The DOI matches its Crossref record; 97 of the 97 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 19 of the 117 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes
Open accessAbstract
The Indo-Pacific lionfish (Pterois volitans and P. miles complex) has become widely established along the United States Southeast coast and continues to colonize the Caribbean, yet its biology and ecology is only beginning to be understood.We used stomach contents and stable isotope analyses to determine the diet of lionfish in the warm-temperate hard bottom reef community in the Southeast US Atlantic Ocean.During June to August 2004 and 2006, we collected lionfish with SCUBA from 18 different locations in Onslow Bay, North Carolina, at depths of 30 to 45 m.In 2006, we also conducted visual surveys of small benthic fishes to estimate the abundances of potential prey.Analyses of stomach contents (n = 183) and stable isotopes (n = 115) suggest a generalist carnivorous diet, and prey categories were predominately fish (~99% of total volume) from 16 families.Major differences in the importance of prey occurred between years.Serranidae and Scaridae dominated the diet in 2004, while Haemulidae and Carangidae were important in 2006.Analyses of visual prey surveys did not reveal specialization on particular prey taxa but instead suggest that prey are consumed in relation to their local abundance.Given current theory pertaining to invasive species impacts, the expanding lionfish distribution, and observations that lionfish appear capable of settling to many different habitat types, the overall pattern of generalist piscivory emerging from these data indicates the potential for significant impacts to the invaded community.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Stomach contents and stable isotopes show invasive lionfish off North Carolina are generalist piscivores, feeding mostly on fishes from 16 families and apparently taking prey in relation to local abundance. The authors conclude this generalist piscivory indicates potential for significant impacts to warm-temperate hard bottom reef communities.
Key findings
- Lionfish diet was predominantly fish: about 99% of total prey volume, with 16 fish families identified; invertebrates made up only 3.8% combined by volume and number. Unidentifiable fishes accounted for 45% of volume and weight and 57% of number.
- Prey importance differed between years: Serranidae and Scaridae dominated in 2004, while Haemulidae, Carangidae, and Crustacea were important in 2006 (1-way ANOSIM, R = 0.306, p = 0.001; SIMPER contributions: Serranidae = 22.50, Scaridae = 10.19, Haemulidae = 20.38, Carangidae = 6.99, Crustacea = 10.54).
- Visual prey surveys in 2006 suggested consumption in relation to local abundance rather than specialization; grunts were the most frequently observed prey and also the most abundant in stomachs.
- Stable isotopes (n = 115) gave mean δ13C = -16.60 ± 0.02‰ and mean δ15N = 11.00 ± 0.04‰; a 2-source mixing model estimated benthic primary producers provide about 77% of carbon in the lionfish food web, and lionfish fed at about trophic level 2.3.
Methods
- Lionfish were collected by SCUBA with spears during June–August 2004 and 2006 from 18 continental shelf locations in Onslow Bay, North Carolina, at 30–45 m depth; 226 lionfish were collected (115 in 2004, 111 in 2006), and 183 stomachs contained food.
- Stomach contents were identified, counted, measured, weighed, and volumetrically displaced; diet indices included mean percent number, volume, weight, frequency of occurrence, and %IRI. In 2006, prey availability was surveyed at 11 sites with one 15 min underwater visual census per site along a 25 m transect, 2 m wide, targeting cryptic or juvenile fishes ≤10 cm TL.
- Stable isotope analysis used muscle tissue from 115 lionfish collected in 2004; statistical comparisons used cumulative prey curves, 1-way and 2-way ANOSIM, SIMPER, Mann-Whitney rank sum tests, linear regression, and a 2-source mixing model.
Limitations
- The paper states that prey censuses were not conducted in 2004, so it is unknown whether between-year differences in prey importance reflected local prey availability.
- The paper states that visual surveys did not search crevices, so sedentary or truly cryptic species such as scorpionfish were unlikely to be sampled effectively, and that patchily distributed scad were unlikely to have been censused effectively.
- The paper states that unidentifiable fish prey were assumed to come from the same species and proportions as identifiable fish prey; it also notes that additional prey surveys coupled with stomach contents are needed to strengthen the conclusion that prey are taken in relation to local abundance. Evident from the text: isotope data came only from 2004, so long-term diet was not compared across both sampling years.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
19 of 117 cited sources checked · 8 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Stomach contents provided information on ingested prey, representing the animal's diet over the last few hours to days, while stable isotopes offered additional information on the trophic status of lionfish by providing a long-term integration of the diet over previous weeks to months (Cocheret de la Morinière et al. 2003).”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Cocheret de la Morinière et al. 2003 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The introductory discussion states that tissue stable isotopes reflect assimilated diet over the previous weeks to months and provide insight into trophic relationships. It says stomach contents usually represent the last few hours, not hours to days. The paper discusses reef fishes generally, not lionfish specifically. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Partly supported
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“The importance of benthic primary producers to the food web supporting lionfish, as determined by the 2-source mixing model, is consistent with analyses of the trophic importance of benthic algae to fishes occupying other shallow nearshore waters”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Thomas & Cahoon 1993 source
Split into 2 atoms — 2 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Reñones et al. 2002 source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Takai et al. 2002 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- Rests on an assumption: The 2-source mixing model appropriately estimates the importance of benthic primary producers to the food web supporting lionfish.
- Supported
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“supports the conclusion that lionfish are generalist feeders.”
- Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · hedged
“providing additional support that lionfish feed as generalists.”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Reñones et al. 2002 source
- Could not verifycites Cocheret de la Morinière et al. 2003 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Carnivorous fishes section discusses the diets of grunts and snappers, not lionfish. Searches for “lionfish,” “Pterois,” and generalist feeding found no passage in our copy addressing whether lionfish are generalist feeders. (LLM, conf=0.76)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Fry 1988 source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Rests on an assumption: Stable N isotopes provide a means of assessing ontogenetic changes in lionfish diets and the trophic level at which lionfish are feeding.
- Rests on an assumption: Muscle tissue isotope values integrate diet over a longer period than stomach contents and reflect all assimilated prey rather than identifiable remains of ingested prey.
- Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · hedged
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Based on δ 15 N values, we conclude that lionfish are feeding at a similar trophic level to multiple species of reef fish in Onslow Bay (spottail pinfish Diplodus holbrooki, vermilion snapper Rhomboplites aurorubens, round scad Decapterus punctatus, red porgy Pagrus pagrus, and tomtate Haemulon aurolineatum) reported by Thomas & Cahoon (1993) (Fig. 7).”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Thomas & Cahoon (1993) source
The Methods report collecting fishes from Onslow and Long Bays and analyzing nitrogen isotopes in the five named species. The Discussion states that their δ15N values indicate all five probably feed within one trophic level. The comparison with lionfish is the citing authors’ own conclusion, not a finding attributed to Thomas and Cahoon. (LLM, conf=0.92)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- Rests on an assumption: Stable N isotopes provide a means of assessing ontogenetic changes in lionfish diets and the trophic level at which lionfish are feeding.
