The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 64 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts
Open accessAbstract
Background: Advances in digital technologies and artificial intelligence (AI) are reshaping healthcare delivery, with AI increasingly integrated into nursing practice. These innovations promise enhanced diagnostic precision, improved operational workflows, and more personalized patient care. However, the direct impact of AI on clinical outcomes, workflow efficiency, and nursing staff well-being requires further elucidation. Methods: This integrative review synthesized findings from 18 studies published through November 2024 across diverse healthcare settings. Using the PRISMA 2020 and SPIDER frameworks alongside rigorous quality appraisal tools (MMAT and ROBINS-I), the review examined the multifaceted effects of AI integration in nursing. Our analysis focused on three principal domains: clinical advancements and patient monitoring, operational efficiency and workload management, and ethical implications. Results: The review demonstrates that AI integration in nursing has yielded substantial clinical and operational benefits. AI-powered monitoring systems, including wearable sensors and real-time alert platforms, have enabled nurses to detect subtle physiological changes—such as early fever onset or pain indicators—well before traditional methods, resulting in timely interventions that reduce complications, shorten hospital stays, and lower readmission rates. For example, several studies reported that early-warning algorithms facilitated faster clinical responses, thereby improving patient safety and outcomes. Operationally, AI-based automation of routine tasks (e.g., scheduling, administrative documentation, and predictive workload classification) has streamlined resource allocation. These efficiencies have led to a measurable reduction in nurse burnout and improved job satisfaction, as nurses can devote more time to direct patient care. However, despite these benefits, ethical challenges remain prominent. Key concerns include data privacy risks, algorithmic bias, and the potential erosion of clinical judgment due to overreliance on technology. These issues underscore the need for robust ethical frameworks and targeted AI literacy training within nursing curricula. Conclusion: This review demonstrates that AI integration holds transformative potential for nursing practice by enhancing both clinical outcomes and operational efficiency. However, to realize these benefits fully, it is imperative to develop robust ethical frameworks, incorporate comprehensive AI literacy training into nursing education, and foster interdisciplinary collaboration. Future longitudinal studies across varied clinical contexts are essential to validate these findings and support the sustainable, equitable implementation of AI technologies in nursing. Policymakers and healthcare leaders must prioritize investments in AI solutions that complement the expertise of nursing professionals while addressing ethical risks.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This integrative review of 18 studies published through November 2024 finds that AI integration in nursing improved diagnostic accuracy, patient monitoring, workflow efficiency, and nurse well-being, while ethical concerns around privacy, bias, and overreliance on AI remain. It calls for ethical frameworks, AI literacy training, and longitudinal research across diverse settings.
Key findings
- AI improved clinical diagnostics and monitoring: Jiang et al. reported AI-based FCM algorithms increased MRI diagnostic accuracy for ovarian endometriosis from 63.15% to 94.32%; Liu et al. found the iThermonitor WT705 detected fevers in 22% of patients versus 17% with standard mercury thermometers and up to 4.35 h earlier.
- Operational AI tools streamlined workload and resource allocation: Rosa et al.’s nursing workload classifier achieved 72% accuracy and 82% AUC-ROC; AI-assisted postoperative follow-up reduced time spent on follow-ups, and the Nurse Healing Space app significantly decreased burnout scores, job stress, and stress responses.
- Ethical concerns were prominent: data privacy risks, algorithmic bias, and potential erosion of clinical judgment due to overreliance on AI, with calls for robust ethical frameworks and targeted AI literacy training.
- Quality appraisal found all 18 studies had moderate risk of bias via ROBINS-I; 15 of 18 met all five MMAT criteria, while three did not meet all criteria due to limited sample, insufficient randomization details, or convenience sampling.
Methods
- Integrative review using PRISMA 2020 and SPIDER frameworks, searching PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, Scopus, and IEEE Xplore plus grey literature through November 2024; 18 studies conducted between 2020 and 2024 were included.
- Inclusion criteria covered nurses or nursing staff using AI in clinical settings, quantitative/qualitative/mixed-methods designs, and outcomes on clinical outcomes, operational efficiency, workload, burnout, or job satisfaction; reviews, meta-analyses, editorials, commentaries, and non-empirical studies were excluded.
- Quality and bias were assessed with MMAT and ROBINS-I, and findings were synthesized thematically into three themes: clinical and therapeutic advancements, operational optimization and staff support, and ethical implications.
Limitations
- The paper states that excluding non-English publications may introduce language bias, and that heterogeneity of AI technologies and healthcare settings challenges synthesis and uniform conclusions. It also notes limited studies in low- and middle-income countries, scarce research on long-term sustainability, and insufficient exploration of AI’s impact on nurse–patient relationships, empathy, and compassionate care.
