Cited by 82Tactile and Sensory InteractionsMotor Control and AdaptationNeural dynamics and brain function

The relationship of vibrissal motor cortex unit activity to whisking in the awake rat

Carvell, George E., Miller, Susan A., Simons, Daniel J.·1996·Somatosensory & Motor Research

Abstract

Rats actively sweep their whiskers back and forth to locate and palpate objects within their immediate environment. Microstimulation studies in anesthetized rats have demonstrated the presence of a large vibrissal motor representation in agranular cortex. However, the manner in which motor cortex neurons contribute to whisking behavior in the awake animal is unknown. This study represents an initial investigation of the relationship between the activity of task-related neurons in vibrissal motor cortex and the electromyographic (EMG) activity of the deep vibrissal pad muscles in the awake, freely whisking rat. Each animal was gently held in an experimenter's hands while the animal whisked the air. A spring-loaded, metal microelectrode mounted in a removable, miniature microdrive provided stabile recordings of motor cortex unit activity. Fine-wire electrodes implanted in the mystacial pad simultaneously recorded facial muscle activity. Results showed that the discharge of task-related neurons was correlated with changing levels of muscle output. Unit discharge was related in a tonic or phasic-tonic fashion to EMG activity. No units were found to discharge rhythmically in a 1:1 fashion with the periodicity of the whisking pattern. These findings support a role for vibrissal motor cortex in the initiation and modulation of the overall level of mystacial pad muscular output, but not in the generation of bursts of EMG activity responsible for individual whisking sweeps.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/08990229609051399

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • At the single-cell spiking level, a subset of neurons increases firing rate just prior (~1 s) to locomotion onset.

    “At the level of single-cell spiking, an increase in firing rate can be observed in a subset of neurons just prior (~1 s) to the onset of locomotion”

    From Waking state: rapid variations modulate neural and behavioral responses (2015) · cites this paper as Carvell et al., 1996

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carvell, G. E., Miller, S. A., & Simons, D. J.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Carvell, George E.
Venue
Somatosensory & Motor Research
Published
1996-01
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
115-127
ISSN
  • 0899-0220 (ISSN-L)
  • 1369-1651
OpenAlex
W2165970664
Cited by
82
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Somatosensory & Motor Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
whisking, rats
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain Mapping, Electromyography, Female, Motor Cortex, Motor Neurons, Orientation, Vibrissae, Wakefulness, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review