- Rests on an assumption: Muscle tissue isotope values integrate diet over a longer period than stomach contents and reflect all assimilated prey rather than identifiable remains of ingested prey.
- Supported
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“The lack of relationship between fish size and δ 15 N values is in contrast to results from other studies examining marine benthic carnivorous fishes”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Reñones et al. 2002 source
- Supportedcites Cocheret de la Morinière et al. 2003 source
The Carnivorous fishes section reports a significant positive relationship between fish size and δ15N in the carnivorous fish studied, both as a group and by species. Table 3 (p. 286) shows significant positive relationships for all five carnivorous species. These findings provide the contrasting result attributed to the source. (LLM, conf=0.92)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- Rests on an assumption: Stable N isotopes provide a means of assessing ontogenetic changes in lionfish diets and the trophic level at which lionfish are feeding.
- Rests on an assumption: Muscle tissue isotope values integrate diet over a longer period than stomach contents and reflect all assimilated prey rather than identifiable remains of ingested prey.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Lionfish C isotope values are also intermediate to those reported for the 5 species of reef fishes (-15.9 to -17.7 ‰) collected from Onslow Bay, which were described as representative of separate planktonic and benthic trophic pathways”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Thomas & Cahoon 1993 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Methods say the five fish species were collected from both Onslow and Long Bays, and the Discussion distinguishes planktonic from benthic trophic pathways. Our copy reports an overall individual-fish carbon-isotope range of −18.3 to −14.8‰, but the retrieved passages do not establish the claimed −15.9 to −17.7‰ range for the five species. The comparison with lionfish is the citing authors’ own, not a finding attributed to this paper. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Rests on an assumption: Stable N isotopes provide a means of assessing ontogenetic changes in lionfish diets and the trophic level at which lionfish are feeding.
- Rests on an assumption: Muscle tissue isotope values integrate diet over a longer period than stomach contents and reflect all assimilated prey rather than identifiable remains of ingested prey.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“subsequent surveys from multiple years and sites indicate that scad is a patchily distributed species that occasionally visits benthic habitats in large (1100 to 40 000 ind. ha -1 ) schools while feeding (Parker et al. 1994, Kendall et al. 2009, P. Whitfield et al. unpubl.).”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Parker et al. 1994
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Partly supportedcites Kendall et al. 2009Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Methods describe an unusually large school of the pelagic scad Caranx crysos at one ledge site, and the results report high biomass for schooling C. crysos on ledges (pages unavailable in our copy). The paper also notes that C. crysos appeared in its visual surveys but not in an earlier study. It does not establish the stated 1,100–40,000 individuals per hectare range or say that the schools were visiting benthic habitats to feed. (LLM, conf=0.85)
- Not matchedcites P. Whitfield et al. unpubl.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Not matched
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“low densities (~2.2 ind.ha -1 ) of lionfish were observed in their native range on Palauan reefs with robust grouper populations”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > Potential impacts -trophic overlap and direct predation
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Grubich et al. 2009 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The main text reports low estimated densities on Palauan reefs and says the expedition encountered robust grouper populations. However, ~2.2 individuals per hectare applies to P. volitans and D. biocellatus, not to all four lionfish species; the other two estimates were ~4.4 and ~13.1 individuals per hectare. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- Partly supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Serranidae and Scaridae dominated the diet in 2004, while Haemulidae and Carangidae were important in 2006.”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > Abstract
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 183Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Major differences in the importance of prey occurred between years.”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > Abstract
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes
- Probably not a substantial claim. 41
- It may state two separate claims as one. 43
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Native to the subtropical and tropical regions of the South Pacific, Indian Ocean, and the Red Sea, lionfish are venomous predators whose popularity in the aquarium trade may have contributed to their introduction to Atlantic waters (Whitfield et al. 2002, Semmens et al. 2004, Ruiz-Carus et al. 2006).”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Whitfield et al. 2002 source
The Introduction describes lionfish as having venomous spines and a distinctive style of predation. The Method of introduction calls them popular aquarium fish and identifies aquarium release as the most likely introduction mechanism, while acknowledging ballast water as another possibility. (LLM, conf=0.93)
- Partly supportedcites Semmens et al. 2004 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results identify Indo-Pacific lionfish among non-native fishes sighted in the western Atlantic and say the observed species were imported for aquaria. The Discussion finds aquarium releases consistent with the introductions, supporting the claim's hedged pathway. Our copy does not describe lionfish as venomous predators or establish their species-specific popularity in the aquarium trade. (LLM, conf=0.86)
- Not matchedcites Ruiz-Carus et al. 2006
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“The Indo-Pacific lionfish (Pterois volitans and P. miles complex) has become widely established along the United States Southeast coast and continues to colonize the Caribbean, yet its biology and ecology is only beginning to be understood.”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Morris et al. 2009 source
- Supportedcites Schofield 2009 source
The Schofield entry in the indexed copy (pp. 473–479) says lionfish were established along the U.S. Atlantic coast from the Florida Keys to Cape Hatteras and in several Caribbean locations. It also reports sightings in additional Caribbean localities where establishment had not yet occurred, consistent with continued colonization. The cited geographical claim does not include the sentence’s separate statement about how well lionfish biology is understood. (LLM, conf=0.89)
Load-bearingStrength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“Along the United States Southeast Atlantic coast, and in Bermuda and the Bahamas, red lionfish Pterois volitans and devil firefish P. miles are now established and are continuing to expand their range in the Caribbean (Morris et al. 2009, Schofield 2009).”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Morris et al. 2009 source
- Supportedcites Schofield 2009 source
The Schofield entry (pp. 473–479) identifies both Pterois volitans and P. miles and reports lionfish established along the southeastern U.S. Atlantic coast, in Bermuda and the Bahamas, and in several Caribbean locations. It also describes reports from additional Caribbean locations where establishment was considered likely imminent, supporting the paraphrase about range expansion. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Stomach contents provided information on ingested prey, representing the animal's diet over the last few hours to days, while stable isotopes offered additional information on the trophic status of lionfish by providing a long-term integration of the diet over previous weeks to months (Cocheret de la Morinière et al. 2003).”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Cocheret de la Morinière et al. 2003 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The paper’s introductory discussion (page not available in our copy) says stomach-content analysis identifies ingested prey and usually represents diet over the last few hours. It also says stable isotopes reflect diet over previous weeks to months. It does not support extending the stomach-content window to days. (LLM, conf=0.89)
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Bahamian studies documented lionfish at 5 to 177 times higher densities than in their native range (Grubich et al. 2009), capable of reducing reef fish recruitment by 79% from experimental patch reefs, and preying mostly on fishes (78% by volume), including 41 species from 21 families (Albins & Hixon 2008, Green & Cote 2009, Morris & Akins 2009).”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Grubich et al. 2009 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The main text reports Western Atlantic densities of about 21.2–390 lionfish per hectare and much lower estimates at Palau’s Helen Reef Atoll; those figures can yield roughly 5- to 177-fold comparisons. It does not identify the full Western Atlantic range as Bahamian or state the 5–177 figure as a finding of Bahamian studies. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Partly supported