- Evident from the text: most included studies had moderate risk of bias driven by incomplete adjustment for confounders, reliance on subjective or self-reported outcomes, and selective reporting; some used convenience sampling, small samples, or single-center designs, limiting generalizability.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
64 Not checked yet · 21 No basis given · 17 Own interpretation · 10 Own result · 9 Own method
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“AI-powered monitoring systems, including wearable sensors and real-time alert platforms, have enabled nurses to detect subtle physiological changes—such as early fever onset or pain indicators—well before traditional methods”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Abstract > Results
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Key concerns include data privacy risks, algorithmic bias, and the potential erosion of clinical judgment due to overreliance on technology.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Abstract > Results
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Operationally, AI-based automation of routine tasks (e.g., scheduling, administrative documentation, and predictive workload classification) has streamlined resource allocation.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Abstract > Results
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Key concerns include data privacy risks, algorithmic bias, and the potential erosion of clinical judgment due to overreliance on technology.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Abstract > Results
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The review demonstrates that AI integration in nursing has yielded substantial clinical and operational benefits.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Abstract > Results
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Overall, the 18 studies were rated as having a moderate risk of bias (29–48).”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Results > Risk of bias
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [29] Zhang, 2022, Evaluation of nursing effects of pelvic floor muscle rehabilitation exercise on gastrointestinal tract rectal cancer patients receiving anus-preserving operation by intelligent algorithm-based magnetic resonance imaging, Contrast Media Mol Imaging source
- Not checked yetcites [30] Sommer, 2024, Nurses’ perceptions, experience and knowledge regarding artificial intelligence: results from a cross-sectional online survey in Germany, BMC Nurs source
- Not checked yetcites [31] Hassan, 2024, Leading with AI in critical care nursing: challenges, opportunities, and the human factor, BMC Nurs source
- Not checked yetcites [32] Hong, 2021, Application of artificial intelligence in emergency nursing of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Contrast Media Mol Imaging source
- Not checked yetcites [33] Simsek-Cetinkaya, 2023, Evaluation of the effectiveness of artificial intelligence assisted interactive screen-based simulation in breast self-examination: an innovative approach in nursing students, Nurse Educ Today source
- Not checked yetcites [34] Liu, 2020, Evaluation of a wearable wireless device with artificial intelligence, iThermonitor WT705, for continuous temperature monitoring for patients in surgical wards: a prospective comparative study, BMJ Open source
- Not checked yetcites [35] Jiang, 2022, Diagnosis and nursing intervention of gynecological ovarian endometriosis with magnetic resonance imaging under artificial intelligence algorithm, Comput Intell Neurosci source
- Not checked yetcites [36] Cho, 2024, Development of an artificial intelligence-based tailored mobile intervention for nurse burnout: single-arm trial, J Med Internet Res source
- Not checked yetcites [37] Bian, 2020, Artificial intelligence-assisted system in postoperative follow-up of orthopedic patients: exploratory quantitative and qualitative study, J Med Internet Res source
- Not checked yetcites [38] Rony, 2024, Artificial intelligence in future nursing care: exploring perspectives of nursing professionals - a descriptive qualitative study, Heliyon source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The validity and reliability of measurements were a consistent strength across the included studies.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Results > Quality assessment MMAT
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“For instance, Jiang et al. (35) demonstrated that AI-based FCM algorithms enhanced MRI diagnostics for ovarian endometriosis, increasing accuracy from 63.15% (conventional MRI) to 94.32%.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Results > Clinical and therapeutic advancements through AI integration
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [35] Jiang, 2022, Diagnosis and nursing intervention of gynecological ovarian endometriosis with magnetic resonance imaging under artificial intelligence algorithm, Comput Intell Neurosci source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, three studies did not meet all five MMAT criteria.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Results > Quality assessment MMAT
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Generalizability was occasionally restricted due to small sample sizes or single-center designs, as observed in a few studies.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Results > Quality assessment MMAT
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 66
- Probably not a substantial claim. 15
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, despite these benefits, ethical challenges remain prominent. Key concerns include data privacy risks, algorithmic bias, and the potential erosion of clinical judgment due to overreliance on technology.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Abstract > Results
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“several studies reported that early-warning algorithms facilitated faster clinical responses, thereby improving patient safety and outcomes.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Abstract > Results
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These efficiencies have led to a measurable reduction in nurse burnout and improved job satisfaction, as nurses can devote more time to direct patient care.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Abstract > Results
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thematic analysis revealed three primary themes: Clinical and Therapeutic Advancements through AI Integration, Operational Optimization and Staff Support, and Ethical Implications.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Results > Thematic synthesis
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Lastly, a cross-sectional survey exploring nurses’ perceptions and knowledge of AI met four criteria, as its convenience sampling strategy and relatively small sample size limited generalizability beyond the study's regional context (30).”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Results > Quality assessment MMAT
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [30] Sommer, 2024, Nurses’ perceptions, experience and knowledge regarding artificial intelligence: results from a cross-sectional online survey in Germany, BMC Nurs source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“AI integration in nursing practice significantly improved diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic interventions.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Results > Clinical and therapeutic advancements through AI integration
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In conclusion, the majority of the included studies demonstrated high methodological rigor, meeting all five MMAT criteria.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Results > Quality assessment MMAT
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Similarly, an RCT evaluating the application of AI in emergency nursing for COPD patients failed to provide sufficient details on randomization procedures and generalizability, meeting only three criteria (32).”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Results > Quality assessment MMAT
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [32] Hong, 2021, Application of artificial intelligence in emergency nursing of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Contrast Media Mol Imaging source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Sampling strategies were generally appropriate for the study designs, with many RCTs employing robust randomization techniques to minimize bias.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Results > Quality assessment MMAT
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The primary drivers of moderate bias were incomplete adjustment for confounders (particularly baseline health differences, demographic factors, and prior AI exposure), reliance on subjective or self-reported outcome measures, and selective reporting due to absent or unreferenced protocols.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Results > Risk of bias
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While selection bias was generally low because most studies had well-defined inclusion criteria, a few relied on convenience sampling, which may limit the generalizability of their findings.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Results > Risk of bias
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Most of the included studies demonstrated high methodological quality, with 15 studies meeting all five MMAT criteria.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Results > Quality assessment MMAT
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Interventions were generally well classified, adherence to intervention protocols was high, and missing data were commonly addressed with appropriate statistical methods.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Results > Risk of bias
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Du et al. (41) implemented an AI-based Plan-Do-Check-Action (PDCA) home nursing model for patients with diabetic nephropathy, which led to significant improvements in clinical effectiveness and patient satisfaction over 12 months by enabling dynamic adjustments to care plans based on AI-generated insights.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Results > Clinical and therapeutic advancements through AI integration
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [41] Du, 2022, Evaluation of functional magnetic resonance imaging under artificial intelligence algorithm on plan-do-check-action home nursing for patients with diabetic nephropathy, Contrast Media Mol Imaging source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“AI-based interventions have been effective in reducing nurse burnout and enhancing staff well-being, thereby supporting nurse retention and overall job satisfaction.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Results > Operational optimization and staff support
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In the realm of therapeutic interventions, Zhang et al. (29) utilized AI-enhanced MRI in pelvic floor muscle rehabilitation for rectal cancer patients, resulting in improved image clarity and diagnostic precision.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Results > Clinical and therapeutic advancements through AI integration
