúbal had the highest canine dirofilariasis prevalence rate.
“Setúbal, which had the highest CD prevalence rate”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [24] Alho AM, Landum M, Ferreira C, Meireles J, Gonçalves L, Madeira de Carvalho L etal. Prevalence and seasonal variations of canine dirofilariosis in Portugal. Vet Parasitol 2014, doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.08.014. source
Not checked in the free run.
- May combine two claims. 22
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 31
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe PCR assay detected parasite DNA at a 1:40 dilution, corresponding to one positive mosquito in a pool of 40, for both head+thorax and abdomen pools.
“Parasite DNA was detected until 1:40 dilution, either for head+thorax or abdomen pools, corresponding to one single positive mosquito in a pool of 40 mosquitoes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMosquitoes with D. immitis DNA were found in all collecting dates except November 2011, usually by both methods and in more than one district.
“Overall, mosquitoes with D. immitis DNA were found in all collecting dates, but November 2011, usually by both methods and in more than one district (Figure 2, Table 5).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCx. pipiens s.l. positive pools for D. immitis were identified as Cx. pipiens s.s., 7 form pipiens and 1 form molestus, with the molestus from Setúbal.
“Culex pipiens s.l. positive pools for D. immitis, were identified as Cx. pipiens s.s., 7 form pipiens and 1 form molestus, which was from Setúbal.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenDDU were at least 117/year in the study period.
“DDU were at least 117/year in the study period.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataD. immitis DNA was found in the four most frequent mosquito species, and also in Ae. detritus s.l.
“Dirofilaria immitis DNA was found in the four most frequent species, but also in Ae. detritus s.l. (Table 3, with respective values of MIR, ERI and 95% CI).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataD. immitis DNA was detected in Cx. theileri with an estimated rate of infection (ERI) of 0.71%.
“| Cx. theileri | 5812 | 3406 | 234 | 13 | 16 | 23 | 6.8/1000 | 0.71% | 0.005–0.01 |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor An. maculipennis s.l. and Ae. caspius, the sample sizes were 400 and 270, respectively, with somewhat large 95% CIs.
“in the case of An. maculipennis s.l. and Ae. caspius the sample size is 400 and 270, respectively, with somewhat large 95% CIs”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenA great proportion of the pools were of a single mosquito specimen.
“probably as a great proportion of our pools were of a single mosquito specimen.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor Ae. detritus s.l., the sample size was 23 specimens with a much wider 95% CI.
“in the case of Ae. detritus s.l., with a sample of 23 specimens and a much wider 95% CI”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe species with the highest infection rates were Ae. caspius (3.7%), An. maculipennis s.l. (3.1%), Cx. theileri (0.7%), and Cx. pipiens s.l. (0.5%).
“The species with the highest infection rates were Ae. caspius (3.7%), followed by An. maculipennis s.l. (3.1%), Cx. theileri (0.7%) and Cx. pipiens s.l. (0.5%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataHighest and lowest mosquito infection rates were registered in Coimbra and Santarém, respectively.
“Highest and lowest infection rates for mosquitoes were registered in Coimbra and Santarém, respectively”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationCx. pipiens s.l. specimens were individually analyzed because of the sympatric existence of the two biological forms pipiens and molestus in Portugal.
“Specimens of Cx. pipiens s.l. were individually analyzed, due to the sympatric existence of the two biological forms, pipiens and molestus of the sensu strictu species, in Portugal [30].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [30] Gomes B, Sousa C, Novo M, Freitas FB, Alves R, Côrte-Real AR, et al. Asymmetric introgression between sympatric molestus and pipiens forms of Culex pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae) in the Comporta region. Portugal BMC EvoBiol. 2009;9:262.
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThere is no extrinsic development of D. immitis in the mosquito at average temperatures ≤14°C.
“For each day in which the average temperature was >14°C, temperature at which there is no extrinsic development of the parasite, the difference between the average temperature and 14°C was calculated (i.e. for Tmean≥15, DDU=Tmean-14) [40].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [40] Fortin JF, Slocombe JOD. Temperature requirements for the development of Dirofilaria immitis in Aedes triseriatus and Ae. vexans. Mosq News. 1981;41:625–33.
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationMosquito females were dissected into head+thorax and abdomen to discriminate between infective and infected Dirofilaria status, respectively.
“Mosquito females were dissected into head+thorax and abdomen to discriminate between Dirofilaria spp. infective/infected status, respectively [29].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [29] Favia G, Lanfrancotti A, Della Torre A, Cancrini G, Coluzzi M. Polymerase chain reaction identification of Dirofilaria repens and Dirofilaria immitis. Parasitology. 1996;6:567–71. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn 2009-2010, the overall seroprevalence of canine dirofilariasis in Northern and Central Portugal was 2.1%.
“In 2009–2010 the overall sero-prevalence in Northern and Central Portugal was 2.1% for CD [23].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [23] Vieira L, Silvestre-Ferreira AC, Fontes-Sousa AP, Balreira AC, Morchón R, Carretón E, et al. Seroprevalence of heartworm (Dirofilaria immitis) in feline and canine hosts from central and northern Portugal. JournHelminth. 2014;14:1–5.
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn 2011-2013, the overall parasitological prevalence of canine dirofilariasis in three districts of Centre-South Portugal was 15.1%.
“A recent survey, 2011–2013, in three districts of Centre-South, has revealed an overall parasitological prevalence rate of 15.1%, the highest in Setúbal (24.8%), followed by Coimbra (13.8%) and Santarém (13.2%) [24].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [24] Alho AM, Landum M, Ferreira C, Meireles J, Gonçalves L, Madeira de Carvalho L etal. Prevalence and seasonal variations of canine dirofilariosis in Portugal. Vet Parasitol 2014, doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.08.014. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationDirofilaria spp. are transmitted by several mosquito species belonging to a wide range of genera in different parts of the world, such as Culex, Aedes and Anopheles.