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“These hard bottom reefs are well recognized as essential fish habitats that support economically valuable commercial and sport fisheries and an increasingly popular sport diving industry (Struhsaker 1969, Parker & Ross 1986), and lionfish have become widespread residents in the region (Whitfield et al. 2007, Morris et al. 2009).”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites Whitfield et al. 2007 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Our copy contains a correction discussing lionfish abundance in surveyed areas and the head-boat fishery, but gives no geographic distribution or evidence that lionfish were widespread residents of the Southeast US Atlantic region. Searches for established populations and geographic range returned only that correction; the relevant distribution discussion may be missing from our copy. (LLM, conf=0.74)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Morris et al. 2009 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Could not verify
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“Bahamian studies documented lionfish at 5 to 177 times higher densities than in their native range (Grubich et al. 2009), capable of reducing reef fish recruitment by 79% from experimental patch reefs, and preying mostly on fishes (78% by volume), including 41 species from 21 families (Albins & Hixon 2008, Green & Cote 2009, Morris & Akins 2009).”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites Green & Cote 2009 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The paper’s main text reports lionfish densities in the Bahamas and cites a 79% reduction in native-fish recruitment on experimental reefs. It does not address prey composition, the 78% by-volume figure, or the count of 41 species from 21 families (searched for those figures and lionfish diet). (LLM, conf=0.76)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Morris & Akins 2009 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Could not verify
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“For example, the narrower depth distribution of lionfish in northern parts of the invaded range may be related to winter water temperatures (Whitfield et al. 2002, Kimball et al. 2004, Ruiz-Carus et al. 2006).”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Whitfield et al. 2002 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Fig. 4 caption identifies a February 16°C isotherm as the likely inshore limit of lionfish habitat, and the Potential survival section says cold winter water likely prevents overwintering on the northeastern shelf. These passages support a possible temperature-related limit, but the paper does not establish that the depth distribution is narrower in northern than in southern parts of the invaded range. (LLM, conf=0.82)
- Supportedcites Kimball et al. 2004 source
The ‘Distribution and potential overwintering range’ section (page unavailable) predicts lionfish habitat from the coast to the shelf edge farther south, but only on the mid- and outer shelf in the mid- and northern portions. It attributes the inshore and northern limits to winter temperatures, supporting the proposed explanation for the narrower northern depth range. (LLM, conf=0.91)
- Not matchedcites Ruiz-Carus et al. 2006
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Onslow Bay reef fishes include those utilizing a benthic pathway (filled symbols) and pelagic pathway (open symbols).”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > Lionfish: a permanent component of the Western Atlantic fish community
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Thomas & Cahoon (1993) source
The Discussion (page unavailable) states that the study distinguished three benthic-feeding species from two pelagic-feeding species. The Introduction places these reef communities in the North Carolina shelf ecosystem, including Onslow Bay. The filled and open symbols describe the citing paper’s figure, not a separate finding attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.91)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Analyses of stomach contents (n = 183) and stable isotopes (n = 115) suggest a generalist carnivorous diet, and prey categories were predominately fish (~99% of total volume) from 16 families.”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Serranidae and Scaridae dominated the diet in 2004 while Haemulidae, Carangidae (scad and jacks), and Crustacea were important in 2006”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > RESULTS
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“mean number of prey per stomach in 2004 vs. 2006 was 4.0 ± 0.36, n = 104 vs. 5.5 ± 1.0, n = 79 (Fig. 5C; 1-way ANOSIM, R = 0.015, p = 0.035).”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > RESULTS
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Unidentifiable fish prey came from the same species and in similar proportions as identifiable species.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Unidentifiable prey fishes accounted for 45% by both volume and weight, and 57% by number.”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > RESULTS
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 183Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The range in δ 15 N values was greater (9.61 to 12.07 ‰), with an overall mean of 11.00 ± 0.04 ‰ (Fig. 7).”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > RESULTS
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 115Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We found that the smallest lionfish contained the greatest proportion by volume of crustacean prey, and higher proportions of small bodied benthic fishes such as gobies (Gobiidae) and blennies (Blenniidae)”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > RESULTS
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We found that prey categories that were important (sea basses, parrotfishes) in 2004 were less important in 2006 (when grunts, crustaceans, and scad were the dominant prey items).”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > DISCUSSION
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“a diverse array of prey fishes from 16 different families was observed in the stomachs (3.77 ± 0.37 ml, n = 176; Table 1, Fig. 2).”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > RESULTS
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“With increasing size, the percent volume of larger-bodied prey such as sea basses, parrotfishes, and grunts increased, along with the variety of different prey categories consumed”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > RESULTS
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Visual surveys of prey availability compared with prey from stomach contents revealed that grunts were observed most frequently in the environment and also in the stomachs of lionfish (Fig. 6).”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > RESULTS
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The δ 13 C values of lionfish muscle tissue exhibited little variability between samples, with an overall mean of -16.60 ± 0.02 ‰ (range -16.0 to -17.2 ‰).”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > RESULTS
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 115Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“In the case of number of prey, the low global R statistic indicates that the overall distribution of prey numbers consumed between years, although statistically significant (because of large sample sizes; Warwick 1993, Warwick & Clarke 2001), was not biologically significant.”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > RESULTS
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Warwick 1993 source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Warwick & Clarke 2001
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The mean prey/predator TL ratio for 2004 was 0.18 ± 0.01 (max.0.41, n = 41), compared with 0.16 ± 0.01 (max.0.25, n = 35) for 2006 and the difference was not significant (t-test, t 74 = 1.84, p = 0.07).”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > RESULTS
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 41Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“a 47 cm (1435 g) lionfish was landed off North Carolina (J.Morris unpubl.)”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > Potential impacts -trophic overlap and direct predation
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites J.Morris unpubl.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedSingle caseTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“In addition, the average prey/predator TL ratio was slightly higher off North Carolina (0.16-0.18 vs. 0.15 in the Bahamas), though the maximum prey/predator TL ratio was higher in the Bahamas (0.48 vs. 0.25-0.41 in North Carolina) (Albins & Hixon 2008, Morris & Akins 2009).”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Smaller-bodied fishes such as gobies, basslets (Grammatidae), and wrasses were ranked as the most important prey items in the Bahamas; whereas, typically larger-bodied prey (sea basses, grunts, parrotfishes) were most important off North Carolina.”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > DISCUSSION