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [29] Zhang, 2022, Evaluation of nursing effects of pelvic floor muscle rehabilitation exercise on gastrointestinal tract rectal cancer patients receiving anus-preserving operation by intelligent algorithm-based magnetic resonance imaging, Contrast Media Mol Imaging source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“By synthesizing data from 18 studies, three critical themes emerge: Clinical and Therapeutic Advancements through AI Integration, Operational Optimization and Staff Support, and Ethical and Safety Implications.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Discussion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Similarly, Chen et al. (47) implemented an AI-based “Internet + Hospital-to-Home” (H2H) nutritional nursing model for chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. This model optimized nutritional assessments and monitoring through automated data analysis and personalized care plans, reducing manual assessment time and enhancing resource allocation based on real-time patient needs.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Results > Operational optimization and staff support
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [47] Chen, 2022, Implementation of hospital-to-home model for nutritional nursing management of patients with chronic kidney disease using artificial intelligence algorithm combined with CT internet +, Contrast Media Mol Imaging source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“AI-integrated monitoring systems provide continuous, real-time data, enabling nurses to detect clinical changes early and intervene promptly, thereby improving patient safety and care quality.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Results > Clinical and therapeutic advancements through AI integration
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Cho et al. (36) evaluated the Nurse Healing Space app, an AI-based mobile intervention designed to reduce burnout. The app significantly decreased burnout scores, job stress, and stress responses among nurses while increasing user satisfaction through personalized recommendations.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Results > Operational optimization and staff support
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [36] Cho, 2024, Development of an artificial intelligence-based tailored mobile intervention for nurse burnout: single-arm trial, J Med Internet Res source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Similarly, Xu et al. (46) integrated the Otsu method algorithm into indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) for diagnosing intracranial aneurysms, which significantly improved diagnostic precision, reduced complications, and enhanced patient satisfaction.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Results > Clinical and therapeutic advancements through AI integration
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [46] Xu, 2022, Cerebral angiography under artificial intelligence algorithm in the design of nursing cooperation plan for intracranial aneurysm patients in craniotomy clipping, Comput Math Methods Med source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Additionally, there is insufficient exploration of the impact of AI on nurse-patient relationships, particularly concerning empathy and compassionate care.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Discussion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“AI technologies have optimized nursing workflows, resource allocation, and administrative tasks, thereby enhancing operational efficiency and reducing the burden on nursing staff.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Results > Operational optimization and staff support
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While these themes highlight significant advancements and benefits, our critical analysis reveals persistent challenges such as data privacy concerns, algorithmic biases, and the potential erosion of clinical judgment.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Discussion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Algorithmic bias can lead to unequal treatment outcomes.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Nurses called for clear guidelines and frameworks to govern AI's ethical implementation in healthcare to protect patient information and maintain trust in healthcare systems.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Results > Ethical implications
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Most of the existing research focuses on high-income settings, leaving a significant gap in understanding how AI integration affects nursing practices in resource-constrained environments.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Discussion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The integration of AI into nursing practice introduces several ethical and safety considerations that must be carefully addressed to ensure responsible and equitable implementation. This theme encompasses concerns related to data privacy, algorithmic bias, overreliance on AI systems, job roles, patient autonomy, and overall patient safety.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Results > Ethical implications
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In emergency nursing for COPD patients, Hong et al. (32) found that AI-driven telemedicine platforms facilitated real-time patient monitoring and early intervention, which reduced hospitalization rates and enhanced patients’ quality of life.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Results > Clinical and therapeutic advancements through AI integration
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [32] Hong, 2021, Application of artificial intelligence in emergency nursing of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Contrast Media Mol Imaging source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“AI technologies have demonstrated transformative potential in optimizing nursing workflows, resource allocation, and administrative efficiency.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Discussion > Operational optimization and staff support
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Liu et al. (34) evaluated the iThermonitor WT705, an AI-assisted wearable thermometer, in surgical wards. The device identified fevers in 22% of patients compared to 17% with standard mercury thermometers and detected fevers up to 4.35 h earlier, allowing nurses to manage potential infections or complications proactively.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Results > Clinical and therapeutic advancements through AI integration
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [34] Liu, 2020, Evaluation of a wearable wireless device with artificial intelligence, iThermonitor WT705, for continuous temperature monitoring for patients in surgical wards: a prospective comparative study, BMJ Open source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“AI-driven predictive models and automation tools have streamlined nursing workflows and optimized the allocation of resources, ensuring efficient use of nursing personnel and enhancing patient care delivery.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Results > Operational optimization and staff support
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Racine et al. (42) assessed AI for pain monitoring in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). The AI-assisted systems enhanced the accuracy and consistency of pain assessments, enabling more effective pain management strategies for preterm infants.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Results > Clinical and therapeutic advancements through AI integration
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [42] Racine, 2024, Health care professionals’ and parents’ perspectives on the use of AI for pain monitoring in the neonatal intensive care unit: multisite qualitative study, JMIR AI source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Seibert et al. (48) highlight barriers such as limited data digitization, privacy and security concerns, and the complexity of nursing tasks that restrict AI to simpler functions.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Results > Ethical implications
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [48] Seibert, 2023, Exploring needs and challenges for AI in nursing care-results of an explorative sequential mixed methods study, BMC Digital Health source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Seibert et al. (48) highlight the potential of AI to optimize staff scheduling and skill mix, improve route planning for home care services, and aid in institutional workflow management.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Results > Operational optimization and staff support
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [48] Seibert, 2023, Exploring needs and challenges for AI in nursing care-results of an explorative sequential mixed methods study, BMC Digital Health source
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“AI-driven diagnostic tools have demonstrated remarkable improvements in diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic effectiveness across various clinical settings.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Discussion > Clinical and therapeutic advancements through AI integration
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Beyond administrative efficiencies, AI also contributes to clinical safety and operational reliability.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Discussion > Operational optimization and staff support
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Data quality issues, ethical considerations, and clinician apprehension toward over-reliance on AI tools are notable barriers.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Discussion > Operational optimization and staff support
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“AI-based interventions have shown considerable promise in mitigating nurse burnout and enhancing job satisfaction.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Discussion > Staff well-being and burnout management
boostedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The integration of predictive analytics in managing nosocomial infections—such as through antimicrobial stewardship programs—further underscores AI's role in reducing hospital-acquired complications and enhancing operational efficiency.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Discussion > Operational optimization and staff support
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“AI, encompassing methodologies such as machine learning, natural language processing, and computer vision, holds the potential to enhance diagnostic accuracy, streamline clinical workflows, and support timely, evidence-based decision-making in multiple areas of care (1–3).”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [1] Topol, 2019, High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence, Nat Med source
- Not checked yetcites [2] Jiang, 2017, Artificial intelligence in healthcare: past, present and future, Stroke Vasc Neurol source