“Dirofilaria spp. are transmitted by several mosquito species belonging to a wide range of genera in different parts of the world, such as Culex, Aedes and Anopheles [5].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [5] Simón F, Siles-Lucas M, Morchón R, González-Miguel J, Mellado I, Carretón E, et al. Human and animal dirofilariasis: the emergence of a zoonotic mosaic. ClinMicrobiol Rev. 2012;25:507–44.
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataCulex theileri, Cx. pipiens, An. maculipennis s.l., An. atroparvus, Ae. caspius, and Ae. detritus s.l. are potential vectors of D. immitis in three districts of Portugal.
“Culex theileri, Cx. pipiens, An. maculipennis s.l. An. atroparvus, Ae.caspius and Ae. detritus s.l. were identified as potential vectors of D. immitis in three districts of Portugal, from Spring to Autumn, in 5 of the 6 collection dates in 2011–2013.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationHigh densities of Cx. theileri, Cx. pipiens s.l., An. maculipennis s.l., and Ae. caspius were recorded in the study areas.
“In addition, high densities of mosquito populations, namely Cx. theileri, Cx. pipiens s.l. An. maculipennis s.l. and Ae.caspius, were recorded in the above mentioned areas [26].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [26] Almeida APG, Galão RP, Sousa CA, Novo MT, Parreira R, Pinto J, et al. Potential mosquito vectors of arboviruses in Portugal: species, distribution, abundance and West Nile infection. Transact Royal Soc Trop Med Hygiene. 2008;102:823–32. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTransmission of dirofilariasis depends on sufficient numbers of infected and microfilaremic dogs, susceptible mosquitoes, and a suitable climate for extrinsic incubation of the parasite.
“Transmission of dirofilariasis is dependent upon the presence of sufficient numbers of infected and microfilaremic dogs, susceptible mosquitoes, and a suitable climate to allow extrinsic incubation of the parasite in the mosquito vector [13,14].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [13] Genchi C, Rinaldi L, Mortarino M, Genchi M, Cringoli G. Climate and Dirofilaria infection in Europe. Vet Parasitol. 2009;163:286–92. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [14] Medlock LM, Barras I, Kerrod E, Taylor MA, Leach S. Analysis of climatic predictions for extrinsic incubation of Dirofilaria in the United Kingdom. Vector Borne Zoon Dis. 2007;7:4–14. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn Portugal, there are records of Cx. pipiens and Cx. torrentium as members of the Cx. pipiens complex.
“In Portugal, there are to date, records of Cx. pipiens and Cx. torrentium as members of the Cx. pipiens complex [46].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [46] Ribeiro H, Ramos HC, Pires CA, Capela RA. An annotated checklist of the mosquitoes of continental Portugal (Diptera, Culicidae) . Actas do III Congresso Ibérico de Entomologia [Proceedings of the III Iberian Congress of Entomology], 1988, 233–254.
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCx. torrentium is rare and occurs only in northern and mountain areas of Portugal.
“Culex torrentium is rare and occurs only in northern and mountain areas of the country [46]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [46] Ribeiro H, Ramos HC, Pires CA, Capela RA. An annotated checklist of the mosquitoes of continental Portugal (Diptera, Culicidae) . Actas do III Congresso Ibérico de Entomologia [Proceedings of the III Iberian Congress of Entomology], 1988, 233–254.
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn Portugal, previous detection of Dirofilaria spp. L1 and L2 larvae in the Malpighian tubules of Cx. theileri in Setúbal yielded an infection rate of 4.76% in a sample of 42.
“In Portugal, previous detection of Dirofilaria spp. L1 and L2 larvae in the MT of Cx. theileri, in the district of Setúbal, had yielded an infection rate of 4.76%, again, in a small sample (N=42) [25].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] Ribeiro H, Ramos HC, Pires CA. Contribuição para o estudo dos vectores de filaríases animais em Portugal. J Socied Ciências Médicas. 1983;147:143–6.
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAn. maculipennis s.l. has previously been found infected with D. immitis.
“Anopheles maculipennis s.l. has also been previously found infected with D. immitis [16].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [16] Cancrini G, Magi M, Gabrielli S, Arispici M, Tolari F, Dell’Omodarme M, et al. Natural vectors of dirofilariasis in rural and urban areas of the Tuscan region, central Italy. J Med Entomol. 2006;43:574–9. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataCx. pipiens form pipiens and form molestus are likely vectors of D. immitis, based on detection of D. immitis DNA only in their abdomens and absence of bloodmeal traces.
“and Cx. pipiens form pipiens and form molestus, as likely vectors, i.e.with DNA only in abdomens, but from mosquitoes without any traces of bloodmeal.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Cx. quinquefasciatus has not been recorded in Portugal.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationInfection rates in Ae. caspius in Italy were 0.18%, much lower than in this study.
“Infection rates in Ae. caspius in Italy were much lower than ours, 0.18% [17].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [17] Latrofa MS, Montarsi F, Ciocchetta S, Annoscia G, Dantas-Torres F, Ravagnan S, et al. Molecular xenomonitoring of Dirofilaria immitis and Dirofilaria repens in mosquitoes from north-eastern Italy by real-time PCR coupled with melting curve analysis. Parasites Vectors. 2012;5:76. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn Italy, D. repens has been found in Cx. pipiens and Ae. albopictus at similar rates as D. immitis.