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Classified as demersal mesocarnivores together with groupers (Serranidae) and snappers (Lutjanidae) (Caillet et al. 1986), lionfish are believed to be opportunistic predators that consume fish, shrimp, and crabs in their native range (Hiatt & Strasburg 1960, Harmelin-Vivien & Bouchon 1976, Sano et al. 1984).”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Generalist invasive predators that become established might potentially affect a wide range of species, but the risk of local extirpation for native species is thought to be lower than for specialized invasive predators.”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Rilov 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“They have the potential to transform marine habitats worldwide, and to cause hundreds of billions of dollars in economic damages (reviews in Strayer et al. 2006, Molnar et al. 2008).”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“However, until their recent invasion of the Atlantic and Caribbean, their biology and ecology were poorly understood beyond general descriptions because conclusions from these earlier studies were hampered by small sample sizes (n = 1 to 12; Hiatt & Strasburg 1960, Harmelin-Vivien & Bouchon 1976, Sano et al. 1984).”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“To determine the ecological impacts of invasive predators, we must understand how they interact with other members of the community and how their arrival and establishment affects community structure (Kalogirou et al. 2007, Rilov 2009).”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Kalogirou et al. 2007 source
- Not matchedcites Rilov 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Invasive species are a major threat to biological diversity.”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“These, in contrast, would be expected to exert stronger direct impacts on a few species and possibly cause more extensive indirect effects, depending on the ecological status of the targeted prey (Rilov 2009).”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Rilov 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Predators are known to have profound effects on the structure of marine communities, and have been shown capable of enhancing species diversity (keystone species) and altering community structure (trophic cascades) (Paine 1966, Estes et al. 1998, Rilov 2009).”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Classified as demersal mesocarnivores together with groupers (Serranidae) and snappers (Lutjanidae) (Caillet et al. 1986), lionfish are believed to be opportunistic predators that consume fish, shrimp, and crabs in their native range (Hiatt & Strasburg 1960, Harmelin-Vivien & Bouchon 1976, Sano et al. 1984).”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Caillet et al. 1986
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Invasive predators have been implicated as one of the most important causes of declines and extinctions of species worldwide (Vitousek et al. 1997).”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Vitousek et al. 1997 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“For example, in the native range, lionfish are reported to have few natural predators (Bernadsky & Goulet 1991), to attain a size of 38 cm total length (TL), and to reach depths of 50 m (Randall et al. 1990).”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Bernadsky & Goulet 1991 source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The size (and economic importance) of prey consumed in the invaded range may increase, however, as increases in body size (relative to the native range) are known for a variety of invasive species, potentially including lionfish (Grosholz & Ruiz 2003).”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Grosholz & Ruiz 2003 source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Because collection of fishes at depth may cause regurgitation (Bowen 1992), we immediately placed speared lionfish in plastic bags to prevent loss of regurgitated stomach contents.”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > MATERIALS AND METHODS
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Bowen 1992
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Based on laboratory studies, 80 adult lionfish along a 1 km stretch of reef in Eilat (Red Sea) were estimated to cumulatively consume approximately 230 kg of mostly small-bodied prey fishes per year (Fishelson 1997).”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Fishelson 1997 source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedn = 80Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Bahamian studies documented lionfish at 5 to 177 times higher densities than in their native range (Grubich et al. 2009), capable of reducing reef fish recruitment by 79% from experimental patch reefs, and preying mostly on fishes (78% by volume), including 41 species from 21 families (Albins & Hixon 2008, Green & Cote 2009, Morris & Akins 2009).”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Albins & Hixon 2008 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These depth and size extensions, as well as novel observations of predation on lionfish in the invaded range, probably reflect the paucity of investigations in the native range.”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > INTRODUCTION
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“These hard bottom reefs are well recognized as essential fish habitats that support economically valuable commercial and sport fisheries and an increasingly popular sport diving industry (Struhsaker 1969, Parker & Ross 1986), and lionfish have become widespread residents in the region (Whitfield et al. 2007, Morris et al. 2009).”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Struhsaker 1969
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Parker & Ross 1986 source
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“In contrast, lionfish in the invaded range have been found in the stomach contents of piscivorous groupers (Maljkoviç et al. 2008) and have been observed to occur at greater depths (down to 304.8 m, R. Gilmore unpubl.)and attain sizes larger (47.6 cm TL; J. Morris unpubl.)than in the native range.”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites R. Gilmore unpubl.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“For example, in the native range, lionfish are reported to have few natural predators (Bernadsky & Goulet 1991), to attain a size of 38 cm total length (TL), and to reach depths of 50 m (Randall et al. 1990).”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Randall et al. 1990
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The cumulative number of prey categories (18) recorded from these specimens had neared an asymptote and additional estimates of prey items indicated that only 1.5 to 3 prey categories may have been missed by sampling”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > RESULTS
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedn = 183Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Unidentifiable fish prey came from the same species and in similar proportions as identifiable species.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Despite recent studies of potential impacts of lionfish to tropical reef communities in the Bahamas (Albins & Hixon 2008, Morris & Akins 2009, Cote & Maljkoviç 2010), impacts to warm-temperate hard bottom reefs of the Southeast US Atlantic Ocean remain unknown.”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In contrast, lionfish in the invaded range have been found in the stomach contents of piscivorous groupers (Maljkoviç et al. 2008) and have been observed to occur at greater depths (down to 304.8 m, R. Gilmore unpubl.)and attain sizes larger (47.6 cm TL; J. Morris unpubl.)than in the native range.”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Maljkoviç et al. 2008 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The invaded range, and densities, size attained and depth distribution of lionfish in invaded habitats, together with laboratory studies of food consumption, all indicate the possibility for substantial impacts to both native prey communities and trophic competitors.”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > INTRODUCTION
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“For example, in the native range, lionfish are reported to have few natural predators (Bernadsky & Goulet 1991), to attain a size of 38 cm total length (TL), and to reach depths of 50 m (Randall et al. 1990).”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Randall et al. 1990