- Not checked yetcites [3] Esteva, 2019, A guide to deep learning in healthcare, Nat Med source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This review demonstrates that AI integration holds transformative potential for nursing practice by enhancing both clinical outcomes and operational efficiency.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Abstract > Conclusion
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“resulting in timely interventions that reduce complications, shorten hospital stays, and lower readmission rates.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Abstract > Results
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These advancements facilitate earlier and more accurate identification of medical conditions, enable personalized care strategies, and improve overall patient outcomes.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Results > Clinical and therapeutic advancements through AI integration
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Two independent reviewers conducted the screening process to minimize bias, with discrepancies resolved through discussion or consultation with a third reviewer.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Methodology > Selection process
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Data extraction was performed independently by two reviewers using a standardized data extraction form.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Methodology > Data extraction
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“This integrative review adheres to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines to ensure comprehensive and transparent reporting (23).”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Methodology > Study design
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [23] Page, 2021, Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement, J Clin Epidemiol source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“while the ROBINS-I (Risk Of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions) tool was utilized to assess the risk of bias specifically in non-randomized studies (26).”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Methodology > Study design
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [26] Sterne, 2016, ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions, Br Med J source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To minimize publication bias, an additional search for grey literature was also conducted using sources such as conference proceedings, dissertations, and preprint servers.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Methodology > Information sources and search strategy
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Beyond direct patient care, AI can also help manage administrative tasks and staffing logistics, ensuring that resources are deployed efficiently to maintain safe workloads and reduce burnout (18, 19).”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Introduction > Original contributions and novelty
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [18] Rožman, 2023, Artificial-intelligence-supported reduction of employees’ workload to increase the company’s performance in today’s VUCA environment, Sustainability source
- Not checked yetcites [19] Pavuluri, 2024, Balancing act: the complex role of artificial intelligence in addressing burnout and healthcare workforce dynamics, BMJ Health Care Inform source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) was employed to evaluate the quality of diverse study designs (25)”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Methodology > Study design
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [25] Thomas, 2008, Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews, BMC Med Res Methodol source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple electronic databases to capture relevant studies published up to November 2024.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Methodology > Information sources and search strategy
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, it is crucial to recognize that these advancements are contingent upon the availability of high-quality data and the integration of AI systems within existing healthcare infrastructures.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Discussion > Clinical and therapeutic advancements through AI integration
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Zhang et al. (29) utilized AI-enhanced MRI in pelvic floor muscle rehabilitation for rectal cancer patients, resulting in improved image clarity and diagnostic precision.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Discussion > Clinical and therapeutic advancements through AI integration
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Zhang et al. (29) Zhang, 2022, Evaluation of nursing effects of pelvic floor muscle rehabilitation exercise on gastrointestinal tract rectal cancer patients receiving anus-preserving operation by intelligent algorithm-based magnetic resonance imaging, Contrast Media Mol Imaging source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“This finding is echoed by Epelde (53), who reported that AI-powered predictive analytics not only optimize staff scheduling but also enhance resource utilization by forecasting bed occupancy and patient flow, thereby reducing operational bottlenecks and improving patient outcomes.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Discussion > Operational optimization and staff support
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Epelde (53) Epelde, 2024, Revolutionizing patient safety: the economic and clinical impact of artificial intelligence in hospitals, Hospitals source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Sommer et al. (30) found that despite limited AI knowledge among nurses, the majority view AI positively, recognizing its potential to alleviate workload pressures and improve nursing efficiency.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Results > Ethical implications
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Sommer et al. (30) Sommer, 2024, Nurses’ perceptions, experience and knowledge regarding artificial intelligence: results from a cross-sectional online survey in Germany, BMC Nurs source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These advancements collectively highlight AI's capacity to enhance both diagnostic and therapeutic dimensions of nursing care, leading to improved patient outcomes and more personalized care strategies.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Discussion > Clinical and therapeutic advancements through AI integration
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This overreliance can lead to a decrease in the ability to identify nuanced patient needs that require human intuition and empathy, thereby impacting the quality of patient care.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Results > Ethical implications
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Armoundas et al. (50), who reported that AI-enhanced cardiac imaging tools, such as echocardiography and cardiac MRI, automated key diagnostic tasks and democratized cardiac expertise, thereby reducing disparities in resource-limited settings.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Discussion > Clinical and therapeutic advancements through AI integration
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Armoundas et al. (50) Armoundas, 2024, Use of artificial intelligence in improving outcomes in heart disease: a scientific statement from the american heart association, Circulation source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In our review, Xu et al. (46) showed how AI-assisted imaging optimized perioperative care, reducing surgical complications and improving postoperative outcomes.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Discussion > Clinical and therapeutic advancements through AI integration
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Xu et al. (46) Xu, 2022, Cerebral angiography under artificial intelligence algorithm in the design of nursing cooperation plan for intracranial aneurysm patients in craniotomy clipping, Comput Math Methods Med source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These advancements enable nurses to integrate high-quality imaging data into patient care plans, enhancing the timeliness and accuracy of diagnoses.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Discussion > Clinical and therapeutic advancements through AI integration
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The exclusion of non-English publications introduces potential language bias, potentially omitting relevant studies conducted in non-English-speaking regions, which may limit the comprehensiveness and generalizability of the findings.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Discussion > Strengths and limitations
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“AI-driven tools enhance patient care quality, optimize resource allocation, and support nursing staff well-being, addressing critical workforce challenges such as burnout and job dissatisfaction.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Conclusion
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“By preventing adverse events, improving infection control, and optimizing resource allocation, AI generates cost savings while maintaining high-quality care (53).”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Discussion > Operational optimization and staff support
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Epelde (53) Epelde, 2024, Revolutionizing patient safety: the economic and clinical impact of artificial intelligence in hospitals, Hospitals source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Automating routine tasks enable nurses to dedicate more time to direct patient care, thereby improving care quality and patient satisfaction.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Discussion > Operational optimization and staff support
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This integrative review highlights the transformative impact of AI in nursing practice, revealing significant advancements in clinical diagnostics, therapeutic interventions, and operational efficiencies.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Conclusion
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Adherence to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines and the utilization of SPIDER framework ensured a structured and transparent study selection process, enhancing the reliability and reproducibility of the findings.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Discussion > Strengths and limitations
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“AI holds significant promise in improving nurse well-being and mitigating burnout through targeted mental health interventions, operational efficiency, and workload management.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Discussion > Staff well-being and burnout management
boostedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, the integration of AI also presents ethical challenges, including data privacy concerns, algorithmic bias, and the potential erosion of clinical judgment.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Conclusion
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Algorithmic bias can lead to unequal treatment outcomes.
