The DOI matches its Crossref record; 84 of the 87 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Crip Technoscience Manifesto
Open accessAbstract
As disabled people engaged in disability community, activism, and scholarship, our collective experiences and histories have taught us that we are effective agents of world building and dismantling toward more socially just relations.The grounds for social justice and world remaking, however, are frictioned;technologies, architectures, and infrastructures are often designed and implemented without committing to disability as a difference that matters. This manifesto calls attention to the powerful, messy, non-innocent, contradictory, and nevertheless crucial work of what we name as “crip technoscience,” practices of critique, alteration, and reinvention of our material-discursive world. Disabled people are experts and designers of everyday life. But we also harness technoscience for political action, refusing to comply with demands to cure, fix, or eliminate disability. Attentive to the intersectional workings of power and privilege, we agitate against independence and productivity as requirements for existence. Instead, we center technoscientific activism and critical design practices that foster disability justice.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“these scholars demonstrate how AI technologies similarly rely on the assumption that we need to “overcome” disability through technology rather than address the structural causes of inaccessibility and discrimination experienced by disabled people.”
From Algorithmic harms and digital ageism in the use of surveillance technologies in nursing homes (2022) · cites this paper as Hamraie and Fritsch, 2019
In the citing paper
“In particular, higher education has been a key site of disability activism in North America [11, 21].”
From Infrastructuring as Collective Resistance: How Disabled Students Negotiate Access Through Technology in Universities (2026) · cites this paper as [21]
In the citing paper
“The politics of accommodations reflect broader neoliberal logics, which Hamraie and Fritsch [21] posit are the result of capitalist systems that instill values of self-sufficiency.”
From Infrastructuring as Collective Resistance: How Disabled Students Negotiate Access Through Technology in Universities (2026) · cites this paper as [21]
In the citing paper
“Building on this, Hamraie [21] highlights the failure of universities to accommodate disabled people that result in relational tensions, exposing the limits of existing infrastructure and its politics.”
From Infrastructuring as Collective Resistance: How Disabled Students Negotiate Access Through Technology in Universities (2026) · cites this paper as [21]
In the citing paper
“Hamraie [21] further argues that attempts to smooth over access so that infrastructure can be “frictionless” and adapted by students would depoliticize disability, obscuring embedded power relations.”
From Infrastructuring as Collective Resistance: How Disabled Students Negotiate Access Through Technology in Universities (2026) · cites this paper as [21]
In the citing paper
“We acknowledge that intersectionality is a critical lens in Critical Disability Studies [21].”
From Infrastructuring as Collective Resistance: How Disabled Students Negotiate Access Through Technology in Universities (2026) · cites this paper as [21]
In the citing paper
“Individuals who directly encounter access frictions possess the situated knowledge [1, 21, 64] required to subvert and reactivate them as counteractive forces that confront university decision-makers [20].”
From Infrastructuring as Collective Resistance: How Disabled Students Negotiate Access Through Technology in Universities (2026) · cites this paper as [21]
In the citing paper
“disability is an ongoing negotiation of access [21, 42, 61] in which frictions will emerge [20]”
From Infrastructuring as Collective Resistance: How Disabled Students Negotiate Access Through Technology in Universities (2026) · cites this paper as [21]
In the citing paper
“Rather than making infrastructures and the design of services “frictionless” or “adaptive” for disabled communities — which is not possible nor desirable because disability is an ongoing negotiation of access [21, 42, 61] in which frictions will emerge [20] — student groups strategically leverage points of disruption to confront authority, compel negotiations, and demand systemic change.”
