The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Meta-analysis of effects of inoculation with homofermentative and facultative heterofermentative lactic acid bacteria on silage fermentation, aerobic stability, and the performance of dairy cows
Open accessAbstract
Forages are usually inoculated with homofermentative and facultative heterofermentative lactic acid bacteria (LAB) to enhance lactic acid fermentation of forages, but effects of such inoculants on silage quality and the performance of dairy cows are unclear. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to examine the effects of LAB inoculation on silage quality and preservation and the performance of dairy cows. A second objective was to examine the factors affecting the response to silage inoculation with LAB. The studies that met the selection criteria included 130 articles that examined the effects of LAB inoculation on silage quality and 31 articles that investigated dairy cow performance responses. The magnitude of the effect (effect size) was evaluated using raw mean differences (RMD) between inoculated and uninoculated treatments. Heterogeneity was explored by meta-regression and subgroup analysis using forage type, LAB species, LAB application rate, and silo scale (laboratory or farm-scale) as covariates for the silage quality response and forage type, LAB species, diet type [total mixed ration (TMR) or non-TMR], and the level of milk yield of the control cows as covariates for the performance responses. Inoculation with LAB (≥10 5 cfu/g as fed) markedly increased silage fermentation and dry matter recovery in temperate and tropical grasses, alfalfa, and other legumes. However, inoculation did not improve the fermentation of corn, sorghum, or sugarcane silages. Inoculation with LAB reduced clostridia and mold growth, butyric acid production, and ammonia-nitrogen in all silages, but it had no effect on aerobic stability. Silage inoculation (≥10 5 cfu/g as fed) increased milk yield and the response had low heterogeneity. However, inoculation had no effect on diet digestibility and feed efficiency. Inoculation with LAB improved the fermentation of grass and legume silages and the performance of dairy cows but did not affect the fermentation of corn, sorghum, and sugar cane silages or the aerobic stability of any silage. Further research is needed to elucidate how silage inoculated with homofermentative and facultative heterofermentative LAB improves the performance of dairy cows.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“Compared with homofermentative lactic acid bacteria, heterofermentative lactic acid bacteria have half the lactate synthesis efficiency and produce more acetic acid and carbon dioxide, which leads to poor silage fermentation [23,25].”
From Analysis on Fermentation Quality, Chemical Composition and Bacterial Communities of Corn Straw and Soybean Straw Mixed Silage (2023) · cites this paper as [23]
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“The addition of heterofermentative lactic acid bacteria can help to extend the storage and utilization time of silage [23].”
From Analysis on Fermentation Quality, Chemical Composition and Bacterial Communities of Corn Straw and Soybean Straw Mixed Silage (2023) · cites this paper as [23]
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“After the aerobic fermentation period, silage enters an anaerobic state, and lactic acid bacteria rapidly reproduce and produce a large amount of lactic acid, which inhibits the activity of harmful microorganisms such as Clostridium [23].”
From Analysis on Fermentation Quality, Chemical Composition and Bacterial Communities of Corn Straw and Soybean Straw Mixed Silage (2023) · cites this paper as [23]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Reviews (e.g., Muck and Kung, 1997; Oliveira et al., 2017) indicate homofermentative inoculants are successful in reducing pH and shifting fermentation toward lactate in the majority of studies.”
From Silage review: Factors affecting dry matter and quality losses in silages (2018) · cites this paper as Oliveira et al., 2017
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“although a meta-analysis indicated no reduction in pH in corn, sorghum, and sugarcane silages relative to untreated silages.”
From Silage review: Recent advances and future uses of silage additives (2018) · cites this paper as Oliveira et al., 2017
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Inoculation reduced the pH of silages in temperate and tropical grasses and in alfalfa and other legumes, but not in corn, sorghum, and sugarcane.”
From Silage review: Recent advances and future uses of silage additives (2018) · cites this paper as Oliveira et al., 2017
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Dry matter recovery was 2.8 percentage units higher in grass silages compared with untreated, unaffected corn and sorghum silages, and reduced by 2.4 percentage units in sugarcane silage.”
From Silage review: Recent advances and future uses of silage additives (2018) · cites this paper as Oliveira et al., 2017
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Silage fermentation is a complex biochemical process mainly dominated by anaerobic lactic acid bacteria [23].”