“or at similar rates as D. immitis in Cx. pipiens and Ae. albopictus [44]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [44] Cancrini G, Scaramozzino P, Gabrielli S, di Paolo M, Toma L, Romi R. Aedes albopictus and Culex pipiens implicated as natural vectors of Dirofilaria repens in central Italy. J Med Entomol. 2007;44:1064–6. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAe. detritus s.l. had been found positive for D. immitis in the abdominal portion.
“and Ae. detritus s.l. for the abdominal portion [45]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [45] Cancrini G, Gabrielli S. Vectors of Dirofilaria nematodes: biology, behaviour and host/parasite relationships. In: Genchi C, Rinaldi L, Cringoli G, editors. Dirofilariaimmitis and D. repens in dog and cat and human infection. Naples: Rolando editore; 2007. p. 49–58.
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA historical study considered Cx. theileri as a probable vector of Dirofilaria spp.
“with a historical study considering Cx. theileri as a probable vector of Dirofilaria spp. [25]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] Ribeiro H, Ramos HC, Pires CA. Contribuição para o estudo dos vectores de filaríases animais em Portugal. J Socied Ciências Médicas. 1983;147:143–6.
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataAn. maculipennis s.l., Ae. caspius, Ae. detritus s.l., and Cx. theileri are likely competent vectors of D. immitis, based on detection of D. immitis DNA in their head+thorax.
“We report the finding of An. maculipennis s.l., Ae. caspius, Ae. detritus s.l. and Cx. theileri as likely competent vectors of D. immitis, i.e. with DNA in head+thorax”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The presence of D. immitis DNA in the head+thorax of mosquitoes indicates the presence of L3 infective stage.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn Iran, infection rates for An. maculipennis were 11.7% (4/34) and for Cx. theileri were 10% (15/149).
“much higher infection rates for An. maculipennis, 11.7% (4/34) and Cx. theileri, 10% (15/149) were found in Iran [21]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [21] Azari-Hamidian S, Yaghoobi-Ershadi MR, Javadian E, Abai MR, Mobedi I, Linton YM, et al. Distribution and ecology of mosquitoes in a focus of in northwestern Iran, with the first finding of filarial larvae in naturally infected local mosquitoes. Med Vet Entomol. 2009;23:111–21. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn other Southern European countries such as Italy, D. repens has been found in Cx. pipiens at much lower rates than D. immitis.
“in contrast with recent findings of D. repens in other Southern European countries such as Italy, albeit in much lower rates than D. immitis, in Cx. pipiens [16,17]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [16] Cancrini G, Magi M, Gabrielli S, Arispici M, Tolari F, Dell’Omodarme M, et al. Natural vectors of dirofilariasis in rural and urban areas of the Tuscan region, central Italy. J Med Entomol. 2006;43:574–9. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [17] Latrofa MS, Montarsi F, Ciocchetta S, Annoscia G, Dantas-Torres F, Ravagnan S, et al. Molecular xenomonitoring of Dirofilaria immitis and Dirofilaria repens in mosquitoes from north-eastern Italy by real-time PCR coupled with melting curve analysis. Parasites Vectors. 2012;5:76. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningAedes detritus s.l. were not differentiated to species level because the available technique would preclude screening for dirofilarial DNA.
“Aedes detritus s.l. were not differentiated as the technique available at the time of this study would preclude the screening for dirofilarial DNA.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAe. caspius had been found positive for D. immitis in the whole mosquito.
“Aedes caspius had been found positive for the whole mosquito [17]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [17] Latrofa MS, Montarsi F, Ciocchetta S, Annoscia G, Dantas-Torres F, Ravagnan S, et al. Molecular xenomonitoring of Dirofilaria immitis and Dirofilaria repens in mosquitoes from north-eastern Italy by real-time PCR coupled with melting curve analysis. Parasites Vectors. 2012;5:76. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCx. pipiens infection rates in Spain, Italy, and Turkey have been reported as 0.3%, 0.048-0.54%, and 0.12%, respectively.
“Infection of Cx. pipiens in Spain has been detected with a rate of 0.3% [15], in Italy it ranges from 0.048% [17], much lower than this present study, to 0.26% and 0.54% [16,44], similar to our values, with an intermediate prevalence rate in Turkey of 0.12% [18].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [15] Morchón R, Bargues MD, Latorre JM, Melero-Alcíbar R, Pou-Barreto C, Mas-Coma S, et al. Haplotype H1 of Culex pipiens implicated as a natural vector of Dirofilaria immitis in an endemic area of western Spain. Vector Borne Zoon Dis. 2007;7:653–8. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [17] Latrofa MS, Montarsi F, Ciocchetta S, Annoscia G, Dantas-Torres F, Ravagnan S, et al. Molecular xenomonitoring of Dirofilaria immitis and Dirofilaria repens in mosquitoes from north-eastern Italy by real-time PCR coupled with melting curve analysis. Parasites Vectors. 2012;5:76. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [16] Cancrini G, Magi M, Gabrielli S, Arispici M, Tolari F, Dell’Omodarme M, et al. Natural vectors of dirofilariasis in rural and urban areas of the Tuscan region, central Italy. J Med Entomol. 2006;43:574–9. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [44] Cancrini G, Scaramozzino P, Gabrielli S, di Paolo M, Toma L, Romi R. Aedes albopictus and Culex pipiens implicated as natural vectors of Dirofilaria repens in central Italy. J Med Entomol. 2007;44:1064–6. source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataInfection rates for An. maculipennis s.l. and Ae. caspius should be interpreted with caution.
“therefore, infection rates should be interpreted with caution”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn Portugal, temperature increases have reached 0.5°C/decade since 1970, more than twice the global median temperature.