From Infrastructuring as Collective Resistance: How Disabled Students Negotiate Access Through Technology in Universities (2026) · cites this paper as [21]
Citations
Cites
Staying with the trouble: making kin in the Chthulucene
McKeithen, W. (2017) · Gender Place & Culture · doi:10.1080/0966369x.2017.1336302 · Cited by 3,949
States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and the Social Order
Jasanoff, S. (2004) · Cited by 2,942
Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene
Haraway, D. (2016) · Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) · Cited by 2,246
Kafer, A. (2013) · doi:10.2979/6841.0 · Cited by 2,131
Crip theory: cultural signs of queerness and disability
McRuer, R., & Bérubé, M. 1. (2007) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-5344 · Cited by 1,868
Impure Science: AIDS, Activism, and the Politics of Knowledge
(1997) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm0297-242 · Cited by 1,666
Modest_Witness@Second_Millenium.FemaleMan_Meets_OncoMouse: Feminism and Technoscience
Haraway, D., & Randolph, L. M. (1997) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,589
Volatile chemical products emerging as largest petrochemical source of urban organic emissions
McDonald, B. C., de Gouw, J. A., Gilman, J. B., Jathar, S. H., Akherati, A., Cappa, C. D., Jimenez, J. L., Lee-Taylor, J., Hayes, P. L., McKeen, S. A., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaq0524 · Cited by 1,373
TallBear, K. (2010) · University of Minnesota Press eBooks · doi:10.5749/9780816685776 · Cited by 1,139
Nothing about us without us: disability oppression and empowerment
Charlton, J. I. (1998) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.36-0640 · Cited by 1,124
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–486 of 486
Krishnan, S., Jencka, M., Langmead, A., Manzo, A. D., Matsumoto, R., Mcauliffe, R., & Barros, B. S. D. A. (2025) · Catalyst Feminism Theory Technoscience · doi:10.28968/cftt.v11i2.45558
Alt Text: Feminist Technoscience Meets Crip Authorship
Hickman, L., Mills, M., & Serlin, D. H. (2025) · Catalyst Feminism Theory Technoscience · doi:10.28968/cftt.v11i2.45670
Novel Sociological Methods and Practices of Engagement across Disability Communities
(2025) · Frontiers research topics · doi:10.3389/978-2-8325-7028-9
Farokhi, Z., & Holtz‐Schramek, E. (2025) · Diversity & Inclusion Research · doi:10.1002/dvr2.70041
Ihnen, C. A., & Love, H. R. (2025) · Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood · doi:10.1177/14639491251397984
Emancipatory futures in epidemiology: abolitionist and anti-colonial perspectives
Ramnarine, J., & Furlano, M. (2025) · Social Theory & Health · doi:10.1057/s41285-025-00244-7
Xenoreproduction: Exploration and Recovery of Collapsible Modes as Core AI Safety ObjectivePreprint
Rios-Sialer, I. (2025) · doi:10.31224/5890
A disability justice approach to the design of Sign Language Automating Assistive Technologies
Kandathil, V., & Mathew, A. (2025) · International Conference of Human-Computer Interaction Design & Research · doi:10.1145/3768633.3770142
Temporal disobedience: Intersex timescapes, chronopolitics and intersex joy
Dudys, T., Orr, C. E., & Burkholder, C. (2025) · Feminist Theory · doi:10.1177/14647001251389818
Chang, V., Sharrief, S., Cruz, V., Sweidan, S., Ting, O., & Mazzoni, A. (2025) · Leonardo · doi:10.1162/leon.a.2584
Cripping glitch feminism: intimacy, pain, and technology
Jerreat-Poole, A. (2025) · Feminist Media Studies · doi:10.1080/14680777.2025.2598336
Autistic Students’ Experiences of Access: Navigating University in Canada
Urbaniak, K., & D’Amico, M. (2025) · Canadian Journal of Disability Studies · doi:10.15353/cjds.v14i3.1286
(2025) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478061120-003
(2025) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478061120-006
(2025) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478061120-004
(2025) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478061120-009
(2025) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478061120-008
(2025) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478061120-001
(2025) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478061120-002
4. “Log In, Chill Out”: “Horizontal Media,” Night Modes, and Sleep Apps
Alexander, N. (2025) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478061120-005
Ethics in Motion: Embedding Alternative Forms of Work Organization Into the Business Ethics Logic
Sferrazzo, R., Faldetta, G., Ferrero, I., Mollona, E., & Pellegrini, M. M. (2025) · Business Ethics the Environment & Responsibility · doi:10.1111/beer.70073
Cartografías del cyborgcrip y la geopolítica del imperio de la mirada en América Latina
Carvajal, W. M. (2026) · Kipus Revista Andina de Letras y Estudios Culturales · doi:10.32719/13900102.2026.59.9
Bombers Into Butterflies: A Painting Made in Gaza on a Postcard Sent From Gernika
Fletcher, R. F., Richardson, J. E., & Akin, Z. F. (2025) · Art Education · doi:10.1080/00043125.2024.2428128
Mapping Interface Evaluation Methods Across the Waves of Human-Computer Interaction Research
Dixon, E., Wood, R. E., Ryan, A., Lazar, J. K., Feng, J., & Jordan, J. B. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-27648-9_33-1
