Cited by 281Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchPhysical Activity and HealthAging and Gerontology Research

Changes in Brain Volume and Cognition in a Randomized Trial of Exercise and Social Interaction in a Community-Based Sample of Non-Demented Chinese Elders

Open access
Mortimer, James A., Ding, Ding, Borenstein, Amy R., DeCarli, Charles, Guo, Qihao, Wu, Yougui, Zhao, Qianhua, Chu, Shugang·2012·Journal of Alzheimer's Disease

Abstract

Physical exercise has been shown to increase brain volume and improve cognition in randomized trials of non-demented elderly. Although greater social engagement was found to reduce dementia risk in observational studies, randomized trials of social interventions have not been reported. A representative sample of 120 elderly from Shanghai, China was randomized to four groups (Tai Chi, Walking, Social Interaction, No Intervention) for 40 weeks. Two MRIs were obtained, one before the intervention period, the other after. A neuropsychological battery was administered at baseline, 20 weeks, and 40 weeks. Comparison of changes in brain volumes in intervention groups with the No Intervention group were assessed by t-tests. Time-intervention group interactions for neuropsychological measures were evaluated with repeated-measures mixed models. Compared to the No Intervention group, significant increases in brain volume were seen in the Tai Chi and Social Intervention groups (p < 0.05). Improvements also were observed in several neuropsychological measures in the Tai Chi group, including the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale score (p = 0.004), the Trailmaking Test A (p = 0.002) and B (p = 0.0002), the Auditory Verbal Learning Test (p = 0.009), and verbal fluency for animals (p = 0.01). The Social Interaction group showed improvement on some, but fewer neuropsychological indices. No differences were observed between the Walking and No Intervention groups. The findings differ from previous clinical trials in showing increases in brain volume and improvements in cognition with a largely non-aerobic exercise (Tai Chi). In addition, intellectual stimulation through social interaction was associated with increases in brain volume as well as with some cognitive improvements.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/jad-2012-120079

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A Finnish RCT showed a small significant improvement on ADAS-cog from a three-month social intervention, but US and China studies did not find facilitator-led group activities beneficial.

    “One Finnish RCT of a three-month intervention with a primary outcome of cognition recruited 235 people who were lonely aged ≥75 and showed a small, significant improvement on ADAS-cog performance (mean difference in change -2.6 /100 points)(225) but studies from the US (226) and China(227) did not find that facilitator-led group activities were beneficial.”

    From Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2024 report of the Lancet standing Commission (2024) · cites this paper as [227]

    The citation to this paper supports the China portion of the sentence, not the Finnish or US findings. In the Results, the social-interaction group improved significantly on animal verbal fluency; the Discussion also reports increased brain volume and improvement on selected cognitive measures. The paper therefore reports benefits from the group activity rather than finding it not beneficial. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mortimer, J. A., Ding, D., Borenstein, A. R., DeCarli, C., Guo, Q., Wu, Y., Zhao, Q., & Chu, S.
Affiliations
  • University of South Florida (US)
  • Fudan University (CN)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
Corresponding author
Mortimer, James A.
Venue
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
Published
2012-06-18
Volume
30
Issue
4
Pages
757-766
ISSN
  • 1387-2877 (ISSN-L)
  • 1875-8908
OpenAlex
W2128127086
Cited by
281
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 1
FWCI
10.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Alzheimer s Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (P30AG010129)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
brain volume, cognitive function
MeSH terms
Aged, Brain, Cognition, Dementia, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Organ Size, Residence Characteristics, Exercise, Walking, Tai Ji, Asian People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review