The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Accountability Texas-Style: The Progress and Learning of Urban Minority Students in a High-Stakes Testing Context
Abstract
This study examines longitudinal student progress and achievement on the elementary, middle, and high school levels in relation to accountability policy incentives in a large urban district in Texas. Using quantitative analyses supplemented by qualitative interviews, the authors found that high-stakes testing policies that rewarded and punished schools based on average student scores created incentives for schools to “game the system” by excluding students from testing and, ultimately, school. In the elementary grades, low-achieving students were disproportionately excluded from taking the high-stakes Texas Assessment of Academic Skills tests, demonstrating gains not reflected on the low-stakes Stanford Achievement Test–Ninth Edition. Student exclusion at the elementary level occurred through special education and language exemptions and missing scores. Furthermore, gaming strategies reduced educational opportunity for African American and Latino high school students. Sharp increases in 9th-grade student retention and disappearance were associated with increases in 10th-grade test scores and related accountability ratings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/226550 · Cited by 28,308
Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes
Oliver, C. (1991) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1991.4279002 · Cited by 8,950
Teacher Quality and Student Achievement: A Review of State Policy Evidence
Darling‐Hammond, L. (2000) · Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) · Cited by 2,801
Self-citationTeacher Quality and Student Achievement
Darling-Hammond, L. (2000) · Education Policy Analysis Archives · doi:10.14507/epaa.v8n1.2000 · Cited by 2,262
Self-citationStock, J. H., & Watson, M. W. (2002) · Cited by 1,980
Teacher and Classroom Context Effects on Student Achievement: Implications for Teacher Evaluation
Sanders, W. L., Wright, S. P., & Horn, S. P. (1997) · Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education · doi:10.1023/a:1007999204543 · Cited by 1,044
Nikolopoulos, K. (2004) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2003.11.008 · Cited by 724
High stakes : testing for tracking, promotion, and graduation
Heubert, J. P., & Hauser, R. M. (1999) · Cited by 713
Student Mobility and the Increased Risk of High School Dropout
Rumberger, R. W., & Larson, K. A. (1998) · American Journal of Education · doi:10.1086/444201 · Cited by 690
Does External Accountability Affect Student Outcomes? A Cross-State Analysis
Carnoy, M., & Loeb, S. (2002) · Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis · doi:10.3102/01623737024004305 · Cited by 608
Darling-Hammond, L., & Sykes, G. (2003) · Education Policy Analysis Archives · doi:10.14507/epaa.v11n33.2003 · Cited by 536
Self-citationHigh-stakes testing, uncertainty, and student learning
Amrein‐Beardsley, A., & Berliner, D. C. (2002) · Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) · Cited by 500
The Myth of the Texas Miracle in Education
Haney, W. (2000) · Education Policy Analysis Archives · doi:10.14507/epaa.v8n41.2000 · Cited by 482
(2004) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 446
High-Stakes Accountability in Urban Elementary Schools: Challenging or Reproducing Inequality?1
Diamond, J. B., & Spillane, J. P. (2004) · Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2004.00375.x · Cited by 362
Improving student achievement: what state NAEP test scores tell us
(2001) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.38-4019 · Cited by 261
What Do Test Scores in Texas Tell Us?
Klein et al, S. P., Hamilton, L., McCaffrey, D. F., & Stecher, B. (2000) · Education Policy Analysis Archives · doi:10.14507/epaa.v8n49.2000 · Cited by 250
Making Sense of Test-Based Accountability in Education
Hamilton, L. S., Stecher, B. M., & Klein, S. P. (2002) · Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) · Cited by 231
Leaving children behind: how "Texas-style" accountability fails Latino youth
(2006) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.43-6026 · Cited by 229
High-Stakes Testing and Student Achievement: Does Accountability Pressure Increase Student Learning?