From Analysis on Fermentation Quality, Chemical Composition and Bacterial Communities of Corn Straw and Soybean Straw Mixed Silage (2023) · cites this paper as [23]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“These additives resulted in higher milk production according to the meta-analysis by mechanisms that are still unclear.”
From Silage review: Recent advances and future uses of silage additives (2018) · cites this paper as Oliveira et al., 2017
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Milk production increases by inoculation were not affected by forage type, inoculant species, or level of milk production.”
From Silage review: Recent advances and future uses of silage additives (2018) · cites this paper as Oliveira et al., 2017
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The recent meta-analysis, Oliveira et al. (2017) found that aerobic stability was not affected by inoculation nor was there any effect by crop.”
From Silage review: Recent advances and future uses of silage additives (2018) · cites this paper as Oliveira et al., 2017
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“with only a trend for increased DMI and no effect on feed efficiency”
From Silage review: Recent advances and future uses of silage additives (2018) · cites this paper as Oliveira et al., 2017
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“However, yeast count was higher in inoculated silages than in untreated silages.”
From Silage review: Recent advances and future uses of silage additives (2018) · cites this paper as Oliveira et al., 2017
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“A recent meta-analysis of 130 articles revealed that the effects of these inoculants varied by crop”
From Silage review: Recent advances and future uses of silage additives (2018) · cites this paper as Oliveira et al., 2017
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Trends were observed for increased milk fat and milk protein concentrations for cows fed inoculated silage.”
From Silage review: Recent advances and future uses of silage additives (2018) · cites this paper as Oliveira et al., 2017
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The reduction in acetic acid by inoculation was significant for all crops except for alfalfa and other legumes.”
From Silage review: Recent advances and future uses of silage additives (2018) · cites this paper as Oliveira et al., 2017
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“A recent metaanalysis of 31 lactating dairy cattle studies indicated that inoculation with homofermentative or facultative heterofermentative LAB increased raw milk production (0.37 kg/d; P < 0.01)”
From Silage review: Recent advances and future uses of silage additives (2018) · cites this paper as Oliveira et al., 2017
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In contrast, the reduction in butyric acid and ammonia-N and the increase in lactic acid from inoculation were unaffected by forage type.”
From Silage review: Recent advances and future uses of silage additives (2018) · cites this paper as Oliveira et al., 2017
In the citing paper
“A recent meta-analysis of the impacts of homofermentative and facultative heterofermentative lactic acid bacteria (LAB) inoculants [5] confirmed these results and proposed some limitations and benefits to be gained by inoculation.”
In the citing paper
“Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) used as silage additives have been shown to improve several fermentation parameters, including aerobic stability.”
In the citing paper
“The concentration of acetic acid in the Control samples after 64 days of fermentation was 17.5 ± 1.6 g·kg−1 DM, i.e., in the range of published reports [5].”
In the citing paper
“Considering that significant differences compared to control were observed for all strains for a dose of 105 CFU/g, and that inoculating at doses as high as 107 CFU/g is economically not feasible (Oliveira et al., 2017), the dose of 106 CFU/g was chosen for further studies.”
From Potential of Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolated From Different Forages as Silage Inoculants for Improving Fermentation Quality and Aerobic Stability (2020) · cites this paper as Oliveira et al., 2017
In the citing paper
“heterofermentative LAB was able to inhibit the growth of undesirable microorganisms, which was consistent with previous reports [6,44].”
From Succession of Microbial Communities of Corn Silage Inoculated with Heterofermentative Lactic Acid Bacteria from Ensiling to Aerobic Exposure (2021) · cites this paper as [44]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 · Cited by 63,139
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 · Cited by 56,722
Meta-analysis in clinical trials
DerSimonian, R., & Laird, N. (1986) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2 · Cited by 39,552
Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package
Viechtbauer, W. (2010) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v036.i03 · Cited by 20,464
Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research
GLASS, G. V. (1976) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x005010003 · Cited by 4,890 · cited 1×
“proves the power or ability to detect treatment effects and increases the capacity to explore sources of variation in responses (Glass, 1976; Higgins, 2008).”