“temperature increases have reached 0.5°C/decade since 1970, more than twice higher than the global median temperature [54]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [54] Ramos AM, Trigo RM, Santo FE. Evolution of extreme temperatures over Portugal: recent changes and future scenarios. Clim Res. 2011;48:177–92. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn continental Portugal, there are 41 identified species of mosquitoes.
“In continental Portugal there are 41 identified species of mosquitoes [46]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [46] Ribeiro H, Ramos HC, Pires CA, Capela RA. An annotated checklist of the mosquitoes of continental Portugal (Diptera, Culicidae) . Actas do III Congresso Ibérico de Entomologia [Proceedings of the III Iberian Congress of Entomology], 1988, 233–254.
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Study design and conductnone givenA 7-day period at 25°C may not be enough for the completion of the extrinsic cycle of D. immitis.
“Although a 7 day period at 25°C may not be enough for the completion of the extrinsic cycle”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationFuture scenarios may range between 3-5.8°C by 2040-2090.
“with future scenarios that may range between 3–5.8°C by 2040–2090”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [55] Casimiro E, Calheiros J, Santos FD, Kovats S. National assessment of human health effects of climate change in Portugal: approach and key findings. Environ Health Perspect. 2006;114:1950–6. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationThis finding is in agreement with previous surveys for Cx. pipiens s.l. by both methods.
“in agreement with previous surveys, namely for Cx. pipiens s.l., by both methods, as a sign of identical capture yield for this species [26]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [26] Almeida APG, Galão RP, Sousa CA, Novo MT, Parreira R, Pinto J, et al. Potential mosquito vectors of arboviruses in Portugal: species, distribution, abundance and West Nile infection. Transact Royal Soc Trop Med Hygiene. 2008;102:823–32. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn Madeira, Cx. theileri has been found at infection rates of circa 0.9%-1.13%.
“and circa 0.9%-1.13% in Madeira [19]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [19] Santa-Ana M, Khadem M, Capela R. Natural infection of Culex theileri (Diptera, Culicidae) with Dirofilaria immitis (Nematoda, Filarioidea) on Madeira Island, Portugal. J Med Entomol. 2006;43:104–6. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningA compromise had to be taken to compensate for mosquito mortality and filarial DNA degradation while allowing for complete digestion of bloodmeals.
“a compromise had to be taken to compensate for mosquito mortality and filarial DNA degradation, while allowing for complete digestion of bloodmeals.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationDirofilariasis is recognized as an expanding zoonosis, particularly in Europe.
“dirofilariasis is recognized as an expanding zoonosis, particularly in Europe [4,5]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [4] Traversa D, Cesare A, Conboy G. Canine and feline cardiopulmonary parasitic nematodes in Europe: emerging and underestimated. Parasites Vectors. 2010;3:62. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [5] Simón F, Siles-Lucas M, Morchón R, González-Miguel J, Mellado I, Carretón E, et al. Human and animal dirofilariasis: the emergence of a zoonotic mosaic. ClinMicrobiol Rev. 2012;25:507–44.
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn the Canaries, Cx. theileri has been found at an infection rate of 0.16%.
“Cx. theileri has been found at infection rates of 0.16% in the Canaries [20]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] Morchón R, Bargues MD, Latorre-Estivalis JM, Pou-Barreto C, Melero-Alcibar R, Moreno M, et al. Molecular Characterization of Culex theileri from Canary Islands, Spain, a potential vector of Dirofilaria immitis. J Clinic Experiment Pathol. 2011;S3:001. doi:10.4172/2161-0681.S3-001.
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThere is not enough data to draw conclusions on the seasonal dynamics of mosquitoes because there were only three collecting moments per year.
“considering there were only three collecting moments per year, there is not enough data to draw conclusions on the seasonal dynamics of mosquitoes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataAe. caspius, An. maculipennis s.l., An. atroparvus, Cx. pipiens of both bioforms pipiens and molestus, and Ae. detritus s.l. can support the development of D. immitis.
“but also Ae. caspius, An. maculipennis s.l., An. atroparvus, Cx. pipiens of both bioforms pipiens and molestus and Ae. detritus s.l. can support the development of D. immitis”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Cx. quinquefasciatus has not been recorded in Portugal.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIR tends to be a more adequate method to capture An. maculipennis s.l.
“as IR tends to be a more adequate method to capture this species [51]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [51] Lourenço PM, Sousa CA, Seixas J, Lopes P, Novo MT, Almeida AP. Anopheles atroparvus density modeling using MODIS NDVI in a former malarious area in Portugal. J Vector Ecol. 2011;36:279–91. source
Not checked in the free run.
The authors state this as an assumption.
A mosquito that takes a blood meal on a microfilaremic host on a day when DDU30 ≥130 can complete the extrinsic cycle and become infective, assuming an average mosquito lifespan of 30 days, regardless of temperatures below 14°C during that period.
“When DDU30 is ≥130, it is assumed that a mosquito that might have taken a blood meal on a microfilaremic host on that particular day, had the possibility of allowing the completion of the extrinsic cycle, hence becoming infective, admitting an average mosquito life span of 30 days [2,13,40], independently of temperatures lower than 14°C during that period [41].”
The paper relies on this without support.
The presence of D. immitis DNA in the head+thorax of mosquitoes indicates the presence of L3 infective stage.
“based on the presence of filarial DNA in the head+thorax”
The paper relies on this without support.
Cx. quinquefasciatus has not been recorded in Portugal.
“although it has not yet been recorded in Portugal”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In Portugal, D. immitis larvae have been identified in new mosquito species Cx. pipiens s.l., Cx. theileri, Ae. caspius, An. maculipennis s.l., and Ae. dentritus s.l. in Coimbra, Santarém, and Setúbal.
