Cited by 159Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health and PsychiatryHistorical Psychiatry and Medical Practices

The history of generalized anxiety disorder as a diagnostic category

Open access
Crocq, Marc-Antoine·2017·Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience

Abstract

From the 19th century into the 20th century, the terms used to diagnose generalized anxiety included “pantophobia” and “anxiety neurosis.” Such terms designated paroxysmal manifestations (panic attacks) as well as interparoxysmal phenomenology (the apprehensive mental state). Also, generalized anxiety was considered one of numerous symptoms of neurasthenia, a vaguely defined illness. Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) appeared as a diagnostic category in the third edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-III) in 1980, when anxiety neurosis was split into GAD and panic disorder. The distinct responses these two disorders had to imipramine therapy was one reason to distinguish between the two. Since the revised DSM-III (DSM-III-R), worry about a number of life circumstances has been gradually emphasized as the distinctive symptom of GAD. Thus, a cognitive aspect of anxiety has become the core criterion of GAD. The validity of GAD as an independent category has been questioned from DSM-III up to preparation of DSM-5. Areas of concern have included the difficulty to establish clear boundaries between GAD and (i) personality dimensions, (ii) other anxiety-spectrum disorders, and (iii) nonbipolar depression. The National Institute of Mental Health has recently proposed the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC), a framework destined to facilitate biological research into the etiology of mental symptoms. Within the RDoC framework, generalized anxiety might be studied as a dimension denominated “anxious apprehension” that would typically fit into the research domain called “negative valence systems” and the more specific construct termed “potential threat.”

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.31887/dcns.2017.19.2/macrocq

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. [2]Ahonen M. Mental Disorders in Ancient Philosophy. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2014 83
  2. [7]Berrios GE. Anxiety and cognate disorders. In Berrios GE, ed: The History of Mental Symptoms. Descriptive Psychopathology Since the 19th Century. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1996 263 288
  3. [13]Freud S. The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud: (1893-1899) Early psycho-analytic publications. Strachey J, trans. London, UK: The Hogarth Press; 1962:90ff. The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud; vol 3
  4. [22]Shorter E. A Historical Dictionary of Psychiatry. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2005 152 153
  5. [38]Crocq MA. Guelfi JD. DSM-5: Manuel Diagnostique et Statistique des Troubles Mentaux (French edition), trans. Paris, France: Elsevier Masson; 2015
  6. [39]Falkai P. Wittchen HU. Diagnostisches und Statistisches Manual Psychischer Storungen DSM-5 (German edition). eds. Gottingen, Germany: Hogrefe; 2015
  7. [40]Shorter E. A Historical Dictionary of Psychiatry. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2005 204

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crocq, M.-A.
Affiliations
Centre hospitalier de Rouffach (FR)
Corresponding author
Crocq, Marc-Antoine
Venue
Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience
Published
2017-06-30
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
107-116
ISSN
  • 1294-8322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1958-5969
OpenAlex
W2982432777
Cited by
159
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
14.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices
Keywords
generalized anxiety disorder, history of diagnosis, anxiety neurosis, neurasthenia, panic disorder, DSM-III, DSM-III-R, DSM-5, worry, diagnostic validity, personality factors, Research Domain Criteria, anxious apprehension, negative valence systems, potential threats
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Depression, Humans, Terminology as Topic, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, History, 19th Century, History, 20th Century

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review