In the paper
“Varnosfaderani et al. (6) emphasized the role of AI in optimizing workflows through automated scheduling and staffing systems, which reduce conflicts and streamline decision-making processes.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Discussion > Staff well-being and burnout management
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Varnosfaderani et al. (6) Maleki Varnosfaderani, 2024, The role of AI in hospitals and clinics: transforming healthcare in the 21st century, Bioengineering source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“These tools not only address stress and anxiety but also offer predictive analytics to identify nurses at risk of mental health issues, enabling early intervention and tailored support.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Discussion > Staff well-being and burnout management
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Dailah et al. (54)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Bian et al. (37) found that AI-assisted follow-up systems for postoperative care achieved comparable effectiveness to manual methods while drastically reducing time and resource demands.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Discussion > Operational optimization and staff support
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bian et al. (37) Bian, 2020, Artificial intelligence-assisted system in postoperative follow-up of orthopedic patients: exploratory quantitative and qualitative study, J Med Internet Res source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This optimization alleviates the administrative burden on nurses, allowing them to focus more on direct patient care, thereby fostering job satisfaction and professional fulfillment.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Discussion > Staff well-being and burnout management
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Clinically, AI technologies have the potential to revolutionize patient care by enhancing diagnostic accuracy, personalizing therapeutic interventions, and streamlining clinical workflows, thereby elevating the overall quality of care and patient outcomes.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Discussion > Implications
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Operationally, AI-driven automation of administrative tasks and optimized resource allocation can significantly alleviate the burdens on nursing staff, reducing burnout and enhancing job satisfaction, which is critical for maintaining a sustainable and resilient nursing workforce.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Discussion > Implications
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Additionally, the application of the ROBINS-I tool for risk of bias assessment and the MMAT for quality evaluation provided a robust appraisal of the included studies, ensuring that the synthesized evidence is both valid and reliable.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Discussion > Strengths and limitations
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“By leveraging tools such as predictive analytics and wearable devices, AI empowers nurses to manage their workloads more effectively, promoting resilience and well-being.”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Discussion > Staff well-being and burnout management
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
There is a significant gap in understanding the comprehensive impact of AI on nursing practice, particularly in diverse healthcare settings and across various AI applications.
“However, there remains a significant gap in understanding the comprehensive impact of AI on nursing practice, particularly in diverse healthcare settings and across various AI applications.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The existing literature predominantly focuses on high-income settings.
“Nonetheless, the existing literature predominantly focuses on high-income settings, indicating a need for more research in diverse and resource-constrained environments.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There is limited evidence on the long-term effects of AI integration, the variability of outcomes across different healthcare settings, and the ethical challenges posed by AI deployment in nursing.
“Specifically, there is limited evidence on the long-term effects of AI integration, the variability of outcomes across different healthcare settings, and the ethical challenges posed by AI deployment in nursing.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Algorithmic bias can lead to unequal treatment outcomes.
“The risk of algorithmic bias is a critical ethical concern that can lead to unequal treatment outcomes.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The humanistic and relational core of nursing is fundamental to high-quality patient care.
“This balance is crucial to maintaining the humanistic and relational core of nursing, which is fundamental to high-quality patient care.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“AI-driven tools boost clinical outcomes and streamline operations, yet the absence of standardized AI literacy programs risks overreliance and erosion of essential interpersonal skills [52].”
From The Role of AI in Nursing Education and Practice: Umbrella Review (2025) · cites this paper as [52]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Moreover, AI’s integration in nursing enhances diagnostic accuracy yet poses substantial ethical risks, such as data privacy breaches and algorithmic bias, that demand robust, transparent frameworks [52].”
From The Role of AI in Nursing Education and Practice: Umbrella Review (2025) · cites this paper as [52]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Moreover, AI’s integration in nursing enhances diagnostic accuracy yet poses substantial ethical risks, such as data privacy breaches and algorithmic bias, that demand robust, transparent frameworks [52].”
From The Role of AI in Nursing Education and Practice: Umbrella Review (2025) · cites this paper as [52]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“AI-driven tools boost clinical outcomes and streamline operations, yet the absence of standardized AI literacy programs risks overreliance and erosion of essential interpersonal skills [52].”
From The Role of AI in Nursing Education and Practice: Umbrella Review (2025) · cites this paper as [52]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Effective AI integration in nursing hinges on interdisciplinary collaboration and longitudinal research, especially in resource-limited settings, to ensure sustainable and equitable implementation [52].”
From The Role of AI in Nursing Education and Practice: Umbrella Review (2025) · cites this paper as [52]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Methodology > Study design
“The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) was employed to evaluate the quality of diverse study designs (25)”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > References
“25. Thomas J Harden A. Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews.”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Results > Risk of bias
“Overall, the 18 studies were rated as having a moderate risk of bias (29–48).”
§ Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts > Results > Study characteristics
“This integrative review included 18 studies conducted between 2020 and 2024 across various countries”
Citations
Cites
Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews.
Ouzzani, M., Hammady, H., Fedorowicz, Z., & Elmagarmid, A. (2016) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4 · Cited by 26,092
ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions
Sterne, J. A., Hernán, M. A., Reeves, B. C., Savović, J., Berkman, N. D., Viswanathan, M., Henry, D., Altman, D. G., Ansari, M. T., Boutron, I., et al. (2016) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.i4919 · Cited by 20,329
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
Topol, E. J. (2019) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0300-7 · Cited by 10,450
Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews
Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-8-45 · Cited by 9,312
A guide to deep learning in healthcare
Esteva, A., Robicquet, A., Ramsundar, B., Kuleshov, V., DePristo, M., Chou, K., Cui, C., Corrado, G., Thrun, S., & Dean, J. (2019) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0316-z · Cited by 5,312
Artificial intelligence in healthcare: past, present and future
Jiang, F., Jiang, Y., Zhi, H., Dong, Y., Li, H., Ma, S., Wang, Y., Dong, Q., Shen, H., & Wang, Y. (2017) · Stroke and Vascular Neurology · doi:10.1136/svn-2017-000101 · Cited by 4,837
The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers
Hong, Q. N., Fàbregues, S., Bartlett, G., Boardman, F., Cargo, M., Dagenais, P., Gagnon, M.-P., Griffiths, F., Nicolau, B., O’Cathain, A., et al. (2018) · Education for Information · doi:10.3233/efi-180221 · Cited by 4,737
Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., & Moher, D. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.02.003 · Cited by 3,490
Methley, A. M., Campbell, S., Chew-Graham, C., McNally, R., & Cheraghi-Sohi, S. (2014) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-014-0579-0 · Cited by 2,706
The Role of AI in Hospitals and Clinics: Transforming Healthcare in the 21st Century
Varnosfaderani, S. M., & Forouzanfar, M. (2024) · Bioengineering · doi:10.3390/bioengineering11040337 · Cited by 1,141
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- 2020, State of the World’s Nursing 2020: Investing in Education, Jobs and Leadership
- Haddad, 2023, Nursing shortage, Br Med J, 3, 534
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Role of AI in Nursing Education and Practice: Umbrella Review
El Arab, R. A., Al Moosa, O. A., Abuadas, F. H., & Somerville, J. (2025) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/69881 · Cited by 202
“Effective AI integration in nursing hinges on interdisciplinary collaboration and longitudinal research, especially in resource-limited settings, to ensure sustainable and equitable implementation [52].”