“In Portugal, the presence of D. immitis larvae were identified in new species of mosquitoes, such us Cx. pipiens s.l.; Cx. theileri, Ae. caspius, An. maculipennis s.l., and Ae. dentritus s.l. in Coimbra (centre), Santarém, and Setúbal (centre-southern) [145,146].”
From What has happened to heartworm disease in Europe in the last 10 years? (2022) · cites this paper as [145]
In neighbouring Portugal, conclusive implication of Cx. pipiens as a vector for D. immitis could not be ascertained because nematode DNA was detected only in abdominal macerates.
“To the west of Extremadura, in neighbouring Portugal, conclusive implication of Cx. pipiens as a vector for D. immitis could not be ascertained either, since nematode DNA was detected only in abdominal macerates ( Ferreira et al., 2015).”
From Culex pipiens as a potential vector for transmission of Dirofilaria immitis and other unclassified Filarioidea in Southwest Spain (2016) · cites this paper as Ferreira et al., 2015
Other mosquito species have been found infected with Dirofilaria throughout Europe, with infection rates ranging from 0.17% to 1.13% for Culex theileri.
“Other mosquito species, have been found infected throughout Europe, such as Cx. theileri in the Canary islands ( Morchón et al., 2011), Madeira island (Santa-Ana et al., 2006), and mainland Portugal (Ferreira et al., 2015), with infection rates that range from 0.17% to 1.13%.”
From Culex pipiens as a potential vector for transmission of Dirofilaria immitis and other unclassified Filarioidea in Southwest Spain (2016) · cites this paper as Ferreira et al., 2015
In neighbouring Portugal, Culex pipiens revealed a higher Dirofilaria immitis infection rate (0.5%).
“In neighbouring Portugal, Cx. pipiens revealed a higher D. immitis infection rate (0.5%) ( Ferreira et al., 2015)”
From Culex pipiens as a potential vector for transmission of Dirofilaria immitis and other unclassified Filarioidea in Southwest Spain (2016) · cites this paper as Ferreira et al., 2015
In continental Portugal, Cx. pipiens were found to be infected with D. immitis, but were not potentially infective; filarial DNA was detected only in the abdomen and not in thorax-head samples.
“In continental Portugal, Cx. pipiens were found to be infected with D. immitis, but were not potentially infective; filarial DNA was detected only in the abdomen and not in thorax-head samples [25].”
From <i>Dirofilaria</i> and <i>Wolbachia</i> in mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in central European Russia and on the Black Sea coast (2019) · cites this paper as [25]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Table 3 reports zero positive pools in its total row
MinorTable 3 reports zero positive head+thorax pools, abdomen pools, and pools overall in its total row. Table 4 reports 23, 41, and 54, respectively, for the same 9,156 collected and 5,866 tested mosquitoes; those values also match the positive rows in Table 3.
“| TOTAL | 9156 | 5866 | 1815 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9.2/1000 | 0.91% | 0.007–0.012 |”
“| TOTAL | 9156 | 5866 | 1815 | 23 | 41 | 54 | 9.2/1000 | 0.91% | 0.007–0.012 |”
Culex pipiens tests are described as individual but tabulated as pools
MinorThe methods say Cx. pipiens s.l. specimens were analyzed individually. Table 3 lists 1,595 specimens tested in only 1,123 pools, so they cannot all have been tested individually as stated.
“Specimens of Cx. pipiens s.l. were individually analyzed, due to the sympatric existence of the two biological forms, pipiens and molestus of the sensu strictu species, in Portugal [30].”
“| Cx. pipiens s.l. | 1940 | 1595 | 1123 | 0 | 8 | 8 | 5/1000 | 0.50% | 0.003–0.01 |”
Cites
Hall, T. A. (1999) · Nucleic Acids Symposium Series · doi:10.14601/phytopathol_mediterr-14998u1.29 · Cited by 38,373 · see citing works
Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences
Guitton, H., & Siegel, S. (1958) · Revue économique · doi:10.2307/3498751 · Cited by 35,281 · see citing works
Nonparametric Statistics : for the Behavioral Sciences
Siegel, S. (1956) · UCLA - Biblioteca de Ciencias y Tecnologia Felix Morales Bueno · Cited by 3,314 · see citing works
Nematode parasites of vertebrates: their development and transmission
Anderson, R. C. (2000) · CABI Publishing eBooks · doi:10.1079/9780851994215.0000 · Cited by 2,487 · see citing works
Human and animal dirofilariasis: The emergence of a zoonotic mosaic
Simón, F., Siles-Lucas, M., Morchón, R., González-Miguel, J., Mellado, I., Carretón, E., & Montoya-Alonso, J. A. (2012) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00012-12 · Cited by 834 · see citing works
The Nematode Parasites of Vertebrates
Yorke, W., & Maplestone, P. A. (1926) · Transactions of the American Microscopical Society · doi:10.2307/3221805 · Cited by 774 · see citing works
Chapter 4 Heartworm Disease in Animals and Humans
McCall, J. W., Genchi, C., Kramer, L. H., Guerrero, J., & Venco, L. (2008) · Advances in Parasitology · doi:10.1016/s0065-308x(08)00204-2 · Cited by 609 · see citing works
Smith, J. L., & Fonseca, D. M. (2004) · American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · doi:10.4269/ajtmh.2004.70.339 · Cited by 357 · see citing works
Canine and feline cardiopulmonary parasitic nematodes in Europe: emerging and underestimated
Traversa, D., Di Cesare, A., & Conboy, G. (2010) · Parasites & Vectors · doi:10.1186/1756-3305-3-62 · Cited by 351 · see citing works
Climate and Dirofilaria infection in Europe
Genchi, C., Rinaldi, L., Mortarino, M., Genchi, M., & Cringoli, G. (2009) · Veterinary parasitology · doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.03.026 · Cited by 349 · cited 4× · see citing works
“, with peaks of infection in Summer, from June to September, even in countries of Northern Europe [2,13,14,42].”