Baljko, M. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-05155-4_2
Hughes, A. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-15942-7_4
Accessibility as Collective Process
Metell, M. (2026) · Voices A World Forum for Music Therapy · doi:10.15845/voices.v26i1.4909
Behm, D. J., & Kirk, R. (2026) · Planning Theory · doi:10.1177/14730952261430807
Bierdz, B. (2026) · Journal of Curriculum Theorizing · doi:10.63997/jct.v41i1.1329
Reshaping fashion towards inclusion and social responsibility
Recupero, A., de Filpo, G., & Marti, P. (2026) · Fashion Highlight · doi:10.36253/fh-3922
Community & Connection: SIGACCESS 2025 Travel Award Report
Brody, M. A. (2026) · ACM SIGACCESS Accessibility and Computing · doi:10.1145/3803767.3803775
Silence is a Feature, Not a Bug: A Deaf Developer’s Autoethnography on Agency and Local AI
Gong, C. (2026) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3772363.3798715
Tooling Justice: Articulating Equity Work Through Design Toolkits
Petterson, A., Ly, C. K., Cross, T., Wong, R. Y., & Chandra, P. (2026) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3772318.3790783
Design for Dis/Ability: A Crip Inquiry into Personal Energy Tracking
Kaklopoulou, I., Homewood, S., & Sanches, P. (2026) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3772318.3790404
Centring Artists With Learning Disabilities: Exploring Access to Visual Arts
Demény, S., Crois, E., Vandermeersche, G., & Backer, F. D. (2026) · British Journal of Learning Disabilities · doi:10.1111/bld.70044
Differential Disruption and Epistemic Injustice
Hopster, J. K. G., & Proost, M. D. (2026) · Digital Society · doi:10.1007/s44206-026-00257-3
Niepełnosprawność jako metoda badania historii kina. Głuche widzostwo
Zdrodowska, M. (2026) · Wielogłos · doi:10.4467/2084395xwi.26.001.23303
Zárate, S., Vora, K., Varma, S., Quintanilla, L., & Hanssmann, C. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-13416-5_4
Buchbaum, K., & Gooding, P. (2026) · Archival Science · doi:10.1007/s10502-026-09545-w
Lofts, K. A., Belal, F., Jodoin, S., Thampi, B. V., Hunt, M. R., Lencucha, R., Lesnikowski, A., & Ramanujam, N. (2026) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2026.103183
Birčanin, F., Nevsky, A., Cruice, M. N., & Neate, T. (2026) · Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/3800645.3812914
Reshaping Inclusive Interpersonal Dynamics through Smart Glasses in Mixed-Vision Social Activities
Ding, J., Zhang, Y., Zhu, X., Yang, K., Wei, Y., Wang, S., Liu, Y., & Jiao, Y. (2026) · Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/3800645.3812989
Speaking for Animals: Design Opportunities through Tensions in Multispecies Activism
Cucumak, S., & Subaşı, Ö. (2026) · Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/3800645.3812970
Future Imperfect? Evaluating Whether AI-Powered Web Accessibility Overlays are Worth the Hype
Hartman, P., & Gorichanaz, T. (2026) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3805689.3812259
Candraningrum, D. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-9221982/v1
Budworth, P., & Larrington‐Spencer, H. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-11375-7_232
A Case of Epistemic Injustice: Prioritising Disability Knowledges in Climate Adaptation
Bell, S., Yeo, R., Shipley, A., & Venn, A. (2026) · Geo Geography and Environment · doi:10.1002/geo2.70100
Disability and AI in smart cities: centering access, agency, and awareness in hybrid spaces
Gualano, R. J., Halegoua, G. R., & Campbell, S. W. (2026) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2026.2699252
Future Imaginaries of Indigenous AI
Yolgörmez, C., Kite, S., Brown, M. L., & Lewis, J. E. (2026) · Imaginations Journal of Cross-Cultural Image Studies · doi:10.17742/image29762
May, L., Le, D.-H., Lazorchak, G., & Wang, E. Q. (2026) · Frontiers in Computer Science · doi:10.3389/fcomp.2026.1823366
Liang, H., & Lin, Z. (2026) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448261467153
Psychosomatic Futurities: Cripping the Future of Cultural Psychiatry in a Posthuman Landscape
Berkhout, S., Fritsch, K., Stern, E.-M., Lee, T.-S. J., Frankel, A. V., Wong-Mersereau, C., Park, M., Necyk, B., Bunch, M. J., Jaarsma, A. S., et al. (2026) · Transcultural Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/13634615261452840
Self-citationShepherd, N. J. (2026) · International Social Sciences and Education Journal · doi:10.61424/issej.v4i3.963
Miller, A. (2025) · Women & Performance a journal of feminist theory · doi:10.1080/0740770x.2025.2696063
Reimagining Access: Editorial Introduction
Napolitano, D., Pellino, A., & Rangan, P. (2026) · Cinema & cie/Cinéma & Cie · doi:10.54103/2036-461x/32454
Ellcessor, E. (2026) · Cinema & cie/Cinéma & Cie · doi:10.54103/2036-461x/30556
Ono, K. (2026) · International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS) · doi:10.1145/3797867.3828990
The Problem of Singular Agents and Entities: And a Commitment to Distributed Agency
Due, B. L. (2026) · Beiträge zur Praxeologie / Contributions to Praxeology · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-73598-5_5
Safety by Design: Preventing Online Harms
Shulruff, T. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-52643-5_307-1