InfluentialEl Arab, R. A., Alshakihs, A. H., Alabdulwahab, S. H., Almubarak, Y. S., Alkhalifah, S. S., Abdrbo, A., Hassanein, S., & Sagbakken, M. (2025) · Frontiers in Digital Health · doi:10.3389/fdgth.2025.1666005 · Cited by 113
Self-citationEl Arab, R. A., Abu-Mahfouz, M. S., Abuadas, F. H., Alzghoul, H., Almari, M., Ghannam, A., & Seweid, M. M. (2025) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare13070701 · Cited by 108
Self-citationArab, R. A. E., Moosa, O. A. A., Sagbakken, M., Ghannam, A., Abuadas, F. H. A., Somerville, J. G., & Mutair, A. S. A. (2025) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1619378 · Cited by 122
The role of AI in emergency department triage: An integrative systematic review
Arab, R. A. E., & Moosa, O. A. A. (2025) · Intensive and Critical Care Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.iccn.2025.104058 · Cited by 79
El-Banna, M. M., Sajid, M. R., Rizvi, M. R., Sami, W., & McNelis, A. M. (2025) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2025.1681784 · Cited by 62
Arab, R. A. E., Moosa, O. A. A., & Sagbakken, M. (2025) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1617138 · Cited by 61
Abdelmohsen, S. A., & Al‐Jabri, M. M. (2025) · Journal of Nursing Scholarship · doi:10.1111/jnu.70040 · Cited by 45
Song, D., Zhang, P., Zhu, Y., Qi, S., Yang, Y., Gong, L., & Zhou, L. (2025) · Nurse Education in Practice · doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2025.104549 · Cited by 45
Arab, R. A. E., Moosa, O. A. A., Albahrani, Z., Alkhalil, I., Somerville, J. G., & Abuadas, F. H. A. (2025) · Nursing Reports · doi:10.3390/nursrep15080281 · Cited by 35
Exploring the ethical dimensions of AI integration in nursing practice: A systematic review
Alnawafleh, K. A., Almagharbeh, W. T., Alfanash, H. A., Alasmari, A. A., Alharbi, A. A., Alamrani, M. H., Alkubati, S. A., Altayar, M. A., & Rezq, K. A. (2025) · Journal of Nursing Regulation · doi:10.1016/j.jnr.2025.08.001 · Cited by 32
(2025) · doi:10.1016/j.ijnss.2025.04.009 · Cited by 24
Ruksakulpiwat, S., Phianhasin, L., Benjasirisan, C., Su, T., Riangkam, C., Thorngthip, S., Aldossary, H. M., Ahmed, B. H., Pongsuwun, K., & Angkaew, N. (2025) · International Nursing Review · doi:10.1111/inr.70080 · Cited by 32
Developing AI literacy in healthcare education: bridging the gap in competency assessment
Ang, C. (2025) · Discover Education · doi:10.1007/s44217-025-00812-z · Cited by 28
Pepito, J. A., Acaso, N. J., Merioles, R., & Ismael, J. D. (2025) · JMIR Nursing · doi:10.2196/72674 · Cited by 26
Chen, Y., Wu, F., Zhang, W., Xing, W., Zhu, Z., Huang, Q., & Yuan, C. (2025) · Nursing Reports · doi:10.3390/nursrep15060218 · Cited by 22
Ethical and Institutional Readiness for Artificial Intelligence in Nursing: An Umbrella Review
Almagharbeh, W. T., Alharrasi, M., Rony, M. K. K., Kabir, S., Ahmed, S. K., & Alrazeeni, D. M. (2025) · International Nursing Review · doi:10.1111/inr.70111 · Cited by 26
Uludaşdemir, D., Ayar, G., & Yetkin, E. E. (2026) · Journal of Pediatric Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.pedn.2026.03.037 · Cited by 8
Liu, X., Chen, Y., Guan, W., Jiang, P., Yan, L., Fan, M., & Zhou, Q. (2025) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.70250 · Cited by 7
Seven, A., Soylu, A., & Soylu, D. (2025) · International Nursing Review · doi:10.1111/inr.70134 · Cited by 8
Ramadan, O. M. E., Aldousari, E., Elsharkawy, N. B., Alotaibi, A., Alruwaili, M. M., & Hafiz, A. H. (2025) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1111/jocn.70170 · Cited by 6
Embracing innovation and GenAI in nursing: Early lessons from the field
Cognetta-Rieke, C., Rocchio, B. J., Seys, J. D., Breece, T. L., Denison, C. L., & Barey, E. (2025) · Nursing Outlook · doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2025.102519 · Cited by 7
Mobile apps, AI, and teletherapy: a comprehensive review of digital mental health tools for nurses
Huang, W., Xing, Y., Zhao, F., & Wang, Y. (2026) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1686766 · Cited by 8
Lipschuetz, M., & Topaz, M. (2026) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2026.105369 · Cited by 7
Intelligent Workflow Automation Systems to Enhance Nursing Efficiency and Patient Safety
Damarched, M. K. (2026) · Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics · doi:10.22270/jddt.v16i2.7554 · Cited by 6
Tong, J., Xie, J., Xiang, Y., Zhou, Y., & Deng, P. (2026) · Journal of Nursing Management · doi:10.1155/jonm/9246900 · Cited by 5
Stratton-Maher, D., Tulleners, T., Elliott, J., Ryan, L., McCulloch, J., Roderick, G., Jayasinghe, T., Buckley, J., Newman, J.-M., Nutter, H., et al. (2026) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2026.105368 · Cited by 4
Wang, X., & Liu, W. (2025) · Journal of Nursing Management · doi:10.1155/jonm/4986260 · Cited by 4
Phanphairoj, K., Wisesrith, W., & Chumwichan, S. (2025) · International Journal of Nursing Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ijnss.2025.12.011 · Cited by 7
Gökalp, M. G., & Yücel, Ş. Ç. (2026) · BMC Nursing · doi:10.1186/s12912-026-04295-7 · Cited by 3
Application of artificial intelligence in postoperative orthopedic rehabilitation: a scoping review
Wang, J., Bi, H., Wang, Y., Song, Y., Xu, H., Zhong, S., He, Q., & Zhang, Q. (2026) · Frontiers in Digital Health · doi:10.3389/fdgth.2025.1746552 · Cited by 4
Nurses’ experiences regarding role boundaries in collaborative AI-Assisted nursing: A meta-synthesis
Zhang, Z., Hou, J., Xu, C., Li, H., & Wan, H. (2026) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119385 · Cited by 3
Liu, Y., 赵秀芳, & Zeng, Q. (2026) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2026.1812848 · Cited by 4
Sezgünsay, E., Polat, A. B., & Kılıcer, S. B. (2026) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-026-09483-2 · Cited by 6
