Cited by 226Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyMycotoxins in Agriculture and Food

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Microbial Populations, Fermentation End-Products, and Aerobic Stability of Corn Silage Treated with Ammonia or a Propionic Acid-Based Preservative

Open access
Kung, L., Robinson, J.R., Ranjit, N.K., Chen, J.H., Golt, C.M., Pesek, J.D.·2000·Journal of Dairy Science

Abstract

We studied the effects of ammonia treatment on microbial populations during the fermentation of corn silage. We also compared the effects of ammonia to a preservative containing buffered propionic acid and other antifungal compounds on the fermentation and aerobic stability of corn silage. In the first experiment, whole-plant corn was ensiled without treatment or treated with ammonia-N to supply an additional 0.3% N (fresh-forage basis). The addition of ammonia immediately increased silage pH and had no effect on numbers of lactic acid bacteria, but delayed their growth compared with untreated silage. Numbers of enterobacteria declined more slowly, but numbers of yeasts and molds declined more quickly in silage treated with ammonia. During the early stages of ensiling, lactic acid increased more rapidly in untreated than in treated silage. The reverse was true for acetic acid concentrations. When exposed to air, growth of yeasts and molds was delayed in ammonia-treated silage. In a second experiment, various levels (0.1 to 0.3%, fresh weight) of ammonium-N or a preservative with buffered propionic acid were added to whole-plant corn and allowed to ensile for 106 d. Silage treated with ammonia had a greater ratio of L- to D-lactic acid than did other silages. Untreated silage was aerobically stable for 32.3 h, whereas the low (42 h) and moderate (52.7 h) concentrations of both additives numerically improved aerobic stability. High concentrations of ammonia-N (0.3%) or a buffered propionic acid preservative (0.3%), markedly improved the aerobic stability of corn silage (82 and 69 h for ammonia and propionic acid-treated silage, respectively).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(00)75020-x

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 19 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Goering, 1980, Anhydrous ammonia addition to whole corn plant for ensiling, J. Dairy Sci., 63, 183
  2. Hoffman, 1997, Quantification of milk yield losses associated with feeding aerobically unstable high moisture corn, J. Dairy Sci., 80, 234
  3. Muck, R. E., and L. Kung, Jr. 1997. Effects of silage additives on ensiling. Pages 187–199 in NRAES-99, Silage: Field to Feedbunk, Proc. N. American Conf. Hershey, PA, 11–13 February, Northeast Reg. Agric. Eng. Serv., Coop. Ext., Ithaca, NY.
  4. Okuda, 1965, A direct colorimetric method for blood ammonia, Tokushima J. Exp. Med., 12, 11
  5. SAS User's Guide: Statistics, Version 5 Edition. 1985. SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–226 of 226

Metadata

Authors
Kung, L., Robinson, J. R., Ranjit, N. K., Chen, J. H., Golt, C. M., & Pesek, J. D.
Affiliations
  • Tunghai University (TW)
  • University of Delaware (US)
Corresponding author
Kung, L.
Venue
Journal of Dairy Science
Published
2000-07
Volume
83
Issue
7
Pages
1479-1486
ISSN
0022-0302 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2085377879
Cited by
226
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
FWCI
6.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Dairy Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Delaware
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food
Keywords
corn silage, ammonia treatment, silage additives, aerobic stability, silage fermentation, lactic acid bacteria, molds and yeasts, Enterobacteriaceae, lactic acid, acetic acid, silage pH, silage spoilage
MeSH terms
Ammonia, Zea mays, Drug Stability, Enterobacteriaceae, Fermentation, Food Preservatives, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Oxygen, Propionates, Silage, Yeasts, Lactococcus, Lactic Acid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review