BackgroundDetection of Influential Observation in Linear Regression
Cook, R. D. (1977) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1977.10489493 · Cited by 3,418
Detection of Influential Observation in Linear Regression
Cook, R. D. (2000) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1271434 · Cited by 2,277
Effects of Diet on Short-Term Regulation of Feed Intake by Lactating Dairy Cattle
Allen, M. S. (2000) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(00)75030-2 · Cited by 1,550
Summing up: The Science of Reviewing Research
Wilkinson, I., Light, R. J., & Pillemer, D. B. (1987) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.2307/1164691 · Cited by 1,486
Commentary: Heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be expected and appropriately quantified
Higgins, J. P. T. (2008) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyn204 · Cited by 995
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 425
Okoye, C. O., Gao, L., Wu, Y., Li, X., Wang, Y., & Jiang, J. (2023) · Preparative Biochemistry & Biotechnology · doi:10.1080/10826068.2023.2204507 · Cited by 25
Self-citationKhan, N. A., Khan, N., Tang, S., & Tan, Z. (2023) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2023.1305999 · Cited by 25
Effects of homolactic bacterial inoculant on the performance of lactating dairy cows
Daniel, J. L. P., Queiroz, O. C. M., Arriola, K. G., Daetz, R., Basso, F., Romero, J. J., & Adesogan, A. T. (2018) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2017-13880 · Cited by 25
Self-citationLi, F., Ding, Z., Adesogan, A. T., Ke, W., Jiang, Y., Bai, J., Mudassar, S., Zhang, Y., Huang, W., & Guo, X. (2020) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani10091575 · Cited by 24
Self-citationAuerbach, H., & Theobald, P. (2020) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy10091432 · Cited by 26
Wang, Y., Xia, K., Wang, X. N., Lin, X., Liu, J., Li, Y. J., Liu, X., Zhao, W.-J., Zhang, Y., & Guo, J.-H. (2021) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2021-20494 · Cited by 24
Effect of pH on the growth of three lactic acid bacteria strains isolated from sour cream
Vera-Peña, M. Y., & Rodriguez-Rodriguez, W. L. (2020) · Universitas Scientiarum · doi:10.11144/javeriana.sc25-2.eopo · Cited by 24
Sarwono, K. A., Rohmatussolihat, R., Watman, M., Ratnakomala, S., Astuti, W. D., Fidriyanto, R., Ridwan, R., & Widyastuti, Y. (2022) · AIMS Agriculture and Food · doi:10.3934/agrfood.2022030 · Cited by 24
Yu, Q., Xu, J., Li, M., Xi, Y., Sun, H. Y., Xie, Y., Cheng, Q., Li, P., Chen, C., Yang, F., et al. (2023) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.13239 · Cited by 25
Zhang, M., Wang, X., Cui, M., Wang, Y., Jiao, Z., & Tan, Z. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0192368 · Cited by 25
Koo, B., Kim, J. W., & Nyachoti, C. M. (2018) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2018.04.007 · Cited by 24
da Silva, V. P., Pereira, O. G., Leandro, E. D. S., de Paula, R. A., Agarussi, M. C. N., & Ribeiro, K. G. (2020) · Agriculture · doi:10.3390/agriculture10110518 · Cited by 24
Gallardo, W. B., & Teixeira, I. A. M. D. A. (2023) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani13132063 · Cited by 23
Wang, Y., Zhou, W. J., Wang, C., Yang, F., Chen, X., & Zhang, Q. (2020) · Microbial Biotechnology · doi:10.1111/1751-7915.13588 · Cited by 23
Zhang, G., Fang, X., Feng, G., Li, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2020) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani10101775 · Cited by 23
Dias, M. S. S., Ghizzi, L. G., Marques, J. A., Nunes, A. T., Grigoletto, N. T. S., Gheller, L. S., Silva, T. B. P., da Silva, G. G., Lobato, D. N., Silva, L. F. C. E., et al. (2021) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2020-19419 · Cited by 23
Gonda, H. L., Nikodinoska, I., Cocq, K. L., & Moran, C. A. (2023) · Grass and Forage Science · doi:10.1111/gfs.12622 · Cited by 24
Tang, X., Liao, C., Huang, X., Chen, C., Xu, D., & Chen, C. (2024) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2023.1247254 · Cited by 23