BackgroundInfluentialDiscrimination between six species of canine microfilariae by a single polymerase chain reaction
Rishniw, M., Barr, S. C., Simpson, K. W., Frongillo, M. F., Franz, M., & Dominguez Alpizar, J. L. (2006) · Veterinary Parasitology · doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2005.10.013 · Cited by 307 · see citing works
Is heartworm disease really spreading in Europe?
Genchi, C., Rinaldi, L., Cascone, C., Mortarino, M., & Cringoli, G. (2005) · Veterinary Parasitology · doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2005.04.009 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
Aedes albopictus is a natural vector of Dirofilaria immitis in Italy
Cancrini, G., Frangipane di Regalbono, A., Ricci, I., Tessarin, C., Gabrielli, S., & Pietrobelli, M. (2003) · Veterinary Parasitology · doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2003.10.011 · Cited by 206 · see citing works
Bahnck, C., & Fonseca, D. M. (2006) · American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · doi:10.4269/ajtmh.2006.75.2.0750251 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
Comparison of methods for estimation of individual-level prevalence based on pooled samples
Cowling, D. W., Gardner, I. A., & Johnson, W. O. (1999) · Preventive Veterinary Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0167-5877(98)00131-7 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
ESTIMATION OF INFECTION RATES IN POPULATIONS OF ORGANISMS USING POOLS OF VARIABLE SIZE
WALTER, S. D., HILDRETH, S. W., & BEATY, B. J. (1980) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112961 · Cited by 169 · cited 1× · see citing works
“<1000, may not accurately represent the true infection rate in the population [50].”
BackgroundGomes, B., Sousa, C. A., Novo, M. T., Freitas, F. B., Alves, R., Côrte-Real, A. R., Salgueiro, P., Donnelly, M. J., de Almeida, A. P. G., & Pinto, J. (2009) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2148-9-262 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Self-citationAzari-Hamidian, S., Ershadi, M. R. Y., Javadian, E., Abai, M. R., Mobedi, I., Linton, Y., & Harbach, R. E. (2009) · Medical and Veterinary Entomology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2915.2009.00802.x · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Sałamatin, R., Pavlikovska, T., Sagach, O., Nikolayenko, S., Kornyushin, V. V., Kharchenko, V., Masny, A., Cielecka, D., Konieczna-Sałamatin, J., Conn, D. B., et al. (2013) · Acta Parasitologica · doi:10.2478/s11686-013-0187-x · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Natural vectors of dirofilariasis in rural and urban areas of the Tuscan region, central Italy
Cancrini, G., Magi, M., Gabrielli, S., Arispici, M., Tolari, F., Dell’Omodarme, M., & Prati, M. C. (2006) · Journal of Medical Entomology · doi:10.1093/jmedent/43.3.574 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
National Assessment of Human Health Effects of Climate Change in Portugal: Approach and Key Findings
Casimiro, E., Calheiros, J., Santos, F. D., & Kovats, S. (2006) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.8431 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Evolution of extreme temperatures over Portugal: recent changes and future scenarios
Ramos, A. M., Trigo, R. M., & Santo, F. E. (2010) · Climate Research · doi:10.3354/cr00934 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Cancrini, G., Scaramozzino, P., Gabrielli, S., Paolo, M. D., Toma, L., & Romi, R. (2007) · Journal of Medical Entomology · doi:10.1603/0022-2585(2007)44[1064:aaacpi]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Polymerase chain reaction—identification of <i>Dirofilaria repens</i> and <i>Dirofilaria immitis</i>
Favia, G., Lanfrancotti, A., Torre, A. D., Cancrini, G., & Coluzzi, M. (1996) · Parasitology · doi:10.1017/s0031182000067615 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Stothard, J. R., Hughes, S., & Rollinson, D. (1996) · Acta Tropica · doi:10.1016/0001-706x(95)00137-4 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Latrofa, M. S., Montarsi, F., Ciocchetta, S., Annoscia, G., Dantas-Torres, F., Ravagnan, S., Capelli, G., & Otranto, D. (2012) · Parasites & Vectors · doi:10.1186/1756-3305-5-76 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Human dirofilariosis in Hungary: an emerging zoonosis in central Europe
Szénási, Z., Kovács, A. H., Pampiglione, S., Fioravanti, M. L., Kucsera, I., Tánczos, B., & Tiszlavicz, L. (2008) · Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · doi:10.1007/s00508-008-0928-2 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Medlock, J. M., Barrass, I., Kerrod, E., Taylor, M. A., & Leach, S. (2007) · Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases · doi:10.1089/vbz.2006.0564 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Almeida, A. P. G., Galão, R. P., Sousa, C. A., Novo, M. T., Parreira, R., Pinto, J., Piedade, J., & Esteves, A. (2008) · Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · doi:10.1016/j.trstmh.2008.03.011 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Self-citationFortin, J., & Slocombe, J. O. D. (1981) · Mosquito news · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Human dirofilariosis in Poland: the first cases of autochthonous infections with Dirofilaria repens.