Fuzzy logic nursing tool for early acute kidney injury detection in surgical patients
Yusop, N., Mat, S. B., Mustafar, R., & Ismail, M. I. (2025) · Frontiers in Nephrology · doi:10.3389/fneph.2025.1624880 · Cited by 2
Hu, W., & Lv, X. (2025) · International Journal of Electrochemical Science · doi:10.1016/j.ijoes.2025.101178 · Cited by 2
Nurses’ ethical leadership, artificial intelligence, and moral sensitivity activation
Jing, J., Fu, Y., Liu, D., Ma, Z., Qiu, H., Liu, F., & Chen, C. (2025) · Nursing Ethics · doi:10.1177/09697330251403139 · Cited by 2
Nursing Educators’ Perceptions of AI in Research: Risks and Benefits
MRAYYAN, M. T., & Alomari, A. K. (2026) · Nursing Research and Practice · doi:10.1155/nrp/2058036 · Cited by 2
Mao, X., Liu, N., Wang, H., Wang, Q., Xia, S., Ma, X., & Yin, L. (2026) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2026.1795233 · Cited by 2
Taşçı, Ö., KARA, İ., Özdere, B., & Özer, N. (2026) · BMC Nursing · doi:10.1186/s12912-026-04629-5 · Cited by 2
Schönfelder, B., Cleland, I., McCance, T., & Mayer, H. (2026) · Frontiers in Health Services · doi:10.3389/frhs.2026.1796648 · Cited by 4
Alanazi, M. (2026) · Nursing in Critical Care · doi:10.1111/nicc.70537 · Cited by 2
Zhao, J., Hua, X., Hu, R., Chen, C., Wu, W., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Y., Wu, A., & (12946), Y. Z. (2026) · JMIR Nursing · doi:10.2196/88016 · Cited by 2
苗书英, Zhang, Z., & Bao, C. (2026) · Journal of Nursing Management · doi:10.1155/jonm/5288231 · Cited by 2
Emerging Technological Innovations in Perioperative Nursing
Macieira, T. G. R., Cho, H., Bjarnadóttir, R. I., & Pruinelli, L. (2025) · AORN Journal · doi:10.1002/aorn.70002 · Cited by 3
Ceylan, H. (2025) · Turkish Journal of Health Science and Life · doi:10.56150/tjhsl.1738995 · Cited by 1
da Penha, A. P., Silva, M. M., & Erdmann, A. L. (2025) · Cogitare Enfermagem · doi:10.1590/ce.v30i0.99578pt · Cited by 1
da Penha, A. P., Silva, M. M., & Erdmann, A. L. (2025) · Cogitare Enfermagem · doi:10.1590/ce.v30i0.99578en · Cited by 1
Quaresma, T. M. S., Tomé, C. D. R., Cardoso, F. M., Lampreia, P. I. P., Cândido, P. S. V., Costa, A. R. R. D. J., & Pierdevara, L. (2026) · STUDIES IN HEALTH SCIENCES · doi:10.54022/shsv7n1-007 · Cited by 1
American Academy of Nursing Position Statement: Artificial Intelligence in Health Care
(2026) · Nursing Outlook · doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2026.102775 · Cited by 2
Heterogeneity in nurses’ attitudes toward artificial intelligence: a latent profile analysis
Li, X., Xu, H. M., Hu, X., Guo, J., Yu, P., & Ju, H. (2026) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-026-14595-y · Cited by 4
Readiness Assessment for AI in Nursing Care Projects: Multimethods Study
Seibert, K., Domhoff, D., Altona, J., Jäger, S., Bießmann, F., Nowak, A., Gubser, R., Schulte‐Althoff, M., Fürstenau, D., Pohle, J., et al. (2026) · JMIR Nursing · doi:10.2196/84148 · Cited by 1
Eroding scholarly integrity: Confronting the misuse of generative AI in nursing education
Iheduru-Anderson, K. C. (2026) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2026.107145 · Cited by 1
Li, S., Wu, L., & Tang, Y. (2026) · Journal of Nursing Management · doi:10.1155/jonm/3840628 · Cited by 1
Karaçay, P., Yaşar, Ö., Göktaş, P., & Küçükkaya, A. (2026) · BMC Nursing · doi:10.1186/s12912-026-04832-4 · Cited by 1
Omeljanciuk, A., Peičius, E., Urbonienė, A., & Urbonas, G. (2026) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare14121638 · Cited by 2
Hajjo, R., Abusara, O. H., Sabbah, D. A., Zidan, R., & Bardaweel, S. K. (2026) · Journal of the American Pharmacists Association · doi:10.1016/j.japh.2026.103490 · Cited by 1
Hosseinkhani, N. T. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5385517 · Cited by 2
Yanto, A., Nurmalia, D., Ilkafah, I., Suhariyati, S., & Pandin, M. G. R. (2025) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-7975002/v1 · Cited by 2
Artificial intelligence in nursing education: Balancing innovation and human-centered care
Nguyen, R. (2026) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2026.107300
Chiaranai, C. (2025) · Pacific Rim International Journal of Nursing Research · doi:10.60099/prijnr.2025.275177
Readiness assessment for AI in nursing care projects (AINCRA): a multimethods study (Preprint)Preprint
Seibert, K., Domhoff, D., Altona, J., Jäger, S., Bießmann, F., Nowak, A., Gubser, R., Schulte‐Althoff, M., Fürstenau, D., Pohle, J., et al. (2025) · doi:10.2196/preprints.84148
Tasijawa, F. A., Addiarto, W., Hartono, D., Munir, Z., & Pandin, M. G. R. (2025) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-8033889/v1
Gökalp, M. G., & YUCEL, S. C. (2025) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-8080438/v1
da Penha, A. P., Silva, M. M., & Erdmann, A. L. (2025) · Cogitare Enfermagem · doi:10.1590/ce.v30i0.99578es
Badhan, A. K., Vasudeva, S., Baweja, S. K., Kaur, J., Sarkar, T., & Singh, A. (2025) · International Conference on Reliability, Infocom Technologies and Optimization (Trends and Future Directions) (ICRITO) · doi:10.1109/icrito66076.2025.11241225
Gu, K., Pan, H., Dong, M., Chen, X., & Yuan, H. (2025) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2025.1670126
Barrientos, K. M., Castano-Villegas, N., Escandón, E. R., Zea, J., & Velásquez, L. (2025) · medRxiv · doi:10.64898/2025.12.17.25342509
Technology in pandemic period and future nursing practices: a literature review
Yüksekol, A., & Serin, E. K. (2025) · Hospital Topics · doi:10.1080/00185868.2025.2604713
Inteligencia Artificial en la práctica de Enfermería: una revisión sistemática
Rocha, N., & Ramos, N. (2025) · Revista Acciones Médicas · doi:10.35622/j.ram.2025.01.001 · Cited by 1
Jiang, L., Jing, F., Cao, Y., Li, Y., Tian, M., Gao, T., Qiu, J., Tang, L., Su, X., & Hu, Y. (2026) · doi:10.2196/preprints.91020
