The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Effect of Lactobacillus buchneri and Other Additives on the Fermentation and Aerobic Stability of Barley Silage
Open accessAbstract
Whole-plant barley (39.4% dry matter) was treated with various chemical and biological additives to assess their effects on silage fermentation and aerobic stability. Treatments were untreated forage, forage treated with several amounts of Lactobacillus buchneri and enzymes (L. buchneri at 1 x 10(5), 5 x 10(5), and 1 x 10(6) cfu/g of fresh forage), forage treated with an inoculant containing (Lactobacillus plantarum, Pediococcus pentosaceus, Propionibacterium freudenreichii, and enzymes), or forage treated with a buffered propionic acid-based additive (0.2% of fresh weight). Sixty-nine d after ensiling, silages treated with L. buchneri and enzymes had lower pH, but had higher concentrations of acetic and propionic acids and higher concentrations of ethanol when compared with untreated silage. Silage treated with the multistrain inoculant containing L. plantarum had lower pH and higher concentrations of lactic acid, but lower concentrations of ammonia-N, neutral detergent fiber, and acid detergent fiber than did untreated silage. The addition of the buffered propionic acid additive resulted in silage with higher concentrations of lactic and acetic acid compared with untreated silage. Numbers of yeasts in all silages were low at silo opening (less than 3.0 log cfu/g) and were numerically the lowest in silages treated with L. buchneri but only treatment with the intermediate and high level of L. buchneri improved the aerobic stability of silage. Because of the altered fermentation pattern, inoculation with L. buchneri, when applied at equal to or more than 5 x 10(5) cfu/g, and enzymes improved the aerobic stability of barley silage.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“which may be because Lactobacillus brucei can improve the aerobic stability of silage materials during silage [45].”
From Cellulase Interacts with Lactic Acid Bacteria to Affect Fermentation Quality, Microbial Community, and Ruminal Degradability in Mixed Silage of Soybean Residue and Corn Stover (2021) · cites this paper as [45]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“When microorganisms, primarily yeasts, are exposed to air, they consume this lactic acid, causing an increase in pH [5,35].”
From Influence of Ensiling Timing and Inoculation on Whole Plant Maize Silage Fermentation and Aerobic Stability (Preliminary Research) (2024) · cites this paper as [35]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Treatment with L. buchneri 40788 has also increased the concentrations of propionic acid in some (Driehuis et , 1999a;Kung and Ranjit, 2001) but not all silages (Ranjit and Kung, 2000), and the reason for this finding is unclear at this time.”
From The effect of treating whole-plant barley with Lactobacillus buchneri 40788 on silage fermentation, aerobic stability, and nutritive value for dairy cows (2002) · cites this paper as Kung and Ranjit, 2001
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“When a buffered propionic acid-based additive was applied to barley silage at 2 g/kg of fresh weight, levels of butyric acid declined (Kung and Ranjit, 2001;Kung et al., 2004), with a numerical decrease in ethanol content and improved aerobic stability of 244 h as compared with untreated silage (Kung and Ranjit, 2001).”
From Silage review: Recent advances and future uses of silage additives (2018) · cites this paper as Kung and Ranjit (2001)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Experiments in laboratory silos indicated that its application at ensiling improved the aerobic stability of the silages (Driehuis et al., 1999a,b;Filya, 2001Filya, , 2003;;Kung and Ranjit, 2001;Filya et al., 2002;Ranjit et al., 2002;Weinberg et al., 2002).”
From The Effect of Lactobacillus buchneri and Lactobacillus plantarum on the Fermentation, Aerobic Stability, and Ruminal Degradability of Low Dry Matter Corn and Sorghum Silages (2003) · cites this paper as Kung and Ranjit, 2001
In the citing paper
“Lactobacillus buchneri 40788 is a biological alternative that, when added to forage at harvest, has resulted in an increase in the concentration of acetic acid, a lower number of yeasts, and improved aerobic stability in a variety of silages (Muck, 1996;Weinberg et al., 1999;Kung and Ranjit, 2001).”
From The Effect of Treating Alfalfa with Lactobacillus buchneri 40788 on Silage Fermentation, Aerobic Stability, and Nutritive Value for Lactating Dairy Cows (2003) · cites this paper as Kung and Ranjit, 2001
In the citing paper
“Our previous data with corn silage (Ranjit and Kung, 2000) and barley silage (Kung and Ranjit, 2001) suggests that a higher inoculation rate must be used to obtain consistent effects from L. buchneri 40788.”