Cielecka, D., Hanna, Ż.-P., Masny, A., Sałamatin, R., Wesołowska, M., & Gołąb, E. (2012) · PubMed · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Venco, L., Genchi, M., Genchi, C., Gatti, D., & Kramer, L. (2011) · Veterinary Parasitology · doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.01.013 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Aedes vexans and Culex pipiens as the potential vectors of Dirofilaria immitis in Central Turkey
Yildirim, A., Inci, A., Duzlu, O., Biskin, Z., Ica, A., & Sahin, I. (2011) · Veterinary Parasitology · doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.12.023 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Dirofilaria infections in working dogs in Slovakia
Miterpáková, M., Antolová, D., Hurníková, Z., Dubinsky, P., Pavlačka, A., & Németh, J. (2009) · Journal of Helminthology · doi:10.1017/s0022149x09990496 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Santa-Ana, M., Khadem, M., & Capela, R. (2006) · Journal of Medical Entomology · doi:10.1603/0022-2585(2006)043[0104:nioctd]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Prevalence and seasonal variations of canine dirofilariosis in Portugal
Alho, A. M., Landum, M., Ferreira, C., Meireles, J., Gonçalves, L., de Carvalho, L. M., & Belo, S. (2014) · Veterinary Parasitology · doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.08.014 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Self-citationAnopheles atroparvus density modeling using MODIS NDVI in a former malarious area in Portugal
Lourenço, P. M., Sousa, C. A., Seixas, J., Lopes, P. M., Novo, M. T., & de Almeida, A. P. G. (2011) · Journal of Vector Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1948-7134.2011.00168.x · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Self-citationMorchón, R., Bargues, M. D., Latorre, J. M., Melero-Alcíbar, R., Pou-Barreto, C., Mas-Coma, S., & Simón, F. (2007) · Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases · doi:10.1089/vbz.2007.0124 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Santa‐Ana, M., Khadem, M., & Capela, R. (2006) · Journal of Medical Entomology · doi:10.1093/jmedent/43.1.104 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
First autochthonous Dirofilaria immitis (Leidy, 1856) infection in a dog in Hungary
Jacsó, O., Mándoki, M., Majoros, G., Pétsch, M., Mortarino, M., Genchi, C., & Fok, É. (2009) · Helminthologia · doi:10.2478/s11687-009-0030-y · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Vieira, L., Silvestre-Ferreira, A. C., Fontes-Sousa, A. P., Balreira, A. C., Morchón, R., Carretón, E., Vilhena, H., Simón, F., & Montoya-Alonso, J. A. (2015) · Journal of Helminthology · doi:10.1017/s0022149x14000352 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Sassnau, R., Czajka, C., Kronefeld, M., Werner, D., Genchi, C., Tannich, E., & Kampen, H. (2014) · Parasitology Research · doi:10.1007/s00436-014-3970-1 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Capinha, C., Gomes, E., Reis, E., Rocha, J., Sousa, C. A., Do Rosário, V. E., & Almeida, A. P. (2009) · Geospatial health · doi:10.4081/gh.2009.219 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
de Almeida, A. P. G., Freitas, F. B., Novo, M. T., Sousa, C. A., Rodrigues, J. C., Alves, R., & Esteves, A. (2010) · Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases · doi:10.1089/vbz.2009.0245 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Self-citationSeroreactivity to Dirofilariaantigens in people from different areas of Serbia
Tasić-Otašević, S. A., Gabrielli, S. V., Tasić, A. V., MiladinovićTasić, N. L., Kostić, J. T., Ignjatović, A. M., Popović Dragonjić, L. D., Milošević, Z. G., Arsić-Arsenijević, V. S., & Cancrini, G. A. (2014) · BMC Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1186/1471-2334-14-68 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Bargues, M. D. (2013) · Journal of Clinical & Experimental Pathology · doi:10.4172/2161-0681.s3-001 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Shaikevich, E. V., & Vinogradova, E. B. (2014) · Entomological Review · doi:10.1134/s0013873814010047 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Cancrini, G., Scaramozzino, P., Gabrielli, S., Paolo, M. D., Toma, L., & Romi, R. (2007) · Journal of Medical Entomology · doi:10.1093/jmedent/44.6.1064 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Species composition and dynamics of adult mosquitoes of southern Portugal
Osório, H. C., Amaro, F. I. F., Zé‐Zé, L., et al. (2008) · Cited by 6 · see citing works
(2007) · IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome)
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- McCall JW, Genchi C, Kramer LH, Guerrero J, Venco L. Heartworm disease in animals and humans. AdvParasitol. 2008;66:193–285.
- Świątalska A, Demiaszkiewicz AW. First autochthonous case of Dirofilaria immitis invasion in dog in Poland. ŽycieWeterynaryjne. 2012;87:685.
- Ribeiro H, Ramos HC, Pires CA. Contribuição para o estudo dos vectores de filaríases animais em Portugal. J Socied Ciências Médicas. 1983;147:143–6.
- Ribeiro H, Ramos HC. Identification keys of the mosquitoes of continental Portugal, Azores and Madeira. Eur Mosquito Bull. 1999;3:1–11.
- BLAST® Basic Local Alignment Search Tool. http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi.
- Ribeiro H, Ramos HC, Pires CA, Capela RA. An annotated checklist of the mosquitoes of continental Portugal (Diptera, Culicidae) . Actas do III Congresso Ibérico de Entomologia [Proceedings of the III Iberian Congress of Entomology], 1988, 233–254.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
What has happened to heartworm disease in Europe in the last 10 years?
