Cited by 157Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyMycotoxins in Agriculture and Food

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Short communication: Influence of various proteolytic sources during fermentation of reconstituted corn grain silages

Open access

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the contribution of corn kernel enzymes, bacteria, fungi, and fermentation end-products (main acids and ethanol) to protein solubilization during fermentation of reconstituted corn grain silage. Flint corn kernels were ground (5-mm sieve), rehydrated to 32% of moisture, and treated with no additives (control), gamma irradiation (32 kGy), gamma irradiation + fermentation end-products (1% of lactic acid, 0.3% of acetic acid, and 0.7% of ethanol, as fed), and natamycin (1% as fed). Treated grains were ensiled in nylon-polyethylene bags and stored for 90 d. Protein solubilization was calculated for each treatment and the contributions of proteolytic sources were determined. Bacterial activity was the main contributor to proteolysis (60%) followed by corn kernel enzymes (30%), whereas fungi and fermentation end-products had only minor contributions (∼5% each).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3168/jds.2017-12943

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 30 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 157

Metadata

Authors
Junges, D., Morais, G., Spoto, M. H. F., Santos, P. S., Adesogan, A. T., Nussio, L. G., & Daniel, J. L. P.
Affiliations
  • Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
  • Instituto de Pesquisas Energéticas e Nucleares (BR)
  • University of Florida (US)
  • Universidade Estadual de Maringá (BR)
Corresponding author
Daniel, J.L.P.
Venue
Journal of Dairy Science
Published
2017-11
Volume
100
Issue
11
Pages
9048-9051
ISSN
0022-0302 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2754070343
Cited by
157
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 4
FWCI
18.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Dairy Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
  • Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food
Keywords
protein solubilization, proteolysis, silage additives, gamma irradiation, natamycin, lactic acid, acetic acid, ethanol, fungal activity, flint corn
MeSH terms
Animals, Bacteria, Zea mays, Fermentation, Fungi, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Plant Proteins, Silage, Acetic Acid, Proteolysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review