Zhao, H., Du, X., Qiao, X., Lu, Y., Wang, C. H., & Wang, X. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-8311732/v1
Integration of AI in Hospital Operations
Sharma, S., Pareek, K., & Kanwar, K. (2025) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence for Innovations in Healthcare Industries (ICAIIHI) · doi:10.1109/icaiihi67124.2025.11403740
Kwaśnicka, D., Nagaraj, K., Aish, K., Kirkwood, S., Koirala, S., Symons, K., Gonzalez, C., Jordan, R., Conway, R., & Smith, K. L. (2026) · doi:10.2196/preprints.93655
Hemşirelerde Yapay Zekâ Kaygısı: Teknolojik Gelişmeler Bağlamında Tanımlayıcı Bir Araştırma
AYDIN, E., & Kahraman, H. A. (2026) · Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi · doi:10.37989/gumussagbil.1733188 · Cited by 1
Sapa, H., Ayana, K., Prajitha, P. G., Shona, S. S., Althaf Umar, K. P., Kaladhar, K., Praveen, V. P., Vivek, N., K, P., Venugopal, B. S., et al. (2026) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-40441-2.00001-9
Sucharitrak, C. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6507518
Enhancing Ophthalmology Practice Management with Artificial Intelligence
Espaillat, A. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-19336-0_18
Role of AI in Hospital Administration Decision-Making: A Narrative Review on Saudi Healthcare System
Alfuraih, A. I., Alshalhoob, M. A., Altuwayjiri, M. A., Alferm, O. B., & Maneea, A. S. B. (2025) · Annals of dental specialty · doi:10.51847/nblgwmopbv
Wang, Y., & Bai, X. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-9381667/v1
Attitudes Toward Artificial Intelligence and E-Health Literacy: A Study Among Nurses
Akçoban, S., Tüzmen, H. D., & YÜKSEL, H. (2026) · Acibadem Universitesi Saglik Bilimleri Dergisi · doi:10.31067/acusaglik.1840596
Wang, Y., Ji, M., Dong, S., & Bai, X. (2026) · doi:10.2196/preprints.101336
IA et données de santé : quels enjeux pour la pratique infirmière ?
Quindroit, P., & Leblanc, J. (2026) · Soins · doi:10.1016/j.soin.2026.03.008
Digitalität in der Pflege: Mehr Aufmerksamkeit für den Nutzen erforderlich
Seibert, K. (2026) · Pflege · doi:10.1024/1012-5302/a001077
Alhumaidi, B. N., & Alharbi, T. A. F. (2026) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare14101407 · Cited by 2
Seong, H., Lim, S., Jeong, J. S., An, G. J., & Kim, Y.-J. (2026) · Journal of Korean Biological Nursing Science · doi:10.7586/jkbns.26.013
Zeng, Q., Zhu, J., Yang, C. R., Hu, J., & Huang, X. (2026) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2026.1786184
Meena, A. K., Sahu, V. K., Shakyawal, A., & Chaturvedi, T. (2026) · International Journal of Innovations in Science Engineering and Management. · doi:10.69968/ijisem.2026v5i2340-347 · Cited by 1
Joo, J. Y., Liu, M. F., Cho, Y. W., & Cho, H. (2026) · JMIR Nursing · doi:10.2196/97905
Veisimiankali, M., Alimohammadzadeh, K., Begloo-Amin, G., Bahadori, M., & Abbaszadeh, A. (2026) · Journal of Health Population and Nutrition · doi:10.1186/s41043-026-01356-0
Yue, W., Chen, Y., & Ma, X. (2026) · Journal of Nursing Management · doi:10.1155/jonm/5002647
Needs assessment and development of an EMR-integrated AI system to enhance nursing handover: NurSync
Park, S., Kang, J. Y., Kim, N., & Lee, Y. (2026) · Health Informatics Journal · doi:10.1177/14604582261463639
Li, X. J., Jing, C., Gong, Z., Zhang, J., & Zhang, S. (2026) · Frontiers in Digital Health · doi:10.3389/fdgth.2026.1842497
Ghaffar, R., Rajab, S., Ghafar, M., Ghafar, S., Hussain, M., Sattar, A., Uwais, M., Rafiq, A., & Aziz, R. Y. (2026) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-44021-2.00015-4
Beyond the algorithm: nursing as a core foundation for ethical and equitable AI in healthcare
Sun, Y., Li, Y. D., Liu, Y., & Yu, S. (2026) · Cognition Technology & Work · doi:10.1007/s10111-026-00886-1
Artificial intelligence literacy of nursing students: A cross-sectional study
Dong, X. (2026) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2026.107272 · Cited by 1
Artificial Intelligence and Clinician Burnout in the United States: A Narrative Review
Sucharitrak, C. (2026) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.112814
Vyas, M. B., Rhudy, L. M., Weckman, S., Ennis, J., Hundt, E., Werner, A., Smith, F. S., Bergvall, E., Chukwuneke, F., Riskey, L. M., et al. (2026) · Journal of Neuroscience Nursing · doi:10.1097/jnn.0000000000000903
Zheng, X., Dong, P., Yuan, W., Fan, Y., & Chen, Y. (2026) · Heart Lung and Circulation · doi:10.1016/j.hlc.2026.05.032
Scerbo, F., Caggianelli, G., Ciucciarelli, S., Cangelosi, G., Vanzi, V., & Mazzotta, R. (2026) · JBI Evidence Synthesis · doi:10.11124/jbies-26-00065
Metadata
- Authors
- Hassanein, S., El Arab, R. A., Abdrbo, A., Abu-Mahfouz, M. S., Gaballah, M. K. F., Seweid, M. M., Almari, M., & Alzghoul, H.
- Affiliations
- Cairo University (EG)
- Beni-Suef University (EG)
- Venue
- Frontiers in Digital Health
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2025-03-07
- Volume
- 7
- Pages
- 1552372-1552372
- ISSN
- 2673-253X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11926144
- OpenAlex
- W4408238726
- Semantic Scholar
- e954dcd7fbea349105d21de0257dad282d62c03b
- Cited by
- 134
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 90 · 2025: 44
- FWCI
- 7.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Frontiers in Digital Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence in nursing, clinical decision support, patient monitoring, early warning algorithm, wearable sensors, workflow automation, nursing workload, nurse burnout, AI ethics, algorithmic bias, data privacy, AI literacy training, nursing education, clinical judgment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-09, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-09 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