Morchón, R., Montoya-Alonso, J. A., Rodríguez-Escolar, I., & Carretón, E. (2022) · Pathogens · doi:10.3390/pathogens11091042 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Bravo-Barriga, D., Parreira, R., Almeida, A. P. G., Calado, M., Blanco-Ciudad, J., Serrano-Aguilera, F. J., Pérez-Martín, J. E., Sánchez-Peinado, J., Pinto, J., Reina, D., et al. (2016) · Veterinary Parasitology · doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2016.04.030 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Self-citationShaikevich, E., Bogacheva, A., & Ganushkina, L. (2019) · Parasite · doi:10.1051/parasite/2019002 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Panarese, R., Iatta, R., Latrofa, M. S., Zatelli, A., Ignjatović Ćupina, A., Montarsi, F., Pombi, M., Mendoza-Roldan, J. A., Beugnet, F., & Otranto, D. (2020) · International Journal for Parasitology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpara.2020.04.002 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Kemenesi, G., Kurucz, K., Kepner, A., Dallos, B., Oldal, M., Herczeg, R., Vajdovics, P., Bányai, K., & Jakab, F. (2015) · Veterinary Parasitology · doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2015.09.010 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Circulation of Dirofilaria repens and Dirofilaria immitis in Moldova
Șuleșco, T., von Thien, H., Toderaș, L., Toderaș, I., Lühken, R., & Tannich, E. (2016) · Parasites & Vectors · doi:10.1186/s13071-016-1916-4 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Tomazatos, A., Cadar, D., Török, E., Maranda, I., Horváth, C., Keresztes, L., Spinu, M., Jansen, S., Jöst, H., Schmidt-Chanasit, J., et al. (2018) · Parasites & Vectors · doi:10.1186/s13071-018-2980-8 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Molecular characterization of Dirofilaria spp. circulating in Portugal
Ferreira, C., Afonso, A., Calado, M., Maurício, I., Alho, A. M., Meireles, J., Madeira de Carvalho, L., & Belo, S. (2017) · Parasites & Vectors · doi:10.1186/s13071-017-2180-y · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Self-citationExposure of humans to the zoonotic nematode <i>Dirofilaria immitis</i> in Northern Portugal
Fontes-Sousa, A. P., Silvestre-Ferreira, A. C., Carretón, E., Esteves-Guimarães, J., Maia-Rocha, C., Oliveira, P., Lobo, L., Morchón, R., Araújo, F., Simón, F., et al. (2019) · Epidemiology and Infection · doi:10.1017/s0950268819001687 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Masny, A., Sałamatin, R., Rozej-Bielicka, W., & Golab, E. (2016) · Parasitology Research · doi:10.1007/s00436-015-4767-6 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
DE PINHO MIXÃO, V., MENDES, A. M., MAURÍCIO, I. L., CALADO, M. M., NOVO, M. T., BELO, S., & ALMEIDA, A. P. G. (2016) · Medical and Veterinary Entomology · doi:10.1111/mve.12179 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Self-citationDetection of Dirofilaria repens microfilariae in a dog from Portugal
Maia, C., Lorentz, S., Cardoso, L., Otranto, D., & Naucke, T. J. (2016) · Parasitology Research · doi:10.1007/s00436-015-4796-1 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Current state of canine heartworm in Portugal
Esteves-Guimarães, J., Matos, J. I., Leal-Sousa, B., Oliveira, P., Lobo, L., Silvestre-Ferreira, A. C., Soares, C. S., Rodríguez-Escolar, I., Carretón, E., Morchón, R., et al. (2024) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani14091300 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Molecular detection of zoonotic filarioids in <i>Culex</i> spp. from Portugal
Manoj, R. R. S., Latrofa, M. S., Cavalera, M. A., Mendoza‐Roldan, J. A., Maia, C., & Otranto, D. (2021) · Medical and Veterinary Entomology · doi:10.1111/mve.12524 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Rodríguez-Escolar, I., Balmori-de la Puente, A., Infante González-Mohino, E., Collado-Cuadrado, M., Carretón, E., Montoya-Alonso, J. A., & Morchón, R. (2025) · Parasites & Vectors · doi:10.1186/s13071-025-07148-5 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Panayotova-Pencheva, M., Šnábel, V., Dakova, V., Čabanová, V., Cavallero, S., Trifonova, A., Mirchev, R., Hurníková, Z., Vasilková, Z., & Miterpáková, M. (2020) · Helminthologia · doi:10.2478/helm-2020-0026 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
González-Mohino, E. I., Rodríguez-Escolar, I., Balmori-de la Puente, A., Collado-Cuadrado, M., Carretón, E., Montoya-Alonso, J. A., & Morchón, R. (2025) · Current Research in Parasitology & Vector-Borne Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.crpvbd.2025.100330 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ferreira, C. A. C., de Pinho Mixão, V., Novo, M. T. L. M., Calado, M. M. P., Gonçalves, L. A. P., Belo, S. M. D., & de Almeida, A. P. G.
- Affiliations
- Universidade Nova de Lisboa (PT)
- University of Lisbon (PT)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Parasites & Vectors
- Published
- 2015-03-03
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 139-139
- ISSN
- 1756-3305 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4369802
- OpenAlex
- W2149798159
- Cited by
- 61
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3
- FWCI
- 4.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Parasites & Vectors (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- UpSpace Institutional Repository (University of Pretoria) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (PTDC/SAU-SAP/113523/2009)
- Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, Universidade Nova de Lisboa
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Research on Leishmaniasis Studies
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
- Keywords
- Dirofilaria immitis, canine dirofilariasis, mosquito vectors, Culex theileri, Culex pipiens, Anopheles maculipennis, Aedes caspius, Aedes detritus, Anopheles atroparvus, Dirofilaria repens, mosquito abundance, continental Portugal, filarial transmission
- MeSH terms
- Aedes, Animals, Anopheles, Culex, Dirofilaria immitis, Dirofilariasis, Dogs, Female, Insect Vectors, Larva, Culicidae, Portugal, Seasons, Polymerase Chain Reaction, DNA, Helminth
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review