Barry, B. (2026) · Visual Anthropology Review · doi:10.1111/var.70028
Beyond Marginalisation: Disability-Themed Podcasts and Collective Advocacy in India
Preenika, S., & Kuriakose, A. (2026) · Asian Studies Review · doi:10.1080/10357823.2026.2728668
Osipova, E., & Spiel, K. (2026) · Proceedings of the 14th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3829807.3829830
Generative AI and media accessibility for disabled audiences in Ibero-America
Galasso, B. (2026) · Cuadernos.info · doi:10.7764/rdp3bb09
A Discourse Analysis of Disability on Websites of Accredited Kinesiology Programs in Canada
Price, J., Bundon, A., Peers, D., Natho, K. E., Rodgers, C. D., Sukhai, M. A., Ma, J. K., & Tomasone, J. R. (2026) · Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly · doi:10.1123/apaq.2026-0018
Trust and Safety of Human- and AI-Powered Visual Description: A Case Study of Be My Eyes
Brigham, N. G., & Kohno, T. (2026) · Journal of Online Trust and Safety · doi:10.54501/jots.v3i4.340
From ethics to epistemology: a decolonial reframing of student AI use in postsecondary education
DiPietro, C. (2026) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2026.2741854
Feminist Fabulations for Reworlding Menopause Care
Mohammadi, O., Maurer, B., & Fuchsberger, V. (2026) · Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3821402.3830163
Toward A Crip HCI of Menopausal Intimacy and Pleasure
Mohammadi, O., Maurer, B., & Fuchsberger, V. (2026) · Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3821402.3830152
Regaudie, T. (2026) · Catalyst Feminism Theory Technoscience · doi:10.28968/cftt.v12i2.46546
Gupta, H. (2026) · Catalyst Feminism Theory Technoscience · doi:10.28968/cftt.v12i2.46487
Facca, D., & Przybyło, E. (2026) · Catalyst Feminism Theory Technoscience · doi:10.28968/cftt.v12i2.46197
A scoping review of disability representation in engineering design education
Hoffman, M. E., Koolman, E., & Feldner, H. A. (2026) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/jee.70084
Feminist Crip Co-Making with Speech-to-Text Accessibility Software
Gaeta, A. (2026) · Australian Feminist Studies · doi:10.1080/08164649.2026.2740487
Seeking Attention: Economies, Modes, Ecologies
Burdon, G., & Jellis, T. (2026) · Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers · doi:10.1111/tran.70103
Bartlett, K. A., Chetawatee, A., Mangal, M., & Williams, A. (2026) · Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play · doi:10.1145/3800965.3834277
How Blind or Low Vision Creators Use Tools for Ideation: A Survey
Li, M., Shi, Y., Bennett, C. L., & Das, M. (2026) · International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS) · doi:10.1145/3797867.3841194
Angelini, R., Meulder, M. D., Tran, N., & Spiel, K. (2026) · International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS) · doi:10.1145/3797867.3828999
Jugaad Justice: Grassroots DIY-AT as Substitute Infrastructure in India
Bhatnagar, T., Manlove, B., Banerjee, S., Mukherjee, S., Holloway, C., & Austin, V. (2026) · International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS) · doi:10.1145/3797867.3829010
Hilton, C., Potts, D., Hawkins, K., Halpin, K., Halpin, N., Edwards, A., Seymour, A., Gillies, M. F. P., Fox, I., Stark, A., et al. (2026) · International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS) · doi:10.1145/3797867.3828976
Jang, J., Liu, J., Carrington, P., & Begel, A. (2026) · International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS) · doi:10.1145/3797867.3829026
Liu, P., Li, J., Lietz, R., Wu, S., & Su, N. M. (2026) · International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS) · doi:10.1145/3797867.3828991
From Rights to Access: Social Implementation as Articulation Work in Disability-Led Research
Matsumura, T. (2026) · International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS) · doi:10.1145/3797867.3845314
GET THE FRAC IN! Or, The Fractal Many-festo: A (Trans)(Crip)t 1
Maier, S., Hsu, V. J., Cedillo, C. V., & Yergeau, M. R. (2020) · Peitho. · doi:10.37514/pei-j.2020.22.4.02
Cripping the Controller: Changing the Game and Reimagining Access
Perry, P., Fiebrink, R. A., & Grierson, M. (2026) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3831297
Metadata
- Authors
- Hamraie, A., & Fritsch, K.
- Affiliations
- Vanderbilt University (US)
- Carleton University (CA)
- Venue
- Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience
- Published
- 2019-04-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-33
- ISSN
- 2380-3312 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2944785538
- Cited by
- 461
- References
- 87
- Citations by year
- 2026: 76 · 2025: 160 · 2024: 78 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 8
- FWCI
- 34.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Catalyst Feminism Theory Technoscience (publishedVersion)
- HAL AMU (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disability Rights and Representation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Bioethics and Human Rights Issues
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
- Keywords
- disability justice, people with disabilities, critical design, intersectionality, social justice, disability studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review