Li, J., Li, Z., Shang, S., Zhao, X., Zhang, W., Zhang, X., Bai, J., Yang, Z., & Guo, K. (2023) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2023.1251946 · Cited by 25
Wang, S., Dong, Z., Li, J., Chen, L., & Shao, T. (2018) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1111/jam.14083 · Cited by 22
Huo, W., Wang, X., Wei, Z., Zhang, H., Liu, Q., Zhang, S., Wang, C., Chen, L., Xu, Q., & Guo, G. (2021) · Italian Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.1080/1828051x.2021.1906167 · Cited by 22
Huang, Z., Wang, M., Ke, W., & Guo, X. (2021) · Agriculture · doi:10.3390/agriculture11070590 · Cited by 23
Agarussi, M. C. N., Pereira, O. G., Pimentel, F. E., Azevedo, C. F., da Silva, V. P., & Silva, F. F. E. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-21461-4 · Cited by 22
Muck, R. E., Kung, L., & Collins, M. (2020) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119436669.ch42 · Cited by 25
Multi-Omics Approach in Amelioration of Food Products
Dutta, B., Lahiri, D., Nag, M., Abukhader, R., Sarkar, T., Pati, S., Upadhye, V. J., Pandit, S., Amin, M. F. M., Al-Tawaha, A. R., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2022.955683 · Cited by 21
Cappellozza, B. I., Cooke, R. F., Amaral, R. C., Bach, À., Engle, T. E., Ferraretto, L. F., Marques, R. S., Miller, A. C., Moriel, P., & Vendramini, J. M. B. (2025) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.1093/jas/skaf165 · Cited by 22
Wang, S., Li, J., Dong, Z., Chen, L., & Shao, T. (2018) · Animal Science Journal · doi:10.1111/asj.13134 · Cited by 20
Chen, L., Li, P., Gou, W., You, M., Cheng, Q., Bai, S., & Cai, Y. (2020) · Animal Science Journal · doi:10.1111/asj.13364 · Cited by 20
Optimized Ensiling Conditions and Microbial Community in Mulberry Leaves Silage With Inoculants
Cui, X., Yang, Y., Zhang, M., Jiao, F., Gan, T., Lin, Z., Huang, Y., Wang, H., Liu, S., Bao, L., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2022.813363 · Cited by 20
Picard, P., Vacher, B., & Pouliquen, X. (1997) · PubMed · Cited by 20
Wang, Z., Tan, Z., Wu, G., Wang, L., Qin, G., Wang, Y., & Pang, H. (2022) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2022.1004495 · Cited by 19
Chen, L., Bao, X., Guo, G., Huo, W., Li, Q., Xu, Q., Wang, C., & Liu, Q. (2021) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1111/jam.15246 · Cited by 19
Chen, C., Xin, Y., Li, X., Ni, H., Zeng, T., Du, Z., Guan, H., Wu, Y., Yang, W., Cai, Y., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2022.1066753 · Cited by 20
Self-citationSoundharrajan, I., Jung, J. S., Muthusamy, K., Lee, B. H., Park, H. S., Sivanesan, R., & Choi, K. C. (2023) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods12234296 · Cited by 20
A comparative evaluation of maize silage quality under diverse pre-ensiling strategies
Serva, L. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0308627 · Cited by 19
Basso, F. C., Rabêlo, C. H. S., Lara, E. C., Siqueira, G. R., & Reis, R. A. (2018) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2018.08.008 · Cited by 20
Zhang, F., Fang, M., Wang, X., Lu, W., & Ma, C. (2021) · Canadian Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.1139/cjas-2019-0170 · Cited by 18
Wang, N., Wang, Y., Lin, Y., Xu, G., Ni, K., & Yang, F. (2023) · Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture · doi:10.1186/s40538-023-00481-w · Cited by 18
Lara, E. C., Bragiato, U. C., Rabêlo, C. H. S., Messana, J. D., Sobrinho, A. G. D. S., & Reis, R. A. (2018) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2018.07.010 · Cited by 21
Biochemical properties of lactic acid bacteria for efficient silage production: an update
Akhtar, M. F., Chai, W., Umar, M., & Changfa, W. (2025) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2025.1581430 · Cited by 18
Huo, W., Zhang, Y., Zhang, L., Shen, C., Chen, L., Liu, Q., Zhang, S., Wang, C., & Guo, G. (2022) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2022.1070175 · Cited by 18