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“In contrast, lionfish in the invaded range have been found in the stomach contents of piscivorous groupers (Maljkoviç et al. 2008) and have been observed to occur at greater depths (down to 304.8 m, R. Gilmore unpubl.)and attain sizes larger (47.6 cm TL; J. Morris unpubl.)than in the native range.”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites J. Morris unpubl.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“A comprehensive understanding of the impacts of invasive species requires investigation of interactions at broad geographic scales (Crooks & Rilov 2009), because impacts may vary as invaders confront and respond to different ecological and physical factors in their invaded range.”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Crooks & Rilov 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These differences may have been due to the availability of prey or a reflection of the sizes of lionfish collected between years.”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > RESULTS
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Since lionfish appear to be generalist predators that feed primarily on benthic fishes”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > Potential impacts -trophic overlap and direct predation
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Like lionfish, serranids, haemulids, and carangids are some of the most important food items in the scamp diet”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > Potential impacts -trophic overlap and direct predation
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Matheson et al. 1986
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Predators may preferentially attack large schools if school size increases the conspicuousness and detectability of prey (Botham & Krause 2005), and not all predators succumb equally to the confusion effect attributed to schools (Turesson & Brönmark 2004).”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Botham & Krause 2005 source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Such an ontogenetic shift is a general pattern for numerous piscivores and can result in increased growth rates following the shift (Reñones et al. 2002, Scharf et al. 2009).”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Available evidence suggests that the most successful fish invaders appear to be piscivorous or omnivorous and ecological generalists (Kolar & Lodge 2001, Unmack & Fagan 2004).”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Predators may preferentially attack large schools if school size increases the conspicuousness and detectability of prey (Botham & Krause 2005), and not all predators succumb equally to the confusion effect attributed to schools (Turesson & Brönmark 2004).”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Turesson & Brönmark 2004 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Morris & Akins (2009) found a greater number of families of fish prey (21 vs. 16 off North Carolina) in their samples but also had a larger sample size (n = 1069 vs. 183 in the present study).”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Morris & Akins 2009 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“When present, however, mid-water schooling herrings (Clupeidae) and fusiliers (Caesionidae) were selected over reef-associated species, similar to our observations of consumption of mid-water schooling grunts and scad.”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > DISCUSSION
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Morris and Akins (2009) examined lionfish stomachs from the Bahamas and also found that the proportion of fishes in the diet increased with lionfish size.”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Morris and Akins (2009) source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Unfortunately, we did not conduct prey censuses in 2004 so we do not know if these differences in prey importance between years were a response to the local availability of prey.”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > DISCUSSION
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“numerous Atlantic fishes are capable of consuming venomous scorpaenids, including goosefish Lophius americanus and mutton snapper Lutjanus analis, which are known to consume the venomous scorpaenid blackbelly rosefish Helicolenus dactylopterus and spotted scorpionfish Scorpaena plumieri, respectively”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > Potential impacts -trophic overlap and direct predation
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Randall 1967
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Bowman et al. 2000
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Sustained control measures may mitigate the eventual extent of lionfish populations, but only on a local scale”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > Lionfish: a permanent component of the Western Atlantic fish community
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Piscivores are believed most capable of altering the communities which they invade”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > Lionfish: a permanent component of the Western Atlantic fish community
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Marchetti et al. 2004 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“The combined effects of overfishing, climate change, and multiple invasive species on ecosystems are not well understood but have been implicated in ecosystem state shifts and decline in several marine ecosystems”
§ Diet of invasive lionfish on hard bottom reefs of the Southeast USA: insights from stomach contents and stable isotopes > Lionfish: a permanent component of the Western Atlantic fish community
What the sources say
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
Active cryptic or juvenile prey fishes 10 cm and less in total length are often underestimated in surveys of larger conspicuous fishes.
“This group is often underestimated in surveys of larger conspicuous fishes.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Different fish species do not show differential digestion rates.
“since different fish species are not expected to show differential digestion rates”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Unidentifiable fish prey came from the same species and in similar proportions as identifiable species.
“we assumed that unidentifiable fish prey came from the same species and in similar pro-portions as identifiable species”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Benthic algae have a similar N isotope value to phytoplankton.
“we assumed that benthic algae would have a similar N isotope value”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Carnivorous fish muscle tissue is enriched by 3.4‰ from its prey.
“We assumed that carnivorous fish muscle tissue is enriched by 3.4 ‰ from its prey”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Herbivorous fish and invertebrates are enriched by 2.4‰ from their food source.
“and that herbivorous fish and invertebrates are enriched by 2.4 ‰ from their food source”
The authors state this as an assumption.
A trophic level of 2.3 is assumed for the lionfish food web.
“Assuming a trophic level of 2.3 and a 0.8 ‰ increase in δ 13 C per trophic step”
The authors state this as an assumption.
There is a 0.8‰ increase in δ13C per trophic step.
“Assuming a trophic level of 2.3 and a 0.8 ‰ increase in δ 13 C per trophic step”
The paper relies on this without support.
Stomach contents provide only a snapshot of prey consumed.
“Since stomach contents provide only a snapshot of prey consumed, we hoped that samples from multiple years would provide insight regarding the consistency or variability of targeted prey.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Stable N isotopes provide a means of assessing ontogenetic changes in lionfish diets and the trophic level at which lionfish are feeding.
“Stable N isotopes provide another means of assessing ontogenetic changes in lionfish diets and the trophic level at which lionfish are feeding.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Muscle tissue isotope values integrate diet over a longer period than stomach contents and reflect all assimilated prey rather than identifiable remains of ingested prey.
“The isotope values of muscle tissue integrate diet over a longer period of time than do stomach contents, and reflect the isotope values of all assimilated prey, rather than the identifiable remains of ingested prey.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The 2-source mixing model appropriately estimates the importance of benthic primary producers to the food web supporting lionfish.
“The importance of benthic primary producers to the food web supporting lionfish, as determined by the 2-source mixing model”
The paper relies on this without support.
The 47 cm lionfish specimen is representative of maximum lionfish size in the Southeast US Atlantic.
“a 47 cm (1435 g) lionfish was landed off North Carolina (J.Morris unpubl.)”
The paper relies on this without support.
Prey/predator TL ratios from observed stomach contents can be extrapolated to larger lionfish.
“maximum prey/predator TL ratios were 0.41 (or 0.48 if we use Bahamas estimates)”
The paper relies on this without support.
Lionfish have planktonic larval dispersal and opportunistic colonization of habitats and food resources.
“Because of their planktonic larval dispersal and their opportunistic colonization of habitats and use of food resources”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Tomtate is also a main dietary item of lionfish in waters off of the SEUS18.”
