Cited by 339Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyMycotoxins in Agriculture and Food

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Effect of Lactobacillus buchneri and Other Additives on the Fermentation and Aerobic Stability of Barley Silage

Open access
Kung, L., Ranjit, N.K.·2001·Journal of Dairy Science

Abstract

Whole-plant barley (39.4% dry matter) was treated with various chemical and biological additives to assess their effects on silage fermentation and aerobic stability. Treatments were untreated forage, forage treated with several amounts of Lactobacillus buchneri and enzymes (L. buchneri at 1 x 10(5), 5 x 10(5), and 1 x 10(6) cfu/g of fresh forage), forage treated with an inoculant containing (Lactobacillus plantarum, Pediococcus pentosaceus, Propionibacterium freudenreichii, and enzymes), or forage treated with a buffered propionic acid-based additive (0.2% of fresh weight). Sixty-nine d after ensiling, silages treated with L. buchneri and enzymes had lower pH, but had higher concentrations of acetic and propionic acids and higher concentrations of ethanol when compared with untreated silage. Silage treated with the multistrain inoculant containing L. plantarum had lower pH and higher concentrations of lactic acid, but lower concentrations of ammonia-N, neutral detergent fiber, and acid detergent fiber than did untreated silage. The addition of the buffered propionic acid additive resulted in silage with higher concentrations of lactic and acetic acid compared with untreated silage. Numbers of yeasts in all silages were low at silo opening (less than 3.0 log cfu/g) and were numerically the lowest in silages treated with L. buchneri but only treatment with the intermediate and high level of L. buchneri improved the aerobic stability of silage. Because of the altered fermentation pattern, inoculation with L. buchneri, when applied at equal to or more than 5 x 10(5) cfu/g, and enzymes improved the aerobic stability of barley silage.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(01)74575-4

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 20 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Muck, R. E. 1996. A lactic acid bacteria strain to improve aerobic stability of silages. Pages 42-43 in U.S. Dairy Forage Res. Center 1996 Res. Summaries. Madison, WI.
  2. Okuda, 1965, A direct colorimetric method for blood ammonia, Tokushima J. Exp. Med., 12, 11
  3. Ranjit, 1999, Moderate to high levels of Lactobacillus buchneri markedly improves the aerobic stability of corn silage, J. Dairy Sci., 82, 125
  4. SAS User's Guide, Version 6 Edition. 1988. SAS Inst., Inc., Cary, NC.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 331

Metadata

Authors
Kung, L., & Ranjit, N. K.
Affiliations
University of Delaware (US)
Venue
Journal of Dairy Science
Published
2001-05
Volume
84
Issue
5
Pages
1149-1155
ISSN
0022-0302 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2006741054
Cited by
339
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 12
FWCI
14.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Dairy Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food
Keywords
barley silage, Lactobacillus buchneri, silage additives, aerobic stability, silage fermentation, Lactobacillus plantarum, Pediococcus pentosaceus, Propionibacterium freudenreichii, enzymes, yeast count, lactic acid, acetic acid, ammonia-N
MeSH terms
Aerobiosis, Hordeum, Fermentation, Food Preservation, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Lactobacillus, Propionates, Silage, Colony Count, Microbial, Acetic Acid, Lactic Acid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review