From The Effect of Lactobacillus buchneri 40788 on the Fermentation and Aerobic Stability of High Moisture Corn in Laboratory Silos (2002) · cites this paper as Kung and Ranjit, 2001
In the citing paper
“Marked improvements in aerobic stability have been reported when silages were inoculated with L. buchneri, 40788 (Driehuis et al., 1999;Kung and Ranjit, 2001).”
From The Effect of Lactobacillus buchneri 40788 on the Fermentation and Aerobic Stability of High Moisture Corn in Laboratory Silos (2002) · cites this paper as Kung and Ranjit, 2001
In the citing paper
“As in past studies, treatment with L. buchneri 40788 and enzymes had no effects on the ADF, NDF, CP, or starch content of silage (Ranjit and Kung, 2000;Kung and Ranjit, 2001).”
From The effect of treating whole-plant barley with Lactobacillus buchneri 40788 on silage fermentation, aerobic stability, and nutritive value for dairy cows (2002) · cites this paper as Kung and Ranjit, 2001
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Van Soest, P. J., Robertson, J. B., & Lewis, B. A. (1991) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(91)78551-2 · Cited by 28,658
A PHOTOMETRIC ADAPTATION OF THE SOMOGYI METHOD FOR THE DETERMINATION OF GLUCOSE
Nelson, N. (1944) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(18)71980-7 · Cited by 10,376
Snedecor, G. W., & Cochran, W. G. (1967) · Cited by 6,573
McDonald, P. (1981) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,473
The Analysis of dietary fiber in food
James, W. P. T., & Theander, O. (1981) · Marcel Dekker eBooks · Cited by 986
Ranjit, N. K., & Kung, L. (2000) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(00)74912-5 · Cited by 429
Self-citationThe detrimental effects of air on silage
Woolford, M. K. (1990) · Journal of Applied Bacteriology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.1990.tb02554.x · Cited by 392
Moon, N. J. (1983) · Journal of Applied Bacteriology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.1983.tb01685.x · Cited by 374
Driehuis, F., Elferink, S. J. W. H. O., & Spoelstra, S. F. (1999) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2672.1999.00856.x · Cited by 344
Microbiological screening of the straight chain fatty acids (c1‐c12) as potential silage additives
Woolford, M. K. (1975) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.2740260213 · Cited by 259
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Muck, R. E. 1996. A lactic acid bacteria strain to improve aerobic stability of silages. Pages 42-43 in U.S. Dairy Forage Res. Center 1996 Res. Summaries. Madison, WI.
- Okuda, 1965, A direct colorimetric method for blood ammonia, Tokushima J. Exp. Med., 12, 11
- Ranjit, 1999, Moderate to high levels of Lactobacillus buchneri markedly improves the aerobic stability of corn silage, J. Dairy Sci., 82, 125
- SAS User's Guide, Version 6 Edition. 1988. SAS Inst., Inc., Cary, NC.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Silage review: Recent advances and future uses of silage additives
Muck, R. E., Nadeau, E. M. G., McAllister, T. A., Contreras-Govea, F. E., Santos, M. C., & Kung, L. (2018) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2017-13839 · Cited by 1,038
Self-citationKleinschmit, D. H., & Kung, L. (2006) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(06)72444-4 · Cited by 356
Self-citationSilage processing and strategies to prevent persistence of undesirable microorganisms.
Dunière, L., Sindou, J., Chaucheyras-Durand, F., Chevallier, I., & Thévenot-Sergentet, D. (2013) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2013.04.006 · Cited by 335
Current perspectives on antifungal lactic acid bacteria as natural bio-preservatives
Crowley, S., Mahony, J., & van Sinderen, D. (2013) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2013.07.004 · Cited by 328
Filya, I. (2003) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(03)73963-0 · Cited by 287
Metadata
- Authors
- Kung, L., & Ranjit, N. K.
- Affiliations
- University of Delaware (US)
- ORCID
- Kung, L.
- Venue
- Journal of Dairy Science
- Publisher
- American Dairy Science Association
- Published
- 2001-05
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1149-1155
- ISSN
- 0022-0302 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2006741054
- Semantic Scholar
- dce6a01a52ac610dddb0ebf3ecebc338fe1fb9c7
- Cited by
- 339
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 14.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Dairy Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food
- Keywords
- barley silage, Lactobacillus buchneri, silage additives, aerobic stability, silage fermentation, Lactobacillus plantarum, Pediococcus pentosaceus, Propionibacterium freudenreichii, enzymes, yeast count, lactic acid, acetic acid, ammonia-N
- MeSH terms
- Aerobiosis, Hordeum, Fermentation, Food Preservation, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Lactobacillus, Propionates, Silage, Colony Count, Microbial, Acetic Acid, Lactic Acid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review