From Invasive lionfish reduce native fish abundance on a regional scale (2016) · cites this paper as [18]
Citations
Cites
Human domination of Earth’s ecosystems
Vitousek, P. M., Mooney, H. A., Lubchenco, J., & Melillo, J. M. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.277.5325.494 · Cited by 9,086
Food Web Complexity and Species Diversity
Paine, R. T. (1966) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/282400 · Cited by 5,361
Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation
Colwell, R. K., & Coddington, J. A. (1994) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1994.0091 · Cited by 4,574
Stomach contents analysis—a review of methods and their application
Hyslop, E. J. (1980) · Journal of Fish Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.1980.tb02775.x · Cited by 4,440
Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders
Kolar, C. S., & Lodge, D. M. (2001) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(01)02101-2 · Cited by 2,825
Variation in trophic shift for stable isotope ratios of carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur
McCutchan, J. H., Lewis, W. M., Kendall, C., & McGrath, C. C. (2003) · Oikos · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12098.x · Cited by 2,729
Campana, S. E. (2001) · Journal of Fish Biology · doi:10.1006/jfbi.2001.1668 · Cited by 2,261
Positive Interactions of Nonindigenous Species: Invasional Meltdown?
Simberloff, D., & Von Holle, B. (1999) · Biological Invasions · doi:10.1023/a:1010086329619 · Cited by 2,231
Variation in δ 15 N and δ 13 C trophic fractionation: Implications for aquatic food web studies
Zanden, M. J. V., & Rasmussen, J. B. (2001) · Limnology and Oceanography · doi:10.4319/lo.2001.46.8.2061 · Cited by 1,859
Assessing the global threat of invasive species to marine biodiversity
Molnar, J. L., Gamboa, R. L., Revenga, C., & Spalding, M. D. (2008) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1890/070064 · Cited by 1,538
Killer Whale Predation on Sea Otters Linking Oceanic and Nearshore Ecosystems
Estes, J. A., Tinker, M. T., Williams, T. M., & Doak, D. F. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.282.5388.473 · Cited by 1,263
Cortés, E. (1997) · Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · doi:10.1139/f96-316 · Cited by 1,222
Trophic Cascades in a Formerly Cod-Dominated Ecosystem
Frank, K. T., Petrie, B., Choi, J. S., & Leggett, W. C. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1113075 · Cited by 1,205
Understanding the long-term effects of species invasions
Strayer, D. L., Eviner, V. T., Jeschke, J. M., & Pace, M. L. (2006) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.07.007 · Cited by 1,025
Stachowicz, J. J., Terwin, J. R., Whitlatch, R. B., & Osman, R. W. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.242437499 · Cited by 863
Carbon-13 enrichment in benthic compared to planktonic algae:foodweb implications
France, R. (1995) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps124307 · Cited by 840
Food web structure on Georges Bank from stable C, N, and S isotopic compositions
Fry, B. (1988) · Limnology and Oceanography · doi:10.4319/lo.1988.33.5.1182 · Cited by 820
Ecological Relationships of the Fish Fauna on Coral Reefs of the Marshall Islands
Hiatt, R. W., & Strasburg, D. W. (1960) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/1942181 · Cited by 700
Fishes of the Great Barrier Reef and Coral Sea
(1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-6264 · Cited by 588
Invasive Indo-Pacific lionfish Pterois volitans reduce recruitment of Atlantic coral-reef fishes
Albins, M., & Hixon, M. (2008) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps07620 · Cited by 544
Environmental impact studies on marine communities: Pragmatical considerations
WARWICK, R. M. (1993) · Australian Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.1993.tb00435.x · Cited by 515
Fishes of the Bahamas and Adjacent Tropical Waters
Smith, C., Böhlke, J. E., Chaplin, C. C. G., et al. (1994) · Copeia · doi:10.2307/1446699 · Cited by 423
A Preliminary Report on a Method of Estimating Reef Fish Populations
Brock, V. E. (1954) · Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3797016 · Cited by 369
Biological Invasions in Marine Ecosystems
Rilov, G., & Crooks, J. A. (2008) · Ecological studies · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-79236-9 · Cited by 369
Feeding ecology of invasive lionfish (Pterois volitans) in the Bahamian archipelago
Morris, J. A., & Akins, J. L. (2009) · Environmental Biology of Fishes · doi:10.1007/s10641-009-9538-8 · Cited by 368
Determining Methods of Underwater Visual Census for Estimating the Abundance of Coral Reef Fishes
Samoilys, M., & Carlos, G. (2000) · Environmental Biology of Fishes · doi:10.1023/a:1007679109359 · Cited by 341
(2001) · Murdoch University Research Portal · Cited by 310
Cocheret de la Morinière, E., Pollux, B., Nagelkerken, I., Hemminga, M., Huiskes, A., & van der Velde, G. (2003) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps246279 · Cited by 307
Whitfield, P., Gardner, T., Vives, S., Gilligan, M., Courtenay Ray, W., Ray, G., & Hare, J. (2002) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps235289 · Cited by 306
Self-citationMcEachran, J. D., & Fechhelm, J. D. (1998) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 290
Fishes of the Gulf of Mexico, Texas, Louisiana, and Adjacent Waters
H., C., Hoese, H. D., & Moore, R. H. (1977) · Copeia · doi:10.2307/1443203 · Cited by 285
A hotspot of non-native marine fishes: evidence for the aquarium trade as an invasion pathway
Semmens, B., Buhle, E., Salomon, A., & Pattengill-Semmens, C. (2004) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps266239 · Cited by 277
Marchetti, M. P., Moyle, P. B., & Levine, R. (2004) · Freshwater Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2004.01202.x · Cited by 272
Schofield, P. (2009) · Aquatic Invasions · doi:10.3391/ai.2009.4.3.5 · Cited by 271
Recent biological invasion may hasten invasional meltdown by accelerating historical introductions
Grosholz, E. D. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0308547102 · Cited by 244
A rapid ontogenetic shift in the diet of juvenile yellowfin tuna from Hawaii
Graham, B. S., Grubbs, R. D., Holland, K. N., & Popp, B. N. (2006) · Marine Biology · doi:10.1007/s00227-006-0360-y · Cited by 240
Fishes: A Field and Laboratory Manual on Their Structure, Identification, and Natural History
Baskin, J. N., Cailliet, G. M., Love, M. S., et al. (1987) · Copeia · doi:10.2307/1445685 · Cited by 210
Jahnke, R. A., Nelson, J. R., Marinelli, R. L., et al. (2000) · Continental Shelf Research · doi:10.1016/s0278-4343(99)00063-1 · Cited by 197
Record densities of Indo-Pacific lionfish on Bahamian coral reefs
Green, S. J., & Côté, I. M. (2009) · Coral Reefs · doi:10.1007/s00338-008-0446-8 · Cited by 177
Harris, L. G., & Tyrrell, M. C. (2001) · Biological Invasions · doi:10.1023/a:1011487219735 · Cited by 176
Kimball, M., Miller, J., Whitfield, P., & Hare, J. (2004) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps283269 · Cited by 176
Self-citationSample size and data analysis : are we characterizing and comparing diet properly?