Nichols, S. L., Glass, G. V., & Berliner, D. C. (2006) · Education Policy Analysis Archives · doi:10.14507/epaa.v14n1.2006 · Cited by 201
Getting Tough? The Impact of High School Graduation Exams
Jacob, B. A. (2001) · Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis · doi:10.3102/01623737023002099 · Cited by 200
Lee, J., & Wong, K. K. (2004) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312041004797 · Cited by 177
Accountability , Ability and Disability: Gaming the System
Figlio, D., & Getzler, L. (2002) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w9307 · Cited by 166
Higher standards, more dropouts? Evidence within and across time
Lillard, D. R., & DeCicca, P. (2001) · Economics of Education Review · doi:10.1016/s0272-7757(00)00022-4 · Cited by 136
Carreira, M. M. (2005) · Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2005.00600.x · Cited by 122
High School Graduation Rates in the United States. Revised.
Greene, J. P. (2001) · Cited by 121
Unintended Effects of Educational Reform in New York
Allington, R. L., & McGill‐Franzen, A. (1992) · Educational Policy · doi:10.1177/0895904892006004003 · Cited by 100
The Implications of Testing Policy for Quality and Equality.
Darling‐Hammond, L. (1991) · Phi Delta Kappan · Cited by 94
Self-citationThe closing door: conservative policy and black opportunity
(1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-2379 · Cited by 91
The Closing Door: Conservative Policy and Black Opportunity
Clotfelter, C. T., Orfield, G., & Ashkinaze, C. (1992) · Journal of Policy Analysis and Management · doi:10.2307/3325375 · Cited by 66
Do higher state test scores in Texas make for better high school outcomes
Carnoy, M., Loeb, S., & Smith, T. (2001) · ScholarlyCommons (University of Pennsylvania) · Cited by 59
Improving educational quality: how best to evaluate our schools
Hanushek, E. A., & Raymond, M. E. (2002) · Conference Series ; [Proceedings] · Cited by 53
Education in the 21st century : meeting the challenges of a changing world
Kodrzycki, Y. K. (2002) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 50
Ending Social Promotion: Results from the First Two Years. Charting Reform in Chicago Series 1.
Roderick, M., Bryk, A. S., Jacob, B. A., Easton, J. Q., & Allensworth, E. M. (1999) · Cited by 45
Amrein‐Beardsley, A., & Berliner, D. C. (2003) · Education Policy Analysis Archives · doi:10.14507/epaa.v11n25.2003 · Cited by 42
Accountability and the pressures to exclude: A cautionary tale from England.
Rustique-Forrester, E. (2005) · Education Policy Analysis Archives · doi:10.14507/epaa.v13n26.2005 · Cited by 40
External Examinations and Accountability, Educational Expectations, and High School Graduation
Schiller, K. S., & Muller, C. L. (2000) · American Journal of Education · doi:10.1086/444235 · Cited by 32
The Limits of Sanctions in Low-Performing Schools
Mintrop, H. (2003) · Education Policy Analysis Archives · doi:10.14507/epaa.v11n3.2003 · Cited by 23
DeBray, E. H., Parson, G., & Woodworth, K. R. (2000) · Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education · Cited by 19
Cited by
Research on Data Use: A Framework and Analysis
Coburn, C. E., & Turner, E. O. (2011) · Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives · doi:10.1080/15366367.2011.626729 · Cited by 365
Differentiation between school attendance problems: why and how?
Heyne, D., Gren-Landell, M., Melvin, G., & Gentle-Genitty, C. (2019) · Cognitive and Behavioral Practice · doi:10.1016/j.cbpra.2018.03.006 · Cited by 339
Carlson, D., Borman, G. D., & Robinson, M. (2011) · Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis · doi:10.3102/0162373711412765 · Cited by 249
Minding and mending the gap: Social psychological interventions to reduce educational disparities
Spitzer, B., & Aronson, J. (2015) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjep.12067 · Cited by 152
Pathways to New Accountability Through the Every Student Succeeds Act
Darling-Hammond, L., Bae, S., Cook-Harvey, C., Lam, L., Mercer, C., Podolsky, A., & Stosich, E. L. (2016) · Learning Policy Institute · doi:10.54300/966.414 · Cited by 127
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Heilig, J. V., & Darling-Hammond, L.
- Venue
- Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis
- Published
- 2008-06
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 75-110
- ISSN
- 0162-3737 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-1062
- OpenAlex
- W2154240172
- Cited by
- 316
- References
- 39
- FWCI
- 46.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.