Pech-Cervantes, A. A., Ferraretto, L. F., & Ogunade, I. M. (2022) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.1093/jas/skac189 · Cited by 18
Self-citationXie, H., Xie, F., Guo, Y., Liang, X., Peng, L., Li, M., Tang, Z., Peng, K., & Yang, C. (2022) · Grassland Science · doi:10.1111/grs.12382 · Cited by 16
Li, X., Cheng, Y., Yang, F., Hu, J., Ma, R., Liu, H., & Shao, T. (2024) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy14081602 · Cited by 18
Self-citationParadhipta, D. H. V., Joo, Y. H., Lee, H., Lee, S. S., Kim, D. H., Kim, J. D., & Kim, S. C. (2019) · Journal of Applied Animal Research · doi:10.1080/09712119.2019.1670667 · Cited by 17
Self-citationHu, Z., Ma, D., Niu, H., Chang, J., Yu, J., Tong, Q., & Li, S. (2021) · AMB Express · doi:10.1186/s13568-020-01158-5 · Cited by 17
Guo, Y., Huang, R., Niu, Y., Zhang, P., Li, Y., & Zhang, W. (2024) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2024.1363256 · Cited by 15
Pech-Cervantes, A. A., Terrill, T. H., Ogunade, I. M., & Estrada-Reyes, Z. M. (2021) · Livestock Science · doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104707 · Cited by 14
Self-citationChelkapally, S. C., Terrill, T. H., Estrada-Reyes, Z. M., Ogunade, I. M., & Pech-Cervantes, A. A. (2023) · Frontiers in Veterinary Science · doi:10.3389/fvets.2023.1141068 · Cited by 15
Self-citationGallo, A., Catellani, A., Ghilardelli, F., Lapris, M., & Mastroeni, C. (2024) · animal · doi:10.1016/j.animal.2024.101280 · Cited by 16
Nkosi, B. D., Malebana, I. M. M., Rios, S. Á., Nkukwana, T. T., & Meeske, R. (2024) · Fermentation · doi:10.3390/fermentation10080426 · Cited by 14
Ensilability of Biomass From Effloresced Flower Strips as Co-substrate in Bioenergy Production
Müller, J., & Hahn, J. (2020) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2020.00014 · Cited by 14
Lactic Acid Bacteria and Bacteriocins in Feed Preservation: Mechanisms and Antifungal Properties
de Azevedo, P. O. D. S., & Gierus, M. (2025) · Grass and Forage Science · doi:10.1111/gfs.12711 · Cited by 13
Yang, J. M., Li, Y., Sun, M., Guo, S., Lin, P., Wang, A., & Jin, Y. (2025) · Animal nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.aninu.2025.04.006 · Cited by 16
Gouvêa, V. N., Vendramini, J. M. B., Sollenberger, L. E., de Oliveira, F. C. L., Dubeux, J. C. B., Moriel, P., Cecato, U., Filho, C. V. S., Sanchez, J. M. D., Yarborough, J. K., et al. (2020) · Crop Forage & Turfgrass Management · doi:10.1002/cft2.20054 · Cited by 13
Wang, S., Zhang, G., Zhao, J., Dong, Z., Li, J., & Shao, T. (2023) · Italian Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.1080/1828051x.2023.2206422 · Cited by 15
Pongsub, S., Suriyapha, C., Boontiam, W., & Cherdthong, A. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29973 · Cited by 13
Lactic Acid Bacteria as Microbial Silage Additives: Current Status and Future Outlook
Drouin, P., Mari, L. J., & Schmidt, R. J. (2019) · IntechOpen eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.89326 · Cited by 13
Han, H., Wang, C., Huang, Z., Zhang, Y., Sun, L., Xue, Y., & Guo, X. (2022) · Fermentation · doi:10.3390/fermentation8070320 · Cited by 13
Yang, X., Zhang, Z., Song, L., Wang, G., & Zhang, J. (2019) · Waste and Biomass Valorization · doi:10.1007/s12649-019-00684-z · Cited by 13
Tian, J., Huang, L., Tian, R., Wu, J., Tang, R., & Zhang, J. (2023) · Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture · doi:10.1186/s40538-023-00423-6 · Cited by 13
Kharazian, Z. A., Xu, D., Su, R., & Guo, X. (2024) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-024-13096-4 · Cited by 12
Torres, R. D. N. S., Ghedini, C. P., Coelho, L. D. M., Ezequiel, J. M. B., Júnior, G. A. A., & Almeida, M. T. C. (2021) · Livestock Science · doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104618 · Cited by 12
Characteristics of Lactobacillus plantarum QZW5 and its effects on wheat silage under multigelation
Zhang, M., Wu, G., Wang, L., Zhang, B., Chen, J., Liu, Y., Pang, H., & Tan, Z. (2021) · Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture · doi:10.1186/s40538-021-00251-6 · Cited by 12