Ferry, L. (1996) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 167
Predation rates of Indo-Pacific lionfish on Bahamian coral reefs
Côté, I., & Maljković, A. (2009) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps08458 · Cited by 145
Food Habits of Teleostean Reef Fishes in Okinawa Island, Southern Japan
Sano, M., Nose, Y., & Shimizu, M. (1985) · Cited by 145
Benthic microalgal production in Onslow Bay, North Carolina, USA
Cahoon, L. B., & Cooke, J. (1992) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps084185 · Cited by 144
Mangrove use by the invasive lionfish Pterois volitans
Barbour, A. B., Montgomery, M., Adamson, A., Díaz‐Ferguson, E., & Silliman, B. R. (2009) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps08373 · Cited by 144
Redundancy of Variables Used to Describe Importance of Prey Species in Fish Diets
Macdonald, J. S., & Green, R. H. (1983) · Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · doi:10.1139/f83-083 · Cited by 143
Whitfield, P. E., Hare, J. A., David, A. W., Harter, S. L., Muñoz, R. C., & Addison, C. M. (2006) · Biological Invasions · doi:10.1007/s10530-006-9005-9 · Cited by 140
Self-citationReñones, O., Polunin, N. V. C., & Goni, R. (2002) · Journal of Fish Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.2002.tb01741.x · Cited by 134
Hamner, R. M., Freshwater, D. W., & Whitfield, P. E. (2007) · Journal of Fish Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.2007.01575.x · Cited by 132
Self-citationWhitfield, P. E., Hare, J. A., David, A. W., Harter, S. L., Muñoz, R. C., & Addison, C. M. (2007) · Biological Invasions · doi:10.1007/s10530-006-9063-z · Cited by 131
Self-citationFishelson, L. (1997) · Environmental Biology of Fishes · doi:10.1023/a:1007331304122 · Cited by 129
Maljković, A., Van Leeuwen, T. E., & Cove, S. N. (2008) · Coral Reefs · doi:10.1007/s00338-008-0372-9 · Cited by 127
Fishes of the Gulf of Mexico, Vol. 1
McEachran, J. D., & Fechhelm, J. D. (1998) · University of Texas Press eBooks · doi:10.7560/752061 · Cited by 127
Comparative feeding ecology of four sympatric skate species off central California, USA
Bizzarro, J. J., Robinson, H. J., Rinewalt, C. S., & Ebert, D. A. (2008) · Environmental Biology of Fishes · doi:10.1007/s10641-008-9428-5 · Cited by 123
Management of Pacific Rockfish
Parker, S. J., Berkeley, S. A., Golden, J. T., Gunderson, D. R., Heifetz, J., Hixon, M. A., Larson, R. J., Leaman, B. M., Love, M. S., Musick, J. A., et al. (2000) · Fisheries · doi:10.1577/1548-8446(2000)025 · Cited by 122
Thomas, C., & Cahoon, L. (1993) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps095019 · Cited by 116
Biological invasions drive size increases in marine and estuarine invertebrates
Grosholz, E. D., & Ruiz, G. M. (2003) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00495.x · Cited by 115
Biology and Ecology of the Invasive Lionfishes, Pterois miles and Pterois volitans
Barse, A. M., Cerino, D. S., & Paris, C. B. (2008) · Cited by 110
Rehage, J. S., Barnett, B. K., & Sih, A. (2005) · Ecology of Freshwater Fish · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0633.2005.00109.x · Cited by 109
The influence of prey abundance on the feeding ecology of two piscivorous species of coral reef fish
Stewart, B. D., & Jones, G. P. (2003) · Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology · doi:10.1016/j.jembe.2003.08.015 · Cited by 105
Ruiz-Carus, R., Matheson, R. E., ROBERTS, D. E., & Whitfield, P. E. (2005) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2005.10.012 · Cited by 93
Self-citationCarpenter, K. E. (2002) · Cited by 89
Takai, N., Mishima, Y., Yorozu, A., & Hoshika, A. (2002) · Limnology and Oceanography · doi:10.4319/lo.2002.47.3.0730 · Cited by 89
Grabowska, J., & Grabowski, M. (2005) · Journal of Applied Ichthyology · doi:10.1111/j.1439-0426.2005.00676.x · Cited by 88
Feeding behavior of some carnivorous fishes (Serranidae and Scorpaenidae) from Tuléar (Madagascar)
Harmelin-Vivien, M. L., & Bouchon, C. (1976) · Marine Biology · doi:10.1007/bf00387488 · Cited by 79
Kalogirou, S., Corsini, M., Kondilatos, G., & Wennhage, H. (2007) · Biological Invasions · doi:10.1007/s10530-006-9088-3 · Cited by 72
Food of northwest Atlantic fishes and two common species of squid / Ray E. Bowman ... [et al.].
Bowman, R. E. (2000) · Biodiversity Heritage Library (Smithsonian Institution) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.4024 · Cited by 67
Biological and isotopic changes in coastal waters induced by Hurricane Gordon
Fogel, M. L., Aguilar, C., Cuhel, R. L., et al. (1999) · Limnology and Oceanography · doi:10.4319/lo.1999.44.6.1359 · Cited by 64
Diet Selectivity of Introduced Flathead Catfish in Coastal Rivers
Pine, W. E., Kwak, T. J., Waters, D. S., & Rice, J. A. (2005) · Transactions of the American Fisheries Society · doi:10.1577/t04-166.1 · Cited by 56
Fishes of the Gulf of Mexico, Volume 2
McEachran, J. D., & Fechhelm, J. D. (2006) · University of Texas Press eBooks · doi:10.7560/706347 · Cited by 55
A Natural Predator of the Lionfish, Pterois miles
Bernadsky, G., & Goulet, D. (1991) · Copeia · doi:10.2307/1446269 · Cited by 53
Foraging behaviour and capture success in perch, pikeperch and pike and the effects of prey density
Turesson, H., & Brönmark, C. (2004) · Journal of Fish Biology · doi:10.1111/j.0022-1112.2004.00455.x · Cited by 51
Riggs, S. R., Ambrose, W. G., Cook, J. W., et al. (1998) · Journal of Sedimentary Research · doi:10.2110/jsr.68.155 · Cited by 43
Meister, H. S., Wyanski, D. M., Loefer, J. K., Ross, S. W., Quattrini, A. M., & Sulak, K. J. (2005) · Southeastern Naturalist · doi:10.1656/1528-7092(2005)004[0193:feftia]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 42
Rates of Gain and Loss of Heat Tolerance in Channel Catfish
Bennett, W. A., McCauley, R. W., & Beitinger, T. L. (1998) · Transactions of the American Fisheries Society · doi:10.1577/1548-8659(1998)127 · Cited by 39
Observing Reef Fishes from Submersibles Off North Carolina
Parker, R. O., & Ross, S. W. (1986) · Northeast Gulf Science · doi:10.18785/negs.0801.03 · Cited by 37
Predator-Prey Interactions of Marine Invaders
Rilov, G. (2008) · Ecological studies · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-79236-9_15 · Cited by 35
Dierking, J., Williams, I. D., & Walsh, W. J. (2009) · AquaDocs (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization) · Cited by 33
Cruz‐Escalona, V. H., Peterson, M. S., Campos-Dávila, L., & Zetina-Rejón, M. J. (2005) · Journal of Applied Ichthyology · doi:10.1111/j.1439-0426.2005.00651.x · Cited by 30
