Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 498

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Culturally Sensitive Research Approaches: An African-American Perspective

Tillman, Linda C.·2002·Educational Researcher
DOI 10.3102/0013189x031009003
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This article contributes to discussions about culturally sensitive research approaches in qualitative research. The author argues that the use of culturally sensitive research approaches in research focusing on African Americans can use the cultural knowledge and experiences of researchers and their participants in the design of the research as well as in the collection and interpretation of data. The author presents a rationale for the use of culturally sensitive research approaches for African Americans, a theoretical framework for culturally sensitive research approaches, and a discussion of culturally sensitive research in practice. This article concludes by discussing some implications for teaching and practice in educational research.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3102/0013189x031009003

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 57 references

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. American Journal of Evaluation1999203
  2. 10.3102/0013189X027007004 · doi:10.3102/0013189x027007004 · Paper page
  3. Coleman J, 1966, Equality of educational opportunities
  4. Cooper A, 1988, A voice from the South
  5. Dunbar C, 2001, Does anyone know we’re here: Alternative schooling for African American youth
  6. Foster M, 1991, Qualitative investigations into schools and schooling, 273
  7. Foster M, 1994, Teaching diverse populations: Formulating a knowledge base, 225
  8. Henry A, 2001, Multiple and intersecting identities in qualitative research, 61
  9. Kershaw T, 1990, Black studies: Theory, method, and cultural perspectives, 16
  10. Kershaw T, 1992, The Western Journal of Black Studies, 16, 160
  11. López G, Research (im-) positions: Interrogating racism in qualitative research methodology
  12. 10.3102/00346543068004401 · doi:10.3102/00346543068004401
  13. Ogbu J, 1989, Dropouts from school, 181
  14. 10.1177/107780040200800102 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Pillow W, Research (im-) positions: Interrogating racism in qualitative research methodology
  16. 10.1080/095183900413287 · doi:10.1080/095183900413287
  17. Stanfield J, 1993, Race and ethnicity in research methods, 3
  18. West-Olatunji C, 2001, Facing the new millennium: A transformative research and action agenda in Black education (Appendix B). A report of the AERA Commission on Research in Black Education
  19. Woodson CG, 1977, The miseducation of the Negro

Cited by

See all 498

Metadata

Authors
Tillman, L. C.
Venue
Educational Researcher
Publisher
American Educational Research Association (AERA)
Published
2002-12
Volume
31
Issue
9
Pages
3-12
ISSN
  • 0013-189X (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-102X
DOI
10.3102/0013189x031009003
OpenAlex
W2085501425
Cited by
498
References
57
FWCI
28.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Culturally Sensitive Research Approaches: An African-American Perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3102/0013189x031009003
The paper
Tillman, L. C. (2002). Culturally Sensitive Research Approaches: An African-American Perspective. Educational Researcher. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x031009003

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.