Survey on the occurrence of silage volatile organic compounds in the Po Valley - Italy
Sigolo, S., Fancello, F., Ghilardelli, F., Mosconi, M., Prandini, A., Masoero, F., Yuan, X., & Gallo, A. (2023) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2023.115593 · Cited by 12
Selwet, M. (2020) · Open Life Sciences · doi:10.1515/biol-2020-0038 · Cited by 12
Lu, Y., Li, P., Bai, S., Chen, S., Zhao, M., Gou, W., You, M., & Cheng, Q. (2022) · BMC Microbiology · doi:10.1186/s12866-022-02499-w · Cited by 12
Tang, X., Liao, C., Zhou, S., Chen, C., Li, L., Lu, G., Huang, X., Zhang, M., Chen, C., & Li, P. (2023) · Fuel · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2023.130365 · Cited by 11
USO DE ADITIVOS NA NUTRIÇÃO DE RUMINANTES: REVISÃO
Danieli, B., & Schogor, A. L. B. (2020) · Veterinária e Zootecnia · doi:10.35172/rvz.2020.v27.444 · Cited by 11
Serva, L., Andrighetto, I., Marchesini, G., Contiero, B., Grandis, D., & Magrin, L. (2021) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2021.115116 · Cited by 11
Zhu, M., Xie, R., Chen, L., You, M., Gou, W., Chen, C., Li, P., & Cai, Y. (2021) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods10102437 · Cited by 11
Sun, J., Wang, T., Huang, F., Liu, Y., Shi, W., Ma, C., & Zhong, J. (2021) · Fermentation · doi:10.3390/fermentation7040273 · Cited by 11
Liu, Y., Chen, T., Sun, R., Zi, X., & Li, M. (2022) · Frontiers in Animal Science · doi:10.3389/fanim.2022.878909 · Cited by 11
Effects of sodium diacetate or microbial inoculants on aerobic stability of wilted rye silage
Li, Y. F., Wang, L. L., Jeong, E. C., Kim, H. J., Ahmadi, F., & Kim, J. G. (2022) · Animal Bioscience · doi:10.5713/ab.22.0150 · Cited by 11
Wang, S., Liu, H., Zhao, J., Dong, Z., Li, J., & Shao, T. (2023) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy13030672 · Cited by 11
Rabêlo, C. H. S., Lara, E. C., Basso, F. C., Härter, C. J., & Reis, R. A. (2018) · The Journal of Agricultural Science · doi:10.1017/s0021859618000679 · Cited by 13
Sekoai, P. T., Mhlongo, S. I., & Ezeokoli, O. T. (2019) · Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology · doi:10.1007/s11157-019-09511-2 · Cited by 11
Ouamba, A. J. K., Gagnon, M., Varin, T. V., Chouinard, P. Y., LaPointe, G., & Roy, D. (2022) · Frontiers in Systems Biology · doi:10.3389/fsysb.2022.955611 · Cited by 11
Franco, M., Tapio, I., & Rinne, M. (2022) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2022.1092062 · Cited by 10
Yang, W., Yang, F., Feng, C., Zhao, S., Zhang, X., & Wang, Y. (2023) · Fermentation · doi:10.3390/fermentation9030279 · Cited by 10
Zong, Y., Kai, Z. H. O. U., Duan, X., Han, B., Jiang, H., & He, C. (2023) · Animal Bioscience · doi:10.5713/ab.23.0117 · Cited by 10
Rodrigues, J. D. P. S., Queiróz, M. A. Á., de Lucena, A. R. F., Costa, F. S., Carvalho, D. T. Q., da Costa, M. M., & Rodrigues, R. T. D. S. (2019) · Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Pecuarias · doi:10.17533/udea.rccp.v32n1a06 · Cited by 10
Effects of sodium diacetate and microbial inoculants on fermentation of forage rye
Li, Y. F., Jeong, E. C., Wang, L. L., Kim, H. J., Ahmadi, F., & Kim, J. G. (2022) · Journal of Animal Science and Technology · doi:10.5187/jast.2022.e90 · Cited by 9
Kok, I., Copani, G., Bryan, K. A., Witt, K. L., van Straalen, W. M., do Amaral, R. C., & Cappellozza, B. I. (2024) · Translational Animal Science · doi:10.1093/tas/txae010 · Cited by 10
Bao, J., Wang, L., & Yu, Z. (2024) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms13010033 · Cited by 10
Chen, Q., Yu, B., Zhu, Y., Xiong, H., Guo, Y., Liu, D., & Sun, B. (2025) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2025.1532060 · Cited by 9
de Moura, D. C., Torres, R. D. N. S., da Silva, H. M., Donadia, A. B., Menegazzo, L. P., Xavier, M. L. M., Alessi, K. C., Soares, S. R., Ghedini, C. P., & de Oliveira, A. S. (2021) · Livestock Science · doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104729 · Cited by 9
Self-citationSoundharrajan, I., Muthusamy, K., Han, O., Lee, H. J., Purushothaman, S., Kim, D., & Choi, K. C. (2020) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app10217855 · Cited by 9
Self-citationTharangani, R. M. H., Yakun, C., Zhao, L. S., Shen, Y., Ma, L., & Bu, D. (2022) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2022.115339 · Cited by 9
Guamán-Rivera, S. A., Albanell, E., Ajenjo, O., Casals, R., Elhadi, A., Salama, A. A. K., & Caja, G. (2023) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2023.115784 · Cited by 9
Zhang, Z., Zhao, K., Yang, S., Min, L., Tong, X., Chen, W., & Li, D. (2023) · Fermentation · doi:10.3390/fermentation9060500 · Cited by 8
Zhong, H., Zhou, J., Wang, F., Wu, W., Xiong, H., Yin, H., & Li, X. O. (2023) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2023.1103652 · Cited by 8
Self-citationOlorunlowu, S. A., Sidoruk, P., Sznajder, J., Szczesny, J., Lechniak, D., Pawlak, P., Ryczek, M., Huang, H., Li, L., Irawan, A., et al. (2025) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani15182740 · Cited by 8
Advanced Studies in the 21st Century Animal Nutrition
Babinszky, L., Oliveira, J., & Santos, E. M. (2021) · Veterinary medicine and science · doi:10.5772/intechopen.92512 · Cited by 8
Huang, R., Zhang, F., Ma, C., & Wang, X. (2023) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants12162967 · Cited by 9
Andrada, E., Mukdsi, M. C. A., Vinderola, G., & Medina, R. B. (2024) · Fermentation · doi:10.3390/fermentation10120614 · Cited by 8
Kim, D. H., Amanullah, S. M., Lee, H., Joo, Y. H., Han, O. K., Adesogan, A. T., & Kim, S. C. (2017) · Animal Science Journal · doi:10.1111/asj.12923 · Cited by 10
Self-citationTian, J., Yin, X., & Zhang, J. (2022) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.11792 · Cited by 8
Ferris, C. P., Laidlaw, A. S., & Wylie, A. R. G. (2022) · Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research · doi:10.15212/ijafr-2022-0103 · Cited by 8
Pereira, R. C., Dornas, M. F. S., Ribeiro, K. G., de Souza, I. A., Agarussi, M. C. N., da Silva, V. P., Júnior, V. C. D. A., & Pereira, O. G. (2020) · Grassland Science · doi:10.1111/grs.12284 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Oliveira, A. S., Weinberg, Z. G., Ogunade, I. M., Cervantes, A. A. P., Arriola, K. G., Jiang, Y., Kim, D., Li, X., Gonçalves, M. C. M., Vyas, D., & Adesogan, A. T.
- Affiliations
- Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso (BR)
- University of Florida (US)
- Instituto Federal Goiano (BR)
- Corresponding author
- Adesogan, Adegbola T.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Dairy Science
- Publisher
- American Dairy Science Association
- Published
- 2017-06
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 4587-4603
- ISSN
- 0022-0302 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2600083889
- Cited by
- 409
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 36 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 69 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 4.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Dairy Science (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- United States - Israel Binational Agricultural Research and Development Fund (IS-4704-14)
- University of Florida
- Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (2013-1)
- Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Mato Grosso (483724/2011)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food
- Keywords
- lactic acid bacteria inoculation, homofermentative lactic acid bacteria, silage fermentation, silage quality, aerobic stability, dairy cow performance, milk yield, dry matter recovery, mold growth, butyrate, ammonia nitrogen, grass silage, legume silage, corn silage, sorghum silage, sugarcane silage, total mixed ration, feed efficiency
- MeSH terms
- Aerobiosis, Medicago sativa, Animals, Cattle, Zea mays, Digestion, Female, Fermentation, Poaceae, Lactation, Lactobacillus, Fabaceae, Silage, Lactic Acid, Saccharum, Sorghum
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