Scharf, F. S., Buckel, J. A., & Juanes, F. (2009) · Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · doi:10.1139/f09-030 · Cited by 29
A Guide to Coastal Fishes of Georgia and Nearby States
H., C., & Dahlberg, M. D. (1975) · Copeia · doi:10.2307/1443346 · Cited by 29
(2009) · AquaDocs (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization) · Cited by 25
Field guide to nonindigenous marine fishes of Florida
Schofield, P. J., Morris, J. A., & Akins, L. (2009) · AquaDocs (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization) · Cited by 23
Shoals Receive more Attacks from the Wolf‐Fish (Hoplias malabaricus Bloch, 1794)
Botham, M. S., & Krause, J. (2005) · Ethology · doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.2005.01122.x · Cited by 22
Diversity of lionfishes (Pisces: Scorpaenidae) among remote coral reefs of the Palau Archipelago
Grubich, J. R., Westneat, M. W., & McCord, C. L. (2009) · Coral Reefs · doi:10.1007/s00338-009-0510-z · Cited by 20
Unmack, P. J., & Fagan, W. F. (2004) · Biological Invasions · doi:10.1023/b:binv.0000022142.77046.4f · Cited by 18
Reñones, O. (2002) · Journal of Fish Biology · doi:10.1006/jfbi.2002.2024 · Cited by 16
(2000) · Time to knit · doi:10.1016/0967-0653(95)90914-k · Cited by 12
Food of gag (Mycteroperca microlepis) from North Carolina and three areas of Florida
Naughton, S. P., & Saloman, C. H. (1985) · Cited by 10
Prey regurgitation in the grouperCephalopholis argus
Dierking, J., & Meyer, A. L. (2009) · Journal of Applied Ichthyology · doi:10.1111/j.1439-0426.2009.01275.x · Cited by 9
Future Directions For Marine Invasions Research
Crooks, J. A., & Rilov, G. (2008) · Ecological studies · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-79236-9_34 · Cited by 5
Fonseca, M. S., Uhrin, A. V., Currin, C. A., et al. (2006) · Cited by 3
Self-citationRecent biological invasion may hasten invasional meltdown by accelerating historical introductions
Grosholz, E. D. (2005) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.18201083
Positive Interactions of Nonindigenous Species: Invasional Meltdown?
Simberloff, D., & Holle, B. V. (1999) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.18201197
Schofield, P. J. (2009) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.18190765
Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders
Kolar, C. S., & Lodge, D. M. (2001) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.18192058
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Caillet GM (1977) Several approaches to the feeding ecology of fishes. In: Simenstad CA, Lipovsky SJ (eds) Fish food habits studies. Proc 1st Pacific NW Technical Workshop, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, p 1–13
- Parrish JD (1987) The trophic biology of snappers and groupers. In: Polovina JJ, Ralston S (eds) Tropical snappers and groupers: biology and fisheries management. Westview Press, Boulder, CO, p 405–463
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Predatory fish invaders: Insights from Indo-Pacific lionfish in the western Atlantic and Caribbean
Côté, I. M., Green, S. J., & Hixon, M. A. (2013) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2013.04.014 · Cited by 269
“In the Atlantic, they exploit a wide range of native fishes and crustaceans (Albins and Hixon, 2008; Côté et al., 2013; Layman and Allgeier, 2012; Morris and Akins, 2009; Muñoz et al., 2011; Valdez-Moreno et al., 2012).”
BackgroundInfluentialLayman, C., & Allgeier, J. (2011) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps09511 · Cited by 192
“Lionfish are widely regarded as generalist predators with an extremely broad dietary niche (Morris & Akins 2009, Côté & Maljkovic 2010, Jud et al. 2011, Muñoz et al. 2011), perhaps one of the reasons they have been such successful invaders in the Caribbean region.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialCoping with the lionfish invasion: can targeted removals yield beneficial effects?
Frazer, T. K., Jacoby, C. A., Edwards, M. A., Barry, S. C., & Manfrino, C. M. (2012) · Reviews in Fisheries Science · doi:10.1080/10641262.2012.700655 · Cited by 162
“…of their body weight per day in fish and invertebrates, potentially leading to reduced abundances of native species and increased competition for food (Morris and Akins, 2009; Côté and Maljković, 2010; Barbour et al., 2010; Albins and Hixon, 2011; Muñoz et al., 2011; Layman and Allgeier, 2012).”
BackgroundKulbicki, M., Beets, J., Chabanet, P., Cure, K., Darling, E., Floeter, Sr., Galzin, R., Green, A., Harmelin-Vivien, M., Hixon, M., et al. (2012) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps09442 · Cited by 154
“Invasive lionfish have broad diets of small crustaceans and especially fishes (Morris & Akins 2009, Muñoz et al. 2011), and exhibit high kill rates (Côté & Maljković 2010).”
BackgroundDahl, K. A., & Patterson, W. F. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0105852 · Cited by 143
“Consistent with earlier investigations of lionfish trophic ecology, our results suggest lionfish are ecological generalists in the nGOM and illustrate their adaptability to a range of habitat [49], [66] and foraging conditions [16], [36].”
BackgroundResult
Metadata
- Authors
- Muñoz, R., Currin, C., & Whitfield, P.
- Affiliations
- NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service (US)
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (US)
- Venue
- Marine Ecology Progress Series
- Publisher
- Inter-Research Science Center
- Published
- 2011-06-27
- Volume
- 432
- Pages
- 181-193
- ISSN
- 0171-8630 (ISSN-L)
- 1616-1599
- OpenAlex
- W2061369979
- Semantic Scholar
- 08f07afce065136e8fe3f98b7a248ae3df09af6e
- Cited by
- 146
- References
- 88
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 7.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Marine Ecology Progress Series (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine Ecology and Invasive Species
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Isotope Analysis in Ecology
- Keywords
- Indo-Pacific lionfish, Pterois volitans, Pterois miles, invasive species, diet, piscivory, stomach contents, stable isotopes, prey abundance, serranid fish, carangid fishes, Onslow Bay, Southeast Atlantic, generalist feeding
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-20, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-20 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review