Cited by 126Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Research TopicsChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Intolerance of uncertainty as a mediator of reductions in worry in a cognitive behavioral treatment program for generalized anxiety disorder

Open access
Bomyea, J., Ramsawh, H., Ball, T.M., Taylor, C.T., Paulus, M.P., Lang, A.J., Stein, M.B.·2015·Journal of Anxiety Disorders

Abstract

Growing evidence suggests that intolerance of uncertainty (IU) is a cognitive vulnerability that is a central feature across diverse anxiety disorders, including generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Although cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) has been shown to reduce IU, it remains to be established whether or not reductions in IU mediate reductions in worry. This study examined the process of change in IU and worry in a sample of 28 individuals with GAD who completed CBT. Changes in IU and worry, assessed bi-weekly during treatment, were analyzed using multilevel mediation models. Results revealed that change in IU mediated change in worry (ab. =. -0.20; 95% CI [-.35, -.09]), but change in worry did not mediate change in IU (ab. =. -0.16; 95% CI [-.06, .12]). Findings indicated that reductions in IU accounted for 59% of the reductions in worry observed over the course of treatment, suggesting that changes in IU are not simply concomitants of changes in worry. Findings support the idea that IU is a critical construct underlying GAD. © 2015 Elsevier Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.janxdis.2015.05.004

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

0 of 10 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    Reductions in intolerance of uncertainty accounted for 59% of the reductions in worry observed over the course of treatment.

    “Findings indicated that reductions in IU accounted for 59% of the reductions in worry observed over the course of treatment”
    • Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
      “reductions in IU accounted for 59% of the reductions in worry observed over the course of treatment”
    • Also stated in: § 3.2. Intolerance of uncertainty reduction as a mediator of worry reduction · plain
      “change in IU accounted for 59% of the effect of time on worry reduction.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Change in worry accounted for less than 1% of the effect of time on intolerance of uncertainty reduction.

    “change in worry accounted for less than 1% of the effect of time on IU reduction.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Intolerance of uncertainty scores decreased over the course of treatment.

    “IUS scores decreased over the course of treatment (B = -1.68, p < .001; path a)”
    • Also stated in: § 3.1. Demographic and clinical variables · plain
      “IUS: F(1, 114) = 51.69, p < .001, ηp2 = .41”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Change in intolerance of uncertainty mediated change in worry, with an indirect effect of -0.20 and a 95% confidence interval from -0.35 to -0.09.

    “Results revealed that change in IU mediated change in worry (ab = -0.20; 95% CI [-.35, -.09])”
    • Also stated in: § 3.2. Intolerance of uncertainty reduction as a mediator of worry reduction · plain
      “confidence intervals for the indirect effect did not cross zero (ab = -0.20; 95% CI [-.35, -0.09])”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Time was no longer a significant predictor of worry when intolerance of uncertainty was included in the model.

    “time was no longer a significant predictor (B = -.14, p = .23; path c′)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 10
  • May combine two claims. 5
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The abbreviated Penn State Worry Questionnaire has adequate psychometric properties and correlates highly with the full-length Penn State Worry Questionnaire.

    “The PSWQ-A is an 8-item assessment of the tendency to worry. It possesses adequate psychometric properties (i.e., high internal consistency, test-retest reliability, convergent-divergent validity) and correlates highly with the full-length PSWQ (Crittendon & Hopko, 2006; Hopko et al., 2003).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Crittendon & Hopko, 2006 source
    • cites Hopko et al., 2003 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Therapists adhered to the treatment protocol and appropriately delivered the CALM intervention components.

    “In all cases, therapists received ratings of “2”, indicating they adhered to the treatment protocol, and appropriately delivered the components of the CALM intervention.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Cronbach's alpha for the abbreviated Penn State Worry Questionnaire ranged from 0.84 to 0.92.

    “Cronbach's αs ranged from 0.84 to 0.92.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale has adequate psychometric properties.

    “This measure possesses adequate psychometric properties (Buhr & Dugas, 2002, 2006; Carleton, Sharpe, & Asmundson, 2007; Norton, 2005).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Buhr & Dugas, 2002 source
    • cites Carleton, Sharpe, & Asmundson, 2007

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Norton, 2005 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Diagnostic status was determined using the MINI administered by trained interviewers, with quality assurance procedures to support diagnostic accuracy.

    “To determine diagnostic status and other initial eligibility criteria, a study clinician administered the MINI (Sheehan et al., 1998). Interviewers were individuals with prior clinical diagnostic experience (e.g., psychologists, marriage and family counselors), and underwent training to develop proficiency in the MINI assessment. Quality assurance procedures were in place to assure diagnostic accu”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sheehan et al., 1998

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Patterns of change within the measured sessions or beyond the acute phase of treatment cannot be determined.

    “Patterns of change within the measured sessions or beyond the acute phase of treatment thus cannot be determined.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    All participants were analyzed using an intent-to-treat approach.

    “All participants in the study were analyzed using an intent-to-treat approach.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationown data

    The analysis extends examination of change over time to a sample of clinically anxious individuals completing cognitive behavioral therapy.

    “our analysis of treatment data extends examination of change over time to a sample of clinically anxious individuals completing CBT.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The 12-item version of the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale demonstrates reduced item redundancy while maintaining sound psychometric properties relative to the full 27-item version.

    “Based on evidence that the 12-item version of this measure demonstrates reduced redundancy in items while maintaining sound psychometric properties relative to the full 27-item version (Carleton, Norton, & Asmundson, 2007; Carleton, Thibodeau, Osborne, & Asmundson, 2012; Gentes & Ruscio, 2011; Khawaja & Yu, 2010), we analyzed the 12-item IUS derived from this questionnairei.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Carleton, Norton, & Asmundson, 2007 source
    • cites Gentes & Ruscio, 2011 source
    • cites Khawaja & Yu, 2010 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisereasoning

    A multilevel modeling framework effectively handles missing data and varied numbers of observations across individuals.

    “A multilevel modeling framework, which effectively handles missing data and varied numbers of observations across individuals, was thus appropriate for the data structure.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Cronbach's alpha for the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale ranged from 0.92 to 0.94.

    “Cronbach's αs ranged from 0.92 to 0.94.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Assessments were conducted every other session only within the acute phase of treatment.

    “Finally, assessments were conducted every other session only within the acute phase of treatment.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
12 of 12

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Statistics recomputed

Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.

  • ConsistentF(1, 122) = 8.23reported p < .01 · recomputed p = .005

    “F(1, 122) = 8.23, p < .01”

  • ConsistentF(1, 114) = 51.69reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “F(1, 114) = 51.69, p < .001”

2 of 2

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Reverse-mediation estimate falls outside its reported confidence interval

    Minor

    The reported indirect-effect estimate is −0.16, but its 95% confidence interval runs from −0.06 to 0.12. The interval does not contain the estimate it is reported for.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bomyea, J., Ramsawh, H., Ball, T. M., Taylor, C. T., Paulus, M. P., Lang, A. J., & Stein, M. B.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (US)
  • San Diego State University (US)
Corresponding author
Bomyea, J.
Venue
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-06
Volume
33
Pages
90-94
ISSN
0887-6185 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W336141019
Cited by
126
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
9.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Anxiety Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
Funders
NIMH
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
intolerance of uncertainty, generalized anxiety disorder, worry, cognitive behavioral therapy, mediation, cognitive vulnerability, change processes, anxiety disorders
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Cognition, Female